Articles | Volume 18, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-475-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-475-2024
Research article
 | 
01 Feb 2024
Research article |  | 01 Feb 2024

Cloud- and ice-albedo feedbacks drive greater Greenland Ice Sheet sensitivity to warming in CMIP6 than in CMIP5

Idunn Aamnes Mostue, Stefan Hofer, Trude Storelvmo, and Xavier Fettweis

Related authors

A novel database of Antarctic meteorological extremes over key ice shelves during 1995–2023
Ian Simpson, Edward Hanna, Ryan S. Williams, Linh Luu, Andrew Orr, Julie Jones, Xavier Fettweis, Jose Abraham Torres Alavez, Ole Bøssing Christensen, Ella Gilbert, Sid Gumber, Christoph Kittel, Sihan Li, Damien Maure, Ruth Mottram, Tony Phillips, Willem Jan van de Berg, and Kristiina Verro
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2270,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2270, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
PIXAL: a physics-inspired explainable machine learning architecture for Greenland ice albedo modeling
Raf Antwerpen, Marco Tedesco, Pierre Gentine, Willem Jan van de Berg, and Xavier Fettweis
The Cryosphere, 20, 3131–3149, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-3131-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-3131-2026, 2026
Short summary
Projected elevation-dependent warming in the Alps: contrasting free-atmosphere and surface trends with surface energy balance drivers
Ian Castellanos, Martin Ménégoz, Juliette Blanchet, Julien Beaumet, Hubert Gallée, Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Chantal Staquet, and Xavier Fettweis
Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 581–605, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-581-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-581-2026, 2026
Short summary
21st century change in precipitation on the Greenland Ice Sheet using high resolution regional climate models
Fredrik Boberg, Xavier Fettweis, Nicolaj Hansen, Ruth Mottram, and Michiel R. van den Broeke
The Cryosphere, 20, 2947–2960, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2947-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2947-2026, 2026
Short summary
Estimating the thermodynamic contribution of post-industrial warming to recent Greenland ice sheet surface mass loss
Jonathon R. Preece, Patrick Alexander, Thomas L. Mote, Gabriel J. Kooperman, Xavier Fettweis, and Marco Tedesco
The Cryosphere, 20, 2871–2894, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2871-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2871-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Barthel, A., Agosta, C., Little, C. M., Hattermann, T., Jourdain, N. C., Goelzer, H., Nowicki, S., Seroussi, H., Straneo, F., and Bracegirdle, T. J.: CMIP5 model selection for ISMIP6 ice sheet model forcing: Greenland and Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 14, 855–879, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-855-2020, 2020. a, b
Bennartz, R., Shupe, M. D., Turner, D. D., Walden, V. P., Steffen, K., Cox, C. J., Kulie, M. S., Miller, N. B., and Pettersen, C.: July 2012 Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds, Nature, 496, 83–86, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12002, 2013. a, b, c
Box, J. E., Fettweis, X., Stroeve, J. C., Tedesco, M., Hall, D. K., and Steffen, K.: Greenland ice sheet albedo feedback: thermodynamics and atmospheric drivers, The Cryosphere, 6, 821–839, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-821-2012, 2012. a, b
Box, J. E., Wehrlé, A., van As, D., Fausto, R. S., Kjeldsen, K. K., Dachauer, A., Ahlstrøm, A. P., and Picard, G.: Greenland Ice Sheet Rainfall, Heat and Albedo Feedback Impacts From the Mid-August 2021 Atmospheric River, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097356, 2022. a, b
Brun, E., David, P., Sudul, M., and Brunot, G.: A numerical model to simulate snow-cover stratigraphy for operational avalanche forecasting, J. Glaciol., 38, 13–22, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000009552, 1992. a, b
Download
Short summary
The latest generation of climate models (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 – CMIP6) warm more over Greenland and the Arctic and thus also project a larger mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) compared to the previous generation of climate models (CMIP5). Our work suggests for the first time that part of the greater mass loss in CMIP6 over the GrIS is driven by a difference in the surface mass balance sensitivity from a change in cloud representation in the CMIP6 models.
Share