Articles | Volume 18, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-475-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-475-2024
Research article
 | 
01 Feb 2024
Research article |  | 01 Feb 2024

Cloud- and ice-albedo feedbacks drive greater Greenland Ice Sheet sensitivity to warming in CMIP6 than in CMIP5

Idunn Aamnes Mostue, Stefan Hofer, Trude Storelvmo, and Xavier Fettweis

Related authors

Inferred effective climate sensitivity from a selection of CMIP6 models
Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Terje K. Berntsen, Ada Gjermundsen, Ragnar Bang Huseby, Gunnar Myhre, Dirk Olivié, and Trude Storelvmo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4634,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4634, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Compound intense warming and precipitation events in the Patagonian Icefields and the Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet – Part 1: Event frequency, atmospheric circulation and impacts on glacier surface
Christian Torres, Deniz Bozkurt, Vincent Favier, Victoire Buffet, Claudio Bravo, Xavier Fettweis, Thomas Dethinne, Antoine Rabatel, Maximiliano Viale, Sang-Jong Park, and Jorge Arigony-Neto
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3508,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3508, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
The Modèle Atmosphérique Régional – Intelligence Artificielle (MAR-IA): surface meltwater over Greenland
Marco Tedesco, Racheet Matai, and Xavier Fettweis
The Cryosphere, 20, 4235–4253, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4235-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4235-2026, 2026
Short summary
Evaluation of MARv3.14 over the Greenland Ice Sheet
Guillaume Timmermans, Brice Noël, Christoph Kittel, Thomas Dethinne, Nicolas Ghilain, and Xavier Fettweis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2341,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2341, 2026
Short summary
A novel database of Antarctic meteorological extremes over key ice shelves during 1995–2023
Ian Simpson, Edward Hanna, Ryan S. Williams, Linh Luu, Andrew Orr, Julie Jones, Xavier Fettweis, Jose Abraham Torres Alavez, Ole Bøssing Christensen, Ella Gilbert, Sid Gumber, Christoph Kittel, Sihan Li, Damien Maure, Ruth Mottram, Tony Phillips, Willem Jan van de Berg, and Kristiina Verro
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2270,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2270, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Barthel, A., Agosta, C., Little, C. M., Hattermann, T., Jourdain, N. C., Goelzer, H., Nowicki, S., Seroussi, H., Straneo, F., and Bracegirdle, T. J.: CMIP5 model selection for ISMIP6 ice sheet model forcing: Greenland and Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 14, 855–879, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-855-2020, 2020. a, b
Bennartz, R., Shupe, M. D., Turner, D. D., Walden, V. P., Steffen, K., Cox, C. J., Kulie, M. S., Miller, N. B., and Pettersen, C.: July 2012 Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds, Nature, 496, 83–86, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12002, 2013. a, b, c
Box, J. E., Fettweis, X., Stroeve, J. C., Tedesco, M., Hall, D. K., and Steffen, K.: Greenland ice sheet albedo feedback: thermodynamics and atmospheric drivers, The Cryosphere, 6, 821–839, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-821-2012, 2012. a, b
Box, J. E., Wehrlé, A., van As, D., Fausto, R. S., Kjeldsen, K. K., Dachauer, A., Ahlstrøm, A. P., and Picard, G.: Greenland Ice Sheet Rainfall, Heat and Albedo Feedback Impacts From the Mid-August 2021 Atmospheric River, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097356, 2022. a, b
Brun, E., David, P., Sudul, M., and Brunot, G.: A numerical model to simulate snow-cover stratigraphy for operational avalanche forecasting, J. Glaciol., 38, 13–22, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000009552, 1992. a, b
Download
Short summary
The latest generation of climate models (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 – CMIP6) warm more over Greenland and the Arctic and thus also project a larger mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) compared to the previous generation of climate models (CMIP5). Our work suggests for the first time that part of the greater mass loss in CMIP6 over the GrIS is driven by a difference in the surface mass balance sensitivity from a change in cloud representation in the CMIP6 models.
Share