Brock, B. W., Willis, I. C., and Sharp, M. J.:
Measurement and parameterization of aerodynamic roughness length variations at Haut Glacier d'Arolla, Switzerland,
J. Glaciol.,
52, 281–297,
https://doi.org/10.3189/172756506781828746, 2006.
a,
b,
c
Casella, V. and Franzini, M.: Modelling steep surfaces by various configurations of nadir and oblique photogrammetry, ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-1, Prague, Czech Republic, 175–182,
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-iii-1-175-2016, 2016.
a
Chambers, J. R., Smith, M. W., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., Ross, A. N., and James, M. R.:
Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates: Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
125, 1–19,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005167, 2020.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g
Chudley, T. R., Christoffersen, P., Doyle, S. H., Abellan, A., and Snooke, N.: High-accuracy UAV photogrammetry of ice sheet dynamics with no ground control, The Cryosphere, 13, 955–968,
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-955-2019, 2019.
a,
b
Dachauer, A.: Aerodynamic Roughness Length of Crevassed Tidewater Glaciers from UAV Mapping, MS thesis, p. 100, available at:
https://folk.ntnu.no/richahan/Publications/2020_Dachauer_Thesis.pdf (last access: 7 December 2021), 2020.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
DJI: Phantom 4 Pro/Pro
+, User Manual v1.4, Tech. rep., DJI, Shenzhen, China, 2017. a
DJI: Mavic 2 Enterprise Series, User Manual v1.8, Tech. rep., DJI, Shenzhen, China, 2019. a
Ericson, Y., Falck, E., Chierici, M., Fransson, A., and Kristiansen, S.:
Marine
CO2 system variability in a high arctic tidewater-glacier fjord system, Tempelfjorden, Svalbard,
Cont. Shelf Res.,
181, 1–13,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2019.04.013, 2019.
a
ESA: Copernicus Open Access Hub, available at:
https://scihub.copernicus.eu/, last access: 23 August 2020.
a,
b
Esau, I. and Repina, I.: Wind climate in kongsfjorden, svalbard, and attribution of leading wind driving mechanisms through turbulence-resolving simulations, Adv. Meteorol., 2012, 568454,
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/568454, 2012.
a
Fausto, R. S., Van As, D., Box, J. E., Colgan, W., Langen, P. L., and Mottram, R. H.:
The implication of nonradiative energy fluxes dominating Greenland ice sheet exceptional ablation area surface melt in 2012,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 2649–2658,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067720, 2016.
a
Federman, A., Santana Quintero, M., Kretz, S., Gregg, J., Lengies, M., Ouimet, C., and Laliberte, J.: UAV photgrammetric workflows: A best practice guideline, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., Ottawa, Canada, XLII-2/W5, 237–244,
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-237-2017, 2017.
a
Fitzpatrick, N., Radić, V., and Menounos, B.: A multi-season investigation of glacier surface roughness lengths through in situ and remote observation, The Cryosphere, 13, 1051–1071,
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1051-2019, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k
Hagen, J. O., Liestøl, O., Roland, E., and Jørgensen, T.:
Glacier Atlas of Svalbard and Jan Mayen,
Norsk polarinstitutt, Oslo, 1993. a
Hann, R., Altstädter, B., Betlem, P., Deja, K., Dragańska-Deja, K., Ewertowski, M., Hartvich, F., Jonassen, M., Lampert, A., Laska, M., Sobota, I., Storvold, R., Tomczyk, A., Wojtysiak, K., and Zagórski, P.:
Scientific Applications of Unmanned Vehicles in Svalbard, SESS report 2020,
Svalbard Integrated Arctic Earth Observing System, Zenodo,
https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4293283, 2021.
a,
b
Hanssen-Bauer, I., Førland, E. J., Hisdal, H., Mayer, S., Sandø, A. B., Sorteberg, A., Adakudlu, M., Andresen, J., Bakke, J., Beldring, S., Benestad, R., Bilt, W., Bogen, J., Borstad, C., Breili, K., Breivik, Ø., Børsheim, K. Y., Christiansen, H. H., Dobler, A., Engeset, R., Frauenfelder, R., Gerland, S., Gjelten, H. M., Gundersen, J., Isaksen, K., Jaedicke, C., Kierulf, H., Kohler, J., Li, H., Lutz, J., Melvold, K., Mezghani, A., Nilsen, F., Nilsen, I. B., Nilsen, J. E. Ø., Pavlova, O., Ravndal, O., Risebrobakken, B., Saloranta, T., Sandven, S., Schuler, T. V., Simpson, M. J. R., Skogen, M., Smedsrud, L. H., Sund, M., Vikhamar-Schuler, D., Westermann, S., and Wong, W. K.: Climate in Svalbard 2100, The Norwegian Centre for Climate Services (NCCS), Trondheim, p. 105, 2019.
a,
b
Irvine-Fynn, T. D., Sanz-Ablanedo, E., Rutter, N., Smith, M. W., and Chandler, J. H.:
Measuring glacier surface roughness using plot-scale, close-range digital photogrammetry,
J. Glaciol.,
60, 957–969,
https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG14J032, 2014.
a,
b,
c
James, M. R. and Robson, S.:
Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground-based image networks,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
39, 1413–1420,
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3609, 2014.
a
James, M. R., Robson, S., and Smith, M. W.:
3-D uncertainty-based topographic change detection with structure-from-motion photogrammetry: precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
42, 1769–1788,
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4125, 2017.
a
Karner, F., Obleitner, F., Krismer, T., Kohler, J., and Greuell, W.:
A decade of energy and mass balance investigations on the glacier Kongsvegen, Svalbard,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 3986–4000,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018342, 2013.
a
Lettau, H.:
Note on aerodynamic roughness-parameter estimation on the basis of roughness-element description,
J. Appl. Meteorol.,
8, 828–832, 1969.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k,
l
Macdonald, R. W., Griffiths, R. F., and Hall, D. J.:
An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays,
Atmos. Environ.,
32, 1857–1864,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00403-2, 1998.
a
Mansell, D., Luckman, A., and Murray, T.:
Dynamics of tidewater surge-type glaciers in northwest Svalbard,
J. Glaciol.,
58, 110–118,
https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J058, 2012.
a
Miles, E. S., Steiner, J. F., and Brun, F.:
Highly variable aerodynamic roughness length (z0) for a hummocky debris-covered glacier,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
122, 8447–8466,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026510, 2017.
a,
b
Munro, D. S.:
Surface roughness and bulk heat transfer on a glacier: comparison with eddy correlation,
J. Glaciol.,
35, 343–348,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022143000009266, 1989.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Murray, T., James, T., MacHeret, Y., Lavrentiev, I., Glazovsky, A., and Sykes, H.:
Geometric changes in a tidewater glacier in svalbard during its surge cycle,
Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res.,
44, 359–367,
https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-44.3.359, 2012.
a
Nicholson, L. I., Pȩtlicki, M., Partan, B., and MacDonell, S.: 3-D surface properties of glacier penitentes over an ablation season, measured using a Microsoft Xbox Kinect, The Cryosphere, 10, 1897–1913,
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1897-2016, 2016.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Nield, J. M., Chiverrell, R. C., Darby, S. E., Leyland, J., Vircavs, L. H., and Jacobs, B.:
Complex spatial feedbacks of tephra redistribution, ice melt and surface roughness modulate ablation on tephra covered glaciers,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
38, 95–102,
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3352, 2013a.
a,
b
Nield, J. M., King, J., Wiggs, G. F. S., Leyland, J., Bryant, R. G., Chiverrell, R. C., Darby, S. E., Eckardt, F. D., Thomas, D. S. G., Vircavs, L. H., and Washington, R.:
Estimating aerodynamic roughness over complex surface terrain,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 12948–12961,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020632, 2013b.
a
Quincey, D., Smith, M., Rounce, D., Ross, A., King, O., and Watson, C.:
Evaluating morphological estimates of the aerodynamic roughness of debris covered glacier ice,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
42, 2541–2553,
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4198, 2017.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g
Rees, W. G. and Arnold, N. S.:
Scale-dependent roughness of a glacier surface: Implications for radar backscatter and aerodynamic roughness modelling,
J. Glaciol.,
52, 214–222,
https://doi.org/10.3189/172756506781828665, 2006.
a,
b
Rounce, D. R., Quincey, D. J., and McKinney, D. C.: Debris-covered glacier energy balance model for Imja–Lhotse Shar Glacier in the Everest region of Nepal, The Cryosphere, 9, 2295–2310,
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2295-2015, 2015.
a,
b,
c
Ryan, J. C., Hubbard, A. L., Box, J. E., Todd, J., Christoffersen, P., Carr, J. R., Holt, T. O., and Snooke, N.: UAV photogrammetry and structure from motion to assess calving dynamics at Store Glacier, a large outlet draining the Greenland ice sheet, The Cryosphere, 9, 1–11,
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1-2015, 2015.
a
Shepard, M. K., Campbell, B. A., Bulmer, M. H., Farr, T. G., Gaddis, L. R., and Plaut, J. J.:
The roughness of natural terrain: A planetary and remote sensing perspective,
J. Geophys. Res.-Planet.,
106, 32777–32795,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JE001429, 2001.
a
Smeets, C. J., Duynkerke, P. G., and Vugts, H. F.:
Observed wind profiles and turbulence fluxes over an ice surface with changing surface roughness,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol.,
92, 101–123,
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1001899015849, 1999.
a,
b,
c
Smith, B. E., Raymond, C. F., and Scambos, T.:
Anisotropic texture of ice sheet surfaces,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
111, 1–8,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000393, 2006.
a
Smith, M. W., Quincey, D. J., Dixon, T., Bingham, R. G., Carrivick, J. L., Irvine-Fynn, T. D. L., and Rippin, D. M.:
Aerodynamic roughness of glacial ice surfaces derived from high-resolution topographic data,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth,
121, 748–766,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003759, 2016.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k
Smith, T., Smith, M. W., Chambers, J. R., Sailer, R., Nicholson, L., Mertes, J., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., and Stiperski, I.:
A scale-dependent model to represent changing aerodynamic roughness of ablating glacier ice based on repeat topographic surveys,
J. Glaciol.,
pp. 1–15,
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.56, 2020.
a,
b
Uysal, M., Toprak, A. S., and Polat, N.:
DEM generation with UAV Photogrammetry and accuracy analysis in Sahitler hill,
Measurement,
73, 539–543,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.010, 2015.
a,
b
van Tiggelen, M., Smeets, P. C. J. P., Reijmer, C. H., Wouters, B., Steiner, J. F., Nieuwstraten, E. J., Immerzeel, W. W., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Mapping the aerodynamic roughness of the Greenland Ice Sheet surface using ICESat-2: evaluation over the K-transect, The Cryosphere, 15, 2601–2621,
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2601-2021, 2021.
a,
b
Verhoeven, G.:
Taking computer vision aloft – archaeological three-dimensional reconstructions from aerial photographs with photoscan,
Archaeol. Prospect.,
18, 67–73,
https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.399, 2011.
a
