Articles | Volume 13, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-943-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-943-2019
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
19 Mar 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 19 Mar 2019

Evaluation of CloudSat snowfall rate profiles by a comparison with in situ micro-rain radar observations in East Antarctica

Florentin Lemonnier, Jean-Baptiste Madeleine, Chantal Claud, Christophe Genthon, Claudio Durán-Alarcón, Cyril Palerme, Alexis Berne, Niels Souverijns, Nicole van Lipzig, Irina V. Gorodetskaya, Tristan L'Ecuyer, and Norman Wood

Related authors

Brief communication: Evaluating Antarctic precipitation in ERA5 and CMIP6 against CloudSat observations
Marie-Laure Roussel, Florentin Lemonnier, Christophe Genthon, and Gerhard Krinner
The Cryosphere, 14, 2715–2727, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2715-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2715-2020, 2020
Short summary
Evaluation of coastal Antarctic precipitation in MAR3.9 regional and LMDz6 global atmospheric model with ground-based radar observations
Florentin Lemonnier, Alizée Chemison, Hubert Gallée, Gerhard Krinner, Jean-Baptiste Madeleine, Chantal Claud, and Christophe Genthon
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2020-167,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2020-167, 2020
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Snow | Subject: Antarctic
Extreme precipitation associated with atmospheric rivers over West Antarctic ice shelves: insights from kilometre-scale regional climate modelling
Ella Gilbert, Denis Pishniak, José Abraham Torres, Andrew Orr, Michelle Maclennan, Nander Wever, and Kristiina Verro
The Cryosphere, 19, 597–618, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-597-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-597-2025, 2025
Short summary
Surface processes and drivers of the snow water stable isotopic composition at Dome C, East Antarctica – a multi-dataset and modelling analysis
Inès Ollivier, Hans Christian Steen-Larsen, Barbara Stenni, Laurent Arnaud, Mathieu Casado, Alexandre Cauquoin, Giuliano Dreossi, Christophe Genthon, Bénédicte Minster, Ghislain Picard, Martin Werner, and Amaëlle Landais
The Cryosphere, 19, 173–200, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-173-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-173-2025, 2025
Short summary
Dual-frequency radar observations of snowmelt processes on Antarctic perennial sea ice by CFOSCAT and ASCAT
Rui Xu, Chaofang Zhao, Stefanie Arndt, and Christian Haas
The Cryosphere, 18, 5769–5788, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5769-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5769-2024, 2024
Short summary
How do extreme ENSO events affect Antarctic surface mass balance?
Jessica M. A. Macha, Andrew N. Mackintosh, Felicity S. Mccormack, Benjamin J. Henley, Helen V. McGregor, Christiaan T. van Dalum, and Ariaan Purich
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3425,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3425, 2024
Short summary
Contribution of blowing-snow sublimation to the surface mass balance of Antarctica
Srinidhi Gadde and Willem Jan van de Berg
The Cryosphere, 18, 4933–4953, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4933-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4933-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arthern, R. J., Winebrenner, D. P., and Vaughan, D. G.: Antarctic snow accumulation mapped using polarization of 4.3-cm wavelength microwave emission, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D06107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005667, 2006. a
Berne, A., Grazioli, J., and Genthon, C.: Snowfall rate estimates derived from a micro rain radar (MRR) at the Dumont d'Urville station, Adelie Land, East Antarctica, link to netCDF file, PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.882565, 2017. a
Boening, C., Lebsock, M., Landerer, F., and Stephens, G.: Snowfall-driven mass change on the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L21501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053316, 2012. a
Bromwich, D. H.: Snowfall in high southern latitudes, Rev. Geophys., 26, 149–168, 1988. a, b
Chen, S., Hong, Y., Kulie, M., Behrangi, A., Stepanian, P. M., Cao, Q., You, Y., Zhang, J., Hu, J., and Zhang, X.: Comparison of snowfall estimates from the NASA CloudSat cloud profiling radar and NOAA/NSSL multi-radar multi-sensor system, J. Hydrol., 541, 862–872, 2016. a
Download
Short summary
Evaluation of the vertical precipitation rate profiles of CloudSat radar by comparison with two surface-based micro-rain radars (MRR) located at two antarctic stations gives a near-perfect correlation between both datasets, even though climatic and geographic conditions are different for the stations. A better understanding and reassessment of CloudSat uncertainties ranging from −13 % up to +22 % confirms the robustness of the CloudSat retrievals of snowfall over Antarctica.
Share