Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5641-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5641-2024
Brief communication
 | 
05 Dec 2024
Brief communication |  | 05 Dec 2024

Brief communication: New perspectives on the skill of modelled sea ice trends in light of recent Antarctic sea ice loss

Caroline R. Holmes, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Paul R. Holland, Julienne Stroeve, and Jeremy Wilkinson

Related authors

Mapping Snow on Northern Winter Roads: A Dual-Frequency Polarimetric Radar Approach for Snow Characterization over Land, Lake and Sea ice
Julienne Stroeve, Rosemary Willatt, Madeleine Downie, Monojit Saha, Carmen Nab, Alicia Fallows, Clement Soriot, Robbie Mallett, Anton Komarov, Vishnu Nandan, Thomas Newman, and John Yackel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-212,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-212, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
A new index used to characterise the extent of Antarctic marine coastal winds in climate projections
Archie Cable, Thomas Caton Harrison, Elizabeth Kent, Richard Cornes, and Thomas J. Bracegirdle
Weather Clim. Dynam., 7, 247–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-247-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-247-2026, 2026
Short summary
Modelled dynamics of floating and grounded icebergs, with application to the Amundsen Sea
Yavor Kostov, Paul R. Holland, Kelly A. Hogan, James A. Smith, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Pierre Mathiot, Anna Olivé Abelló, Andrew H. Fleming, and Andrew J. S. Meijers
The Cryosphere, 20, 135–169, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-135-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-135-2026, 2026
Short summary
Impact, drivers and pathways of two Arctic atmospheric rivers in April 2020
Luisa E. Avilés-Podgurski, Patrick Martineau, Hua Lu, Ayako Yamamoto, Amanda C. Maycock, Andrew Orr, Tony Phillips, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Anna E. Hogg, Grzegorz Muszynski, and Andrew Fleming
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6285,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6285, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Datasets and protocols for including anomalous freshwater from melting ice sheets in climate simulations
Gavin A. Schmidt, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Jonathan L. Bamber, Clara Burgard, Dustin Carroll, David M. Chandler, Violaine Coulon, Benjamin J. Davison, Matthew H. England, Paul R. Holland, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Qian Li, Juliana M. Marson, Pierre Mathiot, Clive R. McMahon, Twila A. Moon, Ruth Mottram, Sophie Nowicki, Anna Olivé Abelló, Andrew G. Pauling, Thomas Rackow, and Damien Ringeisen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 8333–8361, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8333-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8333-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Bracegirdle, T. J., Stephenson, D. B., Turner, J., and Phillips, T.: The importance of sea ice area biases in 21st century multimodel projections of Antarctic temperature and precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10832–10839, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067055, 2015. 
Bracegirdle, T. J., Hyder, P., and Holmes, C. R.: CMIP5 diversity in southern westerly jet projections related to historical sea ice area: Strong link to strengthening and weak link to shift, J. Climate, 31, 195–211, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0320.1, 2018. 
Cavalieri, D., Parkinson, C., and Vinnikov, K. Y.: 30-Year satellite record reveals contrasting Arctic and Antarctic decadal sea ice variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1970, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018031, 2003. 
Diamond, R., Sime, L. C., Schroeder, D., and Holmes, C. R.: CMIP6 models rarely simulate Antarctic winter sea-ice anomalies as large as observed in 2023, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2024GL109265, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109265, 2024. 
Dörr, J., Dirk, N., and Kern, S.: UHH sea-ice area product, 1850–2019 (v2019_fv0.01), UHH [data set], https://doi.org/10.25592/uhhfdm.8559, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
Until recently, satellite data showed an increase in Antarctic sea ice area since 1979, but climate models simulated a decrease over this period. This mismatch was one reason for low confidence in model projections of 21st-century sea ice loss. We show that following low Antarctic sea ice in 2022 and 2023, we can no longer conclude that modelled and observed trends differ. However, differences in the manner of the decline mean that model sea ice projections should still be viewed with caution.
Share