Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-689-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-689-2022
Research article
 | 
25 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 25 Feb 2022

A comparison of the stability and performance of depth-integrated ice-dynamics solvers

Alexander Robinson, Daniel Goldberg, and William H. Lipscomb

Viewed

Total article views: 4,460 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,304 1,038 118 4,460 198 183 206
  • HTML: 3,304
  • PDF: 1,038
  • XML: 118
  • Total: 4,460
  • Supplement: 198
  • BibTeX: 183
  • EndNote: 206
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Sep 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Sep 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,460 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,252 with geography defined and 208 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 01 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Here we investigate the numerical stability of several commonly used methods in order to determine which of them are capable of resolving the complex physics of the ice flow and are also computationally efficient. We find that the so-called DIVA solver outperforms the others. Its representation of the physics is consistent with more complex methods, while it remains computationally efficient at high resolution.
Share