Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-689-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-689-2022
Research article
 | 
25 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 25 Feb 2022

A comparison of the stability and performance of depth-integrated ice-dynamics solvers

Alexander Robinson, Daniel Goldberg, and William H. Lipscomb

Related authors

Antarctic sensitivity to oceanic melting parameterizations
Antonio Juarez-Martinez, Javier Blasco, Alexander Robinson, Marisa Montoya, and Jorge Alvarez-Solas
The Cryosphere, 18, 4257–4283, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4257-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4257-2024, 2024
Short summary
Design and performance of ELSA v2.0: an isochronal model for ice-sheet layer tracing
Therese Rieckh, Andreas Born, Alexander Robinson, Robert Law, and Gerrit Gülle
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6987–7000, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6987-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6987-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analytical solutions for the advective–diffusive ice column in the presence of strain heating
Daniel Moreno-Parada, Alexander Robinson, Marisa Montoya, and Jorge Alvarez-Solas
The Cryosphere, 18, 4215–4232, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4215-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4215-2024, 2024
Short summary
Antarctic tipping points triggered by the mid-Pliocene warm climate
Javier Blasco, Ilaria Tabone, Daniel Moreno-Parada, Alexander Robinson, Jorge Alvarez-Solas, Frank Pattyn, and Marisa Montoya
Clim. Past, 20, 1919–1938, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1919-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-1919-2024, 2024
Short summary
FastIsostasy v1.0 – a regional, accelerated 2D glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) model accounting for the lateral variability of the solid Earth
Jan Swierczek-Jereczek, Marisa Montoya, Konstantin Latychev, Alexander Robinson, Jorge Alvarez-Solas, and Jerry Mitrovica
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5263–5290, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5263-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Ice sheets | Subject: Numerical Modelling
Antarctic sensitivity to oceanic melting parameterizations
Antonio Juarez-Martinez, Javier Blasco, Alexander Robinson, Marisa Montoya, and Jorge Alvarez-Solas
The Cryosphere, 18, 4257–4283, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4257-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4257-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analytical solutions for the advective–diffusive ice column in the presence of strain heating
Daniel Moreno-Parada, Alexander Robinson, Marisa Montoya, and Jorge Alvarez-Solas
The Cryosphere, 18, 4215–4232, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4215-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4215-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ice viscosity governs hydraulic fracture that causes rapid drainage of supraglacial lakes
Tim Hageman, Jessica Mejía, Ravindra Duddu, and Emilio Martínez-Pañeda
The Cryosphere, 18, 3991–4009, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3991-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3991-2024, 2024
Short summary
Biases in ice sheet models from missing noise-induced drift
Alexander A. Robel, Vincent Verjans, and Aminat A. Ambelorun
The Cryosphere, 18, 2613–2623, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2613-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sensitivity of Future Projections of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin Ice Sheet to Grounding Line Melt Parameterizations
Yu Wang, Chen Zhao, Rupert Gladstone, Thomas Zwinger, Ben Galton-Fenzi, and Poul Christoffersen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1005,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1005, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arthern, R. J. and Williams, C. R.: The sensitivity of West Antarctica to the submarine melting feedback, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2352–2359, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072514, 2017. a
Arthern, R. J., Hindmarsh, R. C. A., and Williams, C. R.: Flow speed within the Antarctic ice sheet and its controls inferred from satellite observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 120, 1171–1188, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003239, 2015. a, b
Blatter, H.: Velocity and stress fields in grounded glaciers – a simple algorithm for including deviatoric stress gradients, J. Glaciol., 41, 333–344, 1995. a
Bueler, E.: Lectures at Karthaus: Numerical modelling of ice sheets and ice shelves, https://glaciers.gi.alaska.edu/sites/default/files/Notes_icesheetmod_Bueler2014.pdf (last access: 23 February 2022), 2009. a
Bueler, E. and Brown, J.: Shallow shelf approximation as a “sliding law” in a thermodynamically coupled ice sheet model, J. Geophys. Res., 114, F03008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001179, 2009. a
Download
Short summary
Here we investigate the numerical stability of several commonly used methods in order to determine which of them are capable of resolving the complex physics of the ice flow and are also computationally efficient. We find that the so-called DIVA solver outperforms the others. Its representation of the physics is consistent with more complex methods, while it remains computationally efficient at high resolution.