Articles | Volume 15, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5639-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5639-2021
Research article
 | 
13 Dec 2021
Research article |  | 13 Dec 2021

Improving surface melt estimation over the Antarctic Ice Sheet using deep learning: a proof of concept over the Larsen Ice Shelf

Zhongyang Hu, Peter Kuipers Munneke, Stef Lhermitte, Maaike Izeboud, and Michiel van den Broeke

Related authors

Mass changes of the Antarctic Peninsula ice sheet and peripheral glaciers, 2007–2021
Maud Bernat, Etienne Berthier, Amaury Dehecq, Romain Hugonnet, Joaquin M. C. Belart, Naomi Ochwat, Peter Kuipers Munneke, Elizabeth Case, Ted Scambos, Louis-Marie Gauer, and David Youssefi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-729,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-729, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Diverging runoff drives uncertainty in Antarctic surface mass balance projections under a high emission scenario
Benjamin Heurgue, Charles Amory, Christoph Kittel, Fredrik Boberg, Gaël Durand, Vincent Favier, Xavier Fettweis, Quentin Glaude, Heiko Goelzer, Nicolaj Hansen, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Ruth Mottram, Martin Olesen, Willem Jan Van de Berg, Michiel R. Van den Broeke, and René R. Wijngaard
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-624,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-624, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Exploring new EarthCARE observations for evaluating Greenland clouds in the regional climate model RACMO2.4
Thirza N. Feenstra, Willem Jan van de Berg, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, David P. Donovan, Christiaan T. van Dalum, and Michiel R. van den Broeke
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 1323–1344, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1323-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1323-2026, 2026
Short summary
Impact of climate forcing time step on the modelled ice-sheet firn layer
Tesse E. A. van den Aker, Peter Kuipers Munneke, Willem Jan van de Berg, Walter W. Immerzeel, and Michiel R. van den Broeke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-462,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-462, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
On the accuracy of the measured and modelled surface latent and sensible heat flux in the interior of the Greenland Ice Sheet
Ida Haven, Hans Christian Steen-Larsen, Laura J. Dietrich, Sonja Wahl, Jason E. Box, Michiel R. van den Broeke, Alun Hubbard, Stephan T. Kral, Joachim Reuder, and Maurice van Tiggelen
The Cryosphere, 20, 573–593, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-573-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-573-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Arthur, J. F., Stokes, C., Jamieson, S. S., Carr, J. R., and Leeson, A. A.: Recent understanding of Antarctic supraglacial lakes using satellite remote sensing, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 44, 837–869, 2020. a
Bindschadler, R., Choi, H., Wichlacz, A., Bingham, R., Bohlander, J., Brunt, K., Corr, H., Drews, R., Fricker, H., Hall, M., Hindmarsh, R., Kohler, J., Padman, L., Rack, W., Rotschky, G., Urbini, S., Vornberger, P., and Young, N.: Getting around Antarctica: new high-resolution mappings of the grounded and freely-floating boundaries of the Antarctic ice sheet created for the International Polar Year, The Cryosphere, 5, 569–588, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-569-2011, 2011. a
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2001. a
Cape, M., Vernet, M., Skvarca, P., Marinsek, S., Scambos, T., and Domack, E.: Foehn winds link climate-driven warming to ice shelf evolution in Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 11–037, 2015. a
Chen, T. and Guestrin, C.: Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, in: Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 13–17 August 2016, San Francisco, California, USA, 785–794, 2016. a
Download
Short summary
Antarctica is shrinking, and part of the mass loss is caused by higher temperatures leading to more snowmelt. We use computer models to estimate the amount of melt, but this can be inaccurate – specifically in the areas with the most melt. This is because the model cannot account for small, darker areas like rocks or darker ice. Thus, we trained a computer using artificial intelligence and satellite images that showed these darker areas. The model computed an improved estimate of melt.
Share