Articles | Volume 15, issue 1
The Cryosphere, 15, 233–246, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-233-2021
The Cryosphere, 15, 233–246, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-233-2021

Review article 25 Jan 2021

Review article | 25 Jan 2021

Review article: Earth's ice imbalance

Review article: Earth's ice imbalance
Thomas Slater1, Isobel R. Lawrence1, Inès N. Otosaka1, Andrew Shepherd1, Noel Gourmelen2, Livia Jakob3, Paul Tepes2, Lin Gilbert4, and Peter Nienow2 Thomas Slater et al.
  • 1Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
  • 2School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK
  • 3EarthWave Ltd, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, UK
  • 4Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Department of Space and Climate Physics, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

Correspondence: Thomas Slater (t.slater1@leeds.ac.uk)

Abstract

We combine satellite observations and numerical models to show that Earth lost 28 trillion tonnes of ice between 1994 and 2017. Arctic sea ice (7.6 trillion tonnes), Antarctic ice shelves (6.5 trillion tonnes), mountain glaciers (6.1 trillion tonnes), the Greenland ice sheet (3.8 trillion tonnes), the Antarctic ice sheet (2.5 trillion tonnes), and Southern Ocean sea ice (0.9 trillion tonnes) have all decreased in mass. Just over half (58 %) of the ice loss was from the Northern Hemisphere, and the remainder (42 %) was from the Southern Hemisphere. The rate of ice loss has risen by 57 % since the 1990s – from 0.8 to 1.2 trillion tonnes per year – owing to increased losses from mountain glaciers, Antarctica, Greenland and from Antarctic ice shelves. During the same period, the loss of grounded ice from the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets and mountain glaciers raised the global sea level by 34.6 ± 3.1 mm. The majority of all ice losses were driven by atmospheric melting (68 % from Arctic sea ice, mountain glaciers ice shelf calving and ice sheet surface mass balance), with the remaining losses (32 % from ice sheet discharge and ice shelf thinning) being driven by oceanic melting. Altogether, these elements of the cryosphere have taken up 3.2 % of the global energy imbalance.

Please read the corrigendum first before continuing.
1 Introduction

Fluctuations in Earth's ice cover have been driven by changes in the planetary radiative forcing (Vaughan et al., 2013), affecting global sea level (The IMBIE Team, 2018, 2020; Zemp et al., 2019a), oceanic conditions (Rahmstorf et al., 2015), atmospheric circulation (Francis and Vavrus, 2012; Vellinga and Wood, 2002) and freshwater resources (Huss and Hock, 2018; Immerzeel et al., 2020). Earth's cryosphere is created as meteoric ice in Antarctica, Greenland and in mountain glaciers and as frozen seawater in the Arctic and Southern oceans (Fig. 1). The polar ice sheets store more than 99 % (30 million km3) of Earth's freshwater ice on land (Fretwell et al., 2013; Morlighem et al., 2017), and even modest losses raise the global sea level (The IMBIE Team, 2018, 2020), increase coastal flooding (Vitousek et al., 2017) and disturb oceanic currents (Golledge et al., 2019). To date, these losses have tracked the upper range of climate warming scenarios forecast by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which predict an ice sheet sea level contribution of up to 42 cm by 2100 (Slater et al., 2020). Ice sheet mass balance is the net balance between mass losses associated with ice flow, melting at the ice–ocean interface, subglacial melt and the surface mass balance (the net difference between precipitation, sublimation, evaporation, wind erosion and meltwater runoff). Ice shelves are a major source of ocean fresh water (Jacobs et al., 1992); impart resistive forces on grounded ice upstream (buttressing), which would speed up in its absence (Weertman, 1974); and have been a persistent element of the climate system throughout the Holocene period (Domack et al., 2005). There are over 300 documented ice shelves (the vast majority of Earth's inventory) around Antarctica (SCAR, 2020; Shepherd et al., 2018), containing an estimated 380 thousand km3 of ice (Fretwell et al., 2013), and fluctuations in their volume occur as a result of changes in their extent (Cook and Vaughan, 2010) and thickness (Adusumilli et al., 2020a). Although ice shelves are much smaller and sparsely distributed across the Arctic, ice shelves fringing the northern coast of Ellesmere Island in Canada (Mortimer et al., 2012) and the Russian Arctic islands (Willis et al., 2015) have collapsed in recent decades. Mountain glacier ice moderates global sea level and regional hydrology (Huss and Hock, 2018), impacting local communities who rely on it as a source of fresh water (Immerzeel et al., 2020). There are over 215 thousand glaciers worldwide (RGI Consortium, 2017) containing 160 thousand km3 of ice (Farinotti et al., 2019), and their retreat has accounted for 21 % of global sea level rise between 1993 and 2017 (WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group, 2018). Typically 15 to 25 million km2 of the global ocean surface is covered in sea ice at any one time of year, though its thickness and extent vary seasonally and due to long-term changes in Earth's climate (Maksym, 2019). Sea ice plays a key role in the freshwater and energy budgets of the polar regions, impacts the marine ecosystem (Stroeve and Notz, 2018), and regulates the absorption of solar radiation in summer (Pistone et al., 2014). Furthermore, sea ice loss could influence oceanic and atmospheric circulation and affect weather patterns in the mid-latitudes (Maksym, 2019; Vihma, 2014).

https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/233/2021/tc-15-233-2021-f01

Figure 1Average rate of ice thickness change in the (a) Southern Hemisphere and (b) Northern Hemisphere. Changes in Antarctic (1992–2017) and Greenland ice sheet (1992–2018) thickness were estimated using repeat satellite altimetry following the methods of Shepherd et al. (2019). Sea ice thickness trends between 1990 and 2019 are determined from numerical sea ice and ocean modelling (Zhang and Rothrock, 2003), as well as the average minimum of sea ice extent in February (Antarctic) and September (Arctic) (purple lines) for each decade during the same period. Glacier thickness change between 1992 and 2018 for glacier regions defined in the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI Consortium, 2017) (black boundaries) are from mass change estimates (Braun et al., 2019; Foresta et al., 2016; Jakob et al., 2020; Tepes et al., 2021; Wouters et al., 2019; Zemp et al., 2019b) which have been converted to a thickness change assuming an ice density of 850 kg m−3. The black circle at the south pole indicates the southern limit of the orbit of ERS and ENVISAT satellite altimeters, which were in operation between 1992 and 2010. The area between 81.5 and 88 S has been covered by CryoSat-2, which launched in 2010.

Although sparse in situ records of glacier mass balance date back to the 1890s (Zemp et al., 2015), substantial records of change for other components of the cryosphere did not begin until the advent of satellite observations in the 1970s. Ice shelf extent has been recorded episodically in satellite imagery since the 1940s (Cook and Vaughan, 2010); sea ice extent has been monitored by satellites since the late 1970s (Cavalieri et al., 1999); and ice sheet, ice shelf, sea ice and glacier thickness changes have been recorded systematically in satellite altimetry since the 1990s (Gardner et al., 2013; Laxon et al., 2013; Shepherd et al., 2010; The IMBIE Team, 2018, 2020). Here, we combine satellite observations of changing ice sheet, ice shelf, glacier, and Arctic sea ice mass, with in situ and model-based estimates of glacier and Southern Ocean sea ice mass, to quantify trends in Earth's meteoric and oceanic ice. We do not include elements of the cryosphere that are not ice (i.e. snow on land and permafrost) or where knowledge of their global extent and change is limited (river and lake ice). However, these elements of the cryosphere have also experienced considerable change over recent decades: for example, it is estimated that the quantity of snow on land has decreased by 49 ± 49 Gt per decade in the Northern Hemisphere since 1980 (Pulliainen et al., 2020), that permafrost (perennially frozen ground) has warmed globally by 0.29 ± 0.12 C during the past decade (Biskaborn et al., 2019), and that the duration of river and lake ice cover has shortened by 12 d per century in the Northern Hemisphere over the last 200 years (Magnuson et al., 2000).

2 Mountain glaciers

We combined eight estimates of mass change from an extrapolation of local glaciological and geodetic measurements (Zemp et al., 2019a, 2020), satellite gravimetry (Wouters et al., 2019), satellite swath altimetry (Foresta et al., 2016; Jakob et al., 2020; Tepes et al., 2021), satellite differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry (DInSAR) (Braun et al., 2019), and satellite optical stereo images (Dussaillant et al., 2019b; Shean et al., 2020) to produce a reconciled estimate of global glacier mass changes between 1962 and 2019 and over 19 glacier regions defined in the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI Consortium, 2017) (Fig. 2). Satellite gravimetry directly measures glacier mass change from fluctuations in Earth's gravitational field at monthly intervals and as a result does not require knowledge of the density of the material lost or gained (Wouters et al., 2019). However, satellite gravimetry provides measurements at a spatial resolution on the order of hundreds of kilometres, which limits the interpretation of the spatial distribution of ice loss within individual glaciers. Satellite swath altimetry, DInSAR and optical stereo imagery all measure surface elevation change, which is converted to mass by assuming a fixed density of ice with an associated uncertainty of 60 kg m−3 (Huss, 2013). The included satellite swath altimetry estimates follow the method of Foresta et al. (2016), which uses the swath interferometric mode of CryoSat-2 to provide a dense grid of repeated elevation measurements (Foresta et al., 2016). CryoSat-2 swath altimetry provides up to 2 orders of magnitude more data than conventional altimetry processing, as well as homogeneous spatial coverage necessary to derive mass changes over relatively small glaciers with highly variable topography (Gourmelen et al., 2018; Jakob et al., 2020). The included DInSAR estimate measures surface elevation changes by differencing digital elevation models (DEMs) generated from the SRTM and TanDEM-X synthetic aperture radar missions (Braun et al., 2019). It is important to note that, for both satellite radar altimetry and DInSAR, the radar signal can penetrate beyond the glacier surface into snow and firn (Braun et al., 2019; Jakob et al., 2020); the impact of radar penetration on elevation measurements is difficult to quantify as it depends on spatio-temporal variations in snow and firn characteristics and is an area of ongoing research. We also include estimates of glacier mass balance derived from satellite optical stereo imagery, which generates time series of high-resolution DEMs from ASTER, WorldView-1/2/3 and GeoEye-1 satellite imagery (Dussaillant et al., 2019b; Shean et al., 2020). In glacier regions where these estimates are available (High Mountain Asia, Southern Andes), they offer almost complete coverage of glaciated areas at high (metre-scale) resolution which can resolve changes within individual glaciers. However, optical imagery is weather-dependent, and cloud cover can limit coverage in glacier regions. For each region we aggregated annual mass change rates determined from the techniques available: each region includes between 2 and 4 estimates except for glaciers peripheral to Antarctica and Greenland, where only estimates derived from the extrapolation of in situ and geodetic data are available. For studies in which time-varying mass change rates are not available, we assume the mass change rate to be linear over the period considered and scale the uncertainty by the square root of the number of years. We computed the cumulative mass change as the integral of the aggregated mass change rates and accumulated the associated uncertainty over time as the root sum square of the annual errors. We summed the regional estimates to derive the global glacier mass change and the overall uncertainty as the root mean square of the regional errors.

https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/233/2021/tc-15-233-2021-f02

Figure 2(a) Cumulative mass change for glacier regions (Gt) between 1962 and 2019. Outlines of the glacier regions (RGI 6.0) are marked by black lines and glacierized areas are indicated in orange: ACN, Arctic Canada North (area 105 110 km2); ACS, Arctic Canada South (40 888 km2); ALA, Alaska (86 725 km2); ANT, Antarctic and subantarctic (132 867 km2); CAU, Caucasus and Middle East (1307 km2); CEU, Central Europe (2092 km2); GRL, Greenland (89 717 km2); HMA, High Mountain Asia (97 606 km2); ISL, Iceland (11 059 km2); NZL, New Zealand (1161 km2); RUA, Russian Arctic (51 591 km2); SAN, Southern Andes (29 429 km2); SCA, Scandinavia (2949 km2); SJM, Svalbard and Jan Mayen (33 958 km2); TRP, low latitudes (2341 km2); WNA, Western Canada and USA (14 524 km2). (b) Glacier rate of mass change (Gt yr−1) in regions where estimates from different techniques are available, including satellite altimetry (Foresta et al., 2016; Jakob et al., 2020; Tepes et al., 2021), extrapolation of in situ glaciological and geodetic data (Zemp et al., 2019b, 2020), satellite gravimetry (Wouters et al., 2019), satellite InSAR (Braun et al., 2019), and satellite stereo imagery (Dussaillant et al., 2019b; Shean et al., 2020) over the period 2010–2015. The reconciled estimate (calculated as the average of the estimates available in a given region and year) is shown in grey.

We assessed the consistency of the in situ and satellite gravimetry, altimetry and stereo imagery estimates between 2010 and 2015 in seven regions (Arctic Canada North and South, Russian Arctic, Iceland, Svalbard and Jan Mayen, High Mountain Asia and Southern Andes) where measurements from all techniques overlap (Fig. 2). We record the largest difference (26 Gt yr−1) and standard deviation (14 Gt yr−1) between mass balance estimates in Arctic Canada North – the largest region included in our inter-comparison. The standard deviations of the mass change estimates are 9, 8, 6, 5, 2 and 2 Gt yr−1 for the Southern Andes, Russian Arctic, High Mountain Asia, Arctic Canada South, Iceland, and Svalbard and Jan Mayen regions, respectively. Based on our reconciled estimate, glaciers have collectively lost −9975± 1667 Gt of ice between 1962 and 2019, raising the global mean sea level by 27.7 ± 4.6 mm during this period. Glaciers peripheral to Greenland and in Alaska and the Southern Andes have experienced the largest losses (Fig. 2) – 5694 ± 635 Gt between 1962 and 2019 – and account for more than half (57 %) of the global glacier mass loss over this period. Globally, the rate of glacier mass loss has increased from −120± 70 Gt yr−1 in the 1970s to −327± 65 Gt yr−1 between 2010 and 2019, peaking at −506± 192 Gt yr−1 in 2018. Glacier mass loss is linked to increasing air temperatures; approximately 70 % of the global glacier mass loss has been attributed to anthropogenic forcing, and the remainder is due to natural climate variability (Marzeion et al., 2014).

3 Ice sheets

Ice sheets lose mass when ice discharge and melting at the surface and ice–ocean interface combined exceed snowfall. We use estimates of ice sheet mass balance and their uncertainty derived from an ensemble of satellite altimetry, satellite gravimetry and input–output datasets which span the period 1992–2018. For the Antarctic (24 datasets) (The IMBIE Team, 2018) and Greenland (26 datasets) (The IMBIE Team, 2020) ice sheets, independently derived estimates of mass change from the three satellite geodetic techniques were combined into a single estimate of ice sheet mass balance. Estimates of ice sheet mass balance derived from these methods at the continental scale are similar and can be collated to reduce uncertainty (The IMBIE Team, 2018, 2020): satellite altimetry directly measures changes in ice sheet height (Otosaka et al., 2019; Sandberg Sørensen et al., 2018) converted into mass by assigning a specific density to the volume change (Shepherd et al., 2019) or by explicitly accounting for snowfall fluctuations through firn modelling (Sørensen et al., 2011). Satellite gravimetry measures temporal variations in Earth's gravity field using spherical harmonic solutions (Velicogna et al., 2020) or through local mass concentration analysis (Luthcke et al., 2006). The input–output method removes ice discharge into the oceans (output), estimated from satellite observations of ice velocity and estimates of ice thickness, from the net snow accumulation (input) (Mouginot et al., 2019; Rignot et al., 2019) determined from regional climate modelling (Noël et al., 2018; van Wessem et al., 2018).

These satellite surveys (e.g. Fig. 1) show the Antarctic ice sheet lost 2603 ± 563 Gt of ice between 1992 and 2017, and the Greenland ice sheet lost 3902 ± 342 Gt of ice between 1992 and 2018. Since 2012, the rate of ice loss from Antarctica has tripled when compared to the previous two decades, owing to widespread glacier speed-up (Mouginot et al., 2014) and thinning (Shepherd et al., 2019) in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen Sea sectors in response to the circulation of warm water under the region's ice shelves (Jacobs et al., 2011). Ice shelf collapse (Cook and Vaughan, 2010) (Fig. 3) and thinning at the Antarctic Peninsula has triggered speed-up of glaciers upstream (Hogg et al., 2017) as a consequence of reduced ice shelf buttressing. Unlike in Antarctica, where almost all of the ice loss is associated with ice dynamical imbalance, just over half of Greenland's mass loss during this period arose due to increases in meltwater runoff (Enderlin et al., 2014) enhanced by atmospheric circulation during several warm summers (Bevis et al., 2019). The remaining ice loss was due to increased glacier discharge, primarily at Jakobshavn Isbræ (Holland et al., 2008) and at outlet glaciers in the southeast (Howat et al., 2008) and northwest (Moon et al., 2012). Both ice dynamic and surface processes in Greenland have led to widespread thinning at the ice sheet margins and within individual glacier catchments (McMillan et al., 2016) (Fig. 1). Altogether, ice losses from Antarctica and Greenland have caused global sea levels to rise by 17.8 ± 1.8 mm between 1992 and 2017 (The IMBIE Team, 2018, 2020).

https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/233/2021/tc-15-233-2021-f03

Figure 3Change in Antarctic ice shelf barrier position (left) and thickness (right) over time. Barrier positions are derived from episodic satellite imagery (Cook and Vaughan, 2010), and barrier thicknesses are derived from airborne ice penetrating radar (light grey lines) and satellite radar altimetry (Fretwell et al., 2013). Iceberg calving is calculated as the difference in area between successive barrier positions.

4 Antarctic ice shelves

To compute trends in the volume of Antarctic ice shelves associated with changes in their extent, we combined satellite-based records of their thickness (Fretwell et al., 2013) and area change (Cook and Vaughan, 2010) over time, adjusted for changes in thickness where they have been recorded (Adusumilli et al., 2020a). We restrict this calculation to ice shelves at the Antarctic Peninsula, where a record of progressive retreat has been well established (Fig. 3). Although area changes have been mapped since the late 1940s, comprehensive estimates of their thickness only began in the early 1990s. To estimate the thickness of icebergs calved prior to this period, we combined in situ, airborne and satellite-derived measurements of ice thickness recorded prior to when the ice shelf calving took place (Fig. 3). Uncertainties in volume change associated with ice shelf retreat were computed as the product of errors in ice thickness, determined from the variance of the thickness data, and extent, determined from the precision of the satellite imagery (Cook and Vaughan, 2010). We then used satellite altimetry to determine the volume changes of Antarctic ice shelves owing to changes in their thickness and their associated uncertainty. For this calculation, we use time series of ice thickness change and their estimated uncertainty derived by Adusumilli et al. (2020a) from ERS-1, ERS-2, Envisat and CryoSat-2 satellite radar altimetry between 1994 and 2020, following the method of Paolo et al. (2015). Adusumilli et al. (2020a) applied the following processing steps: (i) ice shelf surface elevation was computed by adjusting the altimeter range measurements for changes in ocean surface height, including contributions due to the geoid, mean dynamic topography, ocean tide, ocean load tide, atmospheric pressure, and sea level rise; (ii) time series of ice shelf elevation change were produced by grouping the elevation measurements within regularly spaced 10 km grid cells, applying a space–time polynomial fit to data from each mission; (iii) time series of ice shelf thickness change were calculated by adjusting the elevation change for fluctuations in firn air content and using a hydrostatic buoyancy relationship, assuming values of 917 and 1028 kg m−3 for the densities of ice and ocean water, respectively; and (iv) time series of ice shelf volume change were computed from the thickness changes and using the minimum (fixed) area for each ice shelf. Full details of the methods used in this calculation can be found in Paolo et al. (2015). The total change in ice shelf volume is computed as the sum of changes due to thinning and retreat, and the uncertainty is estimated as the root sum square of the respective uncertainties.

Antarctic ice shelves have lost 8667 ± 1240 Gt of their mass between 1994 and 2020, 54 % of which has been due to reductions in their extent and the remainder due to changes in their thickness. Although episodic iceberg calving is part of the natural cycle of ice mass transport through the continent, there has been a 39 717 km2 loss of ice shelf area at the Antarctic Peninsula (e.g. Cook and Vaughan, 2010), where air temperatures have risen several times faster than the global trend (Vaughan et al., 2003). Warmer air leads to increased surface melting, which can promote iceberg calving through hydraulic fracture of crevasses (Scambos et al., 2013). At the same time, ocean-driven melting has caused some ice shelves to thin at their base, particularly in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen seas (Paolo et al., 2015; Shepherd et al., 2010) where warm circumpolar deep water is present (Jacobs et al., 1996) but also at the Antarctic Peninsula (Shepherd et al., 2003). Ice shelf thinning can promote instability by weakening their lateral margins (Vieli et al., 2007). Both processes – calving front retreat and basal melting – have triggered speed-up of inland ice (Rignot et al., 2004; Scambos et al., 2004; Shepherd et al., 2004) due to the associated reduction in buttressing (Joughin et al., 2012), leading to global sea level rise (The IMBIE Team, 2018) even though ice shelves themselves are not a direct source of ocean mass. The ice shelf losses combined amount to 3 % of their present volume, while those in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen seas are now 10 % to 18 % thinner (Paolo et al., 2015) and those at the Antarctic Peninsula are 18 % smaller in extent (Cook and Vaughan, 2010).

5 Sea ice

We estimated trends in the mass of Arctic sea ice using a combination of sea-ice–ocean modelling and satellite measurements of thickness change: between 1980 and 2011 we used the Pan-Arctic Ice-Ocean Modelling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS), a coupled sea-ice–ocean model forced with atmospheric reanalyses (Zhang and Rothrock, 2003); from 2011, we used CryoSat-2 satellite radar altimetry measurements of sea ice volume (Tilling et al., 2018). We converted PIOMAS volume estimates to mass assuming a fixed density of 917 kg m−3: this is the density used in the PIOMAS model to attribute a volume to the simulated sea ice growth (Axel Schweiger, personal communication, 2020); therefore, it is appropriate to convert PIOMAS volume estimates back to mass using this same density, as opposed to one that varies according to season or ice type. We divided CryoSat-2 monthly volume estimates into regions of multi-year and first-year ice and multiplied by densities of 882 and 916.7 kg m−3, respectively, to convert to mass (Tilling et al., 2018). The presence of melt ponds on the Arctic sea ice surface from May to September makes it difficult to discriminate between radar returns from leads and sea ice floes, preventing the retrieval of summer sea ice thickness and volume from radar altimetry (Tilling et al., 2018). As a result, we computed the winter-mean (October to April) mass trend across the Arctic for both CryoSat-2 and PIOMAS estimates to maintain consistency: the difference between winter (October–April) and annual (January–December) PIOMAS mass trends during 1980–2011 is 19 Gt yr−1 (6 %) smaller when compared to the magnitude of the overall 12-month trend (−324 Gt yr−1). Since the annual trend is slightly larger, we consider our winter-average mass trend to be a conservative estimate of the actual Arctic sea ice mass loss. In the absence of an available satellite-derived Antarctic sea ice volume product, we used the Global Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (GIOMAS) (Zhang and Rothrock, 2003), the global equivalent to PIOMAS, to estimate the trend. We gridded GIOMAS sea ice thickness data onto 0.2×0.5 grids, multiplied by cell area to retrieve total volume and used a density of 917 kg m−3 to convert to mass (as in PIOMAS, this is the density used to attribute a volume to the simulated sea ice growth in GIOMAS (Jinlun Zhang, personal communication, 2020)). Antarctic sea ice trends were computed as annual averages between January and December. The uncertainties in PIOMAS volume for October and March are 1350 and 2250 km3, respectively, estimated in Schweiger et al. (2011) using a range of methods, including comparison to in situ data and model sensitivity analyses. We take the average of these (1800 km3) as the uncertainty for all months, and, in the absence of a formal error budget, we assign the same uncertainty to monthly GIOMAS estimates. We convert this monthly volume error of 1800 km3 to a mass error using the fixed PIOMAS/GIOMAS density of 917 kg m−3. We estimated the uncertainty on monthly Arctic sea ice volume and mass from CryoSat-2 as a percentage uncertainty, which varies from 14.5 % volume in October to 13 % volume in April (Tilling et al., 2018). The uncertainty on the winter-average (Arctic) and annual-average (Antarctic) mass was propagated from the monthly uncertainties. Finally, we estimated the uncertainty associated with a rate of mass change over a given time period by dividing the total error by the number of years.

Between the winters of 1980 (October 1979 to April 1980) and 2019 (October 2018 to April 2019), Arctic sea ice mass reduced by 230 ± 27 Gt yr−1, predominantly due to a decline in the lateral extent of the ice cover (Fig. 1), which accounts for 93 % of the variance in volume over the entire PIOMAS record. The entire summer ice pack has thinned, which is largely attributable to the loss of the oldest and thickest ice, and sea ice cover has receded in the Beaufort, Chukchi and East Siberian seas (Stroeve and Notz, 2018). Arctic sea ice loss has been attributed to atmospheric warming driven by anthropogenic CO2 emissions (Meredith et al., 2019; Stroeve and Notz, 2018), which has been enhanced in the Arctic when compared to the mid-latitudes likely due to sea ice loss itself (Dai et al., 2019; Screen and Simmonds, 2010). Between 1980 and 2019, GIOMAS volume estimates, which incorporate observations of sea ice extent, show an increase in Antarctic sea ice of +43 ± 17 Gt yr−1. No consensus has been reached on whether trends in Antarctic sea ice cover are anthropogenically driven, for example via the depletion of the ozone layer (Ferreira et al., 2015), or the result of natural climate variability (Meehl et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2019). Given the vastness of the continent it surrounds, regional analyses of Southern Ocean sea ice are essential to understand the processes driving it. The overall trend is a combination of sea ice thickening in the Weddell Sea and thinning in the Amundsen Sea (Fig. 1), accompanied by increases and reductions of the extent in each region, respectively (Parkinson, 2019). In general, global climate models predict a shrinking southern ice cap in response to climate change; projections from the latest coupled climate models suggest that Antarctic sea ice will decline during the 21st century (Roach et al., 2020).

6 Earth's ice imbalance

To determine the global ice imbalance, we summed the mass change of each ice component computed at annual intervals and estimated the combined uncertainty as the root sum square of the individual uncertainty estimates. Between 1994 and 2017, the Earth lost 27.5 ± 2.1 Tt of ice (Fig. 4) – at an average rate of 1.2 ± 0.1 Tt per year (Table 1). Ice losses have been larger in the Northern Hemisphere, primarily owing to declining Arctic sea ice (−7559± 1021 Gt) followed by glacier retreat (−5148± 564 Gt) and Greenland ice sheet melt (−3821± 323 Gt). Ice in the Southern Hemisphere from the ice shelves (−6543± 1221 Gt), the Antarctic ice sheet (−2545± 554 Gt), glaciers (−965± 729 Gt), and sea ice in the Southern Ocean (−924± 674 Gt) has been lost at a total rate of −477± 146 Gt yr−1, which is 34 % slower than in the Northern Hemisphere (−719± 207 Gt yr−1). Earth's ice can be categorized into its floating and on-land components; grounded ice loss from ice sheets and glaciers raises the global sea level (The IMBIE Team, 2018, 2020; Zemp et al., 2019a) and influences oceanic circulation through freshwater input (Rahmstorf et al., 2015), and glacier retreat impacts local communities who rely on glaciers as a freshwater resource (Immerzeel et al., 2020). Grounded ice losses have raised the global mean sea level by 24.9 ± 1.8 and 9.7 ± 2.5 mm in the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere respectively, totalling 34.6 ± 3.1 mm over the 24-year period. Although the loss of floating sea ice and ice shelves does not contribute to global sea level rise, sea ice decline increases habitat loss (Rode et al., 2014), coastal erosion (Overeem et al., 2011), and ocean circulation (Armitage et al., 2020) and may affect mid-latitude weather and climate (Blackport et al., 2019; Overland et al., 2016).

Table 1Average mass change rates (Gt yr−1) of the different global ice components, total floating ice, total grounded ice and global total per decade and over the common period 1994–2017.

* 1990s: the decade is not entirely surveyed but starts from 1994 for ice shelf thinning, from 1993 for Antarctica and from 1992 for Greenland.
** 2010s: the decade is not entirely surveyed but covers up to 2016 for the Antarctic ice sheet; up to 2017 for Greenland; and up to 2019 for sea ice, glaciers and ice shelf calving.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/233/2021/tc-15-233-2021-f04

Figure 4Global ice mass change between 1994 and 2017 partitioned into the different floating (blues) and grounded (purples) components. Shaded bars indicate the cumulative mass change and estimated uncertainty for each individual ice component (blues, purples) and their sum (black). The equivalent sea level contribution due to the loss of grounded ice from Antarctica, Greenland and mountain glaciers is shown in the y axis on the right-hand side.

Download

There is now widespread evidence that climate change has caused reductions in Earth's ice. On average, the planetary surface temperature has risen by 0.85 C since 1880, and this signal has been amplified in the polar regions (Hartmann et al., 2013). Although this warming has led to higher snowfall in winter, it has also driven larger increases in summertime surface melting (Huss and Hock, 2018). The global oceans have warmed too (Hartmann et al., 2013), with significant impacts on tidewater glaciers (Hogg et al., 2017; Holland et al., 2008), on floating ice shelves (Shepherd et al., 2010) and on the ice streams which have relied on their buttressing (Rignot et al., 2004). Atmospheric warming – anthropogenic or otherwise – is responsible for the recent and long-term reductions in mountain glacier ice (Marzeion et al., 2014), and ocean-driven melting of outlet glaciers has caused the vast majority of the observed ice losses from Antarctica (The IMBIE Team, 2018). Elsewhere, the picture is more complicated. In Greenland, for example, roughly half of all ice losses are associated with trends in surface mass balance, and the remainder is due to accelerated ice flow triggered by ocean melting at glacier termini (The IMBIE Team, 2020). Although the retreat and collapse of ice shelves at the Antarctic Peninsula has occurred in tandem with a rapid regional atmospheric warming (Vaughan et al., 2003), warm circumpolar deep water has melted the base of ice shelves in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen seas (Jacobs et al., 2011), and this now amounts to over half of their net loss. While the progressive retreat of Arctic sea ice has been driven by radiative forcing, this has been mediated in part by the increasing presence of open water (Perovich and Richter-Menge, 2009), and broader changes in oceanic conditions are expected to play an increasingly important role (Carmack et al., 2016). Finally, although the extent of Southern Ocean sea ice has shown little overall change, there have been considerable regional variations owing to changes in both atmospheric and oceanic forcing (Hobbs et al., 2016). Attributing Arctic sea ice decline and ice shelf calving to increased radiative forcing, approximately 68 % of the recent global ice imbalance is due to atmospheric warming, and the remainder is due to ocean-driven melting. We determine the energy required to melt the total ice loss as

(1) E = M ( L + c p Δ T ) ,

where M is the mass of ice, ΔT is the rise in temperature required (we assume an initial ice temperature of −20± 10 C), L is the latent heat of fusion for water (333 J g−1) and cp is the specific heat capacity of water (2108 J kg−1C−1). Although the initial temperature is poorly constrained, the fractional energy required for warming is a small (0.7 % C−1) percentage of the total energy imbalance. Altogether, the ice sheet, glacier, ice shelf and sea ice loss amounts to an 8.9 ±0.9×1021 J sink of energy, or 3.2 ± 0.3 % of the global imbalance over the same period (von Schuckmann et al., 2020).

7 Conclusions

Even though Earth's cryosphere has absorbed only a small fraction of the global energy imbalance, it has lost a staggering 28 trillion tonnes of ice between 1994 and 2017. The loss of grounded ice during this period has caused sea levels to rise by 34.6 ± 3.1 mm, and the loss of floating ice has caused reductions in the planetary albedo (Thackeray and Hall, 2019), reductions in the buttressing of grounded ice (Rignot et al., 2004), ocean freshening (Jacobs et al., 1996) and ocean cooling (Bintanja et al., 2013). Our assessment is based primarily on observations; we use satellite measurements to determine Antarctic and Greenland ice sheet mass balance and to determine changes in the mass of Antarctic ice shelves associated with retreat and thinning, we use a combination of satellite observations and in situ measurements to determine changes in the mass of mountain glaciers, and we use a combination of numerical models and satellite observations to determine changes in the mass of sea ice. There is generally good agreement in mass trends derived from observations and models, where both are available. Only our estimate of Southern Ocean sea ice mass imbalance depends on modelling alone (Zhang and Rothrock, 2003), though satellite observations of changes in its extent (Parkinson, 2019) and in situ observations of changes in its thickness (Worby et al., 2008) suggest that little change has occurred in Antarctic sea ice cover. The overall rate of ice loss has increased by 57 % over the past 24 years compared to the 1990s, and in situ measurements of changes in glacier mass (Zemp et al., 2019a) and satellite records of ice shelf extent (Cook and Vaughan, 2010) which predate the complete survey confirm this trend. Although a small fraction of mountain glacier losses are associated with retreat since the little ice age (Marzeion et al., 2014), there can be little doubt that the vast majority of Earth's ice loss is a direct consequence of climate warming.

Data availability

Mountain glacier mass change data from glaciological and geodetic observations are freely available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1492141 (Zemp et al., 2019b). Elevation change fields from DInSAR are available via the World Data Center (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.893612, Braun et al., 2018). Glacier digital elevation models and elevation change maps derived from satellite optical stereo imagery are available at https://nsidc.org/data/highmountainasia (last access: November 2020, Shean et al., 2020) and https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.903618 (Dussaillant et al., 2019a), respectively. Mass change data for the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets are provided by the ice sheet mass balance intercomparison exercise (IMBIE) and are available at http://imbie.org/data-downloads/ (last access: April 2020), The IMBIE Team, 2018, 2020). Changes in ice shelf extent can be downloaded from the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research digital database (https://www.add.scar.org/, SCAR, 2020). Changes in ice shelf thickness from Adusumilli et al. (2020a) are freely available at https://doi.org/10.6075/J04Q7SHT (Adusumilli et al., 2020b). PIOMAS/GIOMAS data are freely available from the University of Washington Polar Science Data Center (http://psc.apl.uw.edu/data/, last access: August 2020, Zhang and Rothrock, 2003).

Author contributions

TS, IRL, INO and AS designed the study, performed the data analysis and wrote the manuscript. NG, LJ, PT and PN prepared mountain glacier mass change estimates from CryoSat-2 satellite radar altimetry. LG prepared the ice sheet thickness change datasets from multi-mission satellite radar altimetry used in Fig. 1.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We thank Axel Schweiger and Jinlun Zhang for their help with PIOMAS/GIOMAS data and Susheel Adusumilli for providing ice shelf thickness change data. We thank the editor, Xavier Fettweis, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments, which greatly improved the manuscript.

Financial support

This research has been supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant no. cpom300001).

Review statement

This paper was edited by Xavier Fettweis and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

References

Adusumilli, S., Fricker, H. A., Medley, B., Padman, L., and Siegfried, M. B.: Interannual variations in meltwater input to the Southern Ocean from Antarctic ice shelves, Nature Geosci., 13, 616–620, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0616-z, 2020a. 

Adusumilli, S., Fricker, H. A., Medley, B. C., Padman, L., and Siegfried, M. R.: Data from: Interannual variations in meltwater input to the Southern Ocean from Antarctic ice shelves [Data set], UC San Diego Library Digital Collections, https://doi.org/10.6075/J04Q7SHT, 2020b. 

Armitage, T. W. K., Manucharyan, G. E., Petty, A. A., Kwok, R., and Thompson, A. F.: Enhanced eddy activity in the Beaufort Gyre in response to sea ice loss, Nature Commun., 11, 761, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14449-z, 2020. 

Bevis, M., Harig, C., Khan, S. A., Brown, A., Simons, F. J., Willis, M., Fettweis, X., Broeke, M. R. van den, Madsen, F. B., Kendrick, E., Caccamise, D. J., Dam, T. van, Knudsen, P., and Nylen, T.: Accelerating changes in ice mass within Greenland, and the ice sheet's sensitivity to atmospheric forcing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 116, 1934–1939, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806562116, 2019. 

Bintanja, R., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Drijfhout, S. S., Wouters, B., and Katsman, C. A.: Important role for ocean warming and increased ice-shelf melt in Antarctic sea-ice expansion, Nature Geosci., 6, 376–379, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1767, 2013. 

Biskaborn, B. K., Smith, S. L., Noetzli, J., Matthes, H., Vieira, G., Streletskiy, D. A., Schoeneich, P., Romanovsky, V. E., Lewkowicz, A. G., Abramov, A., Allard, M., Boike, J., Cable, W. L., Christiansen, H. H., Delaloye, R., Diekmann, B., Drozdov, D., Etzelmüller, B., Grosse, G., Guglielmin, M., Ingeman-Nielsen, T., Isaksen, K., Ishikawa, M., Johansson, M., Johannsson, H., Joo, A., Kaverin, D., Kholodov, A., Konstantinov, P., Kröger, T., Lambiel, C., Lanckman, J.-P., Luo, D., Malkova, G., Meiklejohn, I., Moskalenko, N., Oliva, M., Phillips, M., Ramos, M., Sannel, A. B. K., Sergeev, D., Seybold, C., Skryabin, P., Vasiliev, A., Wu, Q., Yoshikawa, K., Zheleznyak, M., and Lantuit, H.: Permafrost is warming at a global scale, Nature Commun., 10, 264, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08240-4, 2019. 

Blackport, R., Screen, J. A., van der Wiel, K., and Bintanja, R.: Minimal influence of reduced Arctic sea ice on coincident cold winters in mid-latitudes, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 697–704, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0551-4, 2019. 

Braun, M. H., Malz, P., Sommer, C., Farías-Barahona, D., Sauter, T., Casassa, G., Soruco, A., Skvarca, P., and Seehaus, T.: Annual glacier elevation change rate raster dataset, South American Andes 2000 and 2011–2015, PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.893612, 2018. 

Braun, M. H., Malz, P., Sommer, C., Farías-Barahona, D., Sauter, T., Casassa, G., Soruco, A., Skvarca, P., and Seehaus, T. C.: Constraining glacier elevation and mass changes in South America, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 130–136, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0375-7, 2019. 

Carmack, E. C., Yamamoto-Kawai, M., Haine, T. W. N., Bacon, S., Bluhm, B. A., Lique, C., Melling, H., Polyakov, I. V., Straneo, F., Timmermans, M.-L., and Williams, W. J.: Freshwater and its role in the Arctic Marine System: Sources, disposition, storage, export, and physical and biogeochemical consequences in the Arctic and global oceans, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosc., 121, 675–717, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003140, 2016. 

Cavalieri, D. J., Parkinson, C. L., Gloersen, P., Comiso, J. C., and Zwally, H. J.: Deriving long-term time series of sea ice cover from satellite passive-microwave multisensor data sets, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 104, 15803–15814, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900081, 1999. 

Cook, A. J. and Vaughan, D. G.: Overview of areal changes of the ice shelves on the Antarctic Peninsula over the past 50 years, The Cryosphere, 4, 77–98, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-77-2010, 2010. 

Dai, A., Luo, D., Song, M., and Liu, J.: Arctic amplification is caused by sea-ice loss under increasing CO2, Nature Commun., 10, 121, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07954-9, 2019. 

Domack, E., Duran, D., Leventer, A., Ishman, S., Doane, S., McCallum, S., Amblas, D., Ring, J., Gilbert, R., and Prentice, M.: Stability of the Larsen B ice shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula during the Holocene epoch, Nature, 436, 681–685, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03908, 2005. 

Dussaillant, I., Berthier, E., Brun, F., Masiokas, M., Hugonnet, R., Favier, V., Rabatel, A., Pitte, P., and Ruiz, L.: South American Andes elevation changes from 2000 to 2018, links to GeoTIFFs, PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.903618, 2019a. 

Dussaillant, I., Berthier, E., Brun, F., Masiokas, M., Hugonnet, R., Favier, V., Rabatel, A., Pitte, P., and Ruiz, L.: Two decades of glacier mass loss along the Andes, Nature Geosci., 12, 802–808, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0432-5, 2019b. 

Enderlin, E. M., Howat, I. M., Jeong, S., Noh, M.-J., van Angelen, J. H., and van den Broeke, M. R.: An improved mass budget for the Greenland ice sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 866–872, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059010, 2014. 

Farinotti, D., Huss, M., Fürst, J. J., Landmann, J., Machguth, H., Maussion, F., and Pandit, A.: A consensus estimate for the ice thickness distribution of all glaciers on Earth, Nature Geosci., 12, 168–173, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0300-3, 2019. 

Ferreira, D., Marshall, J., Bitz, C. M., Solomon, S., and Plumb, A.: Antarctic Ocean and Sea Ice Response to Ozone Depletion: A Two-Time-Scale Problem, J. Climate, 28, 1206–1226, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00313.1, 2015. 

Foresta, L., Gourmelen, N., Pálsson, F., Nienow, P., Björnsson, H., and Shepherd, A.: Surface elevation change and mass balance of Icelandic ice caps derived from swath mode CryoSat-2 altimetry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 12138–12145, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071485, 2016. 

Francis, J. A. and Vavrus, S. J.: Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06801, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051000, 2012. 

Fretwell, P., Pritchard, H. D., Vaughan, D. G., Bamber, J. L., Barrand, N. E., Bell, R., Bianchi, C., Bingham, R. G., Blankenship, D. D., Casassa, G., Catania, G., Callens, D., Conway, H., Cook, A. J., Corr, H. F. J., Damaske, D., Damm, V., Ferraccioli, F., Forsberg, R., Fujita, S., Gim, Y., Gogineni, P., Griggs, J. A., Hindmarsh, R. C. A., Holmlund, P., Holt, J. W., Jacobel, R. W., Jenkins, A., Jokat, W., Jordan, T., King, E. C., Kohler, J., Krabill, W., Riger-Kusk, M., Langley, K. A., Leitchenkov, G., Leuschen, C., Luyendyk, B. P., Matsuoka, K., Mouginot, J., Nitsche, F. O., Nogi, Y., Nost, O. A., Popov, S. V., Rignot, E., Rippin, D. M., Rivera, A., Roberts, J., Ross, N., Siegert, M. J., Smith, A. M., Steinhage, D., Studinger, M., Sun, B., Tinto, B. K., Welch, B. C., Wilson, D., Young, D. A., Xiangbin, C., and Zirizzotti, A.: Bedmap2: improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 7, 375–393, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-375-2013, 2013. 

Gardner, A. S., Moholdt, G., Cogley, J. G., Wouters, B., Arendt, A. A., Wahr, J., Berthier, E., Hock, R., Pfeffer, W. T., Kaser, G., Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Bolch, T., Sharp, M. J., Hagen, J. O., van den Broeke, M. R., and Paul, F.: A Reconciled Estimate of Glacier Contributions to Sea Level Rise: 2003 to 2009, Science, 340, 852–857, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234532, 2013. 

Golledge, N. R., Keller, E. D., Gomez, N., Naughten, K. A., Bernales, J., Trusel, L. D., and Edwards, T. L.: Global environmental consequences of twenty-first-century ice-sheet melt, Nature, 566, 65–72, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0889-9, 2019. 

Gourmelen, N., Escorihuela, M. J., Shepherd, A., Foresta, L., Muir, A., Garcia-Mondéjar, A., Roca, M., Baker, S. G., and Drinkwater, M. R.: CryoSat-2 swath interferometric altimetry for mapping ice elevation and elevation change, Adv. Space Res., 62, 1226–1242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.11.014, 2018. 

Hartmann, D. L., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Rusticucci, M., Alexander, L. V., Brönnimann, S., Charabi, Y., Dentener, F. J., Dlugokencky, E. J., Easterling, D. R., Kaplan, A., Soden, B. J., Thorne, P. W., Wild, M., and Zhai, P. M.: Observations: Atmosphere and Surface, in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., 159–254, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013. 

Hobbs, W. R., Massom, R., Stammerjohn, S., Reid, P., Williams, G., and Meier, W.: A review of recent changes in Southern Ocean sea ice, their drivers and forcings, Global Planet. Change, 143, 228–250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.06.008, 2016. 

Hogg, A. E., Shepherd, A., Cornford, S. L., Briggs, K. H., Gourmelen, N., Graham, J. A., Joughin, I., Mouginot, J., Nagler, T., Payne, A. J., Rignot, E., and Wuite, J.: Increased ice flow in Western Palmer Land linked to ocean melting, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 4159–4167, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072110, 2017. 

Holland, D. M., Thomas, R. H., de Young, B., Ribergaard, M. H., and Lyberth, B.: Acceleration of Jakobshavn Isbræ triggered by warm subsurface ocean waters, Nature Geosci., 1, 659–664, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo316, 2008. 

Howat, I. M., Joughin, I., Fahnestock, M., Smith, B. E., and Scambos, T. A.: Synchronous retreat and acceleration of southeast Greenland outlet glaciers 2000–06: ice dynamics and coupling to climate, J. Glaciol., 54, 646–660, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214308786570908, 2008. 

Huss, M.: Density assumptions for converting geodetic glacier volume change to mass change, The Cryosphere, 7, 877–887, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-877-2013, 2013. 

Huss, M. and Hock, R.: Global-scale hydrological response to future glacier mass loss, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 135–140, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0049-x, 2018. 

Immerzeel, W. W., Lutz, A. F., Andrade, M., Bahl, A., Biemans, H., Bolch, T., Hyde, S., Brumby, S., Davies, B. J., Elmore, A. C., Emmer, A., Feng, M., Fernández, A., Haritashya, U., Kargel, J. S., Koppes, M., Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Kulkarni, A. V., Mayewski, P. A., Nepal, S., Pacheco, P., Painter, T. H., Pellicciotti, F., Rajaram, H., Rupper, S., Sinisalo, A., Shrestha, A. B., Viviroli, D., Wada, Y., Xiao, C., Yao, T., and Baillie, J. E. M.: Importance and vulnerability of the world's water towers, Nature, 577, 364–369, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1822-y, 2020. 

Jakob, L., Gourmelen, N., Ewart, M., and Plummer, S.: Ice loss in High Mountain Asia and the Gulf of Alaska observed by CryoSat-2 swath altimetry between 2010 and 2019, The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2020-176, in review, 2020. 

Jacobs, S. S., Helmer, H. H., Doake, C. S. M., Jenkins, A., and Frolich, R. M.: Melting of ice shelves and the mass balance of Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 38, 375–387, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000002252, 1992. 

Jacobs, S. S., Hellmer, H. H., and Jenkins, A.: Antarctic Ice Sheet melting in the southeast Pacific, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 957–960, https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL00723, 1996. 

Jacobs, S. S., Jenkins, A., Giulivi, C. F., and Dutrieux, P.: Stronger ocean circulation and increased melting under Pine Island Glacier ice shelf, Nature Geosci., 4, 519–523, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1188, 2011. 

Joughin, I., Alley, R. B., and Holland, D. M.: Ice-Sheet Response to Oceanic Forcing, Science, 338, 1172–1176, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226481, 2012. 

Laxon, S. W., Giles, K. A., Ridout, A. L., Wingham, D. J., Willatt, R., Cullen, R., Kwok, R., Schweiger, A., Zhang, J., Haas, C., Hendricks, S., Krishfield, R., Kurtz, N., Farrell, S., and Davidson, M.: CryoSat-2 estimates of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 732–737, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50193, 2013. 

Luthcke, S. B., Zwally, H. J., Abdalati, W., Rowlands, D. D., Ray, R. D., Nerem, R. S., Lemoine, F. G., McCarthy, J. J., and Chinn, D. S.: Recent Greenland Ice Mass Loss by Drainage System from Satellite Gravity Observations, Science, 314, 1286–1289, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130776, 2006. 

Magnuson, J. J., Robertson, D. M., Benson, B. J., Wynne, R. H., Livingstone, D. M., Arai, T., Assel, R. A., Barry, R. G., Card, V., Kuusisto, E., Granin, N. G., Prowse, T. D., Stewart, K. M., and Vuglinski, V. S.: Historical Trends in Lake and River Ice Cover in the Northern Hemisphere, Science, 289, 1743–1746, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5485.1743, 2000. 

Maksym, T.: Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice Change: Contrasts, Commonalities, and Causes, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 11, 187–213, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060610, 2019. 

Marzeion, B., Cogley, J. G., Richter, K., and Parkes, D.: Attribution of global glacier mass loss to anthropogenic and natural causes, Science, 345, 919–921, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254702, 2014. 

McMillan, M., Leeson, A., Shepherd, A., Briggs, K., Armitage, T. W. K., Hogg, A., Munneke, P. K., Broeke, M. van den, Noël, B., Berg, W. J. van de, Ligtenberg, S., Horwath, M., Groh, A., Muir, A., and Gilbert, L.: A high-resolution record of Greenland mass balance, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7002–7010, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069666, 2016. 

Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., Bitz, C. M., Chung, C. T. Y., and Teng, H.: Antarctic sea-ice expansion between 2000 and 2014 driven by tropical Pacific decadal climate variability, Nature Geosci., 9, 590–595, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2751, 2016. 

Meredith, M., Sommerkorn, M., Cassotta, S., Derksen, C., Ekaykin, A., Hollowed, A., Kofinas, G., Mackintosh, A., Melbourne-Thomas, J., Muelbert, M. M. C., Ottersen, H., Pritchard, H., and Schuur, E. A. G.: Polar Regions, in IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, in press, 2019. 

Moon, T., Joughin, I., Smith, B., and Howat, I.: 21st-Century Evolution of Greenland Outlet Glacier Velocities, Science, 336, 576–578, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219985, 2012. 

Morlighem, M., Williams, C. N., Rignot, E., An, L., Arndt, J. E., Bamber, J. L., Catania, G., Chauché, N., Dowdeswell, J. A., Dorschel, B., Fenty, I., Hogan, K., Howat, I., Hubbard, A., Jakobsson, M., Jordan, T. M., Kjeldsen, K. K., Millan, R., Mayer, L., Mouginot, J., Noël, B. P. Y., O'Cofaigh, C., Palmer, S., Rysgaard, S., Seroussi, H., Siegert, M. J., Slabon, P., Straneo, F., van den Broeke, M. R., Weinrebe, W., Wood, M., and Zinglersen, K. B.: BedMachine v3: Complete Bed Topography and Ocean Bathymetry Mapping of Greenland From Multibeam Echo Sounding Combined With Mass Conservation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 11051–11061, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074954, 2017. 

Mortimer, C. A., Copland, L., and Mueller, D. R.: Volume and area changes of the Milne Ice Shelf, Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Canada, since 1950, J. Geophys. Res.-Ea. Surf., 117, F04011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002074, 2012. 

Mouginot, J., Rignot, E., and Scheuchl, B.: Sustained increase in ice discharge from the Amundsen Sea Embayment, West Antarctica, from 1973 to 2013, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1576–1584, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059069, 2014. 

Mouginot, J., Rignot, E., Bjørk, A. A., Broeke, M. van den, Millan, R., Morlighem, M., Noël, B., Scheuchl, B., and Wood, M.: Forty-six years of Greenland Ice Sheet mass balance from 1972 to 2018, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 116, 9239–9244, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904242116, 2019. 

Noël, B., van de Berg, W. J., van Wessem, J. M., van Meijgaard, E., van As, D., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lhermitte, S., Kuipers Munneke, P., Smeets, C. J. P. P., van Ulft, L. H., van de Wal, R. S. W., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Modelling the climate and surface mass balance of polar ice sheets using RACMO2 – Part 1: Greenland (1958–2016), The Cryosphere, 12, 811–831, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-811-2018, 2018. 

Otosaka, I., Shepherd, A., and McMillan, M.: Ice Sheet Elevation Change in West Antarctica From Ka-Band Satellite Radar Altimetry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 13135–13143, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084271, 2019. 

Overeem, I., Anderson, R. S., Wobus, C. W., Clow, G. D., Urban, F. E., and Matell, N.: Sea ice loss enhances wave action at the Arctic coast, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L17503, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048681, 2011. 

Overland, J. E., Dethloff, K., Francis, J. A., Hall, R. J., Hanna, E., Kim, S.-J., Screen, J. A., Shepherd, T. G., and Vihma, T.: Nonlinear response of mid-latitude weather to the changing Arctic, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 992–999, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3121, 2016. 

Paolo, F. S., Fricker, H. A., and Padman, L.: Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating, Science, 348, 327–331, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0940, 2015. 

Parkinson, C. L.: A 40-y record reveals gradual Antarctic sea ice increases followed by decreases at rates far exceeding the rates seen in the Arctic, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 14414, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906556116, 2019. 

Perovich, D. K. and Richter-Menge, J. A.: Loss of Sea Ice in the Arctic, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 1, 417–441, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163805, 2009. 

Pistone, K., Eisenman, I., and Ramanathan, V.: Observational determination of albedo decrease caused by vanishing Arctic sea ice, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3322, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318201111, 2014. 

Pulliainen, J., Luojus, K., Derksen, C., Mudryk, L., Lemmetyinen, J., Salminen, M., Ikonen, J., Takala, M., Cohen, J., Smolander, T., and Norberg, J.: Patterns and trends of Northern Hemisphere snow mass from 1980 to 2018, Nature, 581, 294–298, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2258-0, 2020. 

Rahmstorf, S., Box, J. E., Feulner, G., Mann, M. E., Robinson, A., Rutherford, S., and Schaffernicht, E. J.: Exceptional twentieth-century slowdown in Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 475–480, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2554, 2015. 

RGI Consortium: Randolph Glacier Inventory – A dataset of global glacier outlines: Version 6.0: Technical Report, Global Land Ice Measurements from Space, Colorado, USA, https://doi.org/10.7265/N5-RGI-60, 2017. 

Rignot, E., Casassa, G., Gogineni, P., Krabill, W., Rivera, A. and Thomas, R.: Accelerated ice discharge from the Antarctic Peninsula following the collapse of Larsen B ice shelf, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L18401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020697, 2004. 

Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., Scheuchl, B., van den Broeke, M., van Wessem, M. J., and Morlighem, M.: Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance from 1979–2017, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 1095, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812883116, 2019. 

Roach, L. A., Dörr, J., Holmes, C. R., Massonnet, F., Blockley, E. W., Notz, D., Rackow, T., Raphael, M. N., O'Farrell, S. P., Bailey, D. A., and Bitz, C. M.: Antarctic Sea Ice Area in CMIP6, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086729, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086729, 2020. 

Rode, K. D., Regehr, E. V., Douglas, D. C., Durner, G., Derocher, A. E., Thiemann, G. W., and Budge, S. M.: Variation in the response of an Arctic top predator experiencing habitat loss: feeding and reproductive ecology of two polar bear populations, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 76–88, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12339, 2014. 

Sandberg Sørensen, L., Simonsen, S. B., Forsberg, R., Khvorostovsky, K., Meister, R., and Engdahl, M. E.: 25 years of elevation changes of the Greenland Ice Sheet from ERS, Envisat, and CryoSat-2 radar altimetry, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 495, 234–241, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.05.015, 2018. 

Scambos, T., Hulbe, C., and Fahnestock, M.: Climate-Induced Ice Shelf Disintegration in the Antarctic Peninsula, in: Antarctic Peninsula Climate Variability: Historical and Paleoenvironmental Perspectives, 79–92, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2013. 

Scambos, T. A., Bohlander, J. A., Shuman, C. A., and Skvarca, P.: Glacier acceleration and thinning after ice shelf collapse in the Larsen B embayment, Antarctica, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L18402, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020670, 2004. 

SCAR: Antarctic Digital Database, Version 7.2, British Antarctic Survey, available at: https://www.add.scar.org/ (last access: June 2020) 2020. 

Schweiger, A., Lindsay, R., Zhang, J., Steele, M., Stern, H., and Kwok, R.: Uncertainty in modeled Arctic sea ice volume, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007084, 2011. 

Screen, J. A. and Simmonds, I.: The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification, Nature, 464, 1334–1337, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09051, 2010. 

Shean, D. E., Bhushan, S., Montesano, P., Rounce, D. R., Arendt, A., and Osmanoglu, B.: A Systematic, Regional Assessment of High Mountain Asia Glacier Mass Balance, Front. Earth Sci., 7, 363, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00363, 2020 (data available at: https://nsidc.org/data/highmountainasia). 

Shepherd, A., Wingham, D., Payne, T., and Skvarca, P.: Larsen Ice Shelf Has Progressively Thinned, Science, 302, 856–859, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089768, 2003. 

Shepherd, A., Wingham, D., and Rignot, E.: Warm ocean is eroding West Antarctic Ice Sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L23402, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021106, 2004. 

Shepherd, A., Wingham, D., Wallis, D., Giles, K., Laxon, S., and Sundal, A. V.: Recent loss of floating ice and the consequent sea level contribution, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L13503, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042496, 2010. 

Shepherd, A., Fricker, H. A., and Farrell, S. L.: Trends and connections across the Antarctic cryosphere, Nature, 558, 223–232, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0171-6, 2018. 

Shepherd, A., Gilbert, L., Muir, A. S., Konrad, H., McMillan, M., Slater, T., Briggs, K. H., Sundal, A. V., Hogg, A. E., and Engdahl, M. E.: Trends in Antarctic Ice Sheet Elevation and Mass, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8174–8183, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082182, 2019. 

Slater, T., Hogg, A. E., and Mottram, R.: Ice-sheet losses track high-end sea-level rise projections, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 879–881, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0893-y, 2020. 

Sørensen, L. S., Simonsen, S. B., Nielsen, K., Lucas-Picher, P., Spada, G., Adalgeirsdottir, G., Forsberg, R., and Hvidberg, C. S.: Mass balance of the Greenland ice sheet (2003–2008) from ICESat data – the impact of interpolation, sampling and firn density, The Cryosphere, 5, 173–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-173-2011, 2011. 

Stroeve, J. and Notz, D.: Changing state of Arctic sea ice across all seasons, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 103001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aade56, 2018. 

Tepes, P., Gourmelen, N., Nienow, P., Tsamados, M., Shepherd, A., and Weissgerber, F.: Dynamic and surface mass imbalance of Arctic glaciers and ice caps, Remote Sens. Environ., in review, 2021. 

Thackeray, C. W. and Hall, A.: An emergent constraint on future Arctic sea-ice albedo feedback, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 972–978, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0619-1, 2019. 

The IMBIE Team: Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017, Nature, 558, 219–222, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0179-y, 2018 (data available at: http://imbie.org/data-downloads/). 

The IMBIE Team: Mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2018, Nature, 579, 233–239, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1855-2, 2020 (data available at: http://imbie.org/data-downloads/). 

Tilling, R. L., Ridout, A., and Shepherd, A.: Estimating Arctic sea ice thickness and volume using CryoSat-2 radar altimeter data, Adv. Space Res., 62, 1203–1225, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.10.051, 2018. 

van Wessem, J. M., van de Berg, W. J., Noël, B. P. Y., van Meijgaard, E., Amory, C., Birnbaum, G., Jakobs, C. L., Krüger, K., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lhermitte, S., Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Medley, B., Reijmer, C. H., van Tricht, K., Trusel, L. D., van Ulft, L. H., Wouters, B., Wuite, J., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Modelling the climate and surface mass balance of polar ice sheets using RACMO2 – Part 2: Antarctica (1979–2016), The Cryosphere, 12, 1479–1498, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1479-2018, 2018. 

Vaughan, D. G., Marshall, G. J., Connolley, W. M., Parkinson, C., Mulvaney, R., Hodgson, D. A., King, J. C., Pudsey, C. J., and Turner, J.: Recent Rapid Regional Climate Warming on the Antarctic Peninsula, Climatic Change, 60, 243–274, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026021217991, 2003. 

Vaughan, D. G., Comiso, J. C., Allison, I., Carrasco, J., Kaser, G., Kwok, R., Mote, P., Murray, T., Paul, F., Ren, J., Rignot, E., Solomina, O., Steffen, K., and Zhang, T.: Observations: Cryosphere, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., 317–382, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013. 

Velicogna, I., Mohajerani, Y., A, G., Landerer, F., Mouginot, J., Noel, B., Rignot, E., Sutterley, T., van den Broeke, M., van Wessem, M., and Wiese, D.: Continuity of Ice Sheet Mass Loss in Greenland and Antarctica From the GRACE and GRACE Follow-On Missions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087291, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087291, 2020. 

Vellinga, M. and Wood, R. A.: Global Climatic Impacts of a Collapse of the Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation, Climatic Change, 54, 251–267, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016168827653, 2002. 

Vieli, A., Payne, A. J., Shepherd, A., and Du, Z.: Causes of pre-collapse changes of the Larsen B ice shelf: Numerical modelling and assimilation of satellite observations, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 259, 297–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.04.050, 2007. 

Vihma, T.: Effects of Arctic Sea Ice Decline on Weather and Climate: A Review, Surv. Geophys., 35, 1175–1214, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-014-9284-0, 2014. 

Vitousek, S., Barnard, P. L., Fletcher, C. H., Frazer, N., Erikson, L., and Storlazzi, C. D.: Doubling of coastal flooding frequency within decades due to sea-level rise, Sci. Rep., 7, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01362-7, 2017. 

von Schuckmann, K., Cheng, L., Palmer, M. D., Hansen, J., Tassone, C., Aich, V., Adusumilli, S., Beltrami, H., Boyer, T., Cuesta-Valero, F. J., Desbruyères, D., Domingues, C., García-García, A., Gentine, P., Gilson, J., Gorfer, M., Haimberger, L., Ishii, M., Johnson, G. C., Killick, R., King, B. A., Kirchengast, G., Kolodziejczyk, N., Lyman, J., Marzeion, B., Mayer, M., Monier, M., Monselesan, D. P., Purkey, S., Roemmich, D., Schweiger, A., Seneviratne, S. I., Shepherd, A., Slater, D. A., Steiner, A. K., Straneo, F., Timmermans, M.-L., and Wijffels, S. E.: Heat stored in the Earth system: where does the energy go?, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2013–2041, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2013-2020, 2020. 

WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group: Global sea-level budget 1993–present, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 1551–1590, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1551-2018, 2018. 

Weertman, J.: Stability of the Junction of an Ice Sheet and an Ice Shelf, J. Glaciol., 13, 3–11, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000023327, 1974. 

Willis, M. J., Melkonian, A. K., and Pritchard, M. E.: Outlet glacier response to the 2012 collapse of the Matusevich Ice Shelf, Severnaya Zemlya, Russian Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Ea. Surf., 120, 2040–2055, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003544, 2015. 

Worby, A. P., Geiger, C. A., Paget, M. J., Woert, M. L. V., Ackley, S. F., and DeLiberty, T. L.: Thickness distribution of Antarctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 113, C05S92, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004254, 2008. 

Wouters, B., Gardner, A. S., and Moholdt, G.: Global Glacier Mass Loss During the GRACE Satellite Mission (2002–2016), Front. Earth Sci., 7, 96, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00096, 2019. 

Zemp, M., Frey, H., Gärtner-Roer, I., Nussbaumer, S. U., Hoelzle, M., Paul, F., Haeberli, W., Denzinger, F., Ahlstrøm, A. P., Anderson, B., Bajracharya, S., Baroni, C., Braun, L. N., Cáceres, B. E., Casassa, G., Cobos, G., Dávila, L. R., Granados, H. D., Demuth, M. N., Espizua, L., Fischer, A., Fujita, K., Gadek, B., Ghazanfar, A., Hagen, J. O., Holmlund, P., Karimi, N., Li, Z., Pelto, M., Pitte, P., Popovnin, V. V., Portocarrero, C. A., Prinz, R., Sangewar, C. V., Severskiy, I., Sigurđsson, O., Soruco, A., Usubaliev, R., and Vincent, C.: Historically unprecedented global glacier decline in the early 21st century, J. Glaciol., 61, 745–762, https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG15J017, 2015. 

Zemp, M., Huss, M., Thibert, E., Eckert, N., McNabb, R., Huber, J., Barandun, M., Machguth, H., Nussbaumer, S. U., Gärtner-Roer, I., Thomson, L., Paul, F., Maussion, F., Kutuzov, S., and Cogley, J. G.: Global glacier mass changes and their contributions to sea-level rise from 1961 to 2016, Nature, 568, 382–386, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1071-0, 2019a. 

Zemp, M., Huss, M., Thibert, E., Eckert, N., McNabb, R., Huber, J., and Cogley, J. G.: Global and regional glacier mass changes from 1961 to 2016 (Version 1.0.0) [Data set], Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1492141, 2019b. 

Zemp, M., Huss, M., Eckert, N., Thibert, E., Paul, F., Nussbaumer, S. U., and Gärtner-Roer, I.: Brief communication: Ad hoc estimation of glacier contributions to sea-level rise from the latest glaciological observations, The Cryosphere, 14, 1043–1050, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1043-2020, 2020. 

Zhang, J. and Rothrock, D. A.: Modeling Global Sea Ice with a Thickness and Enthalpy Distribution Model in Generalized Curvilinear Coordinates, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 845–861, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0845:MGSIWA>2.0.CO;2, 2003 (data available at: http://psc.apl.uw.edu/data/).  

Zhang, L., Delworth, T. L., Cooke, W., and Yang, X.: Natural variability of Southern Ocean convection as a driver of observed climate trends, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 59–65, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0350-3, 2019. 

Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Satellite observations are the best method for tracking ice loss, because the cryosphere is vast and remote. Using these, and some numerical models, we show that Earth has lost 28 trillion tonnes (Tt) of ice since 1994 from Arctic sea ice (7.6 Tt), ice shelves (6.5 Tt), mountain glaciers (6.1 Tt), the Greenland (3.8 Tt) and Antarctic ice sheets (2.5 Tt), and Antarctic sea ice (0.9 Tt). It has taken just 3.2 % of the excess energy Earth has absorbed due to climate warming to cause this ice loss.