Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1007-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1007-2022
Research article
 | 
15 Mar 2022
Research article |  | 15 Mar 2022

Evaluation of Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent in CMIP6 models during 1982–2014

Kerttu Kouki, Petri Räisänen, Kari Luojus, Anna Luomaranta, and Aku Riihelä

Related authors

Detecting snowfall events over the Arctic using optical and microwave satellite measurements
Emmihenna Jääskeläinen, Kerttu Kouki, and Aku Riihelä
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3855–3870, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3855-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of snow cover properties in ERA5 and ERA5-Land with several satellite-based datasets in the Northern Hemisphere in spring 1982–2018
Kerttu Kouki, Kari Luojus, and Aku Riihelä
The Cryosphere, 17, 5007–5026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5007-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5007-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Snow | Subject: Seasonal Snow
Benchmarking of snow water equivalent (SWE) products based on outcomes of the SnowPEx+ Intercomparison Project
Lawrence Mudryk, Colleen Mortimer, Chris Derksen, Aleksandra Elias Chereque, and Paul Kushner
The Cryosphere, 19, 201–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-201-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-201-2025, 2025
Short summary
Snow depth sensitivity to mean temperature, precipitation, and elevation in the Austrian and Swiss Alps
Matthew Switanek, Gernot Resch, Andreas Gobiet, Daniel Günther, Christoph Marty, and Wolfgang Schöner
The Cryosphere, 18, 6005–6026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-6005-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-6005-2024, 2024
Short summary
Use of multiple reference data sources to cross-validate gridded snow water equivalent products over North America
Colleen Mortimer, Lawrence Mudryk, Eunsang Cho, Chris Derksen, Mike Brady, and Carrie Vuyovich
The Cryosphere, 18, 5619–5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterization of non-Gaussianity in the snow distributions of various landscapes
Noriaki Ohara, Andrew D. Parsekian, Benjamin M. Jones, Rodrigo C. Rangel, Kenneth M. Hinkel, and Rui A. P. Perdigão
The Cryosphere, 18, 5139–5152, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5139-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5139-2024, 2024
Short summary
A simple snow temperature index model exposes discrepancies between reanalysis snow water equivalent products
Aleksandra Elias Chereque, Paul J. Kushner, Lawrence Mudryk, Chris Derksen, and Colleen Mortimer
The Cryosphere, 18, 4955–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4955-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4955-2024, 2024
Short summary
Download
Short summary
We analyze state-of-the-art climate models’ ability to describe snow mass and whether biases in modeled temperature or precipitation can explain the discrepancies in snow mass. In winter, biases in precipitation are the main factor affecting snow mass, while in spring, biases in temperature becomes more important, which is an expected result. However, temperature or precipitation cannot explain all snow mass discrepancies. Other factors, such as models’ structural errors, are also significant.