Articles | Volume 14, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3235-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3235-2020
Research article
 | 
29 Sep 2020
Research article |  | 29 Sep 2020

Possible biases in scaling-based estimates of glacier change: a case study in the Himalaya

Argha Banerjee, Disha Patil, and Ajinkya Jadhav

Viewed

Total article views: 4,646 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,309 1,147 190 4,646 287 220 242
  • HTML: 3,309
  • PDF: 1,147
  • XML: 190
  • Total: 4,646
  • Supplement: 287
  • BibTeX: 220
  • EndNote: 242
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jan 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jan 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,646 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,271 with geography defined and 375 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 02 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
Simple models of glacier dynamics based on volume–area scaling underestimate climate sensitivity and response time of glaciers. Consequently, they may predict a faster response and a smaller long-term glacier loss. These biases in scaling models are established theoretically and are analysed in detail by simulating the step response of a set of 703 Himalayan glaciers separately by three different models: a scaling model, a 2-D shallow-ice approximation model, and a linear-response model.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint