Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-535-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-535-2016
Research article
 | 
08 Mar 2016
Research article |  | 08 Mar 2016

Reanalysis of long-term series of glaciological and geodetic mass balance for 10 Norwegian glaciers

Liss M. Andreassen, Hallgeir Elvehøy, Bjarne Kjøllmoen, and Rune V. Engeset

Related authors

The Pléiades Glacier Observatory: high-resolution digital elevation models and ortho-imagery to monitor glacier change
Etienne Berthier, Jérôme Lebreton, Delphine Fontannaz, Steven Hosford, Joaquín Muñoz-Cobo Belart, Fanny Brun, Liss M. Andreassen, Brian Menounos, and Charlotte Blondel
The Cryosphere, 18, 5551–5571, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5551-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5551-2024, 2024
Short summary
Observing glacier elevation changes from spaceborne optical and radar sensors – an inter-comparison experiment using ASTER and TanDEM-X data
Livia Piermattei, Michael Zemp, Christian Sommer, Fanny Brun, Matthias H. Braun, Liss M. Andreassen, Joaquín M. C. Belart, Etienne Berthier, Atanu Bhattacharya, Laura Boehm Vock, Tobias Bolch, Amaury Dehecq, Inés Dussaillant, Daniel Falaschi, Caitlyn Florentine, Dana Floricioiu, Christian Ginzler, Gregoire Guillet, Romain Hugonnet, Matthias Huss, Andreas Kääb, Owen King, Christoph Klug, Friedrich Knuth, Lukas Krieger, Jeff La Frenierre, Robert McNabb, Christopher McNeil, Rainer Prinz, Louis Sass, Thorsten Seehaus, David Shean, Désirée Treichler, Anja Wendt, and Ruitang Yang
The Cryosphere, 18, 3195–3230, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3195-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ice thickness and bed topography of Jostedalsbreen ice cap, Norway
Mette Kusk Gillespie, Liss Marie Andreassen, Matthias Huss, Simon de Villiers, Kamilla Hauknes Sjursen, Jostein Aasen, Jostein Bakke, Jan Magne Cederstrøm, Halgeir Elvehøy, Bjarne Kjøllmoen, Even Loe, Marte Meland, Kjetil Melvold, Sigurd Daniel Nerhus, Torgeir Opeland Røthe, Eivind Nagel Wilhelm Støren, Kåre Øst, and Jacob Clement Yde
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-167,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-167, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Cloud forcing of surface energy balance from in situ measurements in diverse mountain glacier environments
Jonathan P. Conway, Jakob Abermann, Liss M. Andreassen, Mohd Farooq Azam, Nicolas J. Cullen, Noel Fitzpatrick, Rianne H. Giesen, Kirsty Langley, Shelley MacDonell, Thomas Mölg, Valentina Radić, Carleen H. Reijmer, and Jean-Emmanuel Sicart
The Cryosphere, 16, 3331–3356, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3331-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3331-2022, 2022
Short summary
Worldwide version-controlled database of glacier thickness observations
Ethan Welty, Michael Zemp, Francisco Navarro, Matthias Huss, Johannes J. Fürst, Isabelle Gärtner-Roer, Johannes Landmann, Horst Machguth, Kathrin Naegeli, Liss M. Andreassen, Daniel Farinotti, Huilin Li, and GlaThiDa Contributors
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3039–3055, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3039-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3039-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Mass Balance Obs
Accumulation by avalanches as a significant contributor to the mass balance of a peripheral glacier of Greenland
Bernhard Hynek, Daniel Binder, Michele Citterio, Signe Hillerup Larsen, Jakob Abermann, Geert Verhoeven, Elke Ludewig, and Wolfgang Schöner
The Cryosphere, 18, 5481–5494, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5481-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5481-2024, 2024
Short summary
Mapping geodetically inferred Antarctic ice surface height changes into thickness changes: a sensitivity study
Natasha Valencic, Linda Pan, Konstantin Latychev, Natalya Gomez, Evelyn Powell, and Jerry X. Mitrovica
The Cryosphere, 18, 2969–2978, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2969-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2969-2024, 2024
Short summary
Reanalysis of the longest mass balance series in Himalaya using nonlinear model: Chhota Shigri Glacier (India)
Mohd Farooq Azam, Christian Vincent, Smriti Srivastava, Etienne Berthier, Patrick Wagnon, Himanshu Kaushik, Arif Hussain, Manoj Kumar Munda, Arindan Mandal, and Alagappan Ramanathan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-644,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-644, 2024
Short summary
Globally consistent estimates of high-resolution Antarctic ice mass balance and spatially resolved glacial isostatic adjustment
Matthias O. Willen, Martin Horwath, Eric Buchta, Mirko Scheinert, Veit Helm, Bernd Uebbing, and Jürgen Kusche
The Cryosphere, 18, 775–790, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-775-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-775-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the importance of the humidity flux for the surface mass balance in the accumulation zone of the Greenland Ice Sheet
Laura J. Dietrich, Hans Christian Steen-Larsen, Sonja Wahl, Anne-Katrine Faber, and Xavier Fettweis
The Cryosphere, 18, 289–305, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-289-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-289-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexander, D., Shulmeister, J., and Davies, T.: High basal melting rates within high-precipitation temperate glaciers, J. Glaciol., 57, 789–795, 2011.
Alexander, D., Davies, T., and Schulmeister, J.: Basal melting beneath a fast-flowing temperate tidewater glacier, Ann. Glaciol., 54, 265–271, https://doi.org/10.3189/2013AoG63A259, 2013.
Andreassen, L. M.: Comparing traditional mass balance measurements with long-term volume change extracted from topographical maps: a case study of Storbreen glacier in Jotunheimen, Norway, for the period 1940–1997, Geogr. Ann. A, 81, 467–476, 1999.
Andreassen, L. M., Elvehøy, H., Kjøllmoen, B., Engeset, R. V., and Haakensen, N.: Glacier mass-balance and length variation in Norway, Ann. Glaciol., 42, 317–325, 2005.
Andreassen, L. M., Kjøllmoen, B., Rasmussen, A., Melvold, K., and Nordli, Ø.: Langfjordjøkelen, a rapidly shrinking glacier in northern Norway, J. Glaciol., 58, 581–593, https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J014, 2012a.
Download
Short summary
This study provides homogenised and partly calibrated data series of glaciological and geodetic mass balance for the 10 Norwegian glaciers with long-term observations. In total, 21 periods of data were compared. Uncertainties were quantified for relevant sources of errors, both in the glaciological and geodetic series. The reanalysis processes altered seasonal, annual, and cumulative as well as ELA and AAR values for many of the years for the 10 glaciers presented.