Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-567-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-567-2023
Research article
 | 
08 Feb 2023
Research article |  | 08 Feb 2023

Landsat, MODIS, and VIIRS snow cover mapping algorithm performance as validated by airborne lidar datasets

Timbo Stillinger, Karl Rittger, Mark S. Raleigh, Alex Michell, Robert E. Davis, and Edward H. Bair

Related authors

How do tradeoffs in satellite spatial and temporal resolution impact snow water equivalent reconstruction?
Edward H. Bair, Jeff Dozier, Karl Rittger, Timbo Stillinger, William Kleiber, and Robert E. Davis
The Cryosphere, 17, 2629–2643, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of E3SM land model snow simulations over the western United States
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Timbo Stillinger, Edward Bair, Yu Gu, and L. Ruby Leung
The Cryosphere, 17, 673–697, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023, 2023
Short summary
Improving snow albedo modeling in the E3SM land model (version 2.0) and assessing its impacts on snow and surface fluxes over the Tibetan Plateau
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Edward Bair, Cenlin He, Huilin Huang, Cheng Dang, Timbo Stillinger, Yu Gu, Hailong Wang, Yun Qian, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 75–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, 2023
Short summary
Divergence of apparent and intrinsic snow albedo over a season at a sub-alpine site with implications for remote sensing
Edward H. Bair, Jeff Dozier, Charles Stern, Adam LeWinter, Karl Rittger, Alexandria Savagian, Timbo Stillinger, and Robert E. Davis
The Cryosphere, 16, 1765–1778, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1765-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1765-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Snow | Subject: Remote Sensing
Improved snow property retrievals by solving for topography in the inversion of at-sensor radiance measurements
Brenton A. Wilder, Joachim Meyer, Josh Enterkine, and Nancy F. Glenn
The Cryosphere, 18, 5015–5029, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5015-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5015-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simulation of Arctic snow microwave emission in surface-sensitive atmosphere channels
Melody Sandells, Nick Rutter, Kirsty Wivell, Richard Essery, Stuart Fox, Chawn Harlow, Ghislain Picard, Alexandre Roy, Alain Royer, and Peter Toose
The Cryosphere, 18, 3971–3990, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3971-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3971-2024, 2024
Short summary
Retrieval of snow and soil properties for forward radiative transfer modeling of airborne Ku-band SAR to estimate snow water equivalent: the Trail Valley Creek 2018/19 snow experiment
Benoit Montpetit, Joshua King, Julien Meloche, Chris Derksen, Paul Siqueira, J. Max Adam, Peter Toose, Mike Brady, Anna Wendleder, Vincent Vionnet, and Nicolas R. Leroux
The Cryosphere, 18, 3857–3874, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3857-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3857-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating L-band InSAR snow water equivalent retrievals with repeat ground-penetrating radar and terrestrial lidar surveys in northern Colorado
Randall Bonnell, Daniel McGrath, Jack Tarricone, Hans-Peter Marshall, Ella Bump, Caroline Duncan, Stephanie Kampf, Yunling Lou, Alex Olsen-Mikitowicz, Megan Sears, Keith Williams, Lucas Zeller, and Yang Zheng
The Cryosphere, 18, 3765–3785, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3765-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3765-2024, 2024
Short summary
Reanalyzing the spatial representativeness of snow depth at automated monitoring stations using airborne lidar data
Jordan N. Herbert, Mark S. Raleigh, and Eric E. Small
The Cryosphere, 18, 3495–3512, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3495-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aalstad, K., Westermann, S., and Bertino, L.: Evaluating satellite retrieved fractional snow-covered area at a high-Arctic site using terrestrial photography, Remote Sens. Environ., 239, 111618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111618, 2020. 
Adams, J. B., Smith, M. O., and Johnson, P. E.: Spectral Mixture Modeling – a New Analysis of Rock and Soil Types at the Viking Lander-1 Site, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 91, 8098–8112, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB08p08098, 1986. 
Armstrong, R. L., Rittger, K., Brodzik, M. J., Racoviteanu, A., Barrett, A. P.,Singh Khalsa, S.-J., Raup, B., Hill, A. F., Khan, A. L., Wilson, A. M., Kayastha, R. B., Fetterer, F., and Armstrong, B.: Runoff from glacier ice and seasonal snow in High Asia: separating melt water sources in river flow, Reg. Environ. Change, 19, 1249–1261, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1429-0, 2018. 
Ault, T. W., Czajkowski, K. P., Benko, T., Coss, J., Struble, J., Spongberg, A., Templin, M., and Gross, C.: Validation of the MODIS snow product and cloud mask using student and NWS cooperative station observations in the Lower Great Lakes Region, Remote Sens. Environ., 105, 341–353, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.004, 2006. 
Bair, E. and Stillinger, T.: SPIReS: Western USA snow cover and snow surface properties, water years 2001–2021, UCSB [data set], https://doi.org/10.21424/R4H05T, 2022. 
Download
Short summary
Understanding global snow cover is critical for comprehending climate change and its impacts on the lives of billions of people. Satellites are the best way to monitor global snow cover, yet snow varies at a finer spatial resolution than most satellite images. We assessed subpixel snow mapping methods across a spectrum of conditions using airborne lidar. Spectral-unmixing methods outperformed older operational methods and are ready to to advance snow cover mapping at the global scale.