Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2917-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2917-2021
Research article
 | 
28 Jun 2021
Research article |  | 28 Jun 2021

Sensitivity of the Greenland surface mass and energy balance to uncertainties in key model parameters

Tobias Zolles and Andreas Born

Related authors

How does a change in climate variability impact the Greenland ice sheet surface mass balance?
Tobias Zolles and Andreas Born
The Cryosphere, 18, 4831–4844, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4831-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4831-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sources of uncertainty in Greenland surface mass balance in the 21st century
Katharina M. Holube, Tobias Zolles, and Andreas Born
The Cryosphere, 16, 315–331, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-315-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-315-2022, 2022
Short summary
GrSMBMIP: intercomparison of the modelled 1980–2012 surface mass balance over the Greenland Ice Sheet
Xavier Fettweis, Stefan Hofer, Uta Krebs-Kanzow, Charles Amory, Teruo Aoki, Constantijn J. Berends, Andreas Born, Jason E. Box, Alison Delhasse, Koji Fujita, Paul Gierz, Heiko Goelzer, Edward Hanna, Akihiro Hashimoto, Philippe Huybrechts, Marie-Luise Kapsch, Michalea D. King, Christoph Kittel, Charlotte Lang, Peter L. Langen, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, Glen E. Liston, Gerrit Lohmann, Sebastian H. Mernild, Uwe Mikolajewicz, Kameswarrao Modali, Ruth H. Mottram, Masashi Niwano, Brice Noël, Jonathan C. Ryan, Amy Smith, Jan Streffing, Marco Tedesco, Willem Jan van de Berg, Michiel van den Broeke, Roderik S. W. van de Wal, Leo van Kampenhout, David Wilton, Bert Wouters, Florian Ziemen, and Tobias Zolles
The Cryosphere, 14, 3935–3958, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3935-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3935-2020, 2020
Short summary
Robust uncertainty assessment of the spatio-temporal transferability of glacier mass and energy balance models
Tobias Zolles, Fabien Maussion, Stephan Peter Galos, Wolfgang Gurgiser, and Lindsey Nicholson
The Cryosphere, 13, 469–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-469-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-469-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Ice sheets | Subject: Greenland
Projections of precipitation and temperatures in Greenland and the impact of spatially uniform anomalies on the evolution of the ice sheet
Nils Bochow, Anna Poltronieri, and Niklas Boers
The Cryosphere, 18, 5825–5863, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5825-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5825-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impacts of differing melt regimes on satellite radar waveforms and elevation retrievals
Alexander C. Ronan, Robert L. Hawley, and Jonathan W. Chipman
The Cryosphere, 18, 5673–5683, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5673-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5673-2024, 2024
Short summary
The future of Upernavik Isstrøm through the ISMIP6 framework: sensitivity analysis and Bayesian calibration of ensemble prediction
Eliot Jager, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, Nicolas Champollion, Romain Millan, Heiko Goelzer, and Jérémie Mouginot
The Cryosphere, 18, 5519–5550, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5519-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5519-2024, 2024
Short summary
Firn seismic anisotropy in the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream from ambient-noise surface waves
Emma Pearce, Dimitri Zigone, Coen Hofstede, Andreas Fichtner, Joachim Rimpot, Sune Olander Rasmussen, Johannes Freitag, and Olaf Eisen
The Cryosphere, 18, 4917–4932, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4917-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4917-2024, 2024
Short summary
First results of the polar regional climate model RACMO2.4
Christiaan T. van Dalum, Willem Jan van de Berg, Srinidhi N. Gadde, Maurice van Tiggelen, Tijmen van der Drift, Erik van Meijgaard, Lambertus H. van Ulft, and Michiel R. van den Broeke
The Cryosphere, 18, 4065–4088, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4065-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4065-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Amante, C. and Eakins, B.: ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis [data], https://doi.org/10.7289/V5C8276M, 2009. a
Aoki, T., Hachikubo, A., and Mashiro, H.: Effects of snow physical parameters on shortwave broadband albedos, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003506, 2003. a, b, c, d, e
Aschwanden, A., Fahnestock, M. A., Truffer, M., Brinkerhoff, D. J., Hock, R., Khroulev, C., Mottram, R., and Khan, S. A.: Contribution of the Greenland Ice Sheet to sea-level over the next millennium, Science Advances, 5, 12 pp., https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav9396, 2019. a, b
Beven, K.: Changing ideas in hydrology – The case of physically-based models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7, 1989. a
Bintanja, R., Van de Wal, R., and Oerlemans, J.: Global ice volume variations through the last glacial cycle simulated by a 3-D ice-dynamical model, Quatern. Int., 95, 11–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(02)00023-X, 2002. a
Download
Short summary
We investigate the sensitivity of a glacier surface mass and the energy balance model of the Greenland ice sheet for the cold period of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and the present-day climate. The results show that the model sensitivity changes with climate. While for present-day simulations inclusions of sublimation and hoar formation are of minor importance, they cannot be neglected during the LGM. To simulate the surface mass balance over long timescales, a water vapor scheme is necessary.