Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4423-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4423-2022
Research article
 | 
20 Oct 2022
Research article |  | 20 Oct 2022

Exploring the capabilities of electrical resistivity tomography to study subsea permafrost

Mauricio Arboleda-Zapata, Michael Angelopoulos, Pier Paul Overduin, Guido Grosse, Benjamin M. Jones, and Jens Tronicke

Related authors

Brief communication: Testing a portable Bullard-type temperature lance confirms highly spatially heterogeneous sediment temperatures under shallow bodies of water in the Arctic
Frederieke Miesner, William Lambert Cable, Pier Paul Overduin, and Julia Boike
The Cryosphere, 18, 2603–2611, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2603-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2603-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterization of Non-Gaussianity in the Snow Distributions of Various Landscapes
Noriaki Ohara, Andrew D. Parsekian, Benjamin M. Jones, Rodrigo C. Rangel, Kenneth M. Hinkel, and Rui A. P. Perdigão
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-395,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-395, 2024
Short summary
Mapping subsea permafrost around Tuktoyaktuk Island (NWT, Canada) using electrical resistivity tomography
Ephraim Erkens, Michael Angelopoulos, Jens Tronicke, Scott R. Dallimore, Dustin Whalen, Julia Boike, and Pier Paul Overduin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1044,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1044, 2024
Short summary
Review article: Retrogressive thaw slump theory and terminology
Nina Nesterova, Marina Leibman, Alexander Kizyakov, Hugues Lantuit, Ilya Tarasevich, Ingmar Nitze, Alexandra Veremeeva, and Guido Grosse
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2914,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2914, 2024
Short summary
Multi-Source Synthesis, Harmonization, and Inventory of Critical Infrastructure and Human-Impacted Areas in Permafrost Regions of Alaska (SIRIUS)
Soraya Kaiser, Julia Boike, Guido Grosse, and Moritz Langer
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-393,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-393, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Numerical Modelling
Exploring non-Gaussian sea ice characteristics via observing system simulation experiments
Christopher Riedel and Jeffrey Anderson
The Cryosphere, 18, 2875–2896, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2875-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2875-2024, 2024
Short summary
Past and future of the Arctic sea ice in High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) climate models
Julia Selivanova, Doroteaciro Iovino, and Francesco Cocetta
The Cryosphere, 18, 2739–2763, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2739-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2739-2024, 2024
Short summary
Data-driven surrogate modeling of high-resolution sea-ice thickness in the Arctic
Charlotte Durand, Tobias Sebastian Finn, Alban Farchi, Marc Bocquet, Guillaume Boutin, and Einar Ólason
The Cryosphere, 18, 1791–1815, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1791-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Using Icepack to reproduce ice mass balance buoy observations in landfast ice: improvements from the mushy-layer thermodynamics
Mathieu Plante, Jean-François Lemieux, L. Bruno Tremblay, Adrienne Tivy, Joey Angnatok, François Roy, Gregory Smith, Frédéric Dupont, and Adrian K. Turner
The Cryosphere, 18, 1685–1708, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1685-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Understanding the influence of ocean waves on Arctic sea ice simulation: a modeling study with an atmosphere–ocean–wave–sea ice coupled model
Chao-Yuan Yang, Jiping Liu, and Dake Chen
The Cryosphere, 18, 1215–1239, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1215-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1215-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Akça, I. and Basokur, A. T.: Extraction of structure-based geoelectric models by hybrid genetic algorithms, Geophysics, 75, F15–F22, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3273851, 2010. a, b
Angelopoulos, M.: Mapping subsea permafrost with electrical resistivity surveys, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3, 6–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00258-5, 2022. a
Angelopoulos, M., Westermann, S., Overduin, P. P., Faguet, A., Olenchenko, V., Grosse, G., and Grigoriev, M. N.: Conductivity, temperature and depth (CTD), snow and ice thickess and apparent resisitivity on the Bykovsky Peninsula, Lena Delta, in April and July 2017, PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.895887, 2018. a
Angelopoulos, M., Westermann, S., Overduin, P. P., Faguet, A., Olenchenko, V., Grosse, G., and Grigoriev, M. N.: Heat and Salt Flow in Subsea Permafrost Modeled with CryoGRID2, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 124, 920–937, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004823, 2019. a, b, c, d
Angelopoulos, M., Overduin, P. P., Miesner, F., Grigoriev, M. N., and Vasiliev, A. A.: Recent advances in the study of Arctic submarine permafrost, Permafrost Periglac., 31, 442–453, https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2061, 2020a. a, b
Download
Short summary
We demonstrate how we can reliably estimate the thawed–frozen permafrost interface with its associated uncertainties in subsea permafrost environments using 2D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) data. In addition, we show how further analyses considering 1D inversion and sensitivity assessments can help quantify and better understand 2D ERT inversion results. Our results illustrate the capabilities of the ERT method to get insights into the development of the subsea permafrost.