Articles | Volume 17, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2387-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2387-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Exploring the use of multi-source high-resolution satellite data for snow water equivalent reconstruction over mountainous catchments
Valentina Premier
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute for Earth Observation, Eurac Research, Viale Druso, 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento, Via Sommarive, 9 I, 38123 Povo, Italy
Carlo Marin
Institute for Earth Observation, Eurac Research, Viale Druso, 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
Giacomo Bertoldi
Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, Viale Druso, 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
Riccardo Barella
Institute for Earth Observation, Eurac Research, Viale Druso, 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
Claudia Notarnicola
Institute for Earth Observation, Eurac Research, Viale Druso, 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
Lorenzo Bruzzone
Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento, Via Sommarive, 9 I, 38123 Povo, Italy
Related authors
Valentina Premier, Francesca Moschini, Jesús Casado-Rodríguez, Davide Bavera, Carlo Marin, and Alberto Pistocchi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2157, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2157, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Earth observation-derived snow cover data is valuable for evaluating and improving snow modules in hydrological models. We propose a novel calibration of LISFLOOD’s snowmelt coefficient by minimizing errors between observed and modeled snow cover fraction, enhancing pixel-scale accuracy. While basin-scale performance shows minor discrepancies, a more realistic snow module leads to shifts in the timing and magnitude of snowmelt and total runoff, thus affecting the water balance.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
The Cryosphere, 18, 5323–5345, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research revisits a classic scientific technique, melting calorimetry, to measure snow liquid water content. This study shows with a novel uncertainty propagation framework that melting calorimetry, traditionally less trusted than freezing calorimetry, can produce accurate results. The study defines optimal experiment parameters and a robust field protocol. Melting calorimetry has the potential to become a valuable tool for validating other liquid water content measuring techniques.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Unlocking the potential of melting calorimetry, traditionally confined to school labs, this paper demonstrates its application in the field for accurate measurement of liquid water content in snow. Dispelling misconceptions about measurement uncertainty, it provide a robust protocol and quantifies associated uncertainties. The findings endorse the broader adoption of melting calorimetry for quantification of snow liquid water content in operational context.
Xiaodan Wu, Kathrin Naegeli, Valentina Premier, Carlo Marin, Dujuan Ma, Jingping Wang, and Stefan Wunderle
The Cryosphere, 15, 4261–4279, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4261-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4261-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We performed a comprehensive accuracy assessment of an Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer global area coverage snow-cover extent time series dataset for the Hindu Kush Himalayan (HKH) region. The sensor-to-sensor consistency, the accuracy related to snow depth, elevations, land-cover types, slope, and aspects, and topographical variability were also explored. Our analysis shows an overall accuracy of 94 % in comparison with in situ station data, which is the same with MOD10A1 V006.
Pirmin Philipp Ebner, Franziska Koch, Valentina Premier, Carlo Marin, Florian Hanzer, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Hugues François, Daniel Günther, Fabiano Monti, Olivier Hargoaa, Ulrich Strasser, Samuel Morin, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 15, 3949–3973, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3949-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3949-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A service to enable real-time optimization of grooming and snow-making at ski resorts was developed and evaluated using both GNSS-measured snow depth and spaceborne snow maps derived from Copernicus Sentinel-2. The correlation to the ground observation data was high. Potential sources for the overestimation of the snow depth by the simulations are mainly the impact of snow redistribution by skiers, compensation of uneven terrain, or spontaneous local adaptions of the snow management.
Chiara Crippa, Stefan Steger, Giovanni Cuozzo, Francesca Bearzot, Volkmar Mair, and Claudia Notarnicola
The Cryosphere, 19, 3493–3515, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3493-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3493-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study, focused on South Tyrol (NE Italy), develops an updated and comprehensive activity classification system for all rock glaciers in the current regional inventory. Using multisource products, we integrate climatic, morphological, and differential interferometric synthetic aperture radar (DInSAR) data in replicable routines and multivariate statistical methods, producing a comprehensive classification based on the updated Rock Glacier Inventories and Kinematic (RGIK) 2023 guidelines. Results leave only 3.5 % of the features non-classified, as opposed to 13–18.5 % in previous studies.
Valentina Premier, Francesca Moschini, Jesús Casado-Rodríguez, Davide Bavera, Carlo Marin, and Alberto Pistocchi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2157, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2157, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Earth observation-derived snow cover data is valuable for evaluating and improving snow modules in hydrological models. We propose a novel calibration of LISFLOOD’s snowmelt coefficient by minimizing errors between observed and modeled snow cover fraction, enhancing pixel-scale accuracy. While basin-scale performance shows minor discrepancies, a more realistic snow module leads to shifts in the timing and magnitude of snowmelt and total runoff, thus affecting the water balance.
Francesca Carletti, Carlo Marin, Chiara Ghielmini, Mathias Bavay, and Michael Lehning
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-974, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-974, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents the first high-resolution dataset of wet snow properties for satellite applications. With it, we validate links between Sentinel-1 backscattering and snowmelt stages, and investigate scattering mechanisms through a radiative transfer model. We disclose the influence of liquid water content and surface roughness at different melting stages and address future challenges, such as capturing large-scale scattering mechanisms and enhancing radiative transfer modules for wet snow.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
The Cryosphere, 18, 5323–5345, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research revisits a classic scientific technique, melting calorimetry, to measure snow liquid water content. This study shows with a novel uncertainty propagation framework that melting calorimetry, traditionally less trusted than freezing calorimetry, can produce accurate results. The study defines optimal experiment parameters and a robust field protocol. Melting calorimetry has the potential to become a valuable tool for validating other liquid water content measuring techniques.
Raul-David Şerban, Huijun Jin, Mihaela Şerban, Giacomo Bertoldi, Dongliang Luo, Qingfeng Wang, Qiang Ma, Ruixia He, Xiaoying Jin, Xinze Li, Jianjun Tang, and Hongwei Wang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1425–1446, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1425-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1425-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A particular observational network for ground surface temperature (GST) has been established on the northeastern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, covering various environmental conditions and scales. This analysis revealed the substantial influences of the land cover on the spatial variability in GST over short distances (<16 m). Improving the monitoring of GST is important for the biophysical processes at the land–atmosphere boundary and for understanding the climate change impacts on cold environments.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Unlocking the potential of melting calorimetry, traditionally confined to school labs, this paper demonstrates its application in the field for accurate measurement of liquid water content in snow. Dispelling misconceptions about measurement uncertainty, it provide a robust protocol and quantifies associated uncertainties. The findings endorse the broader adoption of melting calorimetry for quantification of snow liquid water content in operational context.
K. Meshkini, F. Bovolo, and L. Bruzzone
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 143–150, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-143-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-143-2022, 2022
Xiaodan Wu, Kathrin Naegeli, Valentina Premier, Carlo Marin, Dujuan Ma, Jingping Wang, and Stefan Wunderle
The Cryosphere, 15, 4261–4279, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4261-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4261-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We performed a comprehensive accuracy assessment of an Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer global area coverage snow-cover extent time series dataset for the Hindu Kush Himalayan (HKH) region. The sensor-to-sensor consistency, the accuracy related to snow depth, elevations, land-cover types, slope, and aspects, and topographical variability were also explored. Our analysis shows an overall accuracy of 94 % in comparison with in situ station data, which is the same with MOD10A1 V006.
Pirmin Philipp Ebner, Franziska Koch, Valentina Premier, Carlo Marin, Florian Hanzer, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Hugues François, Daniel Günther, Fabiano Monti, Olivier Hargoaa, Ulrich Strasser, Samuel Morin, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 15, 3949–3973, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3949-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3949-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A service to enable real-time optimization of grooming and snow-making at ski resorts was developed and evaluated using both GNSS-measured snow depth and spaceborne snow maps derived from Copernicus Sentinel-2. The correlation to the ground observation data was high. Potential sources for the overestimation of the snow depth by the simulations are mainly the impact of snow redistribution by skiers, compensation of uneven terrain, or spontaneous local adaptions of the snow management.
Alice Crespi, Michael Matiu, Giacomo Bertoldi, Marcello Petitta, and Marc Zebisch
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 2801–2818, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2801-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2801-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A 250 m gridded dataset of 1980–2018 daily mean temperature and precipitation records for Trentino–South Tyrol (north-eastern Italian Alps) was derived from a quality-controlled and homogenized archive of station observations. The errors associated with the final interpolated fields were assessed and thoroughly discussed. The product will be regularly updated and is meant to support regional climate studies and local monitoring and applications in integration with other fine-resolution data.
Michael Matiu, Alice Crespi, Giacomo Bertoldi, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Christoph Marty, Samuel Morin, Wolfgang Schöner, Daniele Cat Berro, Gabriele Chiogna, Ludovica De Gregorio, Sven Kotlarski, Bruno Majone, Gernot Resch, Silvia Terzago, Mauro Valt, Walter Beozzo, Paola Cianfarra, Isabelle Gouttevin, Giorgia Marcolini, Claudia Notarnicola, Marcello Petitta, Simon C. Scherrer, Ulrich Strasser, Michael Winkler, Marc Zebisch, Andrea Cicogna, Roberto Cremonini, Andrea Debernardi, Mattia Faletto, Mauro Gaddo, Lorenzo Giovannini, Luca Mercalli, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Andrea Sušnik, Alberto Trenti, Stefano Urbani, and Viktor Weilguni
The Cryosphere, 15, 1343–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The first Alpine-wide assessment of station snow depth has been enabled by a collaborative effort of the research community which involves more than 30 partners, 6 countries, and more than 2000 stations. It shows how snow in the European Alps matches the climatic zones and gives a robust estimate of observed changes: stronger decreases in the snow season at low elevations and in spring at all elevations, however, with considerable regional differences.
Cited articles
Anderton, S., White, S., and Alvera, B.: Micro-scale spatial variability and
the timing of snow melt runoff in a high mountain catchment, J.
Hydrol., 268, 158–176, 2002. a
Archer, D. and Stewart, D.: The Installation and Use of a Snow Pillow to
Monitor Snow Water Equivalent, Water Environ. Manage, 9, 221–230,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.1995.tb00934.x, 1995. a
Arsenault, K. R. and Houser, P. R.: Generating observation-based snow depletion
curves for use in snow cover data assimilation, Geosciences, 8, 484, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120484, 2018. a
Baghdadi, N., Gauthier, Y., and Bernier, M.: Capability of multitemporal ERS-1
SAR data for wet-snow mapping, Remote Sens. Environ., 60, 174–186,
1997. a
Bair, E. H., Rittger, K., Davis, R. E., Painter, T. H., and Dozier, J.:
Validating reconstruction of snow water equivalent in California's Sierra
Nevada using measurements from the NASA Airborne Snow Observatory, Water Resour. Res., 52, 8437–8460,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018704, 2016. a, b
Balk, B. and Elder, K.: Combining binary decision tree and geostatistical
methods to estimate snow distribution in a mountain watershed, Water Resour. Res., 36, 13–26, 2000. a
Barella, R., Marin, C., Gianinetto, M., and Notarnicola, C.: A novel approach
to high resolution snow cover fraction retrieval in mountainous regions, in:
IGARSS 2022–2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,
3856–3859, IEEE, 2022. a
Beniston, M., Farinotti, D., Stoffel, M., Andreassen, L. M., Coppola, E., Eckert, N., Fantini, A., Giacona, F., Hauck, C., Huss, M., Huwald, H., Lehning, M., López-Moreno, J.-I., Magnusson, J., Marty, C., Morán-Tejéda, E., Morin, S., Naaim, M., Provenzale, A., Rabatel, A., Six, D., Stötter, J., Strasser, U., Terzago, S., and Vincent, C.: The European mountain cryosphere: a review of its current state, trends, and future challenges, The Cryosphere, 12, 759–794, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-759-2018, 2018. a
Cline, D. W., Bales, R. C., and Dozier, J.: Estimating the spatial distribution
of snow in mountain basins using remote sensing and energy balance modeling,
Water Resour. Res., 34, 1275–1285, 1998. a
Darychuk, S. E., Shea, J. M., Menounos, B., Chesnokova, A., Jost, G., and Weber, F.: Snowmelt characterization from optical and synthetic-aperture radar observations in the La Joie Basin, British Columbia, The Cryosphere, 17, 1457–1473, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1457-2023, 2023. a
Deschamps-Berger, C., Gascoin, S., Berthier, E., Deems, J., Gutmann, E., Dehecq, A., Shean, D., and Dumont, M.: Snow depth mapping from stereo satellite imagery in mountainous terrain: evaluation using airborne laser-scanning data, The Cryosphere, 14, 2925–2940, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2925-2020, 2020. a
DeWalle, D. and Rango, A.: Modelling snowmelt runoff, Principles of Snow
Hydrology. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 266–305, 2008. a
Dietz, A. J., Kuenzer, C., Gessner, U., and Dech, S.: Remote sensing of snow–a
review of available methods, Int. J. Remote Sens., 33,
4094–4134, 2012. a
Dong, C.: Remote sensing, hydrological modeling and in situ observations in
snow cover research: A review, J. Hydrol., 561, 573–583, 2018. a
Durand, M., Molotch, N. P., and Margulis, S. A.: Merging complementary remote
sensing datasets in the context of snow water equivalent reconstruction,
Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 1212–1225, 2008. a
Endrizzi, S., Gruber, S., Dall'Amico, M., and Rigon, R.: GEOtop 2.0: simulating the combined energy and water balance at and below the land surface accounting for soil freezing, snow cover and terrain effects, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2831–2857, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2831-2014, 2014. a
Fang, Y., Liu, Y., and Margulis, S.: Western United States UCLA Daily Snow
Reanalysis, Version 1.[Indicate subset used], Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA
National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/PP7T2GBI52I2, 760, 2022. a, b
Fehlmann, M., Gascón, E., Rohrer, M., Schwarb, M., and Stoffel, M.:
Estimating the snowfall limit in alpine and pre-alpine valleys: A local
evaluation of operational approaches, Atmos. Res., 204, 136–148,
2018. a
Guneriussen, T., Hogda, K. A., Johnsen, H., and Lauknes, I.: InSAR for
estimation of changes in snow water equivalent of dry snow, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 39, 2101–2108, 2001. a
Günther, D., Marke, T., Essery, R., and Strasser, U.: Uncertainties in
snowpack simulations – Assessing the impact of model structure, parameter
choice, and forcing data error on point-scale energy balance snow model
performance, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2779–2800, 2019. a
Hall, D. K. and Riggs, G. A.: MODIS/Aqua Snow Cover Daily L3 Global 500 m SIN Grid, Version 61. 2021, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD10A1.061 (last access: 1 July 2022), 2021. a
Helfricht, K., Hartl, L., Koch, R., Marty, C., and Olefs, M.: Obtaining sub-daily new snow density from automated measurements in high mountain regions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2655–2668, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2655-2018, 2018. a
Hock, R.: Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas, J.
Hydrol., 282, 104–115,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00257-9, 2003. a, b
Immerzeel, W. W., Lutz, A. F., Andrade, M., Bahl, A., Biemans, H., Bolch, T., Hyde, S., Brumby, S., Davies, B. J., Elmore, A. C., Emmer, A., Feng, M., Fernández, A., Haritashya, U., Kargel, J. S., Koppes, M., Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Kulkarni, A. V., Mayewski, P. A., Nepal, S., Pacheco, P., Painter, T. H., Pellicciotti, F., Rajaram, H., Rupper, S., Sinisalo, A., Shrestha, A. B., Viviroli, D., Wada, Y., Xiao, C., Yao, T., and Baillie, J. E. M.: Importance and
vulnerability of the world’s water towers, Nature, 577, 364–369, 2020. a
Jost, G., Weiler, M., Gluns, D. R., and Alila, Y.: The influence of forest and
topography on snow accumulation and melt at the watershed-scale, J.
Hydrol., 347, 101–115, 2007. a
Lehning, M., Völksch, I., Gustafsson, D., Nguyen, T. A., Stähli, M.,
and Zappa, M.: ALPINE3D: a detailed model of mountain surface processes and
its application to snow hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 20, 2111–2128, 2006. a
Leinss, S., Wiesmann, A., Lemmetyinen, J., and Hajnsek, I.: Snow water
equivalent of dry snow measured by differential interferometry, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appli. Earth Obs., 8,
3773–3790, 2015. a
Li, D., Lettenmaier, D. P., Margulis, S. A., and Andreadis, K.: The value of
accurate high-resolution and spatially continuous snow information to
streamflow forecasts, J. Hydrometeorol., 20, 731–749, 2019. a
Lievens, H., Brangers, I., Marshall, H.-P., Jonas, T., Olefs, M., and De Lannoy, G.: Sentinel-1 snow depth retrieval at sub-kilometer resolution over the European Alps, The Cryosphere, 16, 159–177, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-159-2022, 2022. a
Luce, C. H., Tarboton, D. G., and Cooley, K. R.: The influence of the spatial
distribution of snow on basin-averaged snowmelt, Hydrol. Process., 12,
1671–1683, 1998. a
Marin, C., Bertoldi, G., Premier, V., Callegari, M., Brida, C., Hürkamp, K., Tschiersch, J., Zebisch, M., and Notarnicola, C.: Use of Sentinel-1 radar observations to evaluate snowmelt dynamics in alpine regions, The Cryosphere, 14, 935–956, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-935-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d
Martinec, J. and Rango, A.: Areal Distribution of Snow Water Equivalent
Evaluated by Snow Cover Monitoring, Water Resour. Res., 17,
1480–1488, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR017i005p01480, 1981. a, b, c
Meløysund, V., Leira, B., Høiseth, K. V., and Lisø, K. R.: Predicting
snow density using meteorological data, Meteorol. Appl., 14, 413–423, 2007. a
Mendoza, P. A., Musselman, K. N., Revuelto, J., Deems, J. S., López-Moreno,
J. I., and McPhee, J.: Interannual and seasonal variability of snow depth
scaling behavior in a subalpine catchment, Water Resour. Res., 56,
e2020WR027343, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027343, 2020. a
Molotch, N. P. and Bales, R. C.: Scaling snow observations from the point to
the grid element: Implications for observation network design, Water Resour. Res., 41, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004229, 2005. a
Molotch, N. P. and Bales, R. C.: Comparison of ground-based and airborne snow
surface albedo parameterizations in an alpine watershed: Impact on snowpack
mass balance, Water Resour. Res., 42, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004522, 2006. a
Molotch, N. P., Painter, T. H., Bales, R. C., and Dozier, J.: Incorporating
remotely-sensed snow albedo into a spatially-distributed snowmelt model,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019063, 2004. a
Mott, R., Vionnet, V., and Grünewald, T.: The seasonal snow cover dynamics:
review on wind-driven coupling processes, Front. Earth Sci., 6, 197, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00197,
2018. a
Murphy, B., Yurchak, R., and Müller, S.:
GeoStat-Framework/PyKrige: v1.5.0 (Version v1.5.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3739879
(last access: 1 July 2022),
2020. a
Ohmura, A.: Physical basis for the temperature-based melt-index method, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 40, 753–761, 2001. a
Painter, T. H., Berisford, D. F., Boardman, J. W., Bormann, K. J., Deems, J. S., Gehrke, F., Hedrick, A., Joyce, M., Laidlaw, R., Marks, D., Mattmann, C., McGurk, B., Ramirez, P., Richardson, M., McKenzie Skiles, S., Seidel, F. C., and Winstral, A.:
The Airborne Snow Observatory: Fusion of scanning lidar, imaging
spectrometer, and physically-based modeling for mapping snow water equivalent
and snow albedo, Remote Sens. Environ., 184, 139–152, 2016. a, b
Parajka, J. and Blöschl, G.: Validation of MODIS snow cover images over Austria, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 679–689, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-679-2006, 2006. a, b
Pimentel, R., Herrero, J., Zeng, Y., Su, Z., and Polo, M. J.: Study of snow
dynamics at subgrid scale in semiarid environments combining terrestrial
photography and data assimilation techniques, J. Hydrometeorol.,
16, 563–578, 2015. a
Pimentel, R., Herrero, J., and Polo, M. J.: Subgrid parameterization of snow distribution at a Mediterranean site using terrestrial photography, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 805–820, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-805-2017, 2017. a
Prein, A. F. and Gobiet, A.: Impacts of uncertainties in European gridded
precipitation observations on regional climate analysis, Int.
J. Climatol., 37, 305–327, 2017. a
Premier, V., Marin, C., Bertoldi, G., Barella, R., Notarnicola, C., and Bruzzone, L.: Snow Water Equivalent Dataset for the South Fork of the San Joaquin River (2018/2021) and Senales (2019/2021) (Version v0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8036793, 2023. a
Pulliainen, J., Luojus, K., Derksen, C., Mudryk, L., Lemmetyinen,
J., Salminen, M., Ikonen, J., Takala, M., Cohen, J., Smolander,
T., and Norberg, J.: Patterns and
trends of Northern Hemisphere snow mass from 1980 to 2018, Nature, 581,
294–298, 2020. a
Rees, W. G.: Remote sensing of snow and ice, CRC Press, Boca
Raton, Florida, 285 pp., 2005. a
Revuelto, J., Alonso-González, E., Gascoin, S., Rodríguez-López,
G., and López-Moreno, J. I.: Spatial Downscaling of MODIS Snow Cover
Observations Using Sentinel-2 Snow Products, Remote Sens., 13, 4513, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224513, 2021. a
Rittger, K., Bair, E. H., Kahl, A., and Dozier, J.: Spatial estimates of snow
water equivalent from reconstruction, Adv. Water Resour., 94,
345–363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.05.015, 2016. a, b
Rott, H., Yueh, S. H., Cline, D. W., Duguay, C., Essery, R., Haas, C., Hélière, F., Kern, M., Macelloni, G., Malnes, E., Nagler, T., Pulliainen, J., Rebhan, H., and Thompson, A.: Cold regions hydrology
high-resolution observatory for snow and cold land processes, Proc. IEEE, 98, 752–765, 2010. a
Salomonson, V. V. and Appel, I.: Estimating fractional snow cover from MODIS
using the normalized difference snow index, Remote Sens. Environ.,
89, 351–360, 2004. a
Schattan, P., Köhli, M., Schrön, M., Baroni, G., and Oswald, S. E.:
Sensing area-average snow water equivalent with cosmic-ray neutrons: The
influence of fractional snow cover, Water Resour. Res., 55,
10796–10812, 2019. a
Shi, J., Dozier, J., and Rott, H.: Snow mapping in alpine regions with
synthetic aperture radar, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,
32, 152–158, 1994. a
Slater, A., Barrett, A., Clark, M., Lundquist, J., and Raleigh, M.: Uncertainty
in seasonal snow reconstruction: Relative impacts of model forcing and image
availability, Adv. Water Resour., 55, 165–177,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.006, 2013a. a
Tsang, L., Durand, M., Derksen, C., Barros, A. P., Kang, D.-H., Lievens, H., Marshall, H.-P., Zhu, J., Johnson, J., King, J., Lemmetyinen, J., Sandells, M., Rutter, N., Siqueira, P., Nolin, A., Osmanoglu, B., Vuyovich, C., Kim, E., Taylor, D., Merkouriadi, I., Brucker, L., Navari, M., Dumont, M., Kelly, R., Kim, R. S., Liao, T.-H., Borah, F., and Xu, X.: Review article: Global monitoring of snow water equivalent using high-frequency radar remote sensing, The Cryosphere, 16, 3531–3573, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3531-2022, 2022. a, b
Ulaby, F. T., Moore, R. K., and Fung, A. K.:
Microwave Remote Sensing: Active and Passive,
Vol I, Microwave remote sensing fundamentals and radiometry, Artech House, Norwood, MA,
456–456,
1981. a
Vionnet, V., Brun, E., Morin, S., Boone, A., Faroux, S., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., and Willemet, J.-M.: The detailed snowpack scheme Crocus and its implementation in SURFEX v7.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 773–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-773-2012, 2012. a
Viviroli, D., Weingartner, R., and Messerli, B.: Assessing the hydrological
significance of the world's mountains, Mountain Res. Dev., 23,
32–40, 2003. a
Warscher, M., Marke, T., and Strasser, U.: Operational and experimental snow observation systems in the upper Rofental: data from 2017–2020, Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-68, 2021. a
Yang, K., Musselman, K. N., Rittger, K., Margulis, S. A., Painter, T. H., and
Molotch, N. P.: Combining ground-based and remotely sensed snow data in a
linear regression model for real-time estimation of snow water equivalent,
Adv. Water Resour., 160, 104075, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104075, 2022. a
Zupanc, A.: Improving cloud detection with machine learning, https://medium.com/sentinel-hub/improving-cloud-detection-with-machine-learning-c09dc5d7cf13 (last access: 1 July 2022), 2017. a
Short summary
The large amount of information regularly acquired by satellites can provide important information about SWE. We explore the use of multi-source satellite data, in situ observations, and a degree-day model to reconstruct daily SWE at 25 m. The results show spatial patterns that are consistent with the topographical features as well as with a reference product. Being able to also reproduce interannual variability, the method has great potential for hydrological and ecological applications.
The large amount of information regularly acquired by satellites can provide important...