Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5641-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5641-2024
Brief communication
 | 
05 Dec 2024
Brief communication |  | 05 Dec 2024

Brief communication: New perspectives on the skill of modelled sea ice trends in light of recent Antarctic sea ice loss

Caroline R. Holmes, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Paul R. Holland, Julienne Stroeve, and Jeremy Wilkinson

Related authors

Vertical Crustal Movement along the Coast of South Africa
Franck Eitel Kemgang Ghomsi, Muharrem Hilmi Erkoç, Roshin P. Raj, Atinç Pirti, Antonio Bonaduce, Babatunde J. Abiodun, and Julienne Stroeve
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-M-6-2025, 393–397, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-6-2025-393-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-6-2025-393-2025, 2025
Datasets and protocols for including anomalous freshwater from melting ice sheets in climate simulations
Gavin A. Schmidt, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Jonathan L. Bamber, Dustin Carroll, David M. Chandler, Violaine Coulon, Benjamin J. Davison, Matthew H. England, Paul R. Holland, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Qian Li, Juliana M. Marson, Pierre Mathiot, Clive R. McMahon, Twila A. Moon, Ruth Mottram, Sophie Nowicki, Anne Olivé Abelló, Andrew G. Pauling, Thomas Rackow, and Damien Ringeisen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1940,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1940, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Modelling the Impacts of Extreme Precipitation Events on Surface Mass Balance in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland
Nicole A. Loeb, Alex Crawford, Brice Noël, and Julienne Stroeve
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-995,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-995, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Spatio-temporal melt and basal channel evolution on Pine Island Glacier ice shelf from CryoSat-2
Katie Lowery, Pierre Dutrieux, Paul R. Holland, Anna E. Hogg, Noel Gourmelen, and Benjamin J. Wallis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-267,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-267, 2025
Short summary
Snow depth estimation on leadless landfast ice using Cryo2Ice satellite observations
Monojit Saha, Julienne Stroeve, Dustin Isleifson, John Yackel, Vishnu Nandan, Jack Christopher Landy, and Hoi Ming Lam
The Cryosphere, 19, 325–346, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-325-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-325-2025, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Antarctic
Inferring the seasonality of sea ice floes in the Weddell Sea using ICESat-2
Mukund Gupta, Heather Regan, Younghyun Koo, Sean Minhui Tashi Chua, Xueke Li, and Petra Heil
The Cryosphere, 19, 1241–1257, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1241-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1241-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying the influence of snow over sea ice morphology on L-band passive microwave satellite observations in the Southern Ocean
Lu Zhou, Julienne Stroeve, Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Shiming Xu, Weixin Zhu, Sahra Kacimi, Stefanie Arndt, and Zifan Yang
The Cryosphere, 18, 4399–4434, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4399-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4399-2024, 2024
Short summary
The role of atmospheric conditions in the Antarctic sea ice extent summer minima
Bianca Mezzina, Hugues Goosse, François Klein, Antoine Barthélemy, and François Massonnet
The Cryosphere, 18, 3825–3839, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3825-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3825-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sources of low-frequency variability in observed Antarctic sea ice
David B. Bonan, Jakob Dörr, Robert C. J. Wills, Andrew F. Thompson, and Marius Årthun
The Cryosphere, 18, 2141–2159, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2141-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2141-2024, 2024
Short summary
A contrast in sea ice drift and deformation between winter and spring of 2019 in the Antarctic marginal ice zone
Ashleigh Womack, Alberto Alberello, Marc de Vos, Alessandro Toffoli, Robyn Verrinder, and Marcello Vichi
The Cryosphere, 18, 205–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-205-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-205-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bracegirdle, T. J., Stephenson, D. B., Turner, J., and Phillips, T.: The importance of sea ice area biases in 21st century multimodel projections of Antarctic temperature and precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10832–10839, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067055, 2015. 
Bracegirdle, T. J., Hyder, P., and Holmes, C. R.: CMIP5 diversity in southern westerly jet projections related to historical sea ice area: Strong link to strengthening and weak link to shift, J. Climate, 31, 195–211, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0320.1, 2018. 
Cavalieri, D., Parkinson, C., and Vinnikov, K. Y.: 30-Year satellite record reveals contrasting Arctic and Antarctic decadal sea ice variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1970, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018031, 2003. 
Diamond, R., Sime, L. C., Schroeder, D., and Holmes, C. R.: CMIP6 models rarely simulate Antarctic winter sea-ice anomalies as large as observed in 2023, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2024GL109265, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109265, 2024. 
Dörr, J., Dirk, N., and Kern, S.: UHH sea-ice area product, 1850–2019 (v2019_fv0.01), UHH [data set], https://doi.org/10.25592/uhhfdm.8559, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
Until recently, satellite data showed an increase in Antarctic sea ice area since 1979, but climate models simulated a decrease over this period. This mismatch was one reason for low confidence in model projections of 21st-century sea ice loss. We show that following low Antarctic sea ice in 2022 and 2023, we can no longer conclude that modelled and observed trends differ. However, differences in the manner of the decline mean that model sea ice projections should still be viewed with caution.
Share