Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4929-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4929-2021
Research article
 | 
25 Oct 2021
Research article |  | 25 Oct 2021

Nunataks as barriers to ice flow: implications for palaeo ice sheet reconstructions

Martim Mas e Braga, Richard Selwyn Jones, Jennifer C. H. Newall, Irina Rogozhina, Jane L. Andersen, Nathaniel A. Lifton, and Arjen P. Stroeven

Related authors

FjordRPM v1.0: a reduced-physics model for efficient simulation of glacial fjords
Donald Alexander Slater, Eleanor Johnstone, Martim Mas e Braga, Neil Fraser, Tom Cowton, and Mark Inall
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3934,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3934, 2025
Short summary
Sensitivity of the Antarctic ice sheets to the warming of marine isotope substage 11c
Martim Mas e Braga, Jorge Bernales, Matthias Prange, Arjen P. Stroeven, and Irina Rogozhina
The Cryosphere, 15, 459–478, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-459-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-459-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Ice sheets | Subject: Antarctic
Viscoelastic mechanics of tidally induced lake drainage in the grounding zone
Hanwen Zhang, Richard F. Katz, and Laura A. Stevens
The Cryosphere, 19, 2087–2103, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2087-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2087-2025, 2025
Short summary
A facet-based numerical model to retrieve ice sheet topography from Sentinel-3 altimetry
Jérémie Aublanc, François Boy, Franck Borde, and Pierre Féménias
The Cryosphere, 19, 1937–1954, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1937-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1937-2025, 2025
Short summary
Current reversal leads to regime change in the Amery Ice Shelf cavity in the 21st century
Jing Jin, Antony J. Payne, and Christopher Y. S. Bull
The Cryosphere, 19, 1873–1896, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1873-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1873-2025, 2025
Short summary
Speed-up, slowdown, and redirection of ice flow on neighbouring ice streams in the Pope, Smith, and Kohler region of West Antarctica
Heather L. Selley, Anna E. Hogg, Benjamin J. Davison, Pierre Dutrieux, and Thomas Slater
The Cryosphere, 19, 1725–1738, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1725-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1725-2025, 2025
Short summary
Changes in Antarctic surface conditions and potential for ice shelf hydrofracturing from 1850 to 2200
Nicolas C. Jourdain, Charles Amory, Christoph Kittel, and Gaël Durand
The Cryosphere, 19, 1641–1674, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1641-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1641-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackert, R. P., Barclay, D. J., Borns, H. W., Calkin, P. E., Kurz, M. D., Fastook, J. L., and Steig, E. J.: Measurements of past ice sheet elevations in interior West Antarctica, Science, 286, 276–280, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5438.276, 1999. a
Ackert, R. P., Mukhopadhyay, S., Parizek, B. R., and Borns, H. W.: Ice elevation near the West Antarctic Ice Sheet divide during the Last Glaciation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, GL031412, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031412, 2007. a
Agosta, C., Amory, C., Kittel, C., Orsi, A., Favier, V., Gallée, H., van den Broeke, M. R., Lenaerts, J. T. M., van Wessem, J. M., van de Berg, W. J., and Fettweis, X.: Estimation of the Antarctic surface mass balance using the regional climate model MAR (1979–2015) and identification of dominant processes, The Cryosphere, 13, 281–296, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-281-2019, 2019. a
Åkesson, H., Morlighem, M., Nisancioglu, K. H., Svendsen, J. I., and Mangerud, J.: Atmosphere-driven ice sheet mass loss paced by topography: Insights from modelling the south-western Scandinavian Ice Sheet, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 195, 32–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.07.004, 2018. a
Albrecht, T., Winkelmann, R., and Levermann, A.: Glacial-cycle simulations of the Antarctic Ice Sheet with the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM) – Part 2: Parameter ensemble analysis, The Cryosphere, 14, 633–656, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-633-2020, 2020. a, b
Download
Short summary
Mountains higher than the ice surface are sampled to know when the ice reached the sampled elevation, which can be used to guide numerical models. This is important to understand how much ice will be lost by ice sheets in the future. We use a simple model to understand how ice flow around mountains affects the ice surface topography and show how much this influences results from field samples. We also show that models need a finer resolution over mountainous areas to better match field samples.
Share