Articles | Volume 16, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1873-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1873-2022
Research article
 | 
17 May 2022
Research article |  | 17 May 2022

The sensitivity of landfast sea ice to atmospheric forcing in single-column model simulations: a case study at Zhongshan Station, Antarctica

Fengguan Gu, Qinghua Yang, Frank Kauker, Changwei Liu, Guanghua Hao, Chao-Yuan Yang, Jiping Liu, Petra Heil, Xuewei Li, and Bo Han

Related authors

Understanding the influence of ocean waves on Arctic sea ice simulation: a modeling study with an atmosphere–ocean–wave–sea ice coupled model
Chao-Yuan Yang, Jiping Liu, and Dake Chen
The Cryosphere, 18, 1215–1239, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1215-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1215-2024, 2024
Short summary
Unraveling the complexities of the Last Glacial Maximum climate: the role of individual boundary conditions and forcings
Xiaoxu Shi, Martin Werner, Hu Yang, Roberta D'Agostino, Jiping Liu, Chaoyuan Yang, and Gerrit Lohmann
Clim. Past, 19, 2157–2175, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-2157-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-2157-2023, 2023
Short summary
The characteristics of atmospheric boundary layer height over the Arctic Ocean during MOSAiC
Shijie Peng, Qinghua Yang, Matthew D. Shupe, Xingya Xi, Bo Han, Dake Chen, Sandro Dahlke, and Changwei Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8683–8703, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8683-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8683-2023, 2023
Short summary
Annual evolution of the ice–ocean interaction beneath landfast ice in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica
Haihan Hu, Jiechen Zhao, Petra Heil, Zhiliang Qin, Jingkai Ma, Fengming Hui, and Xiao Cheng
The Cryosphere, 17, 2231–2244, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2231-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2231-2023, 2023
Short summary
Seasonal and interannual variability of the landfast ice mass balance between 2009 and 2018 in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica
Na Li, Ruibo Lei, Petra Heil, Bin Cheng, Minghu Ding, Zhongxiang Tian, and Bingrui Li
The Cryosphere, 17, 917–937, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-917-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-917-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Antarctic
A contrast in sea ice drift and deformation between winter and spring of 2019 in the Antarctic marginal ice zone
Ashleigh Womack, Alberto Alberello, Marc de Vos, Alessandro Toffoli, Robyn Verrinder, and Marcello Vichi
The Cryosphere, 18, 205–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-205-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-205-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multidecadal variability and predictability of Antarctic sea ice in the GFDL SPEAR_LO model
Yushi Morioka, Liping Zhang, Thomas L. Delworth, Xiaosong Yang, Fanrong Zeng, Masami Nonaka, and Swadhin K. Behera
The Cryosphere, 17, 5219–5240, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5219-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5219-2023, 2023
Short summary
Signature of the stratosphere–troposphere coupling on recent record-breaking Antarctic sea-ice anomalies
Raúl R. Cordero, Sarah Feron, Alessandro Damiani, Pedro J. Llanillo, Jorge Carrasco, Alia L. Khan, Richard Bintanja, Zutao Ouyang, and Gino Casassa
The Cryosphere, 17, 4995–5006, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4995-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4995-2023, 2023
Short summary
Southern Ocean polynyas and dense water formation in a high-resolution, coupled Earth system model
Hyein Jeong, Adrian K. Turner, Andrew F. Roberts, Milena Veneziani, Stephen F. Price, Xylar S. Asay-Davis, Luke P. Van Roekel, Wuyin Lin, Peter M. Caldwell, Hyo-Seok Park, Jonathan D. Wolfe, and Azamat Mametjanov
The Cryosphere, 17, 2681–2700, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2681-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2681-2023, 2023
Short summary
A decade-plus of Antarctic sea ice thickness and volume estimates from CryoSat-2 using a physical model and waveform fitting
Steven Fons, Nathan Kurtz, and Marco Bagnardi
The Cryosphere, 17, 2487–2508, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2487-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2487-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Barthélemy, A., Goosse, H., Fichefet, T., and Lecomte, O.: On the sensitivity of Antarctic sea ice model biases to atmospheric forcing uncertainties, Clim. Dynam., 51, 1585–1603, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3972-7, 2018. 
Bitz, C. M., Holland, M. M., Weaver, A. J., and Eby, M.: Simulating the ice-thickness distribution in a coupled climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 106, 2441–2463, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC000113, 2001. 
Bracegirdle, T. J. and Marshall, G. J.: The reliability of Antarctic tropospheric pressure and temperature in the latest global reanalyses, J. Climate, 25, 7138–7146, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00685.1, 2012. 
Briegleb, B. P. and Light, B.: A Delta-Eddington multiple scattering parameterization for solar radiation in the sea ice component of the Community Climate System Model, NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-472+ STR, 1-108, https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/CICE/blob/master/doc/PDF/BL_NCAR2007.pdf (last access: 14 May 2022), 2007. 
Bromwich, D. H., Fogt, R. L., Hodges, K. I., and Walsh, J. E.: A tropospheric assessment of the ERA-40, NCEP, and JRA-25 global reanalyses in the polar regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D10111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007859, 2007. 
Download
Short summary
The sea ice thickness was simulated by a single-column model and compared with in situ observations obtained off Zhongshan Station in the Antarctic. It is shown that the unrealistic precipitation in the atmospheric forcing data leads to the largest bias in sea ice thickness and snow depth modeling. In addition, the increasing snow depth gradually inhibits the growth of sea ice associated with thermal blanketing by the snow.