Articles | Volume 14, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3235-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3235-2020
Research article
 | 
29 Sep 2020
Research article |  | 29 Sep 2020

Possible biases in scaling-based estimates of glacier change: a case study in the Himalaya

Argha Banerjee, Disha Patil, and Ajinkya Jadhav

Related authors

A comprehensive rock glacier inventory for Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh, western Himalaya, India – Baseline for the permafrost research
Imtiyaz Ahmad Bhat, Irfan Rashid, RAAJ Ramsankaran, Argha Banerjee, and Saurabh Vijay
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-522,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-522, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Climate sensitivity of the summer runoff of two glacierised Himalayan catchments with contrasting climate
Sourav Laha, Argha Banerjee, Ajit Singh, Parmanand Sharma, and Meloth Thamban
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 627–645, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-627-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-627-2023, 2023
Short summary
The control of climate sensitivity on variability and change of summer runoff from two glacierised Himalayan catchments
Sourav Laha, Argha Banerjee, Ajit Singh, Parmanand Sharma, and Meloth Thamban
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-499,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-499, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Brief communication: Thinning of debris-covered and debris-free glaciers in a warming climate
Argha Banerjee
The Cryosphere, 11, 133–138, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-133-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-133-2017, 2017
Short summary
Estimating the avalanche contribution to the mass balance of debris covered glaciers
A. Banerjee and R. Shankar
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-8-641-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-8-641-2014, 2014
Revised manuscript not accepted

Related subject area

Discipline: Glaciers | Subject: Alpine Glaciers
Mapping and characterization of avalanches on mountain glaciers with Sentinel-1 satellite imagery
Marin Kneib, Amaury Dehecq, Fanny Brun, Fatima Karbou, Laurane Charrier, Silvan Leinss, Patrick Wagnon, and Fabien Maussion
The Cryosphere, 18, 2809–2830, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2809-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2809-2024, 2024
Short summary
Brief communication: Recent estimates of glacier mass loss for western North America from laser altimetry
Brian Menounos, Alex Gardner, Caitlyn Florentine, and Andrew Fountain
The Cryosphere, 18, 889–894, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-889-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-889-2024, 2024
Short summary
Unprecedented Twenty-First Century Glacier Loss on Mt. Hood, Oregon, U.S.A.
Nicolas Bakken-French, Stephen J. Boyer, W. Clay Southworth, Megan Thayne, Dylan H. Rood, and Anders E. Carlson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-251,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-251, 2024
Short summary
The Aneto glacier's (Central Pyrenees) evolution from 1981 to 2022: ice loss observed from historic aerial image photogrammetry and remote sensing techniques
Ixeia Vidaller, Eñaut Izagirre, Luis Mariano del Rio, Esteban Alonso-González, Francisco Rojas-Heredia, Enrique Serrano, Ana Moreno, Juan Ignacio López-Moreno, and Jesús Revuelto
The Cryosphere, 17, 3177–3192, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3177-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3177-2023, 2023
Short summary
Modelling point mass balance for the glaciers of the Central European Alps using machine learning techniques
Ritu Anilkumar, Rishikesh Bharti, Dibyajyoti Chutia, and Shiv Prasad Aggarwal
The Cryosphere, 17, 2811–2828, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2811-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2811-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Adhikari, S. and Marshall, S. J.: Glacier volume-area relation for high-order mechanics and transient glacier states, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L16505, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052712, 2012. a
Bach, E., Radić, V., and Schoof, C.: How sensitive are mountain glaciers to climate change? Insights from a block model, J. Glaciol., 64, 247–258, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.15, 2018. a, b, c
Bahr, D. B.: Width and length scaling of glaciers, J. Glaciol., 43, 557–562, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000035164, 1997. a, b
Bahr, D. B., Meier, M. F., and Peckham, S. D.: The physical basis of glacier volume-area scaling, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 102, 20355–20362, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB01696, 1997. a
Bahr, D. B., Pfeffer, W. T., and Kaser, G.: A review of volume-area scaling of glaciers, Rev. Geophys., 53, 95–140, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000470, 2015. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l
Download
Short summary
Simple models of glacier dynamics based on volume–area scaling underestimate climate sensitivity and response time of glaciers. Consequently, they may predict a faster response and a smaller long-term glacier loss. These biases in scaling models are established theoretically and are analysed in detail by simulating the step response of a set of 703 Himalayan glaciers separately by three different models: a scaling model, a 2-D shallow-ice approximation model, and a linear-response model.