Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-7
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-7
 
03 Feb 2022
03 Feb 2022
Status: this discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal The Cryosphere (TC). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion.

Comparison of in-situ snow depth measurements and impacts on validation of unpiloted aerial system lidar over a mixed-use temperate forest landscape

Holly Proulx1, Jennifer M. Jacobs1,2, Elizabeth A. Burakowski2, Eunsang Cho1,2, Adam G. Hunsaker1,2, Franklin B. Sullivan2, Michael Palace2,3, and Cameron Wagner1 Holly Proulx et al.
  • 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA
  • 2Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA
  • 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA

Abstract. The accuracy and consistency of snow depth measurements depend on the measuring device and the conditions of the site and snowpack in which it is being used. This study compares collocated snow depth measurements from a magnaprobe automatic snow depth probe and a Federal snow tube, then uses these measurements to validate snow depth maps from an unpiloted aerial system (UAS) with an integrated Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) sensor. We conducted three snow depth sampling campaigns from December 2020 to February 2021 that included 39 open field, coniferous, mixed, and deciduous forest sampling sites in Durham, New Hampshire, United States. Average snow depths were between 9 and 15 cm. For all sampling campaigns and land cover types, the magnaprobe snow depth measurements were consistently deeper than the snow tube. There was a 12 % average difference between the magnaprobe (14.9 cm) and snow tube (13.2 cm) average snow depths with a greater difference in the forest than the field. The lidar estimates of snow depth were 3.6 cm and 1.9 cm shallower on average than the magnaprobe and snow tube, respectively. While the magnaprobe had a better correlation with the UAS lidar, the root mean square errors were higher for the magnaprobe than the snow tube, likely due to overprobing by the magnaprobe into leaf litter. Even though the differences between the in-situ sampling methods resulted in modest performance differences when used to validate the UAS lidar snow depths in this study, measuring vegetation height, leaf litter, and soil frost with in-situ snow depths from multiple sampling techniques helped to account for the errors of in-situ snow depth for robust validation of the UAS snow depth maps.

Holly Proulx et al.

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on tc-2022-7', A.N. Arslan, 18 Mar 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jennifer Jacobs, 01 May 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on tc-2022-7', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Mar 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jennifer Jacobs, 01 May 2022

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on tc-2022-7', A.N. Arslan, 18 Mar 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jennifer Jacobs, 01 May 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on tc-2022-7', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Mar 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jennifer Jacobs, 01 May 2022

Holly Proulx et al.

Holly Proulx et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 457 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
325 110 22 457 11 12
  • HTML: 325
  • PDF: 110
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 457
  • BibTeX: 11
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Feb 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Feb 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 431 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 431 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 May 2022
Download
Short summary
This study compares snow depth measurements from two manual instruments and an airborne platform in a field and forest. The manual instruments’ snow depths differed by 1 to 3 cm. The airborne measurements , which do not penetrate the leaf litter, were consistently shallower than either manual instrument. When combining airborne snow depth maps with manual density measurements, corrections may be required to create unbiased maps of snow properties.