Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1485-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1485-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
24 Mar 2021
Research article |
| 24 Mar 2021
| 24 Mar 2021
Snow depth mapping with unpiloted aerial system lidar observations: a case study in Durham, New Hampshire, United States
Jennifer M. Jacobs
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New
Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth,
Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Adam G. Hunsaker
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New
Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth,
Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Franklin B. Sullivan
Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth,
Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Michael Palace
Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth,
Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Department of Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH
03824, USA
Elizabeth A. Burakowski
Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth,
Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Christina Herrick
Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth,
Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Eunsang Cho
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New
Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth,
Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Related authors
Eunsang Cho, Megan Verfaillie, Jennifer M. Jacobs, Adam G. Hunsaker, Franklin B. Sullivan, Michael Palace, and Cameron Wagner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1530, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1530, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS) lidar and structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry are effective methods for mapping high-resolution snow depths. However, there are limited studies comparing their performance across different surface features and tracking spatial patterns of snowpack changes over time. Our study found that UAS lidar outperformed SfM photogrammetry. With limited wind effects, the snow spatial structure captured by UAS lidar remained temporally stable throughout the snow season.
Holly Proulx, Jennifer M. Jacobs, Elizabeth A. Burakowski, Eunsang Cho, Adam G. Hunsaker, Franklin B. Sullivan, Michael Palace, and Cameron Wagner
The Cryosphere, 17, 3435–3442, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3435-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3435-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares snow depth measurements from two manual instruments in a field and forest. Snow depths measured using a magnaprobe were typically 1 to 3 cm deeper than those measured using a snow tube. These differences were greater in the forest than in the field.
Eunsang Cho, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Rhae Sung Kim, and Jennifer M. Jacobs
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5721–5735, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
While land surface models are a common approach for estimating macroscale snow water equivalent (SWE), the SWE accuracy is often limited by uncertainties in model physics and forcing inputs. In this study, we found large underestimations of modeled SWE compared to observations. Precipitation forcings and melting physics limitations dominantly contribute to the SWE underestimations. Results provide insights into prioritizing strategies to improve the SWE simulations for hydrologic applications.
Holly Proulx, Jennifer M. Jacobs, Elizabeth A. Burakowski, Eunsang Cho, Adam G. Hunsaker, Franklin B. Sullivan, Michael Palace, and Cameron Wagner
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-7, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-7, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares snow depth measurements from two manual instruments and an airborne platform in a field and forest. The manual instruments’ snow depths differed by 1 to 3 cm. The airborne measurements , which do not penetrate the leaf litter, were consistently shallower than either manual instrument. When combining airborne snow depth maps with manual density measurements, corrections may be required to create unbiased maps of snow properties.
Maxime Thomas, Thomas Moenaert, Julien Radoux, Baptiste Delhez, Eléonore du Bois d'Aische, Maëlle Villani, Catherine Hirst, Erik Lundin, François Jonard, Sébastien Lambot, Kristof Van Oost, Veerle Vanacker, Matthias B. Siewert, Carl-Magnus Mörth, Michael W. Palace, Ruth K. Varner, Franklin B. Sullivan, Christina Herrick, and Sophie Opfergelt
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3788, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3788, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines the rate of permafrost degradation, in the form of the transition from intact well-drained palsa to fully thawed and inundated fen at the Stordalen mire, Abisko, Sweden. Across the 14 hectares of the palsa mire, we demonstrate a 5-fold acceleration of the degradation in 2019–2021 compared to previous periods (1970–2014) which might lead to a pool of 12 metric tons of organic carbon exposed annually for the topsoil (23 cm depth), and an increase of ~1.3%/year of GHG emissions.
Colleen Mortimer, Lawrence Mudryk, Eunsang Cho, Chris Derksen, Mike Brady, and Carrie Vuyovich
The Cryosphere, 18, 5619–5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ground measurements of snow water equivalent (SWE) are vital for understanding the accuracy of large-scale estimates from satellites and climate models. We compare two types of measurements – snow courses and airborne gamma SWE estimates – and analyze how measurement type impacts the accuracy assessment of gridded SWE products. We use this analysis to produce a combined reference SWE dataset for North America, applicable for future gridded SWE product evaluations and other applications.
Annelise Waling, Adam Herrington, Katharine Duderstadt, Jack Dibb, and Elizabeth Burakowski
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1117–1135, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1117-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are channel-shaped features within the atmosphere that carry moisture from the mid-latitudes to the poles, bringing warm temperatures and moisture that can cause melt in the Arctic. We used variable-resolution grids to model ARs around the Greenland ice sheet and compared this output to uniform-resolution grids and reanalysis products. We found that the variable-resolution grids produced ARs and precipitation that were more similar to observation-based products.
Eunsang Cho, Megan Verfaillie, Jennifer M. Jacobs, Adam G. Hunsaker, Franklin B. Sullivan, Michael Palace, and Cameron Wagner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1530, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1530, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS) lidar and structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry are effective methods for mapping high-resolution snow depths. However, there are limited studies comparing their performance across different surface features and tracking spatial patterns of snowpack changes over time. Our study found that UAS lidar outperformed SfM photogrammetry. With limited wind effects, the snow spatial structure captured by UAS lidar remained temporally stable throughout the snow season.
Justin M. Pflug, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Sujay V. Kumar, Eunsang Cho, Kristi R. Arsenault, Paul R. Houser, and Carrie M. Vuyovich
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 631–648, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-631-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-631-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Estimates of 250 m of snow water equivalent in the western USA and Canada are improved by assimilating observations representative of a snow-focused satellite mission with a land surface model. Here, by including a gap-filling strategy, snow estimates could be improved in forested regions where remote sensing is challenging. This approach improved estimates of winter maximum snow water volume to within 4 %, on average, with persistent improvements to both spring snow and runoff in many regions.
Eunsang Cho, Yonghwan Kwon, Sujay V. Kumar, and Carrie M. Vuyovich
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4039–4056, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4039-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4039-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An airborne gamma-ray remote-sensing technique provides reliable snow water equivalent (SWE) in a forested area where remote-sensing techniques (e.g., passive microwave) typically have large uncertainties. Here, we explore the utility of assimilating the gamma snow data into a land surface model to improve the modeled SWE estimates in the northeastern US. Results provide new insights into utilizing the gamma SWE data for enhanced land surface model simulations in forested environments.
Eunsang Cho, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Melissa L. Wrzesien, and Rhae Sung Kim
The Cryosphere, 17, 3915–3931, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3915-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3915-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As a future snow mission concept, active microwave sensors have the potential to measure snow water equivalent (SWE) in deep snowpack and forested environments. We used a modeling and data assimilation approach (a so-called observing system simulation experiment) to quantify the usefulness of active microwave-based SWE retrievals over western Colorado. We found that active microwave sensors with a mature retrieval algorithm can improve SWE simulations by about 20 % in the mountainous domain.
Holly Proulx, Jennifer M. Jacobs, Elizabeth A. Burakowski, Eunsang Cho, Adam G. Hunsaker, Franklin B. Sullivan, Michael Palace, and Cameron Wagner
The Cryosphere, 17, 3435–3442, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3435-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3435-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares snow depth measurements from two manual instruments in a field and forest. Snow depths measured using a magnaprobe were typically 1 to 3 cm deeper than those measured using a snow tube. These differences were greater in the forest than in the field.
Eunsang Cho, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Rhae Sung Kim, and Jennifer M. Jacobs
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5721–5735, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
While land surface models are a common approach for estimating macroscale snow water equivalent (SWE), the SWE accuracy is often limited by uncertainties in model physics and forcing inputs. In this study, we found large underestimations of modeled SWE compared to observations. Precipitation forcings and melting physics limitations dominantly contribute to the SWE underestimations. Results provide insights into prioritizing strategies to improve the SWE simulations for hydrologic applications.
Holly Proulx, Jennifer M. Jacobs, Elizabeth A. Burakowski, Eunsang Cho, Adam G. Hunsaker, Franklin B. Sullivan, Michael Palace, and Cameron Wagner
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-7, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-7, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares snow depth measurements from two manual instruments and an airborne platform in a field and forest. The manual instruments’ snow depths differed by 1 to 3 cm. The airborne measurements , which do not penetrate the leaf litter, were consistently shallower than either manual instrument. When combining airborne snow depth maps with manual density measurements, corrections may be required to create unbiased maps of snow properties.
Cited articles
Adams, M. S., Bühler, Y., and Fromm, R.: Multitemporal accuracy and
precision assessment of unmanned aerial system photogrammetry for
slope-scale snow depth maps in Alpine terrain, Pure Appl. Geophys.,
175, 3303–3324, 2018.
Broxton, P., Harpold, A., Biederman, J., Troch, P. A., Molotch, N., and
Brooks, P.: Quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on snow
accumulation and ablation in mixed-conifer forests, Ecohydrology, 8,
1073–1094, 2015.
Broxton, P. D., van Leeuwen, W. J., and Biederman, J. A.: Improving Snow
Water Equivalent Maps With Machine Learning of Snow Survey and Lidar
Measurements, Water Resour. Res., 55, 3739–3757, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr024146, 2019.
Bühler, Y., Adams, M. S., Bösch, R., and Stoffel, A.: Mapping snow depth in alpine terrain with unmanned aerial systems (UASs): potential and limitations, The Cryosphere, 10, 1075–1088, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1075-2016, 2016.
Bühler, Y., Adams, M. S., Stoffel, A., and Boesch, R.: Photogrammetric
reconstruction of homogenous snow surfaces in alpine terrain applying
near-infrared UAS imagery, Int. J. Remote Sens., 38,
3135–3158, 2017.
Burakowski, E., Tawfik, A., Ouimette, A., Lepine, L., Novick, K., Ollinger,
S., Zarzycki, C., and Bonan, G.: The role of surface roughness, albedo, and
Bowen ratio on ecosystem energy balance in the Eastern United States,
Agr. Forest Meteorol., 249, 367–376, 2018.
Burakowski, E. A., Ollinger, S. V., Lepine, L., Schaaf, C. B., Wang, Z.,
Dibb, J. E., Hollinger, D. Y., Kim, J., Erb, A., and Martin, M.: Spatial
scaling of reflectance and surface albedo over a mixed-use, temperate forest
landscape during snow-covered periods, Remote Sens. Environ., 158,
465–477, 2015.
Cimoli, E., Marcer, M., Vandecrux, B., Bøggild, C. E., Williams, G., and
Simonsen, S. B.: Application of low-cost UASs and digital photogrammetry for
high-resolution snow depth mapping in the Arctic, Remote Sens., 9, 1144, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111144,
2017.
Clark, M. P., Hendrikx, J., Slater, A. G., Kavetski, D., Anderson, B.,
Cullen, N. J., Kerr, T., Örn Hreinsson, E., and Woods, R. A.:
Representing spatial variability of snow water equivalent in hydrologic and
land-surface models: A review, Water Resour. Res., 47, W07539, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr010745, 2011.
Cook, B. D., Corp, L. A., Nelson, R. F., Middleton, E. M., Morton, D. C.,
McCorkel, J. T., Masek, J. G., Ranson, K. J., Ly, V., and Montesano, P. M.:
NASA Goddard's LiDAR, Hyperspectral and Thermal (G-LiHT) Airborne Imager,
Remote Sens., 5, 4045–4066, 2013.
Currier, W. R. and Lundquist, J. D.: Snow depth variability at the forest
edge in multiple climates in the western United States, Water Resour.
Res., 54, 8756–8773, 2018.
Currier, W. R., Pflug, J., Mazzotti, G., Jonas, T., Deems, J. S., Bormann,
K. J., Painter, T. H., Hiemstra, C. A., Gelvin, A., and Uhlmann, Z.:
Comparing aerial lidar observations with terrestrial lidar and snow-probe
transects from NASA's 2017 SnowEx campaign, Water Resour. Res., 55, 6285–6294, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr024533,
2019.
Deems, J. S., Painter, T. H., and Finnegan, D. C.: Lidar measurement of snow
depth: a review, J. Glaciol., 59, 467–479, 2013.
De Michele, C., Avanzi, F., Passoni, D., Barzaghi, R., Pinto, L., Dosso, P., Ghezzi, A., Gianatti, R., and Della Vedova, G.: Using a fixed-wing UAS to map snow depth distribution: an evaluation at peak accumulation, The Cryosphere, 10, 511–522, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-511-2016, 2016.
Dickinson, W. and Whiteley, H.: A sampling scheme for shallow snowpacks,
Hydrol. Sci. J., 17, 247–258, 1972.
Dolgun, A. and Demirhan, H.: Performance of nonparametric multiple
comparison tests under heteroscedasticity, dependency, and skewed error
distribution, Commun. Stat. Simulat., 46,
5166–5183, 2017.
Eberhard, L. A., Sirguey, P., Miller, A., Marty, M., Schindler, K., Stoffel, A., and Bühler, Y.: Intercomparison of photogrammetric platforms for spatially continuous snow depth mapping, The Cryosphere, 15, 69–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-69-2021, 2021.
Essery, R., Rutter, N., Pomeroy, J., Baxter, R., Stähli, M., Gustafsson,
D., Barr, A., Bartlett, P., and Elder, K.: SNOWMIP2: An evaluation of forest
snow process simulations, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
90, 1120–1136, 2009.
Fernandes, R., Prevost, C., Canisius, F., Leblanc, S. G., Maloley, M., Oakes, S., Holman, K., and Knudby, A.: Monitoring snow depth change across a range of landscapes with ephemeral snowpacks using structure from motion applied to lightweight unmanned aerial vehicle videos, The Cryosphere, 12, 3535–3550, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3535-2018, 2018.
Fey, C., Schattan, P., Helfricht, K., and Schöber, J.: A compilation of
multitemporal TLS snow depth distribution maps at the Weisssee snow research
site (Kaunertal, Austria), Water Resour. Res., 55, 5154–5164, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024788, 2019.
Gabrlik, P., Janata, P., Zalud, L., and Harcarik, J.: Towards Automatic
UAS-Based Snow-Field Monitoring for Microclimate Research, Sensors, 19,
1945, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081945, 2019.
Gandahl, R.: Determination of the depth of soil freezing with a new frost
meter, Report 30 (SIP 16347), Stattensaginsititut, Stockholm, Sweden, 1957 (in Swedish).
Goetz, J. and Brenning, A.: Quantifying uncertainties in snow depth mapping
from structure from motion photogrammetry in an alpine area, Water Resour.
Res., 55, 7772–7783, 2019.
Grünewald, T., Schirmer, M., Mott, R., and Lehning, M.: Spatial and temporal variability of snow depth and ablation rates in a small mountain catchment, The Cryosphere, 4, 215–225, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-215-2010, 2010.
Harder, P., Schirmer, M., Pomeroy, J., and Helgason, W.: Accuracy of snow depth estimation in mountain and prairie environments by an unmanned aerial vehicle, The Cryosphere, 10, 2559–2571, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2559-2016, 2016.
Harder, P., Pomeroy, J. W., and Helgason, W. D.: Improving sub-canopy snow depth mapping with unmanned aerial vehicles: lidar versus structure-from-motion techniques, The Cryosphere, 14, 1919–1935, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1919-2020, 2020.
Harpold, A., Guo, Q., Molotch, N., Brooks, P., Bales, R., Fernandez-Diaz,
J., Musselman, K., Swetnam, T., Kirchner, P., and Meadows, M.: LiDAR-derived
snowpack data sets from mixed conifer forests across the Western United
States, Water Resour. Res., 50, 2749–2755, 2014.
Helsel, D. R. and Hirsch, R. M.: Statistical methods in water resources,
Elsevier, Reston, VA, 2002.
Hopkinson, C., Chasmer, L., Young-Pow, C., and Treitz, P.: Assessing forest
metrics with a ground-based scanning lidar, Can. J. Forest
Res., 34, 573–583, 2004.
Horn, B. K.: Hill shading and the reflectance map, Proceedings of the IEEE,
69, 14–47, 1981.
Kirchner, P. B., Bales, R. C., Molotch, N. P., Flanagan, J., and Guo, Q.: LiDAR measurement of seasonal snow accumulation along an elevation gradient in the southern Sierra Nevada, California, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4261–4275, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4261-2014, 2014.
Kraus, K. and Pfeifer, N.: Advanced DTM generation from LiDAR data,
ISPRS Archives,
34, 23–30, 2011.
Li, Z., Tan, J., and Liu, H.: Rigorous boresight self-calibration of mobile
and UAV LiDAR scanning systems by strip adjustment, Remote Sens., 11, 442, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11040442,
2019.
Liu, Q., Fu, L., Wang, G., Li, S., Li, Z., Chen, E., Pang, Y., and Hu, K.: Improving Estimation of Forest Canopy Cover by Introducing Loss Ratio of Laser Pulses Using Airborne LiDAR, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 58, 567–585, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2938017, 2020.
Marti, R., Gascoin, S., Berthier, E., de Pinel, M., Houet, T., and Laffly, D.: Mapping snow depth in open alpine terrain from stereo satellite imagery, The Cryosphere, 10, 1361–1380, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1361-2016, 2016.
Maune, D. F. and Nayegandhi, A.: Digital elevation model technologies and
applications: the DEM users manual, Asprs Publications, Bethesda, Maryland, 2018.
Mazzotti, G., Currier, W. R., Deems, J. S., Pflug, J. M., Lundquist, J. D.,
and Jonas, T.: Revisiting Snow Cover Variability and Canopy Structure Within
Forest Stands: Insights From Airborne Lidar Data, Water Resour. Res.,
55, 6198–6216, 2019.
McGrath, D., Webb, R., Shean, D., Bonnell, R., Marshall, H. P., Painter, T.
H., Molotch, N. P., Elder, K., Hiemstra, C., and Brucker, L.: Spatially
extensive ground-penetrating radar snow depth observations during NASA's
2017 SnowEx campaign: Comparison with In situ, airborne, and satellite
observations, Water Resour. Res., 55, 10026–10036, 2019.
Meyer, J. and Skiles, S. M.: Assessing the Ability of Structure From Motion
to Map High-Resolution Snow Surface Elevations in Complex Terrain: A Case
Study From Senator Beck Basin, CO, Water Resour. Res., 55, 6596–6605,
2019.
Moeser, D., Mazzotti, G., Helbig, N., and Jonas, T.: Representing spatial
variability of forest snow: Implementation of a new interception model,
Water Resour. Res., 52, 1208–1226, 2016.
Mott, R., Schirmer, M., and Lehning, M.: Scaling properties of wind and snow
depth distribution in an Alpine catchment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D06106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014886, 2011.
Mott, R., Vionnet, V., and Grünewald, T.: The seasonal snow cover
dynamics: review on wind-driven coupling processes, Front. Earth
Sci., 6, 197, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00197, 2018.
Muir, J., Goodwin, N., Armston, J., Phinn, S., and Scarth, P.: An accuracy
assessment of derived digital elevation models from terrestrial laser
scanning in a sub-tropical forested environment, Remote Sens., 9, 843, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080843, 2017.
Nolan, M., Larsen, C., and Sturm, M.: Mapping snow depth from manned aircraft on landscape scales at centimeter resolution using structure-from-motion photogrammetry, The Cryosphere, 9, 1445–1463, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1445-2015, 2015.
Painter, T. H., Berisford, D. F., Boardman, J. W., Bormann, K. J., Deems, J.
S., Gehrke, F., Hedrick, A., Joyce, M., Laidlaw, R., and Marks, D.: The
Airborne Snow Observatory: Fusion of scanning lidar, imaging spectrometer,
and physically-based modeling for mapping snow water equivalent and snow
albedo, Remote Sens. Environ., 184, 139–152, 2016.
Palace, M., Keller, M., Asner, G. P., Hagen, S., and Braswell, B.: Amazon
forest structure from IKONOS satellite data and the automated
characterization of forest canopy properties, Biotropica, 40, 141–150, 2008.
Palace, M. W., Sullivan, F. B., Ducey, M. J., Herrick, C.: Estimating Tropical Forest Structure Using a Terrestrial Lidar, PloS ONE, 11, e0154115, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154115, 2016.
Palace, M. W., McMichael, C., Braswell, B. H., Hagen, S. C., Bush, M. B.,
Neves, E., Tamanaha, E., Herrick, C., and Frolking, S.: Ancient Amazonian
populations left lasting impacts on forest structure, Ecosphere, 8, e02035, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2035, 2017.
Perron, C. J., Bennett, K., and Lee, T. D.: Forest stewardship plan: Thompson
farm, NH: University of New Hampshire, Produced by Ossipee Mountain Land Company, West Ossipee, available at: https://unh.app.box.com/s/5jk13l1ektbu57iqb93twx28ldb2anfw (last access: 11 March 2021),
2004.
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available at: https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 21 March 2021), 2020.
Ricard, J. A., Tobiasson, W., and Greatorex, A.: The field assembled frost
gage, Technical Note, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA, 7 pp., 1976.
Rutter, N., Essery, R., Pomeroy, J., Altimir, N., Andreadis, K., Baker, I.,
Barr, A., Bartlett, P., Boone, A., and Deng, H.: Evaluation of forest snow
processes models (SnowMIP2), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
114, D06111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011063, 2009.
Schweizer, J., Jamieson, J. B., and Schneebeli, M.: Snow avalanche
formation, Rev. Geophys., 41, 25, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002rg000123, 2003.
Sharratt, B. S. and McCool, D. K.: Frost Depth, in: Micrometeorology in
Agricultural Systems, in: Micrometeorology in Agricultural Systems, edited by: Hatfield, J. L. and Baker, J. M.,
Madison, Wisconsin, USA,
584 pp., 2005.
Shaw, T. E., Gascoin, S., Mendoza, P. A., Pellicciotti, F., and McPhee, J.:
Snow Depth Patterns in a High Mountain Andean Catchment from Satellite
Optical Tristereoscopic Remote Sensing, Water Resour. Res., 56,
e2019WR024880, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr024880, 2020.
Slotznick, S. P., Sperling, E. A., Tosca, N. J., Miller, A. J., Clayton, K. E.,
van Helmond, N. A. G. M., Slomp, C. P., and Swanson-Hysell, N. L.: Unraveling the
mineralogical complexity of sediment iron speciation using sequential
extractions, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 21, e2019GC008666, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gc008666, 2020.
Sturm, M. and Holmgren, J.: An automatic snow depth probe for field
validation campaigns, Water Resour. Res., 54, 9695–9701, 2018.
Tonkin, T. N. and Midgley, N. G.: Ground-Control Networks for Image Based
Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV
Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry, Remote Sens., 8,
786, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090786, 2016.
Vander Jagt, B., Lucieer, A., Wallace, L., Turner, D., and Durand, M.: Snow
depth retrieval with UAS using photogrammetric techniques, Geosciences, 5,
264–285, 2015.
Wallace, L., Lucieer, A., Watson, C., and Turner, D.: Development of a
UAV-LiDAR system with application to forest inventory, Remote Sens., 4,
1519–1543, 2012.
Wallace, L., Lucieer, A., and Watson, C. S.: Evaluating tree detection and
segmentation routines on very high resolution UAV LiDAR data, IEEE
T. Geosci. Remote, 52, 7619–7628, 2014.
Zhang, K., Chen, S.-C., Whitman, D., Shyu, M.-L., Yan, J., and Zhang, C.: A
progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from
airborne LIDAR data, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 41,
872–882, 2003.
Zheng, Z., Kirchner, P. B., and Bales, R. C.: Topographic and vegetation effects on snow accumulation in the southern Sierra Nevada: a statistical summary from lidar data, The Cryosphere, 10, 257–269, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-257-2016, 2016.
Short summary
This pilot study describes a proof of concept for using lidar on an unpiloted aerial vehicle to map shallow snowpack (< 20 cm) depth in open terrain and forests. The 1 m2 resolution snow depth map, generated by subtracting snow-off from snow-on lidar-derived digital terrain models, consistently had 0.5 to 1 cm precision in the field, with a considerable reduction in accuracy in the forest. Performance depends on the point cloud density and the ground surface variability and vegetation.
This pilot study describes a proof of concept for using lidar on an unpiloted aerial vehicle to...
