Articles | Volume 9, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-269-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-269-2015
Research article
 | 
10 Feb 2015
Research article |  | 10 Feb 2015

Arctic sea ice thickness loss determined using subsurface, aircraft, and satellite observations

R. Lindsay and A. Schweiger

Related subject area

Sea Ice
Suitability of the CICE sea ice model for seasonal prediction and positive impact of CryoSat-2 ice thickness initialization
Shan Sun and Amy Solomon
The Cryosphere, 18, 3033–3048, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3033-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3033-2024, 2024
Short summary
A large-scale high-resolution numerical model for sea-ice fragmentation dynamics
Jan Åström, Fredrik Robertsen, Jari Haapala, Arttu Polojärvi, Rivo Uiboupin, and Ilja Maljutenko
The Cryosphere, 18, 2429–2442, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2429-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2429-2024, 2024
Short summary
Experimental modelling of the growth of tubular ice brinicles from brine flows under sea ice
Sergio Testón-Martínez, Laura M. Barge, Jan Eichler, C. Ignacio Sainz-Díaz, and Julyan H. E. Cartwright
The Cryosphere, 18, 2195–2205, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2195-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Why is summertime Arctic sea ice drift speed projected to decrease?
Jamie L. Ward and Neil F. Tandon
The Cryosphere, 18, 995–1012, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Seasonal Evolution of the Sea Ice Floe Size Distribution from Two Decades of MODIS Data
Ellen Margaret Buckley, Leela Cañuelas, Mary-Louise Timmermans, and Monica Martinez Wilhelmus
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-89,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-89, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Haas, C. and Jochmann, P.: Continuous EM and ULS thickness profiling in support of ice force measurements, in: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic conditions (POAC'03), 16–19 June 2003, Trondheim, Norway, edited by: Loeset, S., Bonnemaire, B., and Bjerkas, M., Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 849–856, 2003.
Haas, C., Lobach, J., Hendricks, S., Rabenstein, L., and Pfaffling, A.: Helicopter-borne measurements of sea ice thickness, using a small and lightweight, digital EM system, J. Appl. Geophys., 67, 234–241, 2009.
Haas, C., Hendricks, S., Eicken, H., and Herber, A.: Synoptic airborne thickness surveys reveal state of Arctic sea ice cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042652, 2010.
Hansen, E., Gerland, S., Granskog, M. A., Pavlova, O., Renner, A. H. H., Haapala, J., Lyning, T. B., and Tschudi, M.: Thinning of Arctic sea ice observed in Fram Strait: 1990–2011, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 5202–5221, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20393, 2013.
Krishfield, R. A. and Proshutinsky, A.: BGOS ULS Data Processing Procedure. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute report, available at: http://www.whoi.edu/fileserver.do?id=85684&pt=2&p=100409 (last access: 26 April 2013), 2006.
Download
Short summary
The sea ice thickness of the Arctic Basin is estimated from sources that include upward-looking sonars, electromagnetic sensors, and lidar or radar altimeters. Good agreement is found between five of the systems while larger systematic differences are found for others. The trend in annual mean ice thickness, 2000--2013, is –0.58–/+0.07m decade–1; for the central Arctic Basin alone the annual mean ice thickness has decreased from 3.45m in 1975 to 1.11m in 2013, a 68% reduction.