Reanalysis of long-term series of glaciological and geodetic mass balance  for 10 Norwegian glaciers

Andreassen, Liss M.; Elvehøy, Hallgeir; Kjøllmoen, Bjarne; Engeset, Rune V.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-535-2016

Articles | Volume 10, issue 2

https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-535-2016

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-535-2016

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 10, issue 2

Research article

|

08 Mar 2016

Research article |

| 08 Mar 2016

Reanalysis of long-term series of glaciological and geodetic mass balance for 10 Norwegian glaciers

Liss M. Andreassen, Hallgeir Elvehøy, Bjarne Kjøllmoen, and Rune V. Engeset

Download

Final revised paper (published on 08 Mar 2016)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 26 Nov 2015)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC C2730: 'Traditional glaciological mass balance measurements need to be calibrated', Tomas Johannesson, 09 Jan 2016
RC C2748: 'tc-2015-203', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Jan 2016
SC C2811: 'Glaciological and geodetic mass balance of ten long-term glaciers in Norway', Mauri Pelto, 18 Jan 2016
AC C3023: 'Author comments - final response', Liss M. Andreassen, 15 Feb 2016

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Liss M. Andreassen on behalf of the Authors (15 Feb 2016)

ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (18 Feb 2016) by Etienne Berthier

AR by Liss M. Andreassen on behalf of the Authors (18 Feb 2016) Author's response Manuscript

Short summary

This study provides homogenised and partly calibrated data series of glaciological and geodetic mass balance for the 10 Norwegian glaciers with long-term observations. In total, 21 periods of data were compared. Uncertainties were quantified for relevant sources of errors, both in the glaciological and geodetic series. The reanalysis processes altered seasonal, annual, and cumulative as well as ELA and AAR values for many of the years for the 10 glaciers presented.