Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-771-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-771-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
17 Feb 2021
Research article |
| 17 Feb 2021
| 17 Feb 2021
Snow Ensemble Uncertainty Project (SEUP): quantification of snow water equivalent uncertainty across North America via ensemble land surface modeling
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt, MD, USA
Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA
Sujay Kumar
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt, MD, USA
Carrie Vuyovich
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt, MD, USA
Paul Houser
Department of Geography and Geoinformation Sciences, George Mason
University, Fairfax, VA, USA
Jessica Lundquist
Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA, USA
Lawrence Mudryk
Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Michael Durand
School of Earth Sciences and Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Ana Barros
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
Edward J. Kim
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt, MD, USA
Barton A. Forman
Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Ethan D. Gutmann
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Melissa L. Wrzesien
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt, MD, USA
Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA
Camille Garnaud
Meteorological Research Division, Environment and Climate Change
Canada, Dorval, Quebec, Canada
Melody Sandells
Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University,
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Hans-Peter Marshall
Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA
Nicoleta Cristea
Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA, USA
Justin M. Pflug
Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA, USA
Jeremy Johnston
Department of Geography and Geoinformation Sciences, George Mason
University, Fairfax, VA, USA
Yueqian Cao
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
David Mocko
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt, MD, USA
Science Applications International Corporation, Reston, VA, USA
Shugong Wang
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt, MD, USA
Science Applications International Corporation, Reston, VA, USA
Related authors
Eunsang Cho, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Rhae Sung Kim, and Jennifer M. Jacobs
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5721–5735, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
While land surface models are a common approach for estimating macroscale snow water equivalent (SWE), the SWE accuracy is often limited by uncertainties in model physics and forcing inputs. In this study, we found large underestimations of modeled SWE compared to observations. Precipitation forcings and melting physics limitations dominantly contribute to the SWE underestimations. Results provide insights into prioritizing strategies to improve the SWE simulations for hydrologic applications.
Leung Tsang, Michael Durand, Chris Derksen, Ana P. Barros, Do-Hyuk Kang, Hans Lievens, Hans-Peter Marshall, Jiyue Zhu, Joel Johnson, Joshua King, Juha Lemmetyinen, Melody Sandells, Nick Rutter, Paul Siqueira, Anne Nolin, Batu Osmanoglu, Carrie Vuyovich, Edward Kim, Drew Taylor, Ioanna Merkouriadi, Ludovic Brucker, Mahdi Navari, Marie Dumont, Richard Kelly, Rhae Sung Kim, Tien-Hao Liao, Firoz Borah, and Xiaolan Xu
The Cryosphere, 16, 3531–3573, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3531-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3531-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent (SWE) is of fundamental importance to water, energy, and geochemical cycles but is poorly observed globally. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) measurements at X- and Ku-band can address this gap. This review serves to inform the broad snow research, monitoring, and application communities about the progress made in recent decades to move towards a new satellite mission capable of addressing the needs of the geoscience researchers and users.
Kajsa Holland-Goon, Randall Bonnell, Daniel McGrath, W. Brad Baxter, Tate Meehan, Ryan Webb, Chris Larsen, Hans-Peter Marshall, Megan Mason, and Carrie Vuyovich
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2435, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2435, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
As part of the NASA SnowEx23 campaign, we conducted detailed snowpack experiments in Alaska’s boreal forests and Arctic tundra. We collected ground-penetrating radar measurements of snow depth along 44 short transects. We then excavated the snowpack from below the transects and measured snow depth, noting any vegetation and void spaces. We used the detailed in situ measurements to evaluate uncertainties in ground-penetrating radar and airborne lidar methods for snow depth retrieval.
Louise Busschaert, Michel Bechtold, Sara Modanesi, Christian Massari, Dirk Raes, Sujay V. Kumar, and Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2550, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2550, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
This study estimates irrigation in the Po Valley using AquaCrop and Noah-MP models with sprinkler irrigation. Noah-MP shows higher annual rates than AquaCrop due to more water losses. After adjusting, both align with reported irrigation ranges (500–600 mm/yr). Soil moisture estimates from both models match satellite data, though both have limitations in vegetation and evapotranspiration modeling. The study emphasizes the need for observations to improve irrigation estimates.
Edward H. Bair, Dar A. Roberts, David R. Thompson, Philip G. Brodrick, Brenton A. Wilder, Niklas Bohn, Christopher J. Crawford, Nimrod Carmon, Carrie M. Vuyovich, and Jeff Dozier
The Cryosphere, 19, 2315–2320, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Key to the success of future satellite missions is understanding snowmelt in our warming climate, as this has implications for nearly 2 billion people. An obstacle is that an artifact, called the hook, is often mistaken for soot or dust. Instead, it is caused by three amplifying effects: (1) background reflectance that is too dark, (2) an assumption of level terrain, and (3) differences in optical constants of ice. Sensor calibration and directional effects may also contribute. Solutions are presented.
Esteban Alonso-González, Adrian Harpold, Jessica D. Lundquist, Cara Piske, Laura Sourp, Kristoffer Aalstad, and Simon Gascoin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2347, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2347, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Simulating the snowpack is challenging, as there are several sources of uncertainty due to e.g. the meteorological forcing. Using data assimilation techniques, it is possible to improve the simulations by fusing models and snow observations. However in forests, observations are difficult to obtain, because they cannot be retrieved through the canopy. Here, we explore the possibility of propagating the information obtained in forest clearings to areas covered by the canopy.
Haorui Sun, Yiwen Fang, Steven A. Margulis, Colleen Mortimer, Lawrence Mudryk, and Chris Derksen
The Cryosphere, 19, 2017–2036, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2017-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2017-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The European Space Agency's Snow Climate Change Initiative (Snow CCI) developed a high-quality snow cover extent and snow water equivalent (SWE) climate data record. However, gaps exist in complex terrain due to challenges in using passive microwave sensing and in situ measurements. This study presents a methodology to fill the mountain SWE gap using Snow CCI snow cover fraction within a Bayesian SWE reanalysis framework, with potential applications in untested regions and with other sensors.
Sean P. Burns, Vincent Humphrey, Ethan D. Gutmann, Mark S. Raleigh, David R. Bowling, and Peter D. Blanken
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1755, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1755, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We compared two techniques that are affected by the amount of liquid water in a forest canopy. One technique relies on remote sensing (a pair of GPS systems) and the other uses tree motion generated by the wind. Though completely different, these two techniques show strikingly similar changes when rain falls on an evergreen forest. We combine these measurements with eddy-covariance fluxes of water vapor to provide some insight into the evaporation of canopy-intercepted precipitation.
Rainey Aberle, Ellyn Enderlin, Shad O'Neel, Caitlyn Florentine, Louis Sass, Adam Dickson, Hans-Peter Marshall, and Alejandro Flores
The Cryosphere, 19, 1675–1693, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1675-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1675-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Tracking seasonal snow on glaciers is critical for understanding glacier health. Yet previous work has not directly compared machine learning algorithms for snow classification across satellite image products. To address this, we developed a new automated workflow for tracking seasonal snow on glaciers using several image products and machine learning models. Applying this method can help provide insights into glacier health, water resources, and the effects of climate change on snow cover.
Libo Wang, Lawrence Mudryk, Joe R. Melton, Colleen Mortimer, Jason Cole, Gesa Meyer, Paul Bartlett, and Mickaël Lalande
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1264, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1264, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that an alternate snow cover fraction (SCF) parameterization significantly improves SCF simulated in the CLASSIC model in mountainous areas for all three choices of meteorological datasets. Annual mean bias, unbiased root mean squared area, and correlation improve by 75 %, 32 %, and 7 % when evaluated with MODIS SCF observations over the Northern Hemisphere. We also link relative biases in the meteorological forcing data to differences in simulated snow water equivalent and SCF.
Mari R. Tye, Ming Ge, Jadwiga H. Richter, Ethan D. Gutmann, Allyson Rugg, Cindy L. Bruyère, Sue Ellen Haupt, Flavio Lehner, Rachel McCrary, Andrew J. Newman, and Andy Wood
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1117–1133, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1117-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1117-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
There is a perceived mismatch between the spatial scales on which global climate models can produce data and those needed for water management decisions. However, poor communication of specific metrics relevant to local decisions is also a problem. We assessed the credibility of a set of water management decision metrics in the Community Earth System Model v2 (CESM2). CESM2 shows potentially greater use of its output in long-range water management decisions.
Cenlin He, Tzu-Shun Lin, David M. Mocko, Ronnie Abolafia-Rosenzweig, Jerry W. Wegiel, and Sujay V. Kumar
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4176, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4176, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study integrates the refactored community Noah-MP version 5.0 model with the NASA Land Information System (LIS) version 7.5.2 to streamline the synchronization, development, and maintenance of Noah-MP within LIS and to enhance their interoperability and applicability. The model benchmarking and evaluation results reveal key model strengths and weaknesses in simulating land surface quantities and show implications for future model improvements.
Pinja Venäläinen, Colleen Mortimer, Kari Luojus, Lawrence Mudryk, Matias Takala, and Jouni Pulliainen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3643, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3643, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite data-based estimation of large SWE values can be improved with bias correction. This study updates the bias correction method by using updated snow course data, extending correction to two new months. Additionally, bias correction is expanded from a monthly to a daily time scale. The daily bias correction offers more accurate hemispheric snow mass estimation, aligning well with reanalysis data.
Min Huang, Gregory R. Carmichael, Kevin W. Bowman, Isabelle De Smedt, Andreas Colliander, Michael H. Cosh, Sujay V. Kumar, Alex B. Guenther, Scott J. Janz, Ryan M. Stauffer, Anne M. Thompson, Niko M. Fedkin, Robert J. Swap, John D. Bolten, and Alicia T. Joseph
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1449–1476, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1449-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1449-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use model simulations along with multiplatform, multidisciplinary observations and a range of analysis methods to estimate and understand the distributions, temporal changes, and impacts of reactive nitrogen and ozone over the most populous US region that has undergone significant environmental changes. Deposition, biogenic emissions, and extra-regional sources have been playing increasingly important roles in controlling pollutant budgets in this area as local anthropogenic emissions drop.
Zachary Fair, Carrie Vuyovich, Thomas Neumann, Justin Pflug, David Shean, Ellyn M. Enderlin, Karina Zikan, Hannah Besso, Jessica Lundquist, Cesar Deschamps-Berger, and Désirée Treichler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3992, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3992, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Lidar is commonly used to measure snow over global water reservoirs. However, ground-based and airborne lidar surveys are expensive, so satellite-based methods are needed. In this review, we outline the latest research using satellite-based lidar to monitor snow. Best practices for lidar-based snow monitoring are given, as is a discussion on challenges in this field of research.
Lawrence Mudryk, Colleen Mortimer, Chris Derksen, Aleksandra Elias Chereque, and Paul Kushner
The Cryosphere, 19, 201–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-201-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-201-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate and rank 23 different datasets on their ability to accurately estimate historical snow amounts. The evaluation uses new a set of surface snow measurements with improved spatial coverage, enabling evaluation across both mountainous and nonmountainous regions. Performance measures vary tremendously across the products: while most perform reasonably in nonmountainous regions, accurate representation of snow amounts in mountainous regions and of historical trends is much more variable.
Colleen Mortimer, Lawrence Mudryk, Eunsang Cho, Chris Derksen, Mike Brady, and Carrie Vuyovich
The Cryosphere, 18, 5619–5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ground measurements of snow water equivalent (SWE) are vital for understanding the accuracy of large-scale estimates from satellites and climate models. We compare two types of measurements – snow courses and airborne gamma SWE estimates – and analyze how measurement type impacts the accuracy assessment of gridded SWE products. We use this analysis to produce a combined reference SWE dataset for North America, applicable for future gridded SWE product evaluations and other applications.
Zachary Hoppinen, Ross T. Palomaki, George Brencher, Devon Dunmire, Eric Gagliano, Adrian Marziliano, Jack Tarricone, and Hans-Peter Marshall
The Cryosphere, 18, 5407–5430, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5407-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5407-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses radar imagery from the Sentinel-1 satellite to derive snow depth from increases in the returning energy. These retrieved depths are then compared to nine lidar-derived snow depths across the western United State to assess the ability of this technique to be used to monitor global snow distributions. We also qualitatively compare the changes in underlying Sentinel-1 amplitudes against both the total lidar snow depths and nine automated snow monitoring stations.
Peyman Abbaszadeh, Fadji Zaouna Maina, Chen Yang, Dan Rosen, Sujay Kumar, Matthew Rodell, and Reed Maxwell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-280, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-280, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
To manage Earth's water resources effectively amid climate change, it's crucial to understand both surface and groundwater processes. We developed a new modeling system that combines two advanced tools, ParFlow and LIS/Noah-MP, to better simulate both land surface and groundwater interactions. By testing this integrated model in the Upper Colorado River Basin, we found it improves predictions of hydrologic processes, especially in complex terrains.
Aleksandra Elias Chereque, Paul J. Kushner, Lawrence Mudryk, Chris Derksen, and Colleen Mortimer
The Cryosphere, 18, 4955–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4955-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4955-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We look at three commonly used snow depth datasets that are produced through a combination of snow modelling and historical measurements (reanalysis). When compared with each other, these datasets have differences that arise for various reasons. We show that a simple snow model can be used to examine these inconsistencies and highlight issues. This method indicates that one of the complex datasets should be excluded from further studies.
Louise Busschaert, Michel Bechtold, Sara Modanesi, Christian Massari, Dirk Raes, Sujay V. Kumar, and Gabrielle J. M. De Lannoy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4974019, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4974019, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
This study estimates irrigation in the Po Valley using AquaCrop and Noah-MP models with sprinkler irrigation. Noah-MP shows higher annual rates than AquaCrop due to more water losses. After adjusting, both align with reported irrigation ranges (500–600 mm/yr). Soil moisture estimates from both models match satellite data, though both have limitations in vegetation and evapotranspiration modeling. The study emphasizes the need for observations to improve irrigation estimates.
Randall Bonnell, Daniel McGrath, Jack Tarricone, Hans-Peter Marshall, Ella Bump, Caroline Duncan, Stephanie Kampf, Yunling Lou, Alex Olsen-Mikitowicz, Megan Sears, Keith Williams, Lucas Zeller, and Yang Zheng
The Cryosphere, 18, 3765–3785, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3765-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3765-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow provides water for billions of people, but the amount of snow is difficult to detect remotely. During the 2020 and 2021 winters, a radar was flown over mountains in Colorado, USA, to measure the amount of snow on the ground, while our team collected ground observations to test the radar technique’s capabilities. The technique yielded accurate measurements of the snowpack that had good correlation with ground measurements, making it a promising application for the upcoming NISAR satellite.
Firoz Kanti Borah, Jonas-Fredrick Jans, Zhenming Huang, Leung Tsang, Hans Lievens, and Edward Kim
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1825, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1825, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we study radar data collected by Sentinel-1 over mountain regions of Alps. Using physical models of snow and soil surface scattering, we show the reasons for the high sensitivity of cross-polarized observations with snow depth. This accurate modelling for cross-pol using physical models can be then used to retrieve snow depth at for very deep snow at mountain regions using the cross-pol signal.
Tate G. Meehan, Ahmad Hojatimalekshah, Hans-Peter Marshall, Elias J. Deeb, Shad O'Neel, Daniel McGrath, Ryan W. Webb, Randall Bonnell, Mark S. Raleigh, Christopher Hiemstra, and Kelly Elder
The Cryosphere, 18, 3253–3276, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent (SWE) is a critical parameter for yearly water supply forecasting and can be calculated by multiplying the snow depth by the snow density. We combined high-spatial-resolution snow depth information with ground-based radar measurements to solve for snow density. Extrapolated density estimates over our study area resolved detailed patterns that agree with the known interactions of snow with wind, terrain, and vegetation and were utilized in the calculation of SWE.
Isis Brangers, Hans-Peter Marshall, Gabrielle De Lannoy, Devon Dunmire, Christian Mätzler, and Hans Lievens
The Cryosphere, 18, 3177–3193, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3177-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3177-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To better understand the interactions between C-band radar waves and snow, a tower-based experiment was set up in the Idaho Rocky Mountains. The reflections were collected in the time domain to measure the backscatter profile from the various snowpack and ground surface layers. The results demonstrate that C-band radar is sensitive to seasonal patterns in snow accumulation but that changes in microstructure, stratigraphy and snow wetness may complicate satellite-based snow depth retrievals.
Ross Mower, Ethan D. Gutmann, Glen E. Liston, Jessica Lundquist, and Soren Rasmussen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4135–4154, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4135-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4135-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Higher-resolution model simulations are better at capturing winter snowpack changes across space and time. However, increasing resolution also increases the computational requirements. This work provides an overview of changes made to a distributed snow-evolution modeling system (SnowModel) to allow it to leverage high-performance computing resources. Continental simulations that were previously estimated to take 120 d can now be performed in 5 h.
Steven J. Pestana, C. Chris Chickadel, and Jessica D. Lundquist
The Cryosphere, 18, 2257–2276, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2257-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2257-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We compared infrared images taken by GOES-R satellites of an area with snow and forests against surface temperature measurements taken on the ground, from an aircraft, and by another satellite. We found that GOES-R measured warmer temperatures than the other measurements, especially in areas with more forest and when the Sun was behind the satellite. From this work, we learned that the position of the Sun and surface features such as trees that can cast shadows impact GOES-R infrared images.
Ian E. McDowell, Kaitlin M. Keegan, S. McKenzie Skiles, Christopher P. Donahue, Erich C. Osterberg, Robert L. Hawley, and Hans-Peter Marshall
The Cryosphere, 18, 1925–1946, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1925-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1925-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate knowledge of firn grain size is crucial for many ice sheet research applications. Unfortunately, collecting detailed measurements of firn grain size is difficult. We demonstrate that scanning firn cores with a near-infrared imager can quickly produce high-resolution maps of both grain size and ice layer distributions. We map grain size and ice layer stratigraphy in 14 firn cores from Greenland and document changes to grain size and ice layer content from the extreme melt summer of 2012.
Jinmei Pan, Michael Durand, Juha Lemmetyinen, Desheng Liu, and Jiancheng Shi
The Cryosphere, 18, 1561–1578, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1561-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1561-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed an algorithm to estimate snow mass using X- and dual Ku-band radar, and tested it in a ground-based experiment. The algorithm, the Bayesian-based Algorithm for SWE Estimation (BASE) using active microwaves, achieved an RMSE of 30 mm for snow water equivalent. These results demonstrate the potential of radar, a highly promising sensor, to map snow mass at high spatial resolution.
Siddharth Singh, Michael Durand, Edward Kim, and Ana P. Barros
The Cryosphere, 18, 747–773, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-747-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-747-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Seasonal snowfall accumulation plays a critical role in climate. The water stored in it is measured by the snow water equivalent (SWE), the amount of water released after completely melting. We demonstrate a Bayesian physical–statistical framework to estimate SWE from airborne X- and Ku-band synthetic aperture radar backscatter measurements constrained by physical snow hydrology and radar models. We explored spatial resolutions and vertical structures that agree well with ground observations.
Justin M. Pflug, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Sujay V. Kumar, Eunsang Cho, Kristi R. Arsenault, Paul R. Houser, and Carrie M. Vuyovich
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 631–648, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-631-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-631-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Estimates of 250 m of snow water equivalent in the western USA and Canada are improved by assimilating observations representative of a snow-focused satellite mission with a land surface model. Here, by including a gap-filling strategy, snow estimates could be improved in forested regions where remote sensing is challenging. This approach improved estimates of winter maximum snow water volume to within 4 %, on average, with persistent improvements to both spring snow and runoff in many regions.
Shadi Oveisgharan, Robert Zinke, Zachary Hoppinen, and Hans Peter Marshall
The Cryosphere, 18, 559–574, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-559-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-559-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The seasonal snowpack provides water resources to billions of people worldwide. Large-scale mapping of snow water equivalent (SWE) with high resolution is critical for many scientific and economics fields. In this work we used the radar remote sensing interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) to estimate the SWE change between 2 d. The error in the estimated SWE change is less than 2 cm for in situ stations. Additionally, the retrieved SWE using InSAR is correlated with lidar snow depth.
Zachary Hoppinen, Shadi Oveisgharan, Hans-Peter Marshall, Ross Mower, Kelly Elder, and Carrie Vuyovich
The Cryosphere, 18, 575–592, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-575-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-575-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We used changes in radar echo travel time from multiple airborne flights to estimate changes in snow depths across Idaho for two winters. We compared our radar-derived retrievals to snow pits, weather stations, and a 100 m resolution numerical snow model. We had a strong Pearson correlation and root mean squared error of 10 cm relative to in situ measurements. Our retrievals also correlated well with our model, especially in regions of dry snow and low tree coverage.
Michael Durand, Joel T. Johnson, Jack Dechow, Leung Tsang, Firoz Borah, and Edward J. Kim
The Cryosphere, 18, 139–152, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-139-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-139-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Seasonal snow accumulates each winter, storing water to release later in the year and modulating both water and energy cycles, but the amount of seasonal snow is one of the most poorly measured components of the global water cycle. Satellite concepts to monitor snow accumulation have been proposed but not selected. This paper shows that snow accumulation can be measured using radar, and that (contrary to previous studies) does not require highly accurate information about snow microstructure.
Eunsang Cho, Yonghwan Kwon, Sujay V. Kumar, and Carrie M. Vuyovich
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4039–4056, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4039-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4039-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An airborne gamma-ray remote-sensing technique provides reliable snow water equivalent (SWE) in a forested area where remote-sensing techniques (e.g., passive microwave) typically have large uncertainties. Here, we explore the utility of assimilating the gamma snow data into a land surface model to improve the modeled SWE estimates in the northeastern US. Results provide new insights into utilizing the gamma SWE data for enhanced land surface model simulations in forested environments.
Eunsang Cho, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Melissa L. Wrzesien, and Rhae Sung Kim
The Cryosphere, 17, 3915–3931, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3915-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3915-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As a future snow mission concept, active microwave sensors have the potential to measure snow water equivalent (SWE) in deep snowpack and forested environments. We used a modeling and data assimilation approach (a so-called observing system simulation experiment) to quantify the usefulness of active microwave-based SWE retrievals over western Colorado. We found that active microwave sensors with a mature retrieval algorithm can improve SWE simulations by about 20 % in the mountainous domain.
Dylan Reynolds, Ethan Gutmann, Bert Kruyt, Michael Haugeneder, Tobias Jonas, Franziska Gerber, Michael Lehning, and Rebecca Mott
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5049–5068, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5049-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5049-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The challenge of running geophysical models is often compounded by the question of where to obtain appropriate data to give as input to a model. Here we present the HICAR model, a simplified atmospheric model capable of running at spatial resolutions of hectometers for long time series or over large domains. This makes physically consistent atmospheric data available at the spatial and temporal scales needed for some terrestrial modeling applications, for example seasonal snow forecasting.
Jack Tarricone, Ryan W. Webb, Hans-Peter Marshall, Anne W. Nolin, and Franz J. Meyer
The Cryosphere, 17, 1997–2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1997-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1997-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain snowmelt provides water for billions of people across the globe. Despite its importance, we cannot currently measure the amount of water in mountain snowpacks from satellites. In this research, we test the ability of an experimental snow remote sensing technique from an airplane in preparation for the same sensor being launched on a future NASA satellite. We found that the method worked better than expected for estimating important snowpack properties.
Chris Derksen and Lawrence Mudryk
The Cryosphere, 17, 1431–1443, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1431-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1431-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We examine Arctic snow cover trends through the lens of climate assessments. We determine the sensitivity of change in snow cover extent to year-over-year increases in time series length, reference period, the use of a statistical methodology to improve inter-dataset agreement, version changes in snow products, and snow product ensemble size. By identifying the sensitivity to the range of choices available to investigators, we increase confidence in reported Arctic snow extent changes.
Eunsang Cho, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Rhae Sung Kim, and Jennifer M. Jacobs
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5721–5735, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
While land surface models are a common approach for estimating macroscale snow water equivalent (SWE), the SWE accuracy is often limited by uncertainties in model physics and forcing inputs. In this study, we found large underestimations of modeled SWE compared to observations. Precipitation forcings and melting physics limitations dominantly contribute to the SWE underestimations. Results provide insights into prioritizing strategies to improve the SWE simulations for hydrologic applications.
Leung Tsang, Michael Durand, Chris Derksen, Ana P. Barros, Do-Hyuk Kang, Hans Lievens, Hans-Peter Marshall, Jiyue Zhu, Joel Johnson, Joshua King, Juha Lemmetyinen, Melody Sandells, Nick Rutter, Paul Siqueira, Anne Nolin, Batu Osmanoglu, Carrie Vuyovich, Edward Kim, Drew Taylor, Ioanna Merkouriadi, Ludovic Brucker, Mahdi Navari, Marie Dumont, Richard Kelly, Rhae Sung Kim, Tien-Hao Liao, Firoz Borah, and Xiaolan Xu
The Cryosphere, 16, 3531–3573, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3531-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3531-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent (SWE) is of fundamental importance to water, energy, and geochemical cycles but is poorly observed globally. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) measurements at X- and Ku-band can address this gap. This review serves to inform the broad snow research, monitoring, and application communities about the progress made in recent decades to move towards a new satellite mission capable of addressing the needs of the geoscience researchers and users.
Juha Lemmetyinen, Juval Cohen, Anna Kontu, Juho Vehviläinen, Henna-Reetta Hannula, Ioanna Merkouriadi, Stefan Scheiblauer, Helmut Rott, Thomas Nagler, Elisabeth Ripper, Kelly Elder, Hans-Peter Marshall, Reinhard Fromm, Marc Adams, Chris Derksen, Joshua King, Adriano Meta, Alex Coccia, Nick Rutter, Melody Sandells, Giovanni Macelloni, Emanuele Santi, Marion Leduc-Leballeur, Richard Essery, Cecile Menard, and Michael Kern
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3915–3945, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3915-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3915-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The manuscript describes airborne, dual-polarised X and Ku band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data collected over several campaigns over snow-covered terrain in Finland, Austria and Canada. Colocated snow and meteorological observations are also presented. The data are meant for science users interested in investigating X/Ku band radar signatures from natural environments in winter conditions.
Amy McNally, Jossy Jacob, Kristi Arsenault, Kimberly Slinski, Daniel P. Sarmiento, Andrew Hoell, Shahriar Pervez, James Rowland, Mike Budde, Sujay Kumar, Christa Peters-Lidard, and James P. Verdin
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3115–3135, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3115-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3115-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Land Data Assimilation System (FLDAS) global and Central Asia data streams described here generate routine estimates of snow, soil moisture, runoff, and other variables useful for tracking water availability. These data are hosted by NASA and USGS data portals for public use.
Min Huang, James H. Crawford, Gregory R. Carmichael, Kevin W. Bowman, Sujay V. Kumar, and Colm Sweeney
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7461–7487, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7461-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7461-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates that ozone dry-deposition modeling can be improved by revising the model's dry-deposition parameterizations to better represent the effects of environmental conditions including the soil moisture fields. Applying satellite soil moisture data assimilation is shown to also have added value. Such advancements in coupled modeling and data assimilation can benefit the assessments of ozone impacts on human and vegetation health.
Wanshu Nie, Sujay V. Kumar, Kristi R. Arsenault, Christa D. Peters-Lidard, Iliana E. Mladenova, Karim Bergaoui, Abheera Hazra, Benjamin F. Zaitchik, Sarith P. Mahanama, Rachael McDonnell, David M. Mocko, and Mahdi Navari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2365–2386, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2365-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2365-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The MENA (Middle East and North Africa) region faces significant food and water insecurity and hydrological hazards. Here we investigate the value of assimilating remote sensing data sets into an Earth system model to help build an effective drought monitoring system and support risk mitigation and management by countries in the region. We highlight incorporating satellite-informed vegetation conditions into the model as being one of the key processes for a successful application for the region.
Jawairia A. Ahmad, Barton A. Forman, and Sujay V. Kumar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2221–2243, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2221-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2221-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Assimilation of remotely sensed data into a land surface model to improve the spatiotemporal estimation of soil moisture across South Asia exhibits potential. Satellite retrieval assimilation corrects biases that are generated due to an unmodeled hydrologic phenomenon, i.e., irrigation. The improvements in fine-scale, modeled soil moisture estimates by assimilating coarse-scale retrievals indicates the utility of the described methodology for data-scarce regions.
Hans Lievens, Isis Brangers, Hans-Peter Marshall, Tobias Jonas, Marc Olefs, and Gabriëlle De Lannoy
The Cryosphere, 16, 159–177, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-159-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-159-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Snow depth observations at high spatial resolution from the Sentinel-1 satellite mission are presented over the European Alps. The novel observations can improve our knowledge of seasonal snow mass in areas with complex topography, where satellite-based estimates are currently lacking, and benefit a number of applications including water resource management, flood forecasting, and numerical weather prediction.
Esteban Alonso-González, Ethan Gutmann, Kristoffer Aalstad, Abbas Fayad, Marine Bouchet, and Simon Gascoin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4455–4471, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4455-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4455-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water resources represent a key hydrological resource for the Mediterranean regions, where most of the precipitation falls during the winter months. This is the case for Lebanon, where snowpack represents 31 % of the spring flow. We have used models to generate snow information corrected by means of remote sensing snow cover retrievals. Our results highlight the high temporal variability in the snowpack in Lebanon and its sensitivity to further warming caused by its hypsography.
Min Huang, James H. Crawford, Joshua P. DiGangi, Gregory R. Carmichael, Kevin W. Bowman, Sujay V. Kumar, and Xiwu Zhan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11013–11040, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates the impact of satellite soil moisture data assimilation on modeled weather and ozone fields at various altitudes above the southeastern US during the summer. It emphasizes the importance of soil moisture in the understanding of surface ozone pollution and upper tropospheric chemistry, as well as air pollutants’ source–receptor relationships between the US and its downwind areas.
Michiel Maertens, Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy, Sebastian Apers, Sujay V. Kumar, and Sarith P. P. Mahanama
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4099–4125, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4099-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4099-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we simulated the water balance over the South American Dry Chaco and assessed the impact of land cover changes thereon using three different land surface models. Our simulations indicated that different models result in a different partitioning of the total water budget, but all showed an increase in soil moisture and percolation over the deforested areas. We also found that, relative to independent data, no specific land surface model is significantly better than another.
Konstantin F. F. Ntokas, Jean Odry, Marie-Amélie Boucher, and Camille Garnaud
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3017–3040, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3017-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3017-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This article shows a conversion model of snow depth into snow water equivalent (SWE) using an ensemble of artificial neural networks. The novelty is a direct estimation of SWE and the improvement of the estimation by in-depth analysis of network structures. The usage of an ensemble allows a probabilistic estimation and, therefore, a deeper insight. It is a follow-up study of a similar study over Quebec but extends it to the whole area of Canada and improves it further.
Ahmad Hojatimalekshah, Zachary Uhlmann, Nancy F. Glenn, Christopher A. Hiemstra, Christopher J. Tennant, Jake D. Graham, Lucas Spaete, Arthur Gelvin, Hans-Peter Marshall, James P. McNamara, and Josh Enterkine
The Cryosphere, 15, 2187–2209, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2187-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2187-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We describe the relationships between snow depth, vegetation canopy, and local-scale processes during the snow accumulation period using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). In addition to topography and wind, our findings suggest the importance of fine-scale tree structure, species type, and distributions on snow depth. Snow depth increases from the canopy edge toward the open areas, but wind and topographic controls may affect this trend. TLS data are complementary to wide-area lidar surveys.
Johannes Horak, Marlis Hofer, Ethan Gutmann, Alexander Gohm, and Mathias W. Rotach
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1657–1680, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1657-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1657-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This process-based evaluation of the atmospheric model ICAR is conducted to derive recommendations to increase the likelihood of its results being correct for the right reasons. We conclude that a different diagnosis of the atmospheric background state is necessary, as well as a model top at an elevation of at least 10 km. Alternative boundary conditions at the top were not found to be effective in reducing this model top elevation. The results have wide implications for future ICAR studies.
Yifan Zhou, Benjamin F. Zaitchik, Sujay V. Kumar, Kristi R. Arsenault, Mir A. Matin, Faisal M. Qamer, Ryan A. Zamora, and Kiran Shakya
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 41–61, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-41-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-41-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
South and Southeast Asia face significant food insecurity and hydrological hazards. Here we introduce a South and Southeast Asia hydrological monitoring and sub-seasonal to seasonal forecasting system (SAHFS-S2S) to help local governments and decision-makers prepare for extreme hydroclimatic events. The monitoring system captures soil moisture variability well in most regions, and the forecasting system offers skillful prediction of soil moisture variability 2–3 months in advance, on average.
Miguel A. Aguayo, Alejandro N. Flores, James P. McNamara, Hans-Peter Marshall, and Jodi Mead
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-451, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-451, 2020
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Anne Sophie Daloz, Marian Mateling, Tristan L'Ecuyer, Mark Kulie, Norm B. Wood, Mikael Durand, Melissa Wrzesien, Camilla W. Stjern, and Ashok P. Dimri
The Cryosphere, 14, 3195–3207, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3195-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3195-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The total of snow that falls globally is a critical factor governing freshwater availability. To better understand how this resource is impacted by climate change, we need to know how reliable the current observational datasets for snow are. Here, we compare five datasets looking at the snow falling over the mountains versus the other continents. We show that there is a large consensus when looking at fractional contributions but strong dissimilarities when comparing magnitudes.
César Deschamps-Berger, Simon Gascoin, Etienne Berthier, Jeffrey Deems, Ethan Gutmann, Amaury Dehecq, David Shean, and Marie Dumont
The Cryosphere, 14, 2925–2940, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2925-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2925-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate a recent method to map snow depth based on satellite photogrammetry. We compare it with accurate airborne laser-scanning measurements in the Sierra Nevada, USA. We find that satellite data capture the relationship between snow depth and elevation at the catchment scale and also small-scale features like snow drifts and avalanche deposits. We conclude that satellite photogrammetry stands out as a convenient method to estimate the spatial distribution of snow depth in high mountains.
Cited articles
Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a
warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438, 303–309, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141, 2005.
Barrett, A. P.: National operational hydrologic remote sensing center snow
data assimilation system (SNODAS) products at NSIDC, National Snow and Ice Data Center, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO, USA, p. 19, 2003.
Berghuijs, W. R., Woods, R. A., and Hrachowitz, M.: A precipitation shift
from snow towards rain leads to a decrease in streamflow, Nat. Clim.
Change, 4, 583–586, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2246, 2014.
Berghuijs, W. R., Woods, R. A., Hutton, C. J., and Sivapalan, M.: Dominant
flood generating mechanisms across the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 4382–4390, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068070, 2016.
Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D. B., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Ménard, C. B., Edwards, J. M., Hendry, M. A., Porson, A., Gedney, N., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Cox, P. M., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Harding, R. J.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011, 2011.
Blyth, E., Best, M., Cox, P., Essery, R., Boucher, O., Harding, R.,
Prentice, C., Vidale, P. L., and Woodward, I.: JULES: a new community land
surface model, IGBP Newsl., 66, 9–11, 2006.
Bohn, T. J., Sonessa, M. Y., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Seasonal Hydrologic
Forecasting: Do multimodel ensemble averages always yield improvements in
forecast skill?, J. Hydrometeorol., 11, 1358–1372, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1267.1, 2010.
Brooks, P. D., Grogan, P., Templer, P. H., Groffman, P., Öquist, M. G., and Schimel, J.: Carbon and nitrogen cycling in snow-covered environments,
Geography Compass, 5, 682–699, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00420.x, 2011.
Brown, R., Tapsoba, D., and Derksen, C.: Evaluation of snow water equivalent
datasets over the Saint-Maurice river basin region of southern Québec,
Hydrol. Process., 32, 2748–2764, 2018.
Brown, R. D. and Brasnett, B.: Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) daily
snow depth analysis data, version 1, National Snow and Ice Data Center,
https://doi.org/10.5067/W9FOYWH0EQZ3, 2010.
Broxton, P. D., Zeng, X., and Dawson, N.: Why do global reanalyses and land
data assimilation products underestimate snow water equivalent?, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 2743–2761, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0056.1, 2016.
Chen, F., Barlage, M., Tewari, M., Rasmussen, R., Jin, J., Lettenmaier, D.,
Livneh, B., Lin, C., Miguez-Macho, G., Niu, G. Y., Wen, L., and Yang, Z. L.:
Modeling seasonal snowpack evolution in the complex terrain and forested
colorado headwaters region: A model intercomparison study, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 13–795, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022167, 2014.
Clark, M. P., Hendrikx, J., Slater, A. G., Kavetski, D., Anderson, B.,
Cullen, N. J., Kerr, T., Örn Hreinsson, E., and Woods, R. A.:
Representing spatial variability of snow water equivalent in hydrologic and
land-surface models: A review, Water Resour. Res., 47, 435,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010745, 2011.
Cosgrove, B. A., Lohmann, D., Mitchell, K. E., Houser, P. R., Wood, E. F.,
Schaake, J. C., Robock, A., Marshall, C., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Luo, L.,
Higgins, R. W., Pinker, R. T., Tarpley, J. D., and Meng, J.: Real-time and
retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation System
(NLDAS) project, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8842, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003118, 2003.
Dawson, N., Broxton, P., Zeng, X., Leuthold, M., Barlage, M., and Holbrook,
P.: An evaluation of snow initializations in ncep global and regional
forecasting models, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 1885–1901, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0227.1, 2016.
Derber, J. C., Parrish, D. F., and Lord, S. J.: The new global operational
analysis system at the national-meteorological-center, Weather
Forecast., 6, 538–547, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1991)006<0538:tngoas>2.0.co;2, 1991 (data available at: https://nomads.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/data/nccf/com/gfs/prod, last access: 11 February 2021).
Dietz, A. J., Kuenzer, C., Gessner, U., and Dech, S.: Remote sensing of snow
– a review of available methods, Int. J. Remote Sens., 33, 4094–4134,
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.640964, 2012.
Dirmeyer, P. A., Gao, X., Zhao, M., Guo, Z., Oki, T., and Hanasaki, N.:
GSWP-2: multimodel analysis and implications for our perception of the land
surface, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 1381–1398, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-10-1381, 2006.
Dozier, J., Bair, E. H., and Davis, R. E.: Estimating the spatial
distribution of snow water equivalent in the world's mountains, WIRES Water, 3, 461–474, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1140, 2016.
Ducharne, A., Koster, R. D., Suarez, M. J., Stieglitz, M., and Kumar, P.: A
catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general
circulation model: 2. Parameter estimation and model demonstration, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 24823–24838, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900328, 2000.
Durand, M., Gatebe, C., Kim, E., Molotch, N., Painter, T. H., Raleigh, M.,
Sandells, M., and Vuyovichi C.: Assessing Approaches for Measuring Water in
Earth's Seasonal Snow, available at: https://goo.gl/sFkxHc (last access: 5 February 2021), 2019.
Dutra, E., Kotlarski, S., Viterbo, P., Balsamo, G., Miranda, P. M. A.,
Schär, C., Bissolli, P., and Jonas, T.: Snow cover sensitivity to
horizontal resolution, parameterizations, and atmospheric forcing in a land
surface model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D21109,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016061, 2011.
Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K., and Lin, Y.: Implementation of Noah land surface
model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction
operational mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8851,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296, 2003.
Essery, R., Rutter, N., Pomeroy, J., Baxter, R., Stahli, M., Gustafsson, D.,
Barr, A., Bartlett, P., and Elder, K.: SnowMIP2: An evalution of forest snow
process simulation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 1120–1136,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2629.1, 2009.
Feng, X., Sahoo, A., Arsenault, K., Houser, P., Luo, Y., and Troy, T. J.: The
impact of snow model complexity at three CLPX sites, J. Hydrometeorol., 9, 1464–1481, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM860.1, 2008.
Fick, S. E. and Hijmans, R. J.: WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution
climate surfaces for global land areas, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 4302–4315, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086, 2017.
Forman, B. A., Reichle, R. H., and Rodell, M.: Assimilation of terrestrial
water storage from GRACE in a snow-dominated basin, Water Resour. Res., 48, W01507, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011239, 2012.
Foster, J. L., Hall, D. K., Eylander, J. B., Riggs, G. A., Nghiem, S. V.,
Tedesco, M., Kim, E., Montesano, P. M., Kelly, R. E. J., Casey, K. A., and
Choudhury, B.: A blended global snow product using visible, passive
microwave and scatterometer satellite data,
Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 1371–1395, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903548013, 2011.
Franz, K. J., Hogue, T. S., and Sorooshian, S.: Snow model verification using
ensemble prediction and operational benchmarks, J. Hydrometeorol.,
9, 1402–1415, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM995.1, 2008.
Fyfe, J. C., Derksen, C., Mudryk, L., Flato, G. M., Santer, B. D., Swart, N.
C., Molotch, N. P., Zhang, X., Wan, H., Arora, V. K., Scinocca, J., and Jiao,
Y.: Large near-term projected snowpack loss over the western United States,
Nat. Commun., 8, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14996, 2017.
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan,
K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A.,
da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G. K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D.,
Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M.,
Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The modern-era retrospective
analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017 (data available at: https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/reanalysis/MERRA-2/data_access/, last access: 11 February 2021).
Guan, B., Molotch, N. P., Waliser, D. E., Fetzer, E. J., and Neiman, P. J.:
The 2010/2011 snow season in California's Sierra Nevada: Role of atmospheric
rivers and modes of large-scale variability, Water Resour. Res.,
49, 6731–6743, 2013.
Günther, D., Marke, T., Essery, R., and Strasser, U.: Uncertainties in
snowpack simulations – assessing the impact of model structure, parameter
choice, and forcing data error on point-scale energy balance snow model
performance, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2779–2800, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023403, 2019.
Guo, Z., Dirmeyer, P. A., Gao, X., and Zhao, M.: Improving the quality of
simulated soil moisture with a multi-model ensemble approach, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 731–747, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.48, 2007.
Ikeda, K., Rasmussen, R., Liu, C., Gochis, D., Yates, D., Chen, F., Tewari,
M., Barlage, M., Dudhia, J., Miller, K., Arsenault, K., Grubišić,
V., Thompson, G., and Guttman, E.: Simulation of seasonal snowfall over
Colorado, Atmos. Res., 97, 462–477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.04.010, 2010.
Jordan, R.: A one-dimensional temperature model for a snow cover: Technical
documentation for SNTHERM 89, Tech. Rep. Special Report 91‐16, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, USA, 1991.
Kapnick, S. B. and Delworth, T. L.: Controls of global snow under a changed
climate, J. Climate, 26, 5537–5562, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00528.1, 2013.
Kapos, V., Rhind, J., Edwards, M., Price, M. F., and Ravilious, C.:
Developing a map of the world's mountain forests, in: Forests in sustainable
mountain development: A state-of knowledge report for 2000, Task Force on Forests in Sustainable Mountain Development, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 4–19, 2000.
Kim, E., Gatebe, C., Hall, D., Newlin, J., Misakonis, A., Elder, K., Marshall, H. P., Hiemstra, C., Brucker, L., De Marco, E., and Crawford, C.: NASA's SnowEx campaign: Observing seasonal snow in a forested environment, in: 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 23–28 July 2017, Fort Worth, TX, USA, IEEE, 1388–1390, 2017.
Kim, R. S., Durand, M., Li, D., Baldo, E., Margulis, S. A., Dumont, M., and
Morin, S.: Estimating alpine snow depth by combining multifrequency passive
radiance observations with ensemble snowpack modeling, Remote Sens. Environ., 226, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.016, 2019.
Koster, R. D., Suarez, M. J., Ducharne, A., Stieglitz, M., and Kumar, P.: A
catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general
circulation model 1. Model structure, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 24809–24822, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900327, 2000.
Kumar, S. V., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Tian, Y., Houser, P. R., Geiger, J.,
Olden, S., Lighty, L., Eastman, J. L., Doty, B., Dirmeyer, P., Adams, J.,
Mitchell, K., Wood, E. F., and Sheffield, J.: Land information system: An
interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling,
Environ. Model. Softw., 21, 1402–1415, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.004,
2006.
Kumar, S. V., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Mocko, D., and Tian, Y.: Multiscale
evaluation of the improvements in surface snow simulation through terrain
adjustments to radiation, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 220–232,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-046.1, 2013.
Kumar, S. V, Wang, S., Mocko, D. M., Peters-Lidard, C. D., and Xia, Y.:
Similarity assessment of land surface model outputs in the north american
land data assimilation system, Water Resour. Res., 53, 8941–8965,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020635, 2017.
Lenderink, G., Buishand, A., and van Deursen, W.: Estimates of future discharges of the river Rhine using two scenario methodologies: direct versus delta approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1145–1159, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1145-2007, 2007.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Alsdorf, D., Dozier, J., Huffman, G. J., Pan, M., and
Wood, E. F.: Inroads of remote sensing into hydrologic science during the
WRR era, Water Resour. Res., 51, 7309–7342,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017616, 2015.
Lundquist, J., Hughes, M., Gutmann, E., and Kapnick, S.: Our skill in
modeling mountain rain and snow is bypassing the skill of our observational
networks, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 2473–2490,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0001.1, 2019.
Mahanama, S., Livneh, B., Koster, R., Lettenmaier, D., and Reichle, R.: Soil
moisture, snow, and seasonal streamflow forecasts in the United States,
J. Hydrometeorol., 13, 189–203, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-046.1, 2012.
Marshall, A. M., Abatzoglou, J. T., Link, T. E., and Tennant, C. J.:
Projected Changes in Interannual Variability of Peak Snowpack Amount and
Timing in the Western United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8882–8892,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083770, 2019.
Matheson, J. E. and Winkler, R. L.: Scoring rules for continuous probability
distributions, Manage. Sci., 22, 1087–1096, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.22.10.1087, 1976.
Meromy, L., Molotch, N. P., Link, T. E., Fassnacht, S. R., and Rice, R.:
Subgrid variability of snow water equivalent at operational snow stations in
the western USA, Hydrol. Process., 27, 2383–2400,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9355, 2013.
Mitchell, K. E., Lohmann, D., Houser, P. R., and Wood, E. F.: The
multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS):
Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed
hydrological modeling system, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07S90,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003823, 2004.
Molod, A., Takacs, L., Suarez, M., and Bacmeister, J.: Development of the GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model: evolution from MERRA to MERRA2, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1339–1356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1339-2015, 2015.
Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N., and Petroliagis, T.: The ECMWF
ensemble prediction system: Methodology and validation,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 73–119, https://doi.org/10.1256/smsqj.52904, 1996 (data available at: https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets, last access: 5 February 2021).
Mudryk, L. R., Derksen, C., Kushner, P. J., and Brown, R.: Characterization
of northern hemisphere snow water equivalent datasets, 1981–2010, J. Climate, 28, 8037–8051, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0229.1, 2015.
Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Barnett, D. H., Jones, G. S., Webb, M. J.,
Collins, M., and Stainforth, D. A.: Quantification of modelling uncertainties
in a large ensemble of climate change simulations, Nature, 430, 768–772,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02771, 2004.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Thriving on Our
Changing Planet: A Decadal Strategy for Earth Observation from Space, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA, 2018.
Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M.,
Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.: The
community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options
(Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale
measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12109,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139, 2011.
Nolin, A. W.: Recent advances in remote sensing of seasonal snow,
J. Glaciol., 56, 1141–1150, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311796406077, 2010.
Pavelsky, T. M., Kapnick, S., and Hall, A.: Accumulation and melt dynamics of
snowpack from a multiresolution regional climate model in the central Sierra
Nevada, California, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D16115,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015479, 2011.
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Houser, P. R., Tian, Y., Kumar, S. V., Geiger, J.,
Olden, S., Lighty, L., Doty, B., Dirmeyer, P., Adams, J., Mitchell, K.,
Wood, E. F., and Sheffield, J.: High-performance earth system modeling with
NASA/GSFC's Land Information System, Innovations in Systems and Software
Engineering, 3, 157–165, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-007-0028-x, 2007.
Raleigh, M. S., Livneh, B., Lapo, K., and Lundquist, J. D.: How does
availability of meteorological forcing data impact physically based snowpack
simulations?, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 99–120,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0235.1, 2016.
Raup, B., Racoviteanu, A., Khalsa, S. J. S., Helm, C., Armstrong, R., and
Arnaud, Y.: The GLIMS geospatial glacier database: A new tool for studying
glacier change, Global Planet. Change, 56, 101–110,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.018, 2007.
Reichle, R. H., Draper, C. S., Liu, Q., Girotto, M., Mahanama, S. P. P.,
Koster, R. D., and De Lannoy, G. J. M.: Assessment of MERRA-2 land surface
hydrology estimates, J. Climate, 30, 2937–2960, 2017.
Robinson, D. A. and Kukla, G.: Maximum surface albedo of seasonally
snow-covered lands in the northern hemisphere, J. Clim.
Appl. Meteorol., 24, 402–411, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1985)024<0402:MSAOSS>2.0.CO;2, 1985.
Rutter, N., Essery, R., Pomeroy, J., Altimir, N., Andreadis, K., Baker, I.,
Barr, A., Bartlett, P., Boone, A., Deng, H., Douville, H., Dutra, E., Elder,
K., Ellis, C., Feng, X., Gelfan, A., Goodbody, A., Gusev, Y., Gustafsson,
D., HellströM, R., Hirabayashi, Y., Hirota, T., Jonas, T., Koren, V.,
Kuragina, A., Lettenmaier, D., Li, W.-P., Luce, C., Martin, E., Nasonova,
O., Pumpanen, J., Pyles, R. D., Samuelsson, P., Sandells, M., SchäDler,
G., Shmakin, A., Smirnova, T. G., StäHli, M., StöCkli, R., Strasser,
U., Su, H., Suzuki, K., Takata, K., Tanaka, K., Thompson, E., Vesala, T.,
Viterbo, P., Wiltshire, A., Xia, K., Xue, Y., and Yamazaki, T.: Evaluation of
forest snow processes models (SnowMIP2), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D06111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011063, 2009.
Ryberg, K. R., Akyüz, F. A., Wiche, G. J., and Lin, W.: Changes in
seasonality and timing of peak streamflow in snow and semi-arid climates of
the north-central United States, 1910–2012, Hydrol. Process., 30, 1208–1218, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10693, 2016.
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of the Advanced
Research WRF version 3. Technical Note 475., Note NCAR/TN-4751STR, 113 pp.,
https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH, 2008.
Stewart, I. T., Cayan, D. R., and Dettinger, M. D.: Changes toward earlier
streamflow timing across western North America, J. Climate, 18, 1136–1155,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3321.1, 2005.
Stielstra, C. M., Lohse, K. A., Chorover, J., McIntosh, J. C.,
Barron-Gafford, G. A., Perdrial, J. N., Litvak, M., Barnard, H. R., and
Brooks, P. D.: Climatic and landscape influences on soil moisture are
primary determinants of soil carbon fluxes in seasonally snow-covered forest
ecosystems, Biogeochemistry, 123, 447–465, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0078-3, 2015.
Takala, M., Luojus, K., Pulliainen, J., Derksen, C., Lemmetyinen, J.,
Kärnä, J.-P., Koskinen, J., and Bojkov, B.: Estimating northern
hemisphere snow water equivalent for climate research through assimilation
of space-borne radiometer data and ground-based measurements,
Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 3517–3529, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.014, 2011.
Vuyovich, C. M., Jacobs, J. M., and Daly, S. F.: Comparison of passive
microwave and modeled estimates of total watershed SWE in the continental
United States, Water Resour. Res., 50, 9088–9102,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014734, 2014.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., and Swetnam, T. W.: Warming
and earlier spring increase Western U.S. forest wildfire activity, Science, 313, 940–943, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128834, 2006.
Wrzesien, M. L., Pavelsky, T. M., Kapnick, S. B., Durand, M. T., and Painter,
T. H.: Evaluation of snow cover fraction for regional climate simulations in
the Sierra Nevada, Int. J. Climatol., 35, 2472–2484,
2015.
Wrzesien, M. L., Durand, M. T., Pavelsky, T. M., Howat, I. M., Margulis, S.
A., and Huning, L. S.: Comparison of methods to estimate snow water
equivalent at the mountain range scale: A case study of the California
Sierra Nevada, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 1101–1119, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0246.1, 2017.
Wrzesien, M. L., Durand, M. T., Pavelsky, T. M., Kapnick, S. B., Zhang, Y.,
Guo, J., and Shum, C. K.: A new estimate of North American mountain snow
accumulation from regional climate model simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1423–1432, 2018.
Xia, Y., Mitchell, K., Ek, M., Sheffield, J., Cosgrove, B., Wood, E., Luo,
L., Alonge, C., Wei, H., Meng, J., Livneh, B., Lettenmaier, D., Koren, V.,
Duan, Q., Mo, K., Fan, Y., and Mocko, D.: Continental-scale water and energy
flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation
System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of
model products, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,
D03109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016048, 2012.
Yang, Z. L., Niu, G. Y., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M.,
Longuevergne, L., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.: The
community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options
(Noah-MP): 2. Evaluation over global river basins,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015140, 2011.
Yoon, Y., Kumar, S. V., Forman, B. A., Zaitchik, B. F., Kwon, Y., Qian, Y.,
Rupper, S., Maggioni, V., Houser, P., Kirschbaum, D., Richey, A., Arendt,
A., Mocko, D., Jacob, J., Bhanja, S., and Mukherjee, A.: Evaluating the
uncertainty of terrestrial water budget components over high mountain asia,
Front. Earth Sci., 7, 120, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00120, 2019.
Zeng, X., Broxton, P., and Dawson, N.: Snowpack change from 1982 to 2016 over
conterminous United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12940–12947,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079621, 2018.
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(6267 KB) - Full-text XML
- Corrigendum
-
Supplement
(300 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Short summary
High SWE uncertainty is observed in mountainous and forested regions, highlighting the need for high-resolution snow observations in these regions. Substantial uncertainty in snow water storage in Tundra regions and the dominance of water storage in these regions points to the need for high-accuracy snow estimation. Finally, snow measurements during the melt season are most needed at high latitudes, whereas observations at near peak snow accumulations are most beneficial over the midlatitudes.
High SWE uncertainty is observed in mountainous and forested regions, highlighting the need for...
