The Cryosphere
The Cryosphere
TC
Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1007-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1007-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
Research article
 | 
15 Mar 2022
Research article |  | 15 Mar 2022

Evaluation of Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent in CMIP6 models during 1982–2014

Kerttu Kouki, Petri Räisänen, Kari Luojus, Anna Luomaranta, and Aku Riihelä

Viewed

Total article views: 4,529 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,085 1,337 107 4,529 351 111 148
  • HTML: 3,085
  • PDF: 1,337
  • XML: 107
  • Total: 4,529
  • Supplement: 351
  • BibTeX: 111
  • EndNote: 148
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jul 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jul 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,529 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,395 with geography defined and 134 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 07 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
We analyze state-of-the-art climate models’ ability to describe snow mass and whether biases in modeled temperature or precipitation can explain the discrepancies in snow mass. In winter, biases in precipitation are the main factor affecting snow mass, while in spring, biases in temperature becomes more important, which is an expected result. However, temperature or precipitation cannot explain all snow mass discrepancies. Other factors, such as models’ structural errors, are also significant.
Read more
Share