Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2369-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2369-2020
Research article
 | 
23 Jul 2020
Research article |  | 23 Jul 2020

The Arctic Ocean Observation Operator for 6.9 GHz (ARC3O) – Part 1: How to obtain sea ice brightness temperatures at 6.9 GHz from climate model output

Clara Burgard, Dirk Notz, Leif T. Pedersen, and Rasmus T. Tonboe

Related authors

Uncertainty in the projected Antarctic contribution to sea level due to internal climate variability
Justine Caillet, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Pierre Mathiot, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, Benoit Urruty, Clara Burgard, Charles Amory, Christoph Kittel, and Mondher Chekki
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-128,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-128, 2024
Short summary
An assessment of basal melt parameterisations for Antarctic ice shelves
Clara Burgard, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Ronja Reese, Adrian Jenkins, and Pierre Mathiot
The Cryosphere, 16, 4931–4975, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4931-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4931-2022, 2022
Short summary
Improving model-satellite comparisons of sea ice melt onset with a satellite simulator
Abigail Smith, Alexandra Jahn, Clara Burgard, and Dirk Notz
The Cryosphere, 16, 3235–3248, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3235-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3235-2022, 2022
Short summary
The Arctic Ocean Observation Operator for 6.9 GHz (ARC3O) – Part 2: Development and evaluation
Clara Burgard, Dirk Notz, Leif T. Pedersen, and Rasmus T. Tonboe
The Cryosphere, 14, 2387–2407, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2387-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2387-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Numerical Modelling
Data-driven surrogate modeling of high-resolution sea-ice thickness in the Arctic
Charlotte Durand, Tobias Sebastian Finn, Alban Farchi, Marc Bocquet, Guillaume Boutin, and Einar Ólason
The Cryosphere, 18, 1791–1815, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1791-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Using Icepack to reproduce ice mass balance buoy observations in landfast ice: improvements from the mushy-layer thermodynamics
Mathieu Plante, Jean-François Lemieux, L. Bruno Tremblay, Adrienne Tivy, Joey Angnatok, François Roy, Gregory Smith, Frédéric Dupont, and Adrian K. Turner
The Cryosphere, 18, 1685–1708, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1685-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Understanding the influence of ocean waves on Arctic sea ice simulation: a modeling study with an atmosphere–ocean–wave–sea ice coupled model
Chao-Yuan Yang, Jiping Liu, and Dake Chen
The Cryosphere, 18, 1215–1239, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1215-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1215-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sea ice cover in the Copernicus Arctic Regional Reanalysis
Yurii Batrak, Bin Cheng, and Viivi Kallio-Myers
The Cryosphere, 18, 1157–1183, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1157-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1157-2024, 2024
Short summary
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics implementation of the standard viscous–plastic sea-ice model and validation in simple idealized experiments
Oreste Marquis, Bruno Tremblay, Jean-François Lemieux, and Mohammed Islam
The Cryosphere, 18, 1013–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1013-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1013-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Barber, D., Fung, A., Grenfell, T., Nghiem, S., Onstott, R., Lytle, V., Perovich, D., and Gow, A.: The role of snow on microwave emission and scattering over first-year sea ice, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 36, 1750–1763, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.718643, 1998. a, b
Bunzel, F., Notz, D., Baehr, J., Müller, W., and Fröhlich, K.: Seasonal climate forecasts significantly affected by observational uncertainty of Arctic sea ice concentration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 852–859, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066928, 2016. a
Burgard, C., Notz, D., Pedersen, L. T., and Tonboe, R. T.: The Arctic Ocean Observation Operator for 6.9 GHz (ARC3O) – Part 2: Development and evaluation, The Cryosphere, 14, 2387–2407, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2387-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Dee, D., Uppala, S., Simmons, A., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hersbach, H., Holm, E., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A., Monge-Sanz, B., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thébaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011. a
Short summary
The high disagreement between observations of Arctic sea ice makes it difficult to evaluate climate models with observations. We investigate the possibility of translating the model state into what a satellite could observe. We find that we do not need complex information about the vertical distribution of temperature and salinity inside the ice but instead are able to assume simplified distributions to reasonably translate the simulated sea ice into satellite language.