Articles | Volume 14, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3235-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3235-2020
Research article
 | 
29 Sep 2020
Research article |  | 29 Sep 2020

Possible biases in scaling-based estimates of glacier change: a case study in the Himalaya

Argha Banerjee, Disha Patil, and Ajinkya Jadhav

Related authors

Predictability of mean summertime diurnal winds over ungauged mountain glaciers
J. Krishnanand, Argha Banerjee, R. Shankar, Himanshu Kaushik, Mohd. Farooq Azam, and Chandan Sarangi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3756,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3756, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
A comprehensive rock glacier inventory for Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh, western Himalaya, India – Baseline for the permafrost research
Imtiyaz Ahmad Bhat, Irfan Rashid, RAAJ Ramsankaran, Argha Banerjee, and Saurabh Vijay
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-522,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-522, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Climate sensitivity of the summer runoff of two glacierised Himalayan catchments with contrasting climate
Sourav Laha, Argha Banerjee, Ajit Singh, Parmanand Sharma, and Meloth Thamban
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 627–645, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-627-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-627-2023, 2023
Short summary
The control of climate sensitivity on variability and change of summer runoff from two glacierised Himalayan catchments
Sourav Laha, Argha Banerjee, Ajit Singh, Parmanand Sharma, and Meloth Thamban
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-499,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-499, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Cited articles

Adhikari, S. and Marshall, S. J.: Glacier volume-area relation for high-order mechanics and transient glacier states, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L16505, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052712, 2012. a
Bach, E., Radić, V., and Schoof, C.: How sensitive are mountain glaciers to climate change? Insights from a block model, J. Glaciol., 64, 247–258, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.15, 2018. a, b, c
Bahr, D. B.: Width and length scaling of glaciers, J. Glaciol., 43, 557–562, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000035164, 1997. a, b
Bahr, D. B., Meier, M. F., and Peckham, S. D.: The physical basis of glacier volume-area scaling, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 102, 20355–20362, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB01696, 1997. a
Bahr, D. B., Pfeffer, W. T., and Kaser, G.: A review of volume-area scaling of glaciers, Rev. Geophys., 53, 95–140, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000470, 2015. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l
Download
Short summary
Simple models of glacier dynamics based on volume–area scaling underestimate climate sensitivity and response time of glaciers. Consequently, they may predict a faster response and a smaller long-term glacier loss. These biases in scaling models are established theoretically and are analysed in detail by simulating the step response of a set of 703 Himalayan glaciers separately by three different models: a scaling model, a 2-D shallow-ice approximation model, and a linear-response model.
Share