Articles | Volume 18, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-475-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-475-2024
Research article
 | 
01 Feb 2024
Research article |  | 01 Feb 2024

Cloud- and ice-albedo feedbacks drive greater Greenland Ice Sheet sensitivity to warming in CMIP6 than in CMIP5

Idunn Aamnes Mostue, Stefan Hofer, Trude Storelvmo, and Xavier Fettweis

Related authors

Projected elevation-dependent warming in the Alps depicted with surface energy balance trends
Ian Castellanos, Martin Ménégoz, Juliette Blanchet, Julien Beaumet, Hubert Gallée, Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Chantal Staquet, and Xavier Fettweis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6211,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6211, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Extending the range and reach of physically-based Greenland ice sheet sea-level projections
Heiko Goelzer, Constantijn J. Berends, Fredrik Boberg, Gael Durand, Tamsin L. Edwards, Xavier Fettweis, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, Quentin Glaude, Philippe Huybrechts, Sébastien Le clec'h, Ruth Mottram, Brice Noël, Martin Olesen, Charlotte Rahlves, Jeremy Rohmer, Michiel van den Broeke, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
The Cryosphere, 19, 6887–6906, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6887-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6887-2025, 2025
Short summary
21st century change in precipitation on the Greenland Ice Sheet using high resolution regional climate models
Fredrik Boberg, Nicolaj Hansen, Ruth Mottram, Xavier Fettweis, and Michiel R. van den Broeke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4360,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4360, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Dust radiative forcing in CMIP6 Earth System models: insights from the AerChemMIP piClim-2xdust experiment
Ove W. Haugvaldstad, Dirk Olivié, Trude Storelvmo, and Michael Schulz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13199–13219, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13199-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13199-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessing Regional Climate Model Sensitivity to Vegetation Dynamics Informed by Remote Sensing
Thomas Dethinne, Nicolas Ghilain, Christoph Kittel, Benjamin Lecart, Xavier Fettweis, and François Jonard
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3907,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3907, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary

Cited articles

Barthel, A., Agosta, C., Little, C. M., Hattermann, T., Jourdain, N. C., Goelzer, H., Nowicki, S., Seroussi, H., Straneo, F., and Bracegirdle, T. J.: CMIP5 model selection for ISMIP6 ice sheet model forcing: Greenland and Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 14, 855–879, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-855-2020, 2020. a, b
Bennartz, R., Shupe, M. D., Turner, D. D., Walden, V. P., Steffen, K., Cox, C. J., Kulie, M. S., Miller, N. B., and Pettersen, C.: July 2012 Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds, Nature, 496, 83–86, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12002, 2013. a, b, c
Box, J. E., Fettweis, X., Stroeve, J. C., Tedesco, M., Hall, D. K., and Steffen, K.: Greenland ice sheet albedo feedback: thermodynamics and atmospheric drivers, The Cryosphere, 6, 821–839, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-821-2012, 2012. a, b
Box, J. E., Wehrlé, A., van As, D., Fausto, R. S., Kjeldsen, K. K., Dachauer, A., Ahlstrøm, A. P., and Picard, G.: Greenland Ice Sheet Rainfall, Heat and Albedo Feedback Impacts From the Mid-August 2021 Atmospheric River, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097356, 2022. a, b
Brun, E., David, P., Sudul, M., and Brunot, G.: A numerical model to simulate snow-cover stratigraphy for operational avalanche forecasting, J. Glaciol., 38, 13–22, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000009552, 1992. a, b
Download
Short summary
The latest generation of climate models (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 – CMIP6) warm more over Greenland and the Arctic and thus also project a larger mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) compared to the previous generation of climate models (CMIP5). Our work suggests for the first time that part of the greater mass loss in CMIP6 over the GrIS is driven by a difference in the surface mass balance sensitivity from a change in cloud representation in the CMIP6 models.
Share