Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2161-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2161-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
30 Apr 2024
Research article |
| 30 Apr 2024
| 30 Apr 2024
Improving short-term sea ice concentration forecasts using deep learning
Development Centre for Weather Forecasting, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Thomas Lavergne
Research and Development Department, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Jozef Rusin
Research and Development Department, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Arne Melsom
Research and Development Department, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Julien Brajard
Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway
Are Frode Kvanum
Development Centre for Weather Forecasting, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Section for Meteorology and Oceanography, Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Atle Macdonald Sørensen
Research and Development Department, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Laurent Bertino
Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway
Malte Müller
Development Centre for Weather Forecasting, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Section for Meteorology and Oceanography, Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Related authors
Cyril Palerme, Johannes Röhrs, Thomas Lavergne, Jozef Rusin, Are Frode Kvanum, Atle Macdonald Sørensen, Arne Melsom, Julien Brajard, Martina Idžanović, Marina Durán Moro, and Malte Müller
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2001, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2001, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
We present MET-AICE, a sea ice prediction system based on artificial intelligence techniques that has been running operationally since March 2024. The forecasts are produced daily and provide sea ice concentration predictions for the next 10 days. We evaluate the MET-AICE forecasts from the first year of operation, and we compare them to forecasts produced by a physically-based model (Barents-2.5km). We show that MET-AICE is skillful and provides more accurate forecasts than Barents-2.5km.
Cyril Palerme and Malte Müller
The Cryosphere, 15, 3989–4004, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3989-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3989-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Methods have been developed for calibrating sea ice drift forecasts from an operational prediction system using machine learning algorithms. These algorithms use predictors from sea ice concentration observations during the initialization of the forecasts, sea ice and wind forecasts, and some geographical information. Depending on the calibration method, the mean absolute error is reduced between 3.3 % and 8.0 % for the direction and between 2.5 % and 7.1 % for the speed of sea ice drift.
Zikang He, Yiguo Wang, Julien Brajard, Xidong Wang, and Zheqi Shen
The Cryosphere, 19, 3279–3293, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3279-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3279-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Declining Arctic sea ice presents both risks and opportunities for ecosystems, communities, and economic activities. To address prediction errors in dynamical models, we apply machine learning for error correction during prediction (online) or post-processing (offline). Our results show that both methods enhance sea ice predictions, particularly from September to January, with offline corrections outperforming online corrections.
Matthew J. Martin, Ibrahim Hoteit, Laurent Bertino, and Andrew M. Moore
State Planet, 5-opsr, 9, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-5-opsr-9-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-5-opsr-9-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Observations of the ocean from satellites and platforms in the ocean are combined with information from computer models to produce predictions of how the ocean temperature, salinity, and currents will evolve over the coming days and weeks and to describe how the ocean has evolved in the past. This paper summarises the methods used to produce these ocean forecasts at various centres around the world and outlines the practical considerations for implementing such forecasting systems.
Laurent Bertino, Patrick Heimbach, Ed Blockley, and Einar Ólason
State Planet, 5-opsr, 14, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-5-opsr-14-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-5-opsr-14-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasts of sea ice are in high demand in the polar regions, and they are also quickly improving and becoming more easily accessible to non-experts. We provide here a brief status of the short-term forecasting services – typically 10 d ahead – and an outlook of their upcoming developments.
Cyril Palerme, Johannes Röhrs, Thomas Lavergne, Jozef Rusin, Are Frode Kvanum, Atle Macdonald Sørensen, Arne Melsom, Julien Brajard, Martina Idžanović, Marina Durán Moro, and Malte Müller
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2001, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2001, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
We present MET-AICE, a sea ice prediction system based on artificial intelligence techniques that has been running operationally since March 2024. The forecasts are produced daily and provide sea ice concentration predictions for the next 10 days. We evaluate the MET-AICE forecasts from the first year of operation, and we compare them to forecasts produced by a physically-based model (Barents-2.5km). We show that MET-AICE is skillful and provides more accurate forecasts than Barents-2.5km.
Åsmund Bakketun, Jostein Blyverket, and Malte Müller
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1693, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1693, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
Obtaining accurate estimates of seasonal snow conditions requires a combination of observations and numerical models. We use a model accounting for the vertical structure of the snow, and a data assimilation method representing varying uncertainty of the model in time and space. Compared to existing products, neglecting these considerations, our system produced improved estimates of seasonal snow conditions. Snow mass estimates suggest a potential impact on derived hydrological applications.
Léo Edel, Jiping Xie, Anton Korosov, Julien Brajard, and Laurent Bertino
The Cryosphere, 19, 731–752, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-731-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-731-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study developed a new method to estimate Arctic sea ice thickness from 1992 to 2010 using a combination of machine learning and data assimilation. By training a machine learning model on data from 2011 to 2022, past errors in sea ice thickness can be corrected, leading to improved estimations. This approach provides insights into historical changes in sea ice thickness, showing a notable decline from 1992 to 2022, and offers a valuable resource for future studies.
Charlotte Durand, Tobias Sebastian Finn, Alban Farchi, Marc Bocquet, Julien Brajard, and Laurent Bertino
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4028, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4028, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a four-dimensional variational data assimilation system based on a neural network emulator for sea-ice thickness, learned from neXtSIM simulation outputs. Testing with simulated and real observation retrievals, the system improves forecasts and bias error, performing comparably to operational methods, demonstrating the promise of sea-ice data-driven data assimilation systems.
Zikang He, Julien Brajard, Yiguo Wang, Xidong Wang, and Zheqi Shen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-212, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-212, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate prediction is challenging due to systematic errors in traditional climate models. We addressed this by training a machine learning model to correct these errors and then integrating it with the traditional climate model to form an AI-physics hybrid model. Our study demonstrates that the hybrid model outperforms the original climate model on both short-term and long-term predictions of the atmosphere and ocean.
Robert Ricker, Thomas Lavergne, Stefan Hendricks, Stephan Paul, Emily Down, Mari Anne Killie, and Marion Bocquet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-359, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-359, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new method to map Arctic sea ice thickness daily using satellite measurements. We address a problem similar to motion blur in photography. Traditional methods collect satellite data over one month to get a full picture of Arctic sea ice thickness. But like in photos of moving objects, long exposure leads to motion blur, making it difficult to identify certain features in the sea ice maps. Our method corrects for this motion blur, providing a sharper view of the evolving sea ice.
Georges Baaklini, Julien Brajard, Leila Issa, Gina Fifani, Laurent Mortier, and Roy El Hourany
Ocean Sci., 20, 1707–1720, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1707-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1707-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding the flow of the Levantine Sea surface current is not straightforward. We propose a study based on learning techniques to follow interactions between water near the shore and further out at sea. Our results show changes in the coastal currents past 33.8° E, with frequent instances of water breaking away along the Lebanese coast. These events happen quickly and sometimes lead to long-lasting eddies. This study underscores the need for direct observations to improve our knowledge.
Alexander Barth, Julien Brajard, Aida Alvera-Azcárate, Bayoumy Mohamed, Charles Troupin, and Jean-Marie Beckers
Ocean Sci., 20, 1567–1584, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1567-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1567-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Most satellite observations have gaps, for example, due to clouds. This paper presents a method to reconstruct missing data in satellite observations of the chlorophyll a concentration in the Black Sea. Rather than giving a single possible reconstructed field, the discussed method provides an ensemble of possible reconstructions using a generative neural network. The resulting ensemble is validated using techniques from numerical weather prediction and ocean modelling.
Jean Rabault, Trygve Halsne, Ana Carrasco, Anton Korosov, Joey Voermans, Patrik Bohlinger, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Malte Müller, Øyvind Breivik, Takehiko Nose, Gaute Hope, Fabrice Collard, Sylvain Herlédan, Tsubasa Kodaira, Nick Hughes, Qin Zhang, Kai Haakon Christensen, Alexander Babanin, Lars Willas Dreyer, Cyril Palerme, Lotfi Aouf, Konstantinos Christakos, Atle Jensen, Johannes Röhrs, Aleksey Marchenko, Graig Sutherland, Trygve Kvåle Løken, and Takuji Waseda
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.07619, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.07619, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We observe strongly modulated waves-in-ice significant wave height using buoys deployed East of Svalbard. We show that these observations likely cannot be explained by wave-current interaction or tide-induced modulation alone. We also demonstrate a strong correlation between the waves height modulation, and the rate of sea ice convergence. Therefore, our data suggest that the rate of sea ice convergence and divergence may modulate wave in ice energy dissipation.
Simon Driscoll, Alberto Carrassi, Julien Brajard, Laurent Bertino, Einar Ólason, Marc Bocquet, and Amos Lawless
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2476, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2476, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The formation and evolution of sea ice melt ponds (ponds of melted water) are complex, insufficiently understood and represented in models with considerable uncertainty. These uncertain representations are not traditionally included in climate models potentially causing the known underestimation of sea ice loss in climate models. Our work creates the first observationally based machine learning model of melt ponds that is also a ready and viable candidate to be included in climate models.
Karina von Schuckmann, Lorena Moreira, Mathilde Cancet, Flora Gues, Emmanuelle Autret, Jonathan Baker, Clément Bricaud, Romain Bourdalle-Badie, Lluis Castrillo, Lijing Cheng, Frederic Chevallier, Daniele Ciani, Alvaro de Pascual-Collar, Vincenzo De Toma, Marie Drevillon, Claudia Fanelli, Gilles Garric, Marion Gehlen, Rianne Giesen, Kevin Hodges, Doroteaciro Iovino, Simon Jandt-Scheelke, Eric Jansen, Melanie Juza, Ioanna Karagali, Thomas Lavergne, Simona Masina, Ronan McAdam, Audrey Minière, Helen Morrison, Tabea Rebekka Panteleit, Andrea Pisano, Marie-Isabelle Pujol, Ad Stoffelen, Sulian Thual, Simon Van Gennip, Pierre Veillard, Chunxue Yang, and Hao Zuo
State Planet, 4-osr8, 1, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-4-osr8-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-4-osr8-1-2024, 2024
Andreas Wernecke, Dirk Notz, Stefan Kern, and Thomas Lavergne
The Cryosphere, 18, 2473–2486, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2473-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2473-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The total Arctic sea-ice area (SIA), which is an important climate indicator, is routinely monitored with the help of satellite measurements. Uncertainties in observations of sea-ice concentration (SIC) partly cancel out when summed up to the total SIA, but the degree to which this is happening has been unclear. Here we find that the uncertainty daily SIA estimates, based on uncertainties in SIC, are about 300 000 km2. The 2002 to 2017 September decline in SIA is approx. 105 000 ± 9000 km2 a−1.
Yumeng Chen, Polly Smith, Alberto Carrassi, Ivo Pasmans, Laurent Bertino, Marc Bocquet, Tobias Sebastian Finn, Pierre Rampal, and Véronique Dansereau
The Cryosphere, 18, 2381–2406, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2381-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2381-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We explore multivariate state and parameter estimation using a data assimilation approach through idealised simulations in a dynamics-only sea-ice model based on novel rheology. We identify various potential issues that can arise in complex operational sea-ice models when model parameters are estimated. Even though further investigation will be needed for such complex sea-ice models, we show possibilities of improving the observed and the unobserved model state forecast and parameter accuracy.
Marina Durán Moro, Ann Kristin Sperrevik, Thomas Lavergne, Laurent Bertino, Yvonne Gusdal, Silje Christine Iversen, and Jozef Rusin
The Cryosphere, 18, 1597–1619, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1597-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1597-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Individual satellite passes instead of daily means of sea ice concentration are used to correct the sea ice model forecast in the Barents Sea. The use of passes provides a significantly larger improvement of the forecasts even after a 7 d period due to the more precise information on temporal and spatial variability contained in the passes. One major advantage of the use of satellite passes is that there is no need to wait for the daily mean availability in order to update the forecast.
Are Frode Kvanum, Cyril Palerme, Malte Müller, Jean Rabault, and Nick Hughes
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3107, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3107, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recent studies have shown that machine learning models are effective at predicting sea ice concentration, yet few have explored the development of such models in an operational context. In this study, we present the development of a machine learning forecasting system which can predict sea ice concentration at 1 km resolution, up to 3 days ahead using real time operational data. The developed forecasts predict the sea ice edge position with a better accuracy than physical and baseline forecasts.
Thomas Lavergne and Emily Down
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5807–5834, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5807-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5807-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice in the Arctic and Antarctic can move several tens of kilometers per day due to wind and ocean currents. By analysing thousands of satellite images, we measured how sea ice has been moving every single day from 1991 through to 2020. We compare our data to how buoys attached to the ice moved and find good agreement. Other scientists will now use our data to better understand if climate change has modified the way sea ice moves and in what way.
Stefania A. Ciliberti, Enrique Alvarez Fanjul, Jay Pearlman, Kirsten Wilmer-Becker, Pierre Bahurel, Fabrice Ardhuin, Alain Arnaud, Mike Bell, Segolene Berthou, Laurent Bertino, Arthur Capet, Eric Chassignet, Stefano Ciavatta, Mauro Cirano, Emanuela Clementi, Gianpiero Cossarini, Gianpaolo Coro, Stuart Corney, Fraser Davidson, Marie Drevillon, Yann Drillet, Renaud Dussurget, Ghada El Serafy, Katja Fennel, Marcos Garcia Sotillo, Patrick Heimbach, Fabrice Hernandez, Patrick Hogan, Ibrahim Hoteit, Sudheer Joseph, Simon Josey, Pierre-Yves Le Traon, Simone Libralato, Marco Mancini, Pascal Matte, Angelique Melet, Yasumasa Miyazawa, Andrew M. Moore, Antonio Novellino, Andrew Porter, Heather Regan, Laia Romero, Andreas Schiller, John Siddorn, Joanna Staneva, Cecile Thomas-Courcoux, Marina Tonani, Jose Maria Garcia-Valdecasas, Jennifer Veitch, Karina von Schuckmann, Liying Wan, John Wilkin, and Romane Zufic
State Planet, 1-osr7, 2, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-1-osr7-2-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-1-osr7-2-2023, 2023
Johannes Röhrs, Yvonne Gusdal, Edel S. U. Rikardsen, Marina Durán Moro, Jostein Brændshøi, Nils Melsom Kristensen, Sindre Fritzner, Keguang Wang, Ann Kristin Sperrevik, Martina Idžanović, Thomas Lavergne, Jens Boldingh Debernard, and Kai H. Christensen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5401–5426, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5401-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5401-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A model to predict ocean currents, temperature, and sea ice is presented, covering the Barents Sea and northern Norway. To quantify forecast uncertainties, the model calculates ensemble forecasts with 24 realizations of ocean and ice conditions. Observations from satellites, buoys, and ships are ingested by the model. The model forecasts are compared with observations, and we show that the ocean model has skill in predicting sea surface temperatures.
Sukun Cheng, Yumeng Chen, Ali Aydoğdu, Laurent Bertino, Alberto Carrassi, Pierre Rampal, and Christopher K. R. T. Jones
The Cryosphere, 17, 1735–1754, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1735-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1735-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work studies a novel application of combining a Lagrangian sea ice model, neXtSIM, and data assimilation. It uses a deterministic ensemble Kalman filter to incorporate satellite-observed ice concentration and thickness in simulations. The neXtSIM Lagrangian nature is handled using a remapping strategy on a common homogeneous mesh. The ensemble is formed by perturbing air–ocean boundary conditions and ice cohesion. Thanks to data assimilation, winter Arctic sea ice forecasting is enhanced.
Karina von Schuckmann, Audrey Minière, Flora Gues, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Gottfried Kirchengast, Susheel Adusumilli, Fiammetta Straneo, Michaël Ablain, Richard P. Allan, Paul M. Barker, Hugo Beltrami, Alejandro Blazquez, Tim Boyer, Lijing Cheng, John Church, Damien Desbruyeres, Han Dolman, Catia M. Domingues, Almudena García-García, Donata Giglio, John E. Gilson, Maximilian Gorfer, Leopold Haimberger, Maria Z. Hakuba, Stefan Hendricks, Shigeki Hosoda, Gregory C. Johnson, Rachel Killick, Brian King, Nicolas Kolodziejczyk, Anton Korosov, Gerhard Krinner, Mikael Kuusela, Felix W. Landerer, Moritz Langer, Thomas Lavergne, Isobel Lawrence, Yuehua Li, John Lyman, Florence Marti, Ben Marzeion, Michael Mayer, Andrew H. MacDougall, Trevor McDougall, Didier Paolo Monselesan, Jan Nitzbon, Inès Otosaka, Jian Peng, Sarah Purkey, Dean Roemmich, Kanako Sato, Katsunari Sato, Abhishek Savita, Axel Schweiger, Andrew Shepherd, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Leon Simons, Donald A. Slater, Thomas Slater, Andrea K. Steiner, Toshio Suga, Tanguy Szekely, Wim Thiery, Mary-Louise Timmermans, Inne Vanderkelen, Susan E. Wjiffels, Tonghua Wu, and Michael Zemp
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1675–1709, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Earth's climate is out of energy balance, and this study quantifies how much heat has consequently accumulated over the past decades (ocean: 89 %, land: 6 %, cryosphere: 4 %, atmosphere: 1 %). Since 1971, this accumulated heat reached record values at an increasing pace. The Earth heat inventory provides a comprehensive view on the status and expectation of global warming, and we call for an implementation of this global climate indicator into the Paris Agreement’s Global Stocktake.
Jiping Xie, Roshin P. Raj, Laurent Bertino, Justino Martínez, Carolina Gabarró, and Rafael Catany
Ocean Sci., 19, 269–287, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-269-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-269-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice melt, together with other freshwater sources, has effects on the Arctic environment. Sea surface salinity (SSS) plays a key role in representing water mixing. Recently the satellite SSS from SMOS was developed in the Arctic region. In this study, we first evaluate the impact of assimilating these satellite data in an Arctic reanalysis system. It shows that SSS errors are reduced by 10–50 % depending on areas, encouraging its use in a long-time reanalysis to monitor the Arctic water cycle.
Georges Baaklini, Roy El Hourany, Milad Fakhri, Julien Brajard, Leila Issa, Gina Fifani, and Laurent Mortier
Ocean Sci., 18, 1491–1505, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1491-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1491-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We use machine learning to analyze the long-term variation of the surface currents in the Levantine Sea, located in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. We decompose the circulation into groups based on their physical characteristics and analyze their spatial and temporal variability. We show that most structures of the Levantine Sea are becoming more energetic over time, despite those of the western area remaining the most dominant due to their complex bathymetry and strong currents.
Fabio Mangini, Léon Chafik, Antonio Bonaduce, Laurent Bertino, and Jan Even Ø. Nilsen
Ocean Sci., 18, 331–359, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-331-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-331-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We validate the recent ALES-reprocessed coastal satellite altimetry dataset along the Norwegian coast between 2003 and 2018. We find that coastal altimetry and conventional altimetry products perform similarly along the Norwegian coast. However, the agreement with tide gauges slightly increases in terms of trends when we use the ALES coastal altimetry data. We then use the ALES dataset and hydrographic stations to explore the steric contribution to the Norwegian sea-level anomaly.
Justino Martínez, Carolina Gabarró, Antonio Turiel, Verónica González-Gambau, Marta Umbert, Nina Hoareau, Cristina González-Haro, Estrella Olmedo, Manuel Arias, Rafael Catany, Laurent Bertino, Roshin P. Raj, Jiping Xie, Roberto Sabia, and Diego Fernández
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 307–323, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-307-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-307-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Measuring salinity from space is challenging since the sensitivity of the brightness temperature to sea surface salinity is low, but the retrieval of SSS in cold waters is even more challenging. In 2019, the ESA launched a specific initiative called Arctic+Salinity to produce an enhanced Arctic SSS product with better quality and resolution than the available products. This paper presents the methodologies used to produce the new enhanced Arctic SMOS SSS product.
Stefan Kern, Thomas Lavergne, Leif Toudal Pedersen, Rasmus Tage Tonboe, Louisa Bell, Maybritt Meyer, and Luise Zeigermann
The Cryosphere, 16, 349–378, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-349-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-349-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution clear-sky optical satellite imagery has rarely been used to evaluate satellite passive microwave sea-ice concentration products beyond case-study level. By comparing 10 such products with sea-ice concentration estimated from > 350 such optical images in both hemispheres, we expand results of earlier evaluation studies for these products. Results stress the need to look beyond precision and accuracy and to discuss the evaluation data’s quality and filters applied in the products.
Cyril Palerme and Malte Müller
The Cryosphere, 15, 3989–4004, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3989-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3989-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Methods have been developed for calibrating sea ice drift forecasts from an operational prediction system using machine learning algorithms. These algorithms use predictors from sea ice concentration observations during the initialization of the forecasts, sea ice and wind forecasts, and some geographical information. Depending on the calibration method, the mean absolute error is reduced between 3.3 % and 8.0 % for the direction and between 2.5 % and 7.1 % for the speed of sea ice drift.
Amy Solomon, Céline Heuzé, Benjamin Rabe, Sheldon Bacon, Laurent Bertino, Patrick Heimbach, Jun Inoue, Doroteaciro Iovino, Ruth Mottram, Xiangdong Zhang, Yevgeny Aksenov, Ronan McAdam, An Nguyen, Roshin P. Raj, and Han Tang
Ocean Sci., 17, 1081–1102, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1081-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1081-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Freshwater in the Arctic Ocean plays a critical role in the global climate system by impacting ocean circulations, stratification, mixing, and emergent regimes. In this review paper we assess how Arctic Ocean freshwater changed in the 2010s relative to the 2000s. Estimates from observations and reanalyses show a qualitative stabilization in the 2010s due to a compensation between a freshening of the Beaufort Gyre and a reduction in freshwater in the Amerasian and Eurasian basins.
Arne Melsom
The Cryosphere, 15, 3785–3796, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3785-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3785-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents new methods to assess how well observations of sea ice expansion are reproduced by results from models. The aim is to provide information about the quality of forecasts for changes in the sea ice extent to operators in or near ice-infested waters. A test using 2 years of model results demonstrates the practical applicability and usefulness of the methods that are presented.
Thomas Lavergne, Montserrat Piñol Solé, Emily Down, and Craig Donlon
The Cryosphere, 15, 3681–3698, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3681-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3681-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Pushed by winds and ocean currents, polar sea ice is on the move. We use passive microwave satellites to observe this motion. The images from their orbits are often put together into daily images before motion is measured. In our study, we measure motion from the individual orbits directly and not from the daily images. We obtain many more motion vectors, and they are more accurate. This can be used for current and future satellites, e.g. the Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer (CIMR).
Sourav Chatterjee, Roshin P. Raj, Laurent Bertino, Sebastian H. Mernild, Meethale Puthukkottu Subeesh, Nuncio Murukesh, and Muthalagu Ravichandran
The Cryosphere, 15, 1307–1319, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1307-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1307-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice in the Greenland Sea (GS) is important for its climatic (fresh water), economical (shipping), and ecological contribution (light availability). The study proposes a mechanism through which sea ice concentration in GS is partly governed by the atmospheric and ocean circulation in the region. The mechanism proposed in this study can be useful for assessing the sea ice variability and its future projection in the GS.
Cited articles
Andersson, T. R., Hosking, J. S., Pérez-Ortiz, M., Paige, B., Elliott, A., Russell, C., Law, S., Jones, D. C., Wilkinson, J., Phillips, T., Byrne, J., Tietsche, S., Sarojini, B. B., Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., Aksenov, Y., Downie, R., and Shuckburgh, E.: Seasonal Arctic sea ice forecasting with probabilistic deep learning, Nat. Commun., 12, 5124, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25257-4, 2021. a, b, c, d, e
Barton, N., Metzger, E. J., Reynolds, C. A., Ruston, B., Rowley, C., Smedstad, O. M., Ridout, J. A., Wallcraft, A., Frolov, S., Hogan, P., Janiga, M. A., Shriver, J. F., McLay, J., Thoppil, P., Huang, A., Crawford, W., Whitcomb, T., Bishop, C. H., Zamudio, L., and Phelps, M.: The Navy's Earth System Prediction Capability: A New Global Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean-Sea Ice Prediction System Designed for Daily to Subseasonal Forecasting, Earth Space Sci., 8, e2020EA001199, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001199, 2021. a
Bleck, R.: An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid isopycnic-Cartesian coordinates, Ocean Model., 4, 55–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(01)00012-9, 2002. a
Chassignet, E. P., Hurlburt, H. E., Smedstad, O. M., Halliwell, G. R., Hogan, P. J., Wallcraft, A. J., and Bleck, R.: Ocean Prediction with the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM), Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4028-8_16, pp. 413–426, 2006. a
Director, H. M., Raftery, A. E., and Bitz, C. M.: Probabilistic forecasting of the Arctic sea ice edge with contour modeling, Ann. Appl. Stat., 15, 711–726, https://doi.org/10.1214/20-AOAS1405, 2021. a
Dirkson, A., Merryfield, W. J., and Monahan, A. H.: Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasts of Arctic Sea Ice Concentration, J. Climate, 32, 1251–1271, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0224.1, 2019. a
Dirkson, A., Denis, B., Merryfield, W. J., Peterson, K. A., and Tietsche, S.: Calibration of subseasonal sea-ice forecasts using ensemble model output statistics and observational uncertainty, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 148, 2717–2741, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4332, 2022. a
Durán Moro, M., Sperrevik, A. K., Lavergne, T., Bertino, L., Gusdal, Y., Iversen, S. C., and Rusin, J.: Assimilation of satellite swaths versus daily means of sea ice concentration in a regional coupled ocean–sea ice model, The Cryosphere, 18, 1597–1619, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1597-2024, 2024. a
Fritzner, S., Graversen, R., and Christensen, K. H.: Assessment of High-Resolution Dynamical and Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Sea Ice Concentration in a Regional Application, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2020JC016277, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016277, 2020. a, b, c
Frnda, J., Durica, M., Rozhon, J., Vojtekova, M., Nedoma, J., and Martinek, R.: ECMWF short-term prediction accuracy improvement by deep learning, Sci. Rep.-UK, 12, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11936-9, 2022. a
Goessling, H. F., Tietsche, S., Day, J. J., Hawkins, E., and Jung, T.: Predictability of the Arctic sea ice edge, Geophy. Res. Lett., 43, 1642–1650, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067232, 2016. a, b
Grigoryev, T., Verezemskaya, P., Krinitskiy, M., Anikin, N., Gavrikov, A., Trofimov, I., Balabin, N., Shpilman, A., Eremchenko, A., Gulev, S., Burnaev, E., and Vanovskiy, V.: Data-Driven Short-Term Daily Operational Sea Ice Regional Forecasting, Remote Sens.-Basel, 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225837, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Gunnarsson, B.: Recent ship traffic and developing shipping trends on the Northern Sea Route—Policy implications for future arctic shipping, Mar. Policy, 124, 104369, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104369, 2021. a
Hackett, B., Bertino, L., Ali, A., Burud, A., and Williams, T.: Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) ARCTIC_ANALYSIS_FORECAST_PHYS_002_001_a Product [data set], https://data.marine.copernicus.eu/products/, last access: 25 April 2024. a
Haynes, K., Lagerquist, R., McGraw, M., Musgrave, K., and Ebert-Uphoff, I.: Creating and Evaluating Uncertainty Estimates with Neural Networks for Environmental-Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems, 2, 220061, https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-22-0061.1, 2023. a
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J.: Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification, in: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 7–13 December 2015, Santiago, Chile, 1026–1034, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1502.01852, 2015. a
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 770–778, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90, 2016. a, b
Hunke, E. C. and Dukowicz, J. K.: An Elastic–Viscous–Plastic Model for Sea Ice Dynamics, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 1849–1867, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027<1849:AEVPMF>2.0.CO;2, 1997. a
JCOMM Expert Team on sea ice: Sea ice information services of the world, Edition 2017, Tech. Rep. WMO-No 574, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1325, 2017. a, b
Johnson, S. J., Stockdale, T. N., Ferranti, L., Balmaseda, M. A., Molteni, F., Magnusson, L., Tietsche, S., Decremer, D., Weisheimer, A., Balsamo, G., Keeley, S. P. E., Mogensen, K., Zuo, H., and Monge-Sanz, B. M.: SEAS5: the new ECMWF seasonal forecast system, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1087–1117, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1087-2019, 2019. a
Keller, M. R., Piatko, C., Clemens-Sewall, M. V., Eager, R., Foster, K., Gifford, C., Rollend, D., and Sleeman, J.: Short-Term (7 Day) Beaufort Sea Ice Extent Forecasting with Deep Learning, Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems, 2, e220070, https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-22-0070.1, 2023. a, b, c, d
Kim, Y. J., Kim, H.-C., Han, D., Lee, S., and Im, J.: Prediction of monthly Arctic sea ice concentrations using satellite and reanalysis data based on convolutional neural networks, The Cryosphere, 14, 1083–1104, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1083-2020, 2020. a, b
Kvanum, A. F., Palerme, C., Müller, M., Rabault, J., and Hughes, N.: Developing a deep learning forecasting system for short-term and high-resolution prediction of sea ice concentration, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3107, 2024. a, b, c, d
Lavergne, T., Sørensen, A. M., Tonboe, R., and Pedersen, L. T.: CCI+ Sea Ice ECV Sea Ice Concentration Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Tech. rep., European Space Agency, https://climate.esa.int/media/documents/SeaIce_CCI_P1_ATBD-SIC_D2.1_Issue_3.1_signed.pdf (last access: 2 October 2023), 2021. a
Liu, Q., Zhang, R., Wang, Y., Yan, H., and Hong, M.: 0 Short-Term Daily Prediction of Sea Ice Concentration Based on Deep Learning of Gradient Loss Function, Front. Mar. Sci., 8, 736429, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.736429, 2021. a, b, c
Melsom, A., Palerme, C., and Müller, M.: Validation metrics for ice edge position forecasts, Ocean Sci., 15, 615–630, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-615-2019, 2019. a, b, c
Müller, M., Knol-Kauffman, M., Jeuring, J., and Palerme, C.: Arctic shipping trends during hazardous weather and sea-ice conditions and the Polar Code's effectiveness, npj Ocean Sustainability, 2, 12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-023-00021-x, 2023. a, b
Oktay, O., Schlemper, J., Folgoc, L. L., Lee, M., Heinrich, M., Misawa, K., Mori, K., McDonagh, S., Hammerla, N. Y., Kainz, B., Glocker, B., and Rueckert, D.: Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas, arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03999, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.03999, 2018. a
Palerme, C.: Code accompanying the article “Improving short-term sea ice concentration forecasts using deep learning”, Version 1.0.0, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11071206, 2024. a
Palerme, C. and Müller, M.: Calibration of sea ice drift forecasts using random forest algorithms, The Cryosphere, 15, 3989–4004, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3989-2021, 2021. a
Palerme, C., Müller, M., and Melsom, A.: An Intercomparison of Verification Scores for Evaluating the Sea Ice Edge Position in Seasonal Forecasts, Geophy. Res. Lett., 46, 4757–4763, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082482, 2019. a
Ponsoni, L., Ribergaard, M. H., Nielsen-Englyst, P., Wulf, T., Buus-Hinkler, J., Kreiner, M. B., and Rasmussen, T. A. S.: Greenlandic sea ice products with a focus on an updated operational forecast system, Front. Mar. Sci., 10, 979782, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.979782, 2023. a
Ren, Y., Li, X., and Zhang, W.: A Data-Driven Deep Learning Model for Weekly Sea Ice Concentration Prediction of the Pan-Arctic During the Melting Season, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 60, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3177600, 2022. a, b, c, d
Roberts, N., Ayliffe, B., Evans, G., Moseley, S., Rust, F., Sandford, C., Trzeciak, T., Abernethy, P., Beard, L., Crosswaite, N., Fitzpatrick, B., Flowerdew, J., Gale, T., Holly, L., Hopkinson, A., Hurst, K., Jackson, S., Jones, C., Mylne, K., Sampson, C., Sharpe, M., Wright, B., Backhouse, S., Baker, M., Brierley, D., Booton, A., Bysouth, C., Coulson, R., Coultas, S., Crocker, R., Harbord, R., Howard, K., Hughes, T., Mittermaier, M., Petch, J., Pillinger, T., Smart, V., Smith, E., and Worsfold, M.: IMPROVER: The New Probabilistic Postprocessing System at the Met Office, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 104, E680–E697, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0273.1, 2023. a
Röhrs, J., Gusdal, Y., Rikardsen, E. S. U., Durán Moro, M., Brændshøi, J., Kristensen, N. M., Fritzner, S., Wang, K., Sperrevik, A. K., Idžanović, M., Lavergne, T., Debernard, J. B., and Christensen, K. H.: Barents-2.5km v2.0: an operational data-assimilative coupled ocean and sea ice ensemble prediction model for the Barents Sea and Svalbard, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5401–5426, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5401-2023, 2023. a, b, c
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T.: U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, in: Proceedings of the 18th Int. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Munich, Germany, 2015, 234–241, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28, 2015. a, b, c, d, e
Rusin, J., Lavergne, T., Doulgeris, A. P., and Scott, K. A.: Resolution enhanced sea ice concentration: a new algorithm applied to AMSR2 microwave radiometry data, Ann. Glaciol., 65, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2024.6, 2024a. a
Rusin, J., Lavergne, T., and Sørensen, A.: Pan-Arctic Sea Ice Concentration from AMSR2 using a pansharpening algorithm, Version 1, Norwegian Meteorological Institute [data set], https://thredds.met.no/thredds/catalog/cosi/AMSR2_SIC/catalog.html, last accessed: 25 April 2024. a
Sakov, P., Counillon, F., Bertino, L., Lisæter, K. A., Oke, P. R., and Korablev, A.: TOPAZ4: an ocean-sea ice data assimilation system for the North Atlantic and Arctic, Ocean Sci., 8, 633–656, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-633-2012, 2012. a, b, c, d
Smith, G. C., Roy, F., Reszka, M., Surcel Colan, D., He, Z., Deacu, D., Belanger, J.-M., Skachko, S., Liu, Y., Dupont, F., Lemieux, J.-F., Beaudoin, C., Tranchant, B., Drévillon, M., Garric, G., Testut, C.-E., Lellouche, J.-M., Pellerin, P., Ritchie, H., Lu, Y., Davidson, F., Buehner, M., Caya, A., and Lajoie, M.: Sea ice forecast verification in the Canadian Global Ice Ocean Prediction System, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 659–671, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2555, 2016. a
Vannitsem, S., Bremnes, J. B., Demaeyer, J., Evans, G. R., Flowerdew, J., Hemri, S., Lerch, S., Roberts, N., Theis, S., Atencia, A., Bouallègue, Z. B., Bhend, J., Dabernig, M., Cruz, L. D., Hieta, L., Mestre, O., Moret, L., Plenković, I. O., Schmeits, M., Taillardat, M., den Bergh, J. V., Schaeybroeck, B. V., Whan, K., and Ylhaisi, J.: Statistical Postprocessing for Weather Forecasts: Review, Challenges, and Avenues in a Big Data World, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E681–E699, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0308.1, 2021. a
Veland, S., Wagner, P., Bailey, D., Everet, A., Goldstein, M., Hermann, R., Hjort-Larsen, T., Hovelsrud, G., Hughes, N., Kjøl, A., Li, X., Lynch, A., Müller, M., Olsen, J., Palerme, C., Pedersen, J., Rinaldo, Ø., Stephenson, S., and Storelvmo, T.: Knowledge needs in sea ice forecasting for navigation in Svalbard and the High Arctic, Svalbard Strategic Grant, Svalbard Science Forum, NF-rapport 4/2021, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11169.33129, 2021. a
von Schuckmann, K., Le Traon, P.-Y., Smith, N., Pascual, A., Djavidnia, S., Gattuso, J.-P., Grégoire, M., Aaboe, S., Alari, V., Alexander, B. E., Alonso-Martirena, A, Aydogdu, A., Azzopardi J., Bajo, M., Barbariol, F., Batistić, M., Behrens, A., Ben Ismail, S., Benetazzo, A., Bitetto, I., Borghini, M., Bray, L., Capet, A., Carlucci, R., Chatterjee, S., Chiggiato, J., Ciliberti, S., Cipriano, G., Clementi, E., Cochrane, P., Cossarini, G., D'Andrea, L., Davison, S., Down, E., Drago, A., Druon, J.-N., Engelhard, G., Federico, I., Garić, R., Gauci, A., Gerin, R., Geyer, G., Giesen, R., Good, S., Graham, R., Greiner, E., Gundersen, K., Hélaouët, P., Hendricks, S., Heymans, J. J., Holt, J., Hure, M., Juza, M., Kassis, D., Kellett, P., Knol-Kauffman, M., Kountouris, P., Kõuts, M., Lagemaa, P., Lavergne, T., Legeais, J.-F., Libralato, S., Lien, V. S., Lima, L., Lind, S., Liu, Y., Macías, D., Maljutenko, I., Mangin, A., Männik, A., Marinova, V., Martellucci, R., Masnadi, F., Mauri, E., Mayer, M., Menna, M., Meulders, C., Møgster, J. S., Monier, M., Mork, K. A., Müller, M., Nilsen, J. E. Ø., Notarstefano, G., Oviedo, J. L., Palerme, C., Palialexis, A., Panzeri, D., Pardo, S., Peneva, E., Pezzutto, P., Pirro, A., Platt, T., Poulain, P. M., Prieto, L., Querin, S., Rabenstein, L., Raj, R. P., Raudsepp, U., Reale, M., Renshaw, R., Ricchi, A., Ricker, R., Rikka, S., Ruiz, J., Russo, T., Sanchez, J., Santoleri, R., Sathyendranath, S., Scarcella, G., Schroeder, K., Sparnocchia, S., Spedicato, M. T., Stanev, E., Staneva, J., Stocker, A., Stoffelen, A., Teruzzi, A., Townhill, B., Uiboupin, R., Valcheva, N., Vandenbulcke, L., Vindenes, H., Vrgoč, N., Wakelin, S., and Zupa, W.: Copernicus marine service ocean state report, issue 5, J. Oper. Oceanogr., 14, 1–185, https://doi.org/10.1080/1755876X.2021.1946240, 2021. a
Wagner, P. M., Hughes, N., Bourbonnais, P., Stroeve, J., Rabenstein, L., Bhatt, U., Little, J., Wiggins, H., and Fleming, A.: Sea-ice information and forecast needs for industry maritime stakeholders, Polar Geography, 43, 160–187, https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2020.1766592, 2020. a, b, c, d
Wang, Q., Shao, Y., Song, Y., Schepen, A., Robertson, D. E., Ryu, D., and Pappenberger, F.: An evaluation of ECMWF SEAS5 seasonal climate forecasts for Australia using a new forecast calibration algorithm, Environ. Modell. Softw., 122, 104550, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104550, 2019. a
Williams, T., Korosov, A., Rampal, P., and Ólason, E.: Presentation and evaluation of the Arctic sea ice forecasting system neXtSIM-F, The Cryosphere, 15, 3207–3227, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3207-2021, 2021. a
Zhao, J., Shu, Q., Li, C., Wu, X., Song, Z., and Qiao, F.: The role of bias correction on subseasonal prediction of Arctic sea ice during summer 2018, Acta Oceanol. Sin., 39, 50–59, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-020-1578-0, 2020. a
Short summary
Sea ice forecasts are operationally produced using physically based models, but these forecasts are often not accurate enough for maritime operations. In this study, we developed a statistical correction technique using machine learning in order to improve the skill of short-term (up to 10 d) sea ice concentration forecasts produced by the TOPAZ4 model. This technique allows for the reduction of errors from the TOPAZ4 sea ice concentration forecasts by 41 % on average.
Sea ice forecasts are operationally produced using physically based models, but these forecasts...
