Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
The Cryosphere, 15, 2857–2871, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2857-2021
The Cryosphere, 15, 2857–2871, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2857-2021
Research article
24 Jun 2021
Research article | 24 Jun 2021

A Bayesian approach towards daily pan-Arctic sea ice freeboard estimates from combined CryoSat-2 and Sentinel-3 satellite observations

William Gregory et al.

Related authors

Network connectivity between the winter Arctic Oscillation and summer sea ice in CMIP6 models and observations
William Gregory, Julienne Stroeve, and Michel Tsamados
The Cryosphere, 16, 1653–1673, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1653-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1653-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Data Assimilation
Assimilation of sea ice thickness derived from CryoSat-2 along-track freeboard measurements into the Met Office's Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM)
Emma K. Fiedler, Matthew J. Martin, Ed Blockley, Davi Mignac, Nicolas Fournier, Andy Ridout, Andrew Shepherd, and Rachel Tilling
The Cryosphere, 16, 61–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-61-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-61-2022, 2022
Short summary
Estimating parameters in a sea ice model using an ensemble Kalman filter
Yong-Fei Zhang, Cecilia M. Bitz, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Nancy S. Collins, Timothy J. Hoar, Kevin D. Raeder, and Edward Blanchard-Wrigglesworth
The Cryosphere, 15, 1277–1284, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1277-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1277-2021, 2021
Short summary
Impact of assimilating sea ice concentration, sea ice thickness and snow depth in a coupled ocean–sea ice modelling system
Sindre Fritzner, Rune Graversen, Kai H. Christensen, Philip Rostosky, and Keguang Wang
The Cryosphere, 13, 491–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-491-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-491-2019, 2019
Short summary
Estimation of sea ice parameters from sea ice model with assimilated ice concentration and SST
Siva Prasad, Igor Zakharov, Peter McGuire, Desmond Power, and Martin Richard
The Cryosphere, 12, 3949–3965, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3949-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3949-2018, 2018
Short summary
Impact of assimilating a merged sea-ice thickness from CryoSat-2 and SMOS in the Arctic reanalysis
Jiping Xie, François Counillon, and Laurent Bertino
The Cryosphere, 12, 3671–3691, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3671-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3671-2018, 2018
Short summary

Cited articles

Aaboe, S., Breivik, L.-A., Sørensen, A., Eastwood, S., and Lavergne, T.: Global sea ice edge and type product user's manual, OSI-403-c & EUMETSAT, 2016. a
Allard, R. A., Farrell, S. L., Hebert, D. A., Johnston, W. F., Li, L., Kurtz, N. T., Phelps, M. W., Posey, P. G., Tilling, R., Ridout, A., and Wallcraft, A. J.: Utilizing CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness to initialize a coupled ice-ocean modeling system, Adv. Space Res., 62, 1265–1280, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.12.030, 2018. a
Balan-Sarojini, B., Tietsche, S., Mayer, M., Balmaseda, M., Zuo, H., de Rosnay, P., Stockdale, T., and Vitart, F.: Year-round impact of winter sea ice thickness observations on seasonal forecasts, The Cryosphere, 15, 325–344, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-325-2021, 2021. a
Bishop, C. M.: Pattern recognition and machine learning, Springer, ISBN 978-0387-31073-2, chap. 3, 152–165, 2006. a
Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E. and Bitz, C. M.: Characteristics of Arctic sea-ice thickness variability in GCMs, J. Climate, 27, 8244–8258, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00345.1, 2014. a
Download
Short summary
Satellite measurements of radar freeboard allow us to compute the thickness of sea ice from space; however attaining measurements across the entire Arctic basin typically takes up to 30 d. Here we present a statistical method which allows us to combine observations from three separate satellites to generate daily estimates of radar freeboard across the Arctic Basin. This helps us understand how sea ice thickness is changing on shorter timescales and what may be causing these changes.