Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-949-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-949-2017
Research article
 | 
18 Apr 2017
Research article |  | 18 Apr 2017

How accurate are estimates of glacier ice thickness? Results from ITMIX, the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment

Daniel Farinotti, Douglas J. Brinkerhoff, Garry K. C. Clarke, Johannes J. Fürst, Holger Frey, Prateek Gantayat, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, Claire Girard, Matthias Huss, Paul W. Leclercq, Andreas Linsbauer, Horst Machguth, Carlos Martin, Fabien Maussion, Mathieu Morlighem, Cyrille Mosbeux, Ankur Pandit, Andrea Portmann, Antoine Rabatel, RAAJ Ramsankaran, Thomas J. Reerink, Olivier Sanchez, Peter A. Stentoft, Sangita Singh Kumari, Ward J. J. van Pelt, Brian Anderson, Toby Benham, Daniel Binder, Julian A. Dowdeswell, Andrea Fischer, Kay Helfricht, Stanislav Kutuzov, Ivan Lavrentiev, Robert McNabb, G. Hilmar Gudmundsson, Huilin Li, and Liss M. Andreassen

Related authors

A regional analysis of paraglacial landslide activation in southern coastal Alaska
Jane Walden, Mylène Jacquemart, Bretwood Higman, Romain Hugonnet, Andrea Manconi, and Daniel Farinotti
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1086,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1086, 2024
Short summary
21st century global glacier evolution under CMIP6 scenarios and the role of glacier-specific observations
Harry Zekollari, Matthias Huss, Lilian Schuster, Fabien Maussion, David R. Rounce, Rodrigo Aguayo, Nicolas Champollion, Loris Compagno, Romain Hugonnet, Ben Marzeion, Seyedhamidreza Mojtabavi, and Daniel Farinotti
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1013,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1013, 2024
Short summary
Global vs local glacier modelling: a comparison in the Tien Shan
Lander Van Tricht, Harry Zekollari, Matthias Huss, Daniel Farinotti, and Philippe Huybrechts
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-87,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-87, 2023
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
European heat waves 2022: contribution to extreme glacier melt in Switzerland inferred from automated ablation readings
Aaron Cremona, Matthias Huss, Johannes Marian Landmann, Joël Borner, and Daniel Farinotti
The Cryosphere, 17, 1895–1912, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1895-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1895-2023, 2023
Short summary
Brief communication: An autonomous UAV for catchment-wide monitoring of a debris flow torrent
Fabian Walter, Elias Hodel, Erik S. Mannerfelt, Kristen Cook, Michael Dietze, Livia Estermann, Michaela Wenner, Daniel Farinotti, Martin Fengler, Lukas Hammerschmidt, Flavia Hänsli, Jacob Hirschberg, Brian McArdell, and Peter Molnar
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4011–4018, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-4011-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-4011-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical Modelling
Exploring non-Gaussian sea ice characteristics via observing system simulation experiments
Christopher Riedel and Jeffrey Anderson
The Cryosphere, 18, 2875–2896, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2875-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2875-2024, 2024
Short summary
Past and future of the Arctic sea ice in High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) climate models
Julia Selivanova, Doroteaciro Iovino, and Francesco Cocetta
The Cryosphere, 18, 2739–2763, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2739-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2739-2024, 2024
Short summary
Biases in ice sheet models from missing noise-induced drift
Alexander A. Robel, Vincent Verjans, and Aminat A. Ambelorun
The Cryosphere, 18, 2613–2623, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2613-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2613-2024, 2024
Short summary
A 3D glacier dynamics–line plume model to estimate the frontal ablation of Hansbreen, Svalbard
José M. Muñoz-Hermosilla, Jaime Otero, Eva De Andrés, Kaian Shahateet, Francisco Navarro, and Iván Pérez-Doña
The Cryosphere, 18, 1911–1924, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1911-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1911-2024, 2024
Short summary
Data-driven surrogate modeling of high-resolution sea-ice thickness in the Arctic
Charlotte Durand, Tobias Sebastian Finn, Alban Farchi, Marc Bocquet, Guillaume Boutin, and Einar Ólason
The Cryosphere, 18, 1791–1815, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1791-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1791-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, B. M., Mackintosh, A. N., Stumm, D., George, L., Kerr, T., Winter-Billington, A., and Fitzsimons, S. J.: Climate sensitivity of a high-precipitation glacier in New Zealand, J. Glaciol., 56, 114–128, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214310791190929, 2010.
Anderton, P. W.: Tasman Glacier 1971-73, Hydrological Research: Annual Report 33., Published by the Ministry of Works and Development for the National Water and Soil Conservation Organization of New Zealand, 1975.
Andreassen, L. M., Paul, F., Kääb, A., and Hausberg, J. E.: Landsat-derived glacier inventory for Jotunheimen, Norway, and deduced glacier changes since the 1930s, The Cryosphere, 2, 131–145, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2-131-2008, 2008.
Andreassen, L. M., Huss, M., Melvold, K., Elvehøy, H., and Winsvold, S. H.: Ice thickness measurements and volume estimates for glaciers in Norway, J. Glaciol., 61, 763–775, https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J161, 2015.
Andreassen, L. M., Elvehøy, H., Kjøllmoen, B., and Engeset, R. V.: Reanalysis of long-term series of glaciological and geodetic mass balance for 10 Norwegian glaciers, The Cryosphere, 10, 535–552, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-535-2016, 2016.
Download
Short summary
ITMIX – the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment – was the first coordinated performance assessment for models inferring glacier ice thickness from surface characteristics. Considering 17 different models and 21 different test cases, we show that although solutions of individual models can differ considerably, an ensemble average can yield uncertainties in the order of 10 ± 24 % the mean ice thickness. Ways forward for improving such estimates are sketched.