Please respond to the minor comments on the revised m/s by Reviewer 1 included below.

This paper might benefit from from a table in the discussion or collusion about the strengths and weaknesses of the different methods - or rank the methods based on usability for different attributes.

Figure 2 is unnecessary, it does not add to the story (it has also been published elsewhere by the same authors).

Can the colour ramp in figure 5 be expanded to show more details. Also the black and grey for buildings and trees is nearly impossible to find. (same in fig 6)

Throughout the entire paper there numbers followed by units sold always have a space, this should be corrected in various locations.

The conclusion section contains a lot of information that might be better in a discussion section, for example the discussion on if a UAV would be a good platform is not a conclusion of this paper.

"Now the successor sensor Leica ADS100 is available." This is not a sentence, i think something is missing.

"In any case" This is not technical language

Thank you for your diligence in responding to the reviewer comments.