Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1187-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1187-2019
Research article
 | 
12 Apr 2019
Research article |  | 12 Apr 2019

Assessment of contemporary satellite sea ice thickness products for Arctic sea ice

Heidi Sallila, Sinéad Louise Farrell, Joshua McCurry, and Eero Rinne

Related authors

Dual-hemisphere sea ice thickness reference measurements from multiple data sources for evaluation and product inter-comparison of satellite altimetry
Ida Birgitte Lundtorp Olsen, Henriette Skourup, Heidi Sallila, Stefan Hendricks, Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen, Stefan Kern, Stephan Paul, Marion Bocquet, Sara Fleury, Dmitry Divine, and Eero Rinne
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-234,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-234, 2024
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Arctic sea ice radar freeboard retrieval from the European Remote-Sensing Satellite (ERS-2) using altimetry: toward sea ice thickness observation from 1995 to 2021
Marion Bocquet, Sara Fleury, Fanny Piras, Eero Rinne, Heidi Sallila, Florent Garnier, and Frédérique Rémy
The Cryosphere, 17, 3013–3039, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3013-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3013-2023, 2023
Short summary
Kara and Barents sea ice thickness estimation based on CryoSat-2 radar altimeter and Sentinel-1 dual-polarized synthetic aperture radar
Juha Karvonen, Eero Rinne, Heidi Sallila, Petteri Uotila, and Marko Mäkynen
The Cryosphere, 16, 1821–1844, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1821-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1821-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Remote Sensing
Pan-Arctic sea ice concentration from SAR and passive microwave
Tore Wulf, Jørgen Buus-Hinkler, Suman Singha, Hoyeon Shi, and Matilde Brandt Kreiner
The Cryosphere, 18, 5277–5300, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5277-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5277-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing sea ice microwave emissivity up to submillimeter waves from airborne and satellite observations
Nils Risse, Mario Mech, Catherine Prigent, Gunnar Spreen, and Susanne Crewell
The Cryosphere, 18, 4137–4163, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4137-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4137-2024, 2024
Short summary
The AutoICE Challenge
Andreas Stokholm, Jørgen Buus-Hinkler, Tore Wulf, Anton Korosov, Roberto Saldo, Leif Toudal Pedersen, David Arthurs, Ionut Dragan, Iacopo Modica, Juan Pedro, Annekatrien Debien, Xinwei Chen, Muhammed Patel, Fernando Jose Pena Cantu, Javier Noa Turnes, Jinman Park, Linlin Xu, Katharine Andrea Scott, David Anthony Clausi, Yuan Fang, Mingzhe Jiang, Saeid Taleghanidoozdoozan, Neil Curtis Brubacher, Armina Soleymani, Zacharie Gousseau, Michał Smaczny, Patryk Kowalski, Jacek Komorowski, David Rijlaarsdam, Jan Nicolaas van Rijn, Jens Jakobsen, Martin Samuel James Rogers, Nick Hughes, Tom Zagon, Rune Solberg, Nicolas Longépé, and Matilde Brandt Kreiner
The Cryosphere, 18, 3471–3494, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3471-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3471-2024, 2024
Short summary
A study of sea ice topography in the Weddell and Ross seas using dual-polarimetric TanDEM-X imagery
Lanqing Huang and Irena Hajnsek
The Cryosphere, 18, 3117–3140, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3117-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Estimating differential penetration of green (532 nm) laser light over sea ice with NASA's Airborne Topographic Mapper: observations and models
Michael Studinger, Benjamin E. Smith, Nathan Kurtz, Alek Petty, Tyler Sutterley, and Rachel Tilling
The Cryosphere, 18, 2625–2652, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2625-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2625-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Allard, R. A., Farrell, S. L., Hebert, D. H., Johnston, W. F., Li, L., Kurtz, N. T., Phelps, M. W., Posey, P. G., Tilling, R., Ridout, A., and Wallcraft, A. L.: Utilizing CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness to initialize a coupled ice-ocean modeling system, Adv. Space Res., 62, 1265–1280, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.12.030, 2018. 
Armitage, T. W. K and Ridout, A. L.: Arctic sea ice freeboard from AltiKa and comparison with CryoSat-2 and Operation IceBridge, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 6724–6731, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064823, 2015. 
Belward, A. and Dowell, M. (Eds.): The Global Observing System for Climate (GCOS): Implementation Needs, GCOS 2016 Implementation Plan, Global Ocean Observing System Report (GCOS 200, GOOS 214), World Meteorological Organisation, 341, available at: https://library.wmo.int/opac/doc_num.php?explnum_id=3417 (last access: November 2018), 2016. 
Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., Farrell, S., Newman, T., and Bitz, C.: Snow cover on Arctic sea ice in observations and an Earth system model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10342–10348. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066049, 2015. 
Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., Webster, M. A., Farrell, S. L., and Bitz, C. M.: Reconstruction of Snow on Arctic Sea Ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 3588–3602, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013364, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
We assess 8 years of sea ice thickness observations derived from measurements of CryoSat-2 (CS2), AVHRR and SMOS satellites, collating key details of primary interest to users. We find a number of differences among data products but find that CS2 measurements are reliable for sea ice thickness, particularly between ~ 0.5 and 4 m. Regional comparisons reveal noticeable differences in ice thickness between products, particularly in the marginal seas in areas of considerable ship traffic.