Articles | Volume 9, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-217-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-217-2015
Research article
 | 
06 Feb 2015
Research article |  | 06 Feb 2015

Enthalpy benchmark experiments for numerical ice sheet models

T. Kleiner, M. Rückamp, J. H. Bondzio, and A. Humbert

Related authors

Coupling of the Ice-sheet and Sea-level System Model (version 4.24) with hydrology model CUAS-MPI (version 0.1) using the preCICE coupling library
Daniel Abele, Thomas Kleiner, Yannic Fischler, Benjamin Uekermann, Gerasimos Chourdakis, Mathieu Morlighem, Achim Basermann, Christian Bischof, Hans-Joachim Bungartz, and Angelika Humbert
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3345,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3345, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Improved basal drag of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet from L-curve analysis of inverse models utilizing subglacial hydrology simulations
Lea-Sophie Höyns, Thomas Kleiner, Andreas Rademacher, Martin Rückamp, Michael Wolovick, and Angelika Humbert
The Cryosphere, 19, 2133–2158, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2133-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2133-2025, 2025
Short summary
Insights into the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
Hélène Seroussi, Vincent Verjans, Sophie Nowicki, Antony J. Payne, Heiko Goelzer, William H. Lipscomb, Ayako Abe-Ouchi, Cécile Agosta, Torsten Albrecht, Xylar Asay-Davis, Alice Barthel, Reinhard Calov, Richard Cullather, Christophe Dumas, Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi, Rupert Gladstone, Nicholas R. Golledge, Jonathan M. Gregory, Ralf Greve, Tore Hattermann, Matthew J. Hoffman, Angelika Humbert, Philippe Huybrechts, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Thomas Kleiner, Eric Larour, Gunter R. Leguy, Daniel P. Lowry, Chistopher M. Little, Mathieu Morlighem, Frank Pattyn, Tyler Pelle, Stephen F. Price, Aurélien Quiquet, Ronja Reese, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, Andrew Shepherd, Erika Simon, Robin S. Smith, Fiammetta Straneo, Sainan Sun, Luke D. Trusel, Jonas Van Breedam, Peter Van Katwyk, Roderik S. W. van de Wal, Ricarda Winkelmann, Chen Zhao, Tong Zhang, and Thomas Zwinger
The Cryosphere, 17, 5197–5217, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5197-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5197-2023, 2023
Short summary
Regularization and L-curves in ice sheet inverse models: a case study in the Filchner–Ronne catchment
Michael Wolovick, Angelika Humbert, Thomas Kleiner, and Martin Rückamp
The Cryosphere, 17, 5027–5060, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5027-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5027-2023, 2023
Short summary
A parallel implementation of the confined–unconfined aquifer system model for subglacial hydrology: design, verification, and performance analysis (CUAS-MPI v0.1.0)
Yannic Fischler, Thomas Kleiner, Christian Bischof, Jeremie Schmiedel, Roiy Sayag, Raban Emunds, Lennart Frederik Oestreich, and Angelika Humbert
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5305–5322, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5305-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5305-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical Modelling
Sea level rise contribution from Ryder Glacier in northern Greenland varies by an order of magnitude by 2300 depending on future emissions
Felicity A. Holmes, Jamie Barnett, Henning Åkesson, Mathieu Morlighem, Johan Nilsson, Nina Kirchner, and Martin Jakobsson
The Cryosphere, 19, 2695–2714, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2695-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2695-2025, 2025
Short summary
Calibrated sea level contribution from the Amundsen Sea sector, West Antarctica, under RCP8.5 and Paris 2C scenarios
Sebastian H. R. Rosier, G. Hilmar Gudmundsson, Adrian Jenkins, and Kaitlin A. Naughten
The Cryosphere, 19, 2527–2557, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2527-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2527-2025, 2025
Short summary
Calving driven by horizontal forces in a revised crevasse-depth framework
Donald A. Slater and Till J. W. Wagner
The Cryosphere, 19, 2475–2493, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2475-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2475-2025, 2025
Short summary
The demise of the world's largest piedmont glacier: a probabilistic forecast
Douglas J. Brinkerhoff, Brandon S. Tober, Michael Daniel, Victor Devaux-Chupin, Michael S. Christoffersen, John W. Holt, Christopher F. Larsen, Mark Fahnestock, Michael G. Loso, Kristin M. F. Timm, Russell C. Mitchell, and Martin Truffer
The Cryosphere, 19, 2321–2353, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2321-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2321-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improved basal drag of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet from L-curve analysis of inverse models utilizing subglacial hydrology simulations
Lea-Sophie Höyns, Thomas Kleiner, Andreas Rademacher, Martin Rückamp, Michael Wolovick, and Angelika Humbert
The Cryosphere, 19, 2133–2158, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2133-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2133-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Aschwanden, A. and Blatter, H.: Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation of polythermal glaciers, J. Geophys. Res., 114, F01027, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001028, 2009.
Aschwanden, A., Bueler, E., Khroulev, C., and Blatter, H.: An enthalpy formulation for glaciers and ice sheets, J. Glaciol., 58, 441–457, https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J088, 2012.
Blatter, H. and Greve, R.: Comparison and verification of enthalpy schemes for polythermal glaciers and ice sheets with a one-dimensional model, Polar Science, submitted, preprint at ArXiv E-Prints, arXiv:1410.6251, 2014.
Blatter, H. and Hutter, K.: Polythermal conditions in Arctic glaciers, J. Glaciol., 37, 261–269, 1991.
Bradford, J. H. and Harper, J. T.: Wave field migration as a tool for estimating spatially continuous radar velocity and water content in glaciers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L08502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021770, 2005.
Download
Short summary
We present benchmark experiments and analytical solutions to test the implementation of enthalpy and the corresponding boundary conditions in numerical ice sheet models. The results of the applied models agree well with the analytical solutions if the change in conductivity between cold and temperate ice is properly considered in the model.
Share