Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5985-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5985-2024
Research article
 | 
18 Dec 2024
Research article |  | 18 Dec 2024

Impact assessment of snow thickness, sea ice density and water density in CryoSat-2-derived sea ice thickness

Imke Sievers, Henriette Skourup, and Till A. S. Rasmussen

Related authors

Evaluating Arctic Sea-Ice and Snow Thickness: A Proxy-Based Comparison of MOSAiC Data with CMIP6 Simulations
Shreya Trivedi, Imke Sievers, Marylou Athanase, Antonio Sánchez Benítez, and Tido Semmler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2214,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2214, 2024
Short summary
Assimilating CryoSat-2 freeboard to improve Arctic sea ice thickness estimates
Imke Sievers, Till A. S. Rasmussen, and Lars Stenseng
The Cryosphere, 17, 3721–3738, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3721-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3721-2023, 2023
Short summary
Arctic sea ice and snow from different ice models: A CICE–SI3 intercomparison study
Imke Sievers, Andrea M. U. Gierisch, Till A. S. Rasmussen, Robinson Hordoir, and Lars Stenseng
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-84,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-84, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Remote Sensing
Pan-Arctic sea ice concentration from SAR and passive microwave
Tore Wulf, Jørgen Buus-Hinkler, Suman Singha, Hoyeon Shi, and Matilde Brandt Kreiner
The Cryosphere, 18, 5277–5300, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5277-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5277-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing sea ice microwave emissivity up to submillimeter waves from airborne and satellite observations
Nils Risse, Mario Mech, Catherine Prigent, Gunnar Spreen, and Susanne Crewell
The Cryosphere, 18, 4137–4163, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4137-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4137-2024, 2024
Short summary
The AutoICE Challenge
Andreas Stokholm, Jørgen Buus-Hinkler, Tore Wulf, Anton Korosov, Roberto Saldo, Leif Toudal Pedersen, David Arthurs, Ionut Dragan, Iacopo Modica, Juan Pedro, Annekatrien Debien, Xinwei Chen, Muhammed Patel, Fernando Jose Pena Cantu, Javier Noa Turnes, Jinman Park, Linlin Xu, Katharine Andrea Scott, David Anthony Clausi, Yuan Fang, Mingzhe Jiang, Saeid Taleghanidoozdoozan, Neil Curtis Brubacher, Armina Soleymani, Zacharie Gousseau, Michał Smaczny, Patryk Kowalski, Jacek Komorowski, David Rijlaarsdam, Jan Nicolaas van Rijn, Jens Jakobsen, Martin Samuel James Rogers, Nick Hughes, Tom Zagon, Rune Solberg, Nicolas Longépé, and Matilde Brandt Kreiner
The Cryosphere, 18, 3471–3494, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3471-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3471-2024, 2024
Short summary
A study of sea ice topography in the Weddell and Ross seas using dual-polarimetric TanDEM-X imagery
Lanqing Huang and Irena Hajnsek
The Cryosphere, 18, 3117–3140, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3117-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Estimating differential penetration of green (532 nm) laser light over sea ice with NASA's Airborne Topographic Mapper: observations and models
Michael Studinger, Benjamin E. Smith, Nathan Kurtz, Alek Petty, Tyler Sutterley, and Rachel Tilling
The Cryosphere, 18, 2625–2652, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2625-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2625-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexandrov, V., Sandven, S., Wahlin, J., and Johannessen, O. M.: The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic, The Cryosphere, 4, 373–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-373-2010, 2010. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u
Assur, A.: Composition of sea ice and its tensile strength, Arctic Sea Ice, 598, 106–138, 1958. a
Feltham, D. L., Untersteiner, N., Wettlaufer, J. S., and Worster, M. G.: Sea ice is a mushy layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L14501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026290, 2006. a, b, c, d
Fiedler, E. K., Martin, M. J., Blockley, E., Mignac, D., Fournier, N., Ridout, A., Shepherd, A., and Tilling, R.: Assimilation of sea ice thickness derived from CryoSat-2 along-track freeboard measurements into the Met Office's Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM), The Cryosphere, 16, 61–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-61-2022, 2022. a, b, c
Garcia, H. E., Boyer, T. P., Baranova, O. K., Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Grodsky, A., Paver, C. R., Weathers, K. W., Smolyar, I. V., Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., and Zweng, M. M.: World Ocean Atlas, https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/data/oceans/woa/WOA18/DOC/woa18documentation.pdf (last access: 16 January 2023), 2018. a
Download
Short summary
To derive sea ice thickness (SIT) from satellite freeboard (FB) observations, assumptions about snow thickness, snow density, sea ice density and water density are needed. These parameters are impossible to observe alongside FB, so many existing products use empirical values. In this study, modeled values are used instead. The modeled values and otherwise commonly used empirical values are evaluated against in situ observations. In a further analysis, the influence on SIT is quantified.