Articles | Volume 18, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3495-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3495-2024
Research article
 | 
08 Aug 2024
Research article |  | 08 Aug 2024

Reanalyzing the spatial representativeness of snow depth at automated monitoring stations using airborne lidar data

Jordan N. Herbert, Mark S. Raleigh, and Eric E. Small

Related authors

Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA
Tate G. Meehan, Ahmad Hojatimalekshah, Hans-Peter Marshall, Elias J. Deeb, Shad O'Neel, Daniel McGrath, Ryan W. Webb, Randall Bonnell, Mark S. Raleigh, Christopher Hiemstra, and Kelly Elder
The Cryosphere, 18, 3253–3276, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024, 2024
Short summary
Canopy structure modulates the sensitivity of subalpine forest stands to interannual snowpack and precipitation variability
Max Berkelhammer, Gerald F. Page, Frank Zurek, Christopher Still, Mariah S. Carbone, William Talavera, Laura Hildebrand, James Byron, Kyle Inthabandith, Angellica Kucinski, Melissa Carter, Kelsey Foss, Wendy Brown, Rosemary W. H. Carroll, Austin Simonpietri, Marshall Worsham, Ian Breckheimer, Anna Ryken, Reed Maxwell, David Gochis, Mark Raleigh, Eric Small, and Kenneth H. Williams
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3063,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3063, 2024
Short summary
Landsat, MODIS, and VIIRS snow cover mapping algorithm performance as validated by airborne lidar datasets
Timbo Stillinger, Karl Rittger, Mark S. Raleigh, Alex Michell, Robert E. Davis, and Edward H. Bair
The Cryosphere, 17, 567–590, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-567-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-567-2023, 2023
Short summary
Controls on surface soil drying rates observed by SMAP and simulated by the Noah land surface model
Peter J. Shellito, Eric E. Small, and Ben Livneh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1649–1663, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1649-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1649-2018, 2018
Short summary
Modeling bulk density and snow water equivalent using daily snow depth observations
J. L. McCreight and E. E. Small
The Cryosphere, 8, 521–536, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-521-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-521-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Discipline: Snow | Subject: Remote Sensing
Improved snow property retrievals by solving for topography in the inversion of at-sensor radiance measurements
Brenton A. Wilder, Joachim Meyer, Josh Enterkine, and Nancy F. Glenn
The Cryosphere, 18, 5015–5029, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5015-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5015-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simulation of Arctic snow microwave emission in surface-sensitive atmosphere channels
Melody Sandells, Nick Rutter, Kirsty Wivell, Richard Essery, Stuart Fox, Chawn Harlow, Ghislain Picard, Alexandre Roy, Alain Royer, and Peter Toose
The Cryosphere, 18, 3971–3990, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3971-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3971-2024, 2024
Short summary
Retrieval of snow and soil properties for forward radiative transfer modeling of airborne Ku-band SAR to estimate snow water equivalent: the Trail Valley Creek 2018/19 snow experiment
Benoit Montpetit, Joshua King, Julien Meloche, Chris Derksen, Paul Siqueira, J. Max Adam, Peter Toose, Mike Brady, Anna Wendleder, Vincent Vionnet, and Nicolas R. Leroux
The Cryosphere, 18, 3857–3874, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3857-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3857-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating L-band InSAR snow water equivalent retrievals with repeat ground-penetrating radar and terrestrial lidar surveys in northern Colorado
Randall Bonnell, Daniel McGrath, Jack Tarricone, Hans-Peter Marshall, Ella Bump, Caroline Duncan, Stephanie Kampf, Yunling Lou, Alex Olsen-Mikitowicz, Megan Sears, Keith Williams, Lucas Zeller, and Yang Zheng
The Cryosphere, 18, 3765–3785, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3765-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3765-2024, 2024
Short summary
Tower-based C-band radar measurements of an alpine snowpack
Isis Brangers, Hans-Peter Marshall, Gabrielle De Lannoy, Devon Dunmire, Christian Mätzler, and Hans Lievens
The Cryosphere, 18, 3177–3193, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3177-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3177-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, B. T., McNamara, J. P., Marshall, H.-P., and Flores, A. N.: Insights into the physical processes controlling correlations between snow distribution and terrain properties, Water Resour. Res., 50, 4545–4563, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013714, 2014. 
Barrett, A. P.: National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center SNOw Data Assimilation System (SNODAS) Products at NSIDC, NSIDC Special Report 11, Boulder, CO, USA, National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2003. 
Blankinship, J. C., Meadows, M. W., Lucas, R. G., and Hart, S. C.: Snowmelt timing alters shallow but not deep soil moisture in the Sierra Nevada, Water Resour. Res., 50, 1448–1456, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014541, 2014. 
Blöschl, G.: Scaling issues in snow hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 13, 2149–2175, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199910)13:14/15<2149::AID-HYP847>3.0.CO;2-8, 1999. 
Bonnell, R., McGrath, D., Hedrick, A. R., Trujillo, E., Meehan, T. G., Williams, K., Marshall, H.-P., Sexstone, G., Fulton, J., Ronayne, M. J., Fassnacht, S. R., Webb, R. W., and Hale, K. E.: Snowpack relative permittivity and density derived from near-coincident lidar and ground-penetrating radar, Hydrol. Process., 37, e14996, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14996, 2023. 
Download
Short summary
Automated stations measure snow properties at a single point but are frequently used to validate data that represent much larger areas. We use lidar snow depth data to see how often the mean snow depth surrounding a snow station is within 10 cm of the snow station depth at different scales. We found snow stations overrepresent the area-mean snow depth in ~ 50 % of cases, but the direction of bias at a site is temporally consistent, suggesting a site could be calibrated to the surrounding area.