Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-689-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-689-2022
Research article
 | 
25 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 25 Feb 2022

A comparison of the stability and performance of depth-integrated ice-dynamics solvers

Alexander Robinson, Daniel Goldberg, and William H. Lipscomb

Model code and software

palma-ice/yelmo: Solver Stability v1.0 Alexander Robinson https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5791864

ESCOMP/CISM: CISM Slab Tests (cism_slab_tests) William Lipscomb https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5889016

Download
Short summary
Here we investigate the numerical stability of several commonly used methods in order to determine which of them are capable of resolving the complex physics of the ice flow and are also computationally efficient. We find that the so-called DIVA solver outperforms the others. Its representation of the physics is consistent with more complex methods, while it remains computationally efficient at high resolution.