Articles | Volume 9, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-229-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-229-2015
Research article
 | 
06 Feb 2015
Research article |  | 06 Feb 2015

Snow depth mapping in high-alpine catchments using digital photogrammetry

Y. Bühler, M. Marty, L. Egli, J. Veitinger, T. Jonas, P. Thee, and C. Ginzler

Related authors

National-scale debris-flow hazard indication modelling for Swiss railway infrastructure
Feiko Bernard van Zadelhoff, Yves Bühler, and Michael Bründl
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4604,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4604, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Probabilistic modelling for avalanche hazard and risk assessment
Jan Kleinn, Dörte Aller, Yves Bühler, Julia Glaus, Adrian Peter, and Nils Hählen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3799,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3799, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Comparing high spatial and temporal resolution snow depth measurements and modelling results in an avalanche release area
Pia Ruttner, Nora Helbig, Annelies Voordendag, Andreas Wieser, and Yves Bühler
The Cryosphere, 20, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4185-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4185-2026, 2026
Short summary
Automated Avalanche Hazard Indication for Southeast Alaska
Elizabeth Fischer, Gabriel J. Wolken, Yves Bühler, Marc Christen, and Rick Lader
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1345,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1345, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Probabilistic avalanche runout modelling for daily risk management of traffic routes
Julia Glaus, Jan Kleinn, Lukas Stoffel, Pia Ruttner, Katreen Wikstrom Jones, Johan Gaume, and Yves Bühler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-999,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-999, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Aguilar, F. J. and Mills, J. P.: Accuracy assessment of lidar-derived digital elevation models, Photogramm. Record, 23, 148–169, 2008.
Bavay, M., Lehning, M., Jonas, T., and Löwe, H.: Simulations of future snow cover and discharge in Alpine headwater catchments, Hydrol. Process., 23, 95–108, 2009.
Bründl, M., Etter, H.-J., Steiniger, M., Klingler, Ch., Rhyner, J., and Ammann, W. J.: IFKIS – a basis for managing avalanche risk in settlements and on roads in Switzerland, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 257–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-257-2004, 2004.
Buchroithner, M. F.: Problems of mountain hazard mapping using spaceborne remote sensing techniques, Adv. Space Res., 15, 57–66, 1995.
Bühler, Y., Meier, L., and Ginzler, C.: Potential of Operational High Spatial Resolution Near-Infrared Remote Sensing Instruments for Snow Surface Type Mapping, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 12, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2014.2363237, 2015.
Download
Short summary
We are able to map snow depth over large areas ( > 100km2) using airborne digital photogrammetry. Digital photogrammetry is more economical than airborne Laser Scanning but slightly less accurate. Comparisons to independent snow depth measurements reveal an accuracy of about 30cm. Spatial continuous mapping of snow depth is a major step forward compared to point measurements usually applied today. Limitations are steep slopes (> 50°) and areas covered by trees and scrubs.
Share