Articles | Volume 19, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5671-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5671-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review article
| 
13 Nov 2025
Review article |
| 13 Nov 2025
| 13 Nov 2025
Review article: using spaceborne lidar for snow depth retrievals: recent findings and utility for hydrologic applications
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Carrie Vuyovich
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Thomas Neumann
Earth Sciences Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Justin Pflug
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
David Shean
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Ellyn M. Enderlin
Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA
Karina Zikan
Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA
Hannah Besso
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Jessica Lundquist
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Cesar Deschamps-Berger
Pyrenean Institute of Ecology-CSIC, Avda Montañana 1005, Zaragoza 50.059, Spain
Désirée Treichler
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Related authors
Benjamin E. Smith, Michael Studinger, Tyler Sutterley, Zachary Fair, and Thomas Neumann
The Cryosphere, 19, 975–995, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-975-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-975-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates errors (biases) that may result when green lasers are used to measure the elevation of glaciers and ice sheets. These biases are important because if the snow or ice on top of the ice sheet changes, it can make the elevation of the ice appear to change by the wrong amount. We measure these biases over the Greenland Ice Sheet with a laser system on an airplane and explore how the use of satellite data can let us correct for the biases.
Zachary Fair, Mark Flanner, Adam Schneider, and S. McKenzie Skiles
The Cryosphere, 16, 3801–3814, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3801-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3801-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Snow grain size is important to determine the age and structure of snow, but it is difficult to measure. Snow grain size can be found from airborne and spaceborne observations by measuring near-infrared energy reflected from snow. In this study, we use the SNICAR radiative transfer model and a Monte Carlo model to examine how snow grain size measurements change with snow structure and solar zenith angle. We show that improved understanding of these variables improves snow grain size precision.
Zachary Fair, Mark Flanner, Kelly M. Brunt, Helen Amanda Fricker, and Alex Gardner
The Cryosphere, 14, 4253–4263, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4253-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4253-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Ice on glaciers and ice sheets may melt and pond on ice surfaces in summer months. Detection and observation of these meltwater ponds is important for understanding glaciers and ice sheets, and satellite imagery has been used in previous work. However, image-based methods struggle with deep water, so we used data from the Ice, Clouds, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) and the Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM) to demonstrate the potential for lidar depth monitoring.
Karina Zikan, Ellyn M. Enderlin, Hans-Peter Marshall, and Shad O'Neel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4813, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4813, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
We present an improved method for measuring mountain snow depth using NASA’s ICESat-2 satellite that accounts for steep terrain. By comparison to weather station and helicopter measurements, we show that ICESat-2 captures snow depth both over a season and across a mountain ridge. ICESat-2 works best when slopes are less than 20°. Enough mountain terrain falls within this slope range that ICESat-2 could dramatically expand snow depth observation and provide critical data for water management.
Marco Mazzolini, Kristoffer Aalstad, Esteban Alonso-González, Sebastian Westermann, and Désirée Treichler
The Cryosphere, 19, 3831–3848, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3831-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3831-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we showcase the use the satellite laser altimeter ICESat-2, which is able to retrieve snow depth in areas where snow amounts are still poorly estimated despite the importance of these water resources. We can update snow models with these observations through algorithms that spatially propagate the information beyond the satellite profiles. The positive results show the potential of the approach to improve snow simulations, in terms of average snow depth and spatial distribution.
Aman KC, Ellyn M. Enderlin, Dominik Fahrner, Twila Moon, and Dustin Carroll
The Cryosphere, 19, 3089–3106, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3089-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3089-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The sum of ice flowing towards a glacier’s terminus and changes in the position of the terminus over time collectively makes up terminus ablation. We found that terminus ablation has more seasonal variability than previously concluded from flux-based estimates of ice discharge. The findings are of importance in understanding the timing and location of the freshwater input to the fjords and surrounding ocean basins affecting local and regional ecosystems and ocean properties.
Kajsa Holland-Goon, Randall Bonnell, Daniel McGrath, W. Brad Baxter, Tate Meehan, Ryan Webb, Chris Larsen, Hans-Peter Marshall, Megan Mason, and Carrie Vuyovich
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2435, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2435, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
As part of the NASA SnowEx23 campaign, we conducted detailed snowpack experiments in Alaska’s boreal forests and Arctic tundra. We collected ground-penetrating radar measurements of snow depth along 44 short transects. We then excavated the snowpack from below the transects and measured snow depth, noting any vegetation and void spaces. We used the detailed in situ measurements to evaluate uncertainties in ground-penetrating radar and airborne lidar methods for snow depth retrieval.
Edward H. Bair, Dar A. Roberts, David R. Thompson, Philip G. Brodrick, Brenton A. Wilder, Niklas Bohn, Christopher J. Crawford, Nimrod Carmon, Carrie M. Vuyovich, and Jeff Dozier
The Cryosphere, 19, 2315–2320, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Key to the success of future satellite missions is understanding snowmelt in our warming climate, as this has implications for nearly 2 billion people. An obstacle is that an artifact, called the hook, is often mistaken for soot or dust. Instead, it is caused by three amplifying effects: (1) background reflectance that is too dark, (2) an assumption of level terrain, and (3) differences in optical constants of ice. Sensor calibration and directional effects may also contribute. Solutions are presented.
Esteban Alonso-González, Adrian Harpold, Jessica D. Lundquist, Cara Piske, Laura Sourp, Kristoffer Aalstad, and Simon Gascoin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2347, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2347, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Simulating the snowpack is challenging, as there are several sources of uncertainty due to e.g. the meteorological forcing. Using data assimilation techniques, it is possible to improve the simulations by fusing models and snow observations. However in forests, observations are difficult to obtain, because they cannot be retrieved through the canopy. Here, we explore the possibility of propagating the information obtained in forest clearings to areas covered by the canopy.
Rainey Aberle, Ellyn Enderlin, Shad O'Neel, Caitlyn Florentine, Louis Sass, Adam Dickson, Hans-Peter Marshall, and Alejandro Flores
The Cryosphere, 19, 1675–1693, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1675-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1675-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Tracking seasonal snow on glaciers is critical for understanding glacier health. Yet previous work has not directly compared machine learning algorithms for snow classification across satellite image products. To address this, we developed a new automated workflow for tracking seasonal snow on glaciers using several image products and machine learning models. Applying this method can help provide insights into glacier health, water resources, and the effects of climate change on snow cover.
Benjamin E. Smith, Michael Studinger, Tyler Sutterley, Zachary Fair, and Thomas Neumann
The Cryosphere, 19, 975–995, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-975-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-975-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates errors (biases) that may result when green lasers are used to measure the elevation of glaciers and ice sheets. These biases are important because if the snow or ice on top of the ice sheet changes, it can make the elevation of the ice appear to change by the wrong amount. We measure these biases over the Greenland Ice Sheet with a laser system on an airplane and explore how the use of satellite data can let us correct for the biases.
Colleen Mortimer, Lawrence Mudryk, Eunsang Cho, Chris Derksen, Mike Brady, and Carrie Vuyovich
The Cryosphere, 18, 5619–5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ground measurements of snow water equivalent (SWE) are vital for understanding the accuracy of large-scale estimates from satellites and climate models. We compare two types of measurements – snow courses and airborne gamma SWE estimates – and analyze how measurement type impacts the accuracy assessment of gridded SWE products. We use this analysis to produce a combined reference SWE dataset for North America, applicable for future gridded SWE product evaluations and other applications.
George Brencher, Scott Henderson, and David Shean
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3196, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3196, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Glacial lakes are often dammed by moraines, which can fail, causing floods. Traditional methods of measuring moraine dam structure are not feasible for thousands of lakes. We instead developed a method to measure moraine dam movement with satellite radar data and applied this approach to the Imja Lake moraine dam in Nepal. We found that the moraine dam moved ~90 cm from 2017–2024, providing information about its internal structure. These data can help guide limited hazard remediation resources.
Beata Csatho, Tony Schenk, and Tom Neumann
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-3-2024, 83–88, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-83-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-83-2024, 2024
Jukes Liu, Madeline Gendreau, Ellyn Mary Enderlin, and Rainey Aberle
The Cryosphere, 18, 3571–3590, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3571-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3571-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
There are sometimes gaps in global glacier velocity records produced using satellite image feature-tracking algorithms during times of rapid glacier acceleration, which hinders the study of glacier flow processes. We present an open-source pipeline for customizing the feature-tracking parameters and for including images from an additional source. We applied it to five glaciers and found that it produced accurate velocity data that supplemented their velocity records during rapid acceleration.
Livia Piermattei, Michael Zemp, Christian Sommer, Fanny Brun, Matthias H. Braun, Liss M. Andreassen, Joaquín M. C. Belart, Etienne Berthier, Atanu Bhattacharya, Laura Boehm Vock, Tobias Bolch, Amaury Dehecq, Inés Dussaillant, Daniel Falaschi, Caitlyn Florentine, Dana Floricioiu, Christian Ginzler, Gregoire Guillet, Romain Hugonnet, Matthias Huss, Andreas Kääb, Owen King, Christoph Klug, Friedrich Knuth, Lukas Krieger, Jeff La Frenierre, Robert McNabb, Christopher McNeil, Rainer Prinz, Louis Sass, Thorsten Seehaus, David Shean, Désirée Treichler, Anja Wendt, and Ruitang Yang
The Cryosphere, 18, 3195–3230, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3195-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Satellites have made it possible to observe glacier elevation changes from all around the world. In the present study, we compared the results produced from two different types of satellite data between different research groups and against validation measurements from aeroplanes. We found a large spread between individual results but showed that the group ensemble can be used to reliably estimate glacier elevation changes and related errors from satellite data.
Ange Haddjeri, Matthieu Baron, Matthieu Lafaysse, Louis Le Toumelin, César Deschamps-Berger, Vincent Vionnet, Simon Gascoin, Matthieu Vernay, and Marie Dumont
The Cryosphere, 18, 3081–3116, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3081-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study addresses the complex challenge of evaluating distributed alpine snow simulations with snow transport against snow depths from Pléiades stereo imagery and snow melt-out dates from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellites. Additionally, we disentangle error contributions between blowing snow, precipitation heterogeneity, and unresolved subgrid variability. Snow transport enhances the snow simulations at high elevations, while precipitation biases are the main error source in other areas.
Ross Mower, Ethan D. Gutmann, Glen E. Liston, Jessica Lundquist, and Soren Rasmussen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4135–4154, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4135-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4135-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Higher-resolution model simulations are better at capturing winter snowpack changes across space and time. However, increasing resolution also increases the computational requirements. This work provides an overview of changes made to a distributed snow-evolution modeling system (SnowModel) to allow it to leverage high-performance computing resources. Continental simulations that were previously estimated to take 120 d can now be performed in 5 h.
Steven J. Pestana, C. Chris Chickadel, and Jessica D. Lundquist
The Cryosphere, 18, 2257–2276, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2257-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2257-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We compared infrared images taken by GOES-R satellites of an area with snow and forests against surface temperature measurements taken on the ground, from an aircraft, and by another satellite. We found that GOES-R measured warmer temperatures than the other measurements, especially in areas with more forest and when the Sun was behind the satellite. From this work, we learned that the position of the Sun and surface features such as trees that can cast shadows impact GOES-R infrared images.
Justin M. Pflug, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Sujay V. Kumar, Eunsang Cho, Kristi R. Arsenault, Paul R. Houser, and Carrie M. Vuyovich
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 631–648, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-631-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-631-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Estimates of 250 m of snow water equivalent in the western USA and Canada are improved by assimilating observations representative of a snow-focused satellite mission with a land surface model. Here, by including a gap-filling strategy, snow estimates could be improved in forested regions where remote sensing is challenging. This approach improved estimates of winter maximum snow water volume to within 4 %, on average, with persistent improvements to both spring snow and runoff in many regions.
Zachary Hoppinen, Shadi Oveisgharan, Hans-Peter Marshall, Ross Mower, Kelly Elder, and Carrie Vuyovich
The Cryosphere, 18, 575–592, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-575-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-575-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We used changes in radar echo travel time from multiple airborne flights to estimate changes in snow depths across Idaho for two winters. We compared our radar-derived retrievals to snow pits, weather stations, and a 100 m resolution numerical snow model. We had a strong Pearson correlation and root mean squared error of 10 cm relative to in situ measurements. Our retrievals also correlated well with our model, especially in regions of dry snow and low tree coverage.
Josep Bonsoms, Juan I. López-Moreno, Esteban Alonso-González, César Deschamps-Berger, and Marc Oliva
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 245–264, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-245-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-245-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate warming is changing mountain snowpack patterns, leading in some cases to rain-on-snow (ROS) events. Here we analyzed near-present ROS and its sensitivity to climate warming across the Pyrenees. ROS increases during the coldest months of the year but decreases in the warmest months and areas under severe warming due to snow cover depletion. Faster snow ablation is anticipated in the coldest and northern slopes of the range. Relevant implications in mountain ecosystem are anticipated.
Esteban Alonso-González, Kristoffer Aalstad, Norbert Pirk, Marco Mazzolini, Désirée Treichler, Paul Leclercq, Sebastian Westermann, Juan Ignacio López-Moreno, and Simon Gascoin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4637–4659, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4637-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4637-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Here we explore how to improve hyper-resolution (5 m) distributed snowpack simulations using sparse observations, which do not provide information from all the areas of the simulation domain. We propose a new way of propagating information throughout the simulations adapted to the hyper-resolution, which could also be used to improve simulations of other nature. The method has been implemented in an open-source data assimilation tool that is readily accessible to everyone.
Dominik Fahrner, Donald Slater, Aman KC, Claudia Cenedese, David A. Sutherland, Ellyn Enderlin, Femke de Jong, Kristian K. Kjeldsen, Michael Wood, Peter Nienow, Sophie Nowicki, and Till Wagner
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-411, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-411, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Marine-terminating glaciers can lose mass through frontal ablation, which comprises submarine and surface melting, and iceberg calving. We estimate frontal ablation for 49 marine-terminating glaciers in Greenland by combining existing, satellite derived data and calculating volume change near the glacier front over time. The dataset offers exciting opportunities to study the influence of climate forcings on marine-terminating glaciers in Greenland over multi-decadal timescales.
Eunsang Cho, Yonghwan Kwon, Sujay V. Kumar, and Carrie M. Vuyovich
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4039–4056, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4039-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4039-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An airborne gamma-ray remote-sensing technique provides reliable snow water equivalent (SWE) in a forested area where remote-sensing techniques (e.g., passive microwave) typically have large uncertainties. Here, we explore the utility of assimilating the gamma snow data into a land surface model to improve the modeled SWE estimates in the northeastern US. Results provide new insights into utilizing the gamma SWE data for enhanced land surface model simulations in forested environments.
Whyjay Zheng, Shashank Bhushan, Maximillian Van Wyk De Vries, William Kochtitzky, David Shean, Luke Copland, Christine Dow, Renette Jones-Ivey, and Fernando Pérez
The Cryosphere, 17, 4063–4078, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4063-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4063-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We design and propose a method that can evaluate the quality of glacier velocity maps. The method includes two numbers that we can calculate for each velocity map. Based on statistics and ice flow physics, velocity maps with numbers close to the recommended values are considered to have good quality. We test the method using the data from Kaskawulsh Glacier, Canada, and release an open-sourced software tool called GLAcier Feature Tracking testkit (GLAFT) to help users assess their velocity maps.
Eunsang Cho, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Melissa L. Wrzesien, and Rhae Sung Kim
The Cryosphere, 17, 3915–3931, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3915-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3915-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As a future snow mission concept, active microwave sensors have the potential to measure snow water equivalent (SWE) in deep snowpack and forested environments. We used a modeling and data assimilation approach (a so-called observing system simulation experiment) to quantify the usefulness of active microwave-based SWE retrievals over western Colorado. We found that active microwave sensors with a mature retrieval algorithm can improve SWE simulations by about 20 % in the mountainous domain.
Justin M. Pflug, Yiwen Fang, Steven A. Margulis, and Ben Livneh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2747–2762, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2747-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2747-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wolverine denning habitat inferred using a snow threshold differed for three different spatial representations of snow. These differences were based on the annual volume of snow and the elevation of the snow line. While denning habitat was most influenced by winter meteorological conditions, our results show that studies applying thresholds to environmental datasets should report uncertainties stemming from different spatial resolutions and uncertainties introduced by the thresholds themselves.
César Deschamps-Berger, Simon Gascoin, David Shean, Hannah Besso, Ambroise Guiot, and Juan Ignacio López-Moreno
The Cryosphere, 17, 2779–2792, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2779-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2779-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The estimation of the snow depth in mountains is hard, despite the importance of the snowpack for human societies and ecosystems. We measured the snow depth in mountains by comparing the elevation of points measured with snow from the high-precision altimetric satellite ICESat-2 to the elevation without snow from various sources. Snow depths derived only from ICESat-2 were too sparse, but using external airborne/satellite products results in spatially richer and sufficiently precise snow depths.
Chris Miele, Timothy C. Bartholomaus, and Ellyn M. Enderlin
The Cryosphere, 17, 2701–2704, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2701-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2701-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Vertical shear stress (the stress orientation usually associated with vertical gradients in horizontal velocities) is a key component of the stress balance of ice shelves. However, partly due to historical assumptions, vertical shear is often misspoken of today as
negligiblein ice shelf models. We address this miscommunication, providing conceptual guidance regarding this often misrepresented stress. Fundamentally, vertical shear is required to balance thickness gradients in ice shelves.
Eunsang Cho, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Rhae Sung Kim, and Jennifer M. Jacobs
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5721–5735, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
While land surface models are a common approach for estimating macroscale snow water equivalent (SWE), the SWE accuracy is often limited by uncertainties in model physics and forcing inputs. In this study, we found large underestimations of modeled SWE compared to observations. Precipitation forcings and melting physics limitations dominantly contribute to the SWE underestimations. Results provide insights into prioritizing strategies to improve the SWE simulations for hydrologic applications.
Maximillian Van Wyk de Vries, Shashank Bhushan, Mylène Jacquemart, César Deschamps-Berger, Etienne Berthier, Simon Gascoin, David E. Shean, Dan H. Shugar, and Andreas Kääb
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3309–3327, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3309-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3309-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
On 7 February 2021, a large rock–ice avalanche occurred in Chamoli, Indian Himalaya. The resulting debris flow swept down the nearby valley, leaving over 200 people dead or missing. We use a range of satellite datasets to investigate how the collapse area changed prior to collapse. We show that signs of instability were visible as early 5 years prior to collapse. However, it would likely not have been possible to predict the timing of the event from current satellite datasets.
Brooke Medley, Thomas A. Neumann, H. Jay Zwally, Benjamin E. Smith, and C. Max Stevens
The Cryosphere, 16, 3971–4011, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3971-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3971-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite altimeters measure the height or volume change over Earth's ice sheets, but in order to understand how that change translates into ice mass, we must account for various processes at the surface. Specifically, snowfall events generate large, transient increases in surface height, yet snow fall has a relatively low density, which means much of that height change is composed of air. This air signal must be removed from the observed height changes before we can assess ice mass change.
Zachary Fair, Mark Flanner, Adam Schneider, and S. McKenzie Skiles
The Cryosphere, 16, 3801–3814, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3801-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3801-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Snow grain size is important to determine the age and structure of snow, but it is difficult to measure. Snow grain size can be found from airborne and spaceborne observations by measuring near-infrared energy reflected from snow. In this study, we use the SNICAR radiative transfer model and a Monte Carlo model to examine how snow grain size measurements change with snow structure and solar zenith angle. We show that improved understanding of these variables improves snow grain size precision.
Leung Tsang, Michael Durand, Chris Derksen, Ana P. Barros, Do-Hyuk Kang, Hans Lievens, Hans-Peter Marshall, Jiyue Zhu, Joel Johnson, Joshua King, Juha Lemmetyinen, Melody Sandells, Nick Rutter, Paul Siqueira, Anne Nolin, Batu Osmanoglu, Carrie Vuyovich, Edward Kim, Drew Taylor, Ioanna Merkouriadi, Ludovic Brucker, Mahdi Navari, Marie Dumont, Richard Kelly, Rhae Sung Kim, Tien-Hao Liao, Firoz Borah, and Xiaolan Xu
The Cryosphere, 16, 3531–3573, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3531-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3531-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent (SWE) is of fundamental importance to water, energy, and geochemical cycles but is poorly observed globally. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) measurements at X- and Ku-band can address this gap. This review serves to inform the broad snow research, monitoring, and application communities about the progress made in recent decades to move towards a new satellite mission capable of addressing the needs of the geoscience researchers and users.
Frank Paul, Livia Piermattei, Désirée Treichler, Lin Gilbert, Luc Girod, Andreas Kääb, Ludivine Libert, Thomas Nagler, Tazio Strozzi, and Jan Wuite
The Cryosphere, 16, 2505–2526, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2505-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2505-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Glacier surges are widespread in the Karakoram and have been intensely studied using satellite data and DEMs. We use time series of such datasets to study three glacier surges in the same region of the Karakoram. We found strongly contrasting advance rates and flow velocities, maximum velocities of 30 m d−1, and a change in the surge mechanism during a surge. A sensor comparison revealed good agreement, but steep terrain and the two smaller glaciers caused limitations for some of them.
Christian J. Taubenberger, Denis Felikson, and Thomas Neumann
The Cryosphere, 16, 1341–1348, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1341-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1341-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Outlet glaciers are projected to account for half of the total ice loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet over the 21st century. We classify patterns of seasonal dynamic thickness changes of outlet glaciers using new observations from the Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2). Our results reveal seven distinct patterns that differ across glaciers even within the same region. Future work can use our results to improve our understanding of processes that drive seasonal ice sheet changes.
Bertrand Cluzet, Matthieu Lafaysse, César Deschamps-Berger, Matthieu Vernay, and Marie Dumont
The Cryosphere, 16, 1281–1298, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1281-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1281-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The mountainous snow cover is highly variable at all temporal and spatial scales. Snow cover models suffer from large errors, while snowpack observations are sparse. Data assimilation combines them into a better estimate of the snow cover. A major challenge is to propagate information from observed into unobserved areas. This paper presents a spatialized version of the particle filter, in which information from in situ snow depth observations is successfully used to constrain nearby simulations.
Joachim Meyer, McKenzie Skiles, Jeffrey Deems, Kat Boremann, and David Shean
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-281, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-281, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Seasonally accumulated snow in the mountains forms a natural water reservoir which is challenging to measure in the rugged and remote terrain. Here, we use overlapping aerial images that model surface elevations using software to map snow depth by calculating the difference in surface elevations between two dates, one with snow and one without. Results demonstrate the utility of aerial images to improve our ability to capture the amount of water held as snow in remote and inaccessible locations.
Rhae Sung Kim, Sujay Kumar, Carrie Vuyovich, Paul Houser, Jessica Lundquist, Lawrence Mudryk, Michael Durand, Ana Barros, Edward J. Kim, Barton A. Forman, Ethan D. Gutmann, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Camille Garnaud, Melody Sandells, Hans-Peter Marshall, Nicoleta Cristea, Justin M. Pflug, Jeremy Johnston, Yueqian Cao, David Mocko, and Shugong Wang
The Cryosphere, 15, 771–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-771-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-771-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
High SWE uncertainty is observed in mountainous and forested regions, highlighting the need for high-resolution snow observations in these regions. Substantial uncertainty in snow water storage in Tundra regions and the dominance of water storage in these regions points to the need for high-accuracy snow estimation. Finally, snow measurements during the melt season are most needed at high latitudes, whereas observations at near peak snow accumulations are most beneficial over the midlatitudes.
Joachim Meyer, S. McKenzie Skiles, Jeffrey Deems, Kat Bormann, and David Shean
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-34, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-34, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Snow that accumulates seasonally in mountains forms a natural water reservoir and is difficult to measure in the rugged and remote landscapes. Here, we use modern software that models surface elevations from overlapping aerial images to map snow depth by calculating the difference in surface elevations between two dates, one with snow and one without. Results demonstrate the potential value of aerial images for understanding the amount of water held as snow in remote and inaccessible locations.
Nora Helbig, Yves Bühler, Lucie Eberhard, César Deschamps-Berger, Simon Gascoin, Marie Dumont, Jesus Revuelto, Jeff S. Deems, and Tobias Jonas
The Cryosphere, 15, 615–632, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-615-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-615-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The spatial variability in snow depth in mountains is driven by interactions between topography, wind, precipitation and radiation. In applications such as weather, climate and hydrological predictions, this is accounted for by the fractional snow-covered area describing the fraction of the ground surface covered by snow. We developed a new description for model grid cell sizes larger than 200 m. An evaluation suggests that the description performs similarly well in most geographical regions.
Zachary Fair, Mark Flanner, Kelly M. Brunt, Helen Amanda Fricker, and Alex Gardner
The Cryosphere, 14, 4253–4263, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4253-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4253-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Ice on glaciers and ice sheets may melt and pond on ice surfaces in summer months. Detection and observation of these meltwater ponds is important for understanding glaciers and ice sheets, and satellite imagery has been used in previous work. However, image-based methods struggle with deep water, so we used data from the Ice, Clouds, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) and the Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM) to demonstrate the potential for lidar depth monitoring.
Ellyn M. Enderlin and Timothy C. Bartholomaus
The Cryosphere, 14, 4121–4133, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4121-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4121-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate predictions of future changes in glacier flow require the realistic simulation of glacier terminus position change in numerical models. We use crevasse observations for 19 Greenland glaciers to explore whether the two commonly used crevasse depth models match observations. The models cannot reproduce spatial patterns, and we largely attribute discrepancies between modeled and observed depths to the models' inability to account for advection.
Cited articles
Abshire, J. B., Sun, X., Riris, H., Sirota, J. M., McGarry, J. F., Palm, S., Yi, D., and Liiva, P.: Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) on the ICESat Mission: On-orbit measurement performance, Geophysical Research Letters, 32, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024028, 2005. a
Adam, M., Urbazaev, M., Dubois, C., and Schmullius, C.: Accuracy Assessment of GEDI Terrain Elevation and Canopy Height Estimates in European Temperate Forests: Influence of Environmental and Acquisition Parameters, Remote Sensing, 12, 3948, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12233948, 2020. a
Alonso-González, E., Aalstad, K., Pirk, N., Mazzolini, M., Treichler, D., Leclercq, P., Westermann, S., López-Moreno, J. I., and Gascoin, S.: Spatio-temporal information propagation using sparse observations in hyper-resolution ensemble-based snow data assimilation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4637–4659, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4637-2023, 2023. a
Anghileri, D., Voisin, N., Castelletti, A., Pianosi, F., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Value of long-term streamflow forecasts to reservoir operations for water supply in snow-dominated river catchments, Water Resources Research, 52, 4209–4225, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017864, 2016. a
Arendt, A., Scheick, J., Shean, D., Buckley, E., Grigsby, S., Haley, C., Heagy, L., Mohajerani, Y., Neumann, T., Nilsson, J., Markus, T., Paolo, F. S., Perez, F., Petty, A., Schweiger, A., Smith, B., Steiker, A., Alvis, S., Henderson, S., Holschuh, N., Liu, Z., and Sutterly, T.: 2020 ICESat-2 Hackweek Tutorials, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3966463, 2020. a
Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438, 303–309, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141, 2005. a
Boelman, N. T., Liston, G. E., Gurarie, E., Meddens, A. J. H., Mahoney, P. J., Kirchner, P. B., Bohrer, G., Brinkman, T. J., Cosgrove, C. L., Eitel, J. U. H., Hebblewhite, M., Kimball, J. S., LaPoint, S., Nolin, A. W., Pedersen, S. H., Prugh, L. R., Reinking, A. K., and Vierling, L. A.: Integrating snow science and wildlife ecology in Arctic-boreal North America, Environmental Research Letters, 14, 010401, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaeec1, 2019. a
Brauchli, T., Trujillo, E., Huwald, H., and Lehning, M.: Influence of Slope-Scale Snowmelt on Catchment Response Simulated With the Alpine3D Model, Water Resources Research, 53, 10723–10739, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021278, 2017. a
Brunt, K. M., Smith, B. E., Sutterley, T. C., Kurtz, N. T., and Neumann, T. A.: Comparisons of Satellite and Airborne Altimetry With Ground-Based Data From the Interior of the Antarctic Ice Sheet, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2020GL090572, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090572, 2021. a
Collados-Lara, A.-J., Pardo-Igúzquiza, E., and Pulido-Velazquez, D.: Spatiotemporal estimation of snow depth using point data from snow stakes, digital terrain models, and satellite data, Hydrological Processes, 31, 1966–1982, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11165, 2017. a
Cui, G., Anderson, M., and Bales, R.: Mapping of snow water equivalent by a deep-learning model assimilating snow observations, Journal of Hydrology, 616, 128835, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128835, 2023. a
Currier, W. R., Pflug, J., Mazzotti, G., Jonas, T., Deems, J. S., Bormann, K. J., Painter, T. H., Hiemstra, C. A., Gelvin, A., Uhlmann, Z., Spaete, L., Glenn, N. F., and Lundquist, J. D.: Comparing Aerial Lidar Observations With Terrestrial Lidar and Snow-Probe Transects From NASA's 2017 SnowEx Campaign, Water Resources Research, 55, 6285–6294, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024533, 2019. a
DeBeer, C. M. and Pomeroy, J. W.: Influence of snowpack and melt energy heterogeneity on snow cover depletion and snowmelt runoff simulation in a cold mountain environment, Journal of Hydrology, 553, 199–213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.051, 2017. a
Deems, J. S., Fassnacht, S. R., and Elder, K. J.: Interannual Consistency in Fractal Snow Depth Patterns at Two Colorado Mountain Sites, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 9, 977–988, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM901.1, 2008. a
Deems, J. S., Painter, T. H., and Finnegan, D. C.: Lidar measurement of snow depth: a review, Journal of Glaciology, 59, 467–479, https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J154, 2013. a, b, c, d
Dong, P. and Chen, Q.: LiDAR Remote Sensing and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, ISBN 978-1-351-23335-4, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351233354, 2017. a
Donnellan, A., Harding, D., Lundgren, P., Wessels, K., Gardner, A., Simard, M., Parrish, C., Jones, C., Lou, Y., Stoker, J., Ranson, K. J., Osmanoglu, B., Lavalle, M., Luthcke, S., Saatchi, S., and Treuhaft, R.: Observing Earth's Changing Surface Topography and Vegetation Structure: A Framework for the Decade, NASA Surface Topography and Vegetation Incubation Study, Tech. rep., NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/STV_Study_Report_20210622.pdf (last access: 4 November 2025), 2021. a
Dozier, J.: Spectral signature of alpine snow cover from the landsat thematic mapper, Remote Sensing of Environment, 28, 9–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(89)90101-6, 1989. a
Drusch, M., Vasiljevic, D., and Viterbo, P.: ECMWF's Global Snow Analysis: Assessment and Revision Based on Satellite Observations, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 43, 1282–1294, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<1282:EGSAAA>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Dubayah, R., Blair, J. B., Goetz, S., Fatoyinbo, L., Hansen, M., Healey, S., Hofton, M., Hurtt, G., Kellner, J., Luthcke, S., Armston, J., Tang, H., Duncanson, L., Hancock, S., Jantz, P., Marselis, S., Patterson, P. L., Qi, W., and Silva, C.: The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation: High-resolution laser ranging of the Earth's forests and topography, Science of Remote Sensing, 1, 100002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100002, 2020. a, b
Elder, K., Rosenthal, W., and Davis, R. E.: Estimating the spatial distribution of snow water equivalence in a montane watershed, Hydrol. Process., 12, 1793–1808, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199808/09)12:10/11<1793::AID-HYP695>3.3.CO;2-B, 1998. a
Enderlin, E. M., Elkin, C. M., Gendreau, M., Marshall, H. P., O'Neel, S., McNeil, C., Florentine, C., and Sass, L.: Uncertainty of ICESat-2 ATL06- and ATL08-derived snow depths for glacierized and vegetated mountain regions, Remote Sensing of Environment, 283, 113307, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113307, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Estilow, T. W., Young, A. H., and Robinson, D. A.: A long-term Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent data record for climate studies and monitoring, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 7, 137–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-137-2015, 2015. a
Fair, Z., Vuyovich, C., Neumann, T., Larsen, C., Stuefer, S., Mason, M., and May, L.: Plotting Code for “Characterizing ICESat-2 Snow Depths Over the Boreal Forests and Tundra of Alaska in Support of the SnowEx 2023 Campaign”, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13852000, 2024a. a
Fair, Z., Flanner, M., Neumann, T., Vuyovich, C., Smith, B., and Schneider, A.: Quantifying volumetric scattering bias in ICESat-2 and Operation IceBridge altimetry over Greenland firn and aged snow, AGU Earth and Space Science, 11, 2022EA002479, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002479, 2024b. a
Feng, T., Duncanson, L., Montesano, P., Hancock, S., Minor, D., Guenther, E., and Neuenschwander, A.: A systematic evaluation of multi-resolution ICESat-2 ATL08 terrain and canopy heights in boreal forests, Remote Sensing of Environment, 291, 113570, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113570, 2023. a
Gagliano, E., Shean, D., Henderson, S., and Vanderwilt, S.: Capturing the Onset of Mountain Snowmelt Runoff Using Satellite Synthetic Aperture Radar, Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL105303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105303, 2023. a
Gascoin, S., Grizonnet, M., Bouchet, M., Salgues, G., and Hagolle, O.: Theia Snow collection: high-resolution operational snow cover maps from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 493–514, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-493-2019, 2019. a, b
GCOS: The 2022 GCOS ECVs Requirements (GCOS 245), https://library.wmo.int/records/item/58111-the-2022-gcos-ecvs-requirements-gcos-245 (last access: 2 December 2024), 2022. a
Guidicelli, M., Aalstad, K., Treichler, D., and Salzmann, N.: A Combined Data Assimilation and Deep Learning Approach for Continuous Spatio-Temporal SWE Reconstruction from Sparse Ground Tracks, Journal of Hydrology X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2024.100190, 2024. a, b
Hall, D. K., Riggs, G. A., Salomonson, V. V., DiGirolamo, N. E., and Bayr, K. J.: MODIS snow-cover products, Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 181–194, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00095-0, 2002. a
Harder, P., Pomeroy, J. W., and Helgason, W. D.: Improving sub-canopy snow depth mapping with unmanned aerial vehicles: lidar versus structure-from-motion techniques, The Cryosphere, 14, 1919–1935, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1919-2020, 2020. a
Hedrick, A. R., Marks, D., Havens, S., Robertson, M., Johnson, M., Sandusky, M., Marshall, H.-P., Kormos, P. R., Bormann, K. J., and Painter, T. H.: Direct Insertion of NASA Airborne Snow Observatory-Derived Snow Depth Time Series Into the iSnobal Energy Balance Snow Model, Water Resources Research, 54, 8045–8063, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023190, 2018. a
Henn, B., Painter, T. H., Bormann, K. J., McGurk, B., Flint, A. L., Flint, L. E., White, V., and Lundquist, J. D.: High-Elevation Evapotranspiration Estimates During Drought: Using Streamflow and NASA Airborne Snow Observatory SWE Observations to Close the Upper Tuolumne River Basin Water Balance, Water Resources Research, 54, 746–766, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020473, 2018. a, b
Herzfeld, U. C., Trantow, T. M., Harding, D., and Dabney, P. W.: Surface-Height Determination of Crevassed Glaciers – Mathematical Principles of an Autoadaptive Density-Dimension Algorithm and Validation Using ICESat-2 Simulator (SIMPL) Data, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55, 1874–1896, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2617323, 2017. a
Howat, I., Porter, C., Noh, M.-J., Husby, E., Khuvis, S., Danish, E., Tomko, K., Gardiner, J., Negrete, A., Yadav, B., Klassen, J., Kelleher, C., Cloutier, M., Bakker, J., Enos, J., Arnold, G., Bauer, G., and Morin, P.: The Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica – Mosaics, Version 2, Harvard Dataverse [data set], https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EBW8UC, 2022. a
Hu, X., Hao, X., Wang, J., Huang, G., Li, H., and Yang, Q.: Can the Depth of Seasonal Snow be Estimated From ICESat-2 Products: A Case Investigation in Altay, Northwest China, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 19, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3078805, 2022a. a, b, c
Hu, Y., Lu, X., Zeng, X., Stamnes, S. A., Neuman, T. A., Kurtz, N. T., Zhai, P., Gao, M., Sun, W., Xu, K., Liu, Z., Omar, A. H., Baize, R. R., Rogers, L. J., Mitchell, B. O., Stamnes, K., Huang, Y., Chen, N., Weimer, C., Lee, J., and Fair, Z.: Deriving Snow Depth From ICESat-2 Lidar Multiple Scattering Measurements, Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 3, https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.855159, 2022b. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Hughes, M., Lundquist, J. D., and Henn, B.: Dynamical downscaling improves upon gridded precipitation products in the Sierra Nevada, California, Climate Dynamics, 55, 111–129, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3631-z, 2020. a
Huppenkothen, D., Arendt, A., Hogg, D. W., Ram, K., VanderPlas, J. T., and Rokem, A.: Hack weeks as a model for data science education and collaboration, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 8872–8877, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717196115, 2018. a
Höhle, J. and Höhle, M.: Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64, 398–406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.02.003, 2009. a
Ilangakoon, N. T., Glenn, N. F., Dashti, H., Painter, T. H., Mikesell, T. D., Spaete, L. P., Mitchell, J. J., and Shannon, K.: Constraining plant functional types in a semi-arid ecosystem with waveform lidar, Remote Sensing of Environment, 209, 497–509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.070, 2018. a
IPCC: High Mountain Areas, in: The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 131–202, ISBN 978-1-00-915796-4, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.004, 2022. a
Jacobs, J. M., Hunsaker, A. G., Sullivan, F. B., Palace, M., Burakowski, E. A., Herrick, C., and Cho, E.: Snow depth mapping with unpiloted aerial system lidar observations: a case study in Durham, New Hampshire, United States, The Cryosphere, 15, 1485–1500, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1485-2021, 2021. a
Kiewiet, L., Trujillo, E., Hedrick, A., Havens, S., Hale, K., Seyfried, M., Kampf, S., and Godsey, S. E.: Effects of spatial and temporal variability in surface water inputs on streamflow generation and cessation in the rain–snow transition zone, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2779–2796, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2779-2022, 2022. a
Kim, R. S., Kumar, S., Vuyovich, C., Houser, P., Lundquist, J., Mudryk, L., Durand, M., Barros, A., Kim, E. J., Forman, B. A., Gutmann, E. D., Wrzesien, M. L., Garnaud, C., Sandells, M., Marshall, H.-P., Cristea, N., Pflug, J. M., Johnston, J., Cao, Y., Mocko, D., and Wang, S.: Snow Ensemble Uncertainty Project (SEUP): quantification of snow water equivalent uncertainty across North America via ensemble land surface modeling, The Cryosphere, 15, 771–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-771-2021, 2021. a
Kinar, N. J. and Pomeroy, J. W.: Measurement of the physical properties of the snowpack, Reviews of Geophysics, 53, 481–544, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000481, 2015. a
Kokhanovsky, A., Lamare, M., Danne, O., Brockmann, C., Dumont, M., Picard, G., Arnaud, L., Favier, V., Jourdain, B., Le Meur, E., Di Mauro, B., Aoki, T., Niwano, M., Rozanov, V., Korkin, S., Kipfstuhl, S., Freitag, J., Hoerhold, M., Zuhr, A., and Box, J. E.: Retrieval of Snow Properties from the Sentinel-3 Ocean and Land Colour Instrument, Remote Sensing, 11, 2280, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11192280, 2019. a
Krinner, G., Derksen, C., Essery, R., Flanner, M., Hagemann, S., Clark, M., Hall, A., Rott, H., Brutel-Vuilmet, C., Kim, H., Ménard, C. B., Mudryk, L., Thackeray, C., Wang, L., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Bartlett, P., Boike, J., Boone, A., Chéruy, F., Colin, J., Cuntz, M., Dai, Y., Decharme, B., Derry, J., Ducharne, A., Dutra, E., Fang, X., Fierz, C., Ghattas, J., Gusev, Y., Haverd, V., Kontu, A., Lafaysse, M., Law, R., Lawrence, D., Li, W., Marke, T., Marks, D., Ménégoz, M., Nasonova, O., Nitta, T., Niwano, M., Pomeroy, J., Raleigh, M. S., Schaedler, G., Semenov, V., Smirnova, T. G., Stacke, T., Strasser, U., Svenson, S., Turkov, D., Wang, T., Wever, N., Yuan, H., Zhou, W., and Zhu, D.: ESM-SnowMIP: assessing snow models and quantifying snow-related climate feedbacks, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5027–5049, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5027-2018, 2018. a
Kwok, R., Kacimi, S., Webster, M., Kurtz, N., and Petty, A.: Arctic Snow Depth and Sea Ice Thickness From ICESat-2 and CryoSat-2 Freeboards: A First Examination, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 125, e2019JC016008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC016008, 2020. a
Kwon, Y., Yoon, Y., Forman, B. A., Kumar, S. V., and Wang, L.: Quantifying the observational requirements of a space-borne LiDAR snow mission, Journal of Hydrology, 601, 126709, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126709, 2021. a, b
Larsen, C. F.: SnowEx23 Airborne Lidar-Derived 0.25M Snow Depth and Canopy Height, Version 1, NSIDC [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/BV4D8RRU1H7U, 2024. a, b
Li, D., Wrzesien, M. L., Durand, M., Adam, J., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: How much runoff originates as snow in the western United States, and how will that change in the future?, Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 6163–6172, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073551, 2017. a
Liston, G. E.: Representing Subgrid Snow Cover Heterogeneities in Regional and Global Models, Journal of Climate, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<1381:RSSCHI>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Liu, Z., Filhol, S., and Treichler, D.: Retrieving snow depth distribution by downscaling ERA5 Reanalysis with ICESat-2 laser altimetry, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.17934, 2024. a
Lu, X., Hu, Y., Zeng, X., Stamnes, S. A., Neuman, T. A., Kurtz, N. T., Yang, Y., Zhai, P.-W., Gao, M., Sun, W., Xu, K., Liu, Z., Omar, A. H., Baize, R. R., Rogers, L. J., Mitchell, B. O., Stamnes, K., Huang, Y., Chen, N., Weimer, C., Lee, J., and Fair, Z.: Deriving Snow Depth From ICESat-2 Lidar Multiple Scattering Measurements: Uncertainty Analyses, Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 3, https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.891481, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n
Lundquist, J. D., Hughes, M., Henn, B., Gutmann, E. D., Livneh, B., Dozier, J., and Neiman, P.: High-Elevation Precipitation Patterns: Using Snow Measurements to Assess Daily Gridded Datasets across the Sierra Nevada, California, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 16, 1773–1792, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0019.1, 2015. a
Luojus, K., Pulliainen, J., Takala, M., Lemmetyinen, J., Mortimer, C., Derksen, C., Mudryk, L., Moisander, M., Hiltunen, M., Smolander, T., Ikonen, J., Cohen, J., Salminen, M., Norberg, J., Veijola, K., and Venäläinen, P.: GlobSnow v3.0 Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent dataset, Scientific Data, 8, 163, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00939-2, 2021. a
Luthcke, S. B., Thomas, T. C., Pennington, T. A., Rebold, T. W., Nicholas, J. B., Rowlands, D. D., Gardner, A. S., and Bae, S.: ICESat-2 Pointing Calibration and Geolocation Performance, Earth and Space Science, 8, e2020EA001494, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001494, 2021. a
Magnusson, J., Gustafsson, D., Hüsler, F., and Jonas, T.: Assimilation of point SWE data into a distributed snow cover model comparing two contrasting methods, Water Resources Research, 50, 7816–7835, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015302, 2014. a
Magruder, L., Brunt, K., Neumann, T., Klotz, B., and Alonzo, M.: Passive Ground-Based Optical Techniques for Monitoring the On-Orbit ICESat-2 Altimeter Geolocation and Footprint Diameter, Earth and Space Science, 8, e2020EA001414, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001414, 2021. a
Margulis, S. A., Fang, Y., Li, D., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Andreadis, K.: The Utility of Infrequent Snow Depth Images for Deriving Continuous Space-Time Estimates of Seasonal Snow Water Equivalent, Geophysical Research Letters, 46, 5331–5340, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082507, 2019. a, b, c
Markus, T., Neumann, T., Martino, A., Abdalati, W., Brunt, K., Csatho, B., Farrell, S., Fricker, H., Gardner, A., Harding, D., Jasinski, M., Kwok, R., Magruder, L., Lubin, D., Luthcke, S., Morison, J., Nelson, R., Neuenschwander, A., Palm, S., Popescu, S., Shum, C., Schutz, B. E., Smith, B., Yang, Y., and Zwally, J.: The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): Science requirements, concept, and implementation, Remote Sensing of Environment, 190, 260–273, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.029, 2017. a
Mazzolini, M., Aalstad, K., Alonso-González, E., Westermann, S., and Treichler, D.: Spatio-temporal snow data assimilation with the ICESat-2 laser altimeter, The Cryosphere, 19, 3831–3848, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3831-2025, 2025. a
McGill, M. J., Yorks, J. E., Scott, V. S., Kupchock, A. W., and Selmer, P. A.: The Cloud-Aerosol Transport System (CATS): a technology demonstration on the International Space Station, in: Lidar Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring XV, SPIE, vol. 9612, 34–39, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2190841, 2015. a
McGrath, C., Lowe, C., Macdonald, M., and Hancock, S.: Investigation of very low Earth orbits (VLEOs) for global spaceborne lidar, CEAS Space J., 14, 625–636, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-022-00427-2, 2022. a
Meehan, T. G., Hojatimalekshah, A., Marshall, H.-P., Deeb, E. J., O'Neel, S., McGrath, D., Webb, R. W., Bonnell, R., Raleigh, M. S., Hiemstra, C., and Elder, K.: Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA, The Cryosphere, 18, 3253–3276, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024, 2024. a
Meyer, R., Schødt, M. P., Rasmussen, M. L., Andersen, J. K., Dømgaard, M., and Bjørk, A.: A new method for large scale snow depth estimates using Sentinel-1 and ICESat-2, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3850, 2025. a
Mudryk, L. R., Elias Chereque, A., Derksen, C., Luojus, K., and Decharme, B.: NOAA Arctic Report Card 2023 : Terrestrial Snow Cover, NOAA Global Ocean Monitoring and Observing Program, https://doi.org/10.25923/XQWA-H543, 2023. a
Musselman, K. N., Clark, M. P., Liu, C., Ikeda, K., and Rasmussen, R.: Slower snowmelt in a warmer world, Nature Climate Change, 7, 214–219, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3225, 2017. a
NASEM: Thriving on Our Changing Planet: A Decadal Strategy for Earth Observation from Space, https://doi.org/10.17226/24938, 2018. a
Neuenschwander, A. and Pitts, K.: The ATL08 land and vegetation product for the ICESat-2 Mission, Remote Sensing of Environment, 221, 247–259, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.005, 2019. a, b, c
Neuenschwander, A., Guenther, E., White, J. C., Duncanson, L., and Montesano, P.: Validation of ICESat-2 terrain and canopy heights in boreal forests, Remote Sensing of Environment, 251, 112110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112110, 2020. a, b
Neuenschwander, A. L. and Magruder, L. A.: Canopy and Terrain Height Retrievals with ICESat-2: A First Look, Remote Sensing, 11, 1721, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11141721, 2019. a
Neumann, T. A., Martino, A. J., Markus, T., Bae, S., Bock, M. R., Brenner, A. C., Brunt, K. M., Cavanaugh, J., Fernandes, S. T., Hancock, D. W., Harbeck, K., Lee, J., Kurtz, N. T., Luers, P. J., Luthcke, S. B., Magruder, L., Pennington, T. A., Ramos-Izquierdo, L., Rebold, T., Skoog, J., and Thomas, T. C.: The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite – 2 mission: A global geolocated photon product derived from the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System, Remote Sensing of Environment, 233, 111325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111325, 2019. a, b, c
Nuth, C. and Kääb, A.: Co-registration and bias corrections of satellite elevation data sets for quantifying glacier thickness change, The Cryosphere, 5, 271–290, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-271-2011, 2011. a
Oveisgharan, S., Zinke, R., Hoppinen, Z., and Marshall, H. P.: Snow water equivalent retrieval over Idaho – Part 1: Using Sentinel-1 repeat-pass interferometry, The Cryosphere, 18, 559–574, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-559-2024, 2024. a
Painter, T. H., Rittger, K., McKenzie, C., Slaughter, P., Davis, R. E., and Dozier, J.: Retrieval of subpixel snow covered area, grain size, and albedo from MODIS, Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 868–879, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.001, 2009. a
Painter, T. H., Berisford, D. F., Boardman, J. W., Bormann, K. J., Deems, J. S., Gehrke, F., Hedrick, A., Joyce, M., Laidlaw, R., Marks, D., Mattmann, C., McGurk, B., Ramirez, P., Richardson, M., Skiles, S. M., Seidel, F. C., and Winstral, A.: The Airborne Snow Observatory: Fusion of scanning lidar, imaging spectrometer, and physically-based modeling for mapping snow water equivalent and snow albedo, Remote Sensing of Environment, 184, 139–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.06.018, 2016. a, b
Palm, S. P., Kayetha, V., Yang, Y., and Pauly, R.: Blowing snow sublimation and transport over Antarctica from 11 years of CALIPSO observations, The Cryosphere, 11, 2555–2569, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2555-2017, 2017. a
Pflug, J. M. and Lundquist, J. D.: Inferring Distributed Snow Depth by Leveraging Snow Pattern Repeatability: Investigation Using 47 Lidar Observations in the Tuolumne Watershed, Sierra Nevada, California, Water Resources Research, 56, e2020WR027243, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027243, 2020. a
Pflug, J. M., Hughes, M., and Lundquist, J. D.: Downscaling Snow Deposition Using Historic Snow Depth Patterns: Diagnosing Limitations From Snowfall Biases, Winter Snow Losses, and Interannual Snow Pattern Repeatability, Water Resources Research, 57, e2021WR029999, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029999, 2021. a, b, c
Pflug, J. M., Margulis, S. A., and Lundquist, J. D.: Inferring watershed-scale mean snowfall magnitude and distribution using multidecadal snow reanalysis patterns and snow pillow observations, Hydrological Processes, 36, e14581, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14581, 2022. a, b
Pomeroy, J. W., Gray, D. M., Shook, K. R., Toth, B., Essery, R. L. H., Pietroniro, A., and Hedstrom, N.: An evaluation of snow accumulation and ablation processes for land surface modelling, Hydrological Processes, 12, 2339–2367, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199812)12:15<2339::AID-HYP800>3.0.CO;2-L, 1998. a
Popescu, S. C., Zhao, K., Neuenschwander, A., and Lin, C.: Satellite lidar vs. small footprint airborne lidar: Comparing the accuracy of aboveground biomass estimates and forest structure metrics at footprint level, Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 2786–2797, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.01.026, 2011. a
Porter, C., Howat, I., Noh, M.-J., Husby, E., Khuvis, S., Danish, E., Tomko, K., Gardiner, J., Negrete, A., Yadav, B., Klassen, J., Kelleher, C., Cloutier, M., Bakker, J., Enos, J., Arnold, G., Bauer, G., and Morin, P.: ArcticDEM – Mosaics, Version 4.1, Harvard Dataverse [data set], https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/3VDC4W, 2023. a
Premier, V., Marin, C., Stegar, S., Notarnicola, C., and Bruzzone, L.: A Novel Approach Based on a Hierarchical Multiresolution Analysis of Optical Time Series to Reconstruct the Daily High-Resolution Snow Cover Area, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 14, 9223–9240, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3103585, 2021. a
Prokop, A.: Assessing the applicability of terrestrial laser scanning for spatial snow depth measurements, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 54, 155–163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2008.07.002, 2008. a
roksch, M., Rutter, N., Fierz, C., and Schneebeli, M.: Intercomparison of snow density measurements: bias, precision, and vertical resolution, The Cryosphere, 10, 371–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-371-2016, 2016. a
Raleigh, M. S. and Small, E. E.: Snowpack density modeling is the primary source of uncertainty when mapping basin-wide SWE with lidar, Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 3700–3709, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071999, 2017. a
Raleigh, M. S., Lundquist, J. D., and Clark, M. P.: Exploring the impact of forcing error characteristics on physically based snow simulations within a global sensitivity analysis framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3153–3179, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3153-2015, 2015. a
Reinking, A. K., Højlund Pedersen, S., Elder, K., Boelman, N. T., Glass, T. W., Oates, B. A., Bergen, S., Roberts, S., Prugh, L. R., Brinkman, T. J., Coughenour, M. B., Feltner, J. A., Barker, K. J., Bentzen, T. W., Pedersen, Ø., Schmidt, N. M., and Liston, G. E.: Collaborative wildlife–snow science: Integrating wildlife and snow expertise to improve research and management, Ecosphere, 13, e4094, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4094, 2022. a
Revuelto, J., López-Moreno, J. I., Azorin-Molina, C., and Vicente-Serrano, S. M.: Canopy influence on snow depth distribution in a pine stand determined from terrestrial laser data, Water Resources Research, 51, 3476–3489, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016496, 2015. a
Riggs, G. A., Hall, D. K., and Román, M. O.: Overview of NASA's MODIS and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) snow-cover Earth System Data Records, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 765–777, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-765-2017, 2017. a
Scheick, J., Leong, W. J., Bisson, K., Arendt, A., Bhushan, S., Fair, Z., Hagen, N. R., Henderson, S., Knuth, F., Li, T., Liu, Z., Piunno, R., Ravinder, N., Landung, Sutterley, T., Swinski, J., and Anubhav: icepyx: querying, obtaining, analyzing, and manipulating ICESat-2 datasets, Journal of Open Source Software, 8, 4912, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04912, 2023. a
Schirmer, M. and Lehning, M.: Persistence in intra-annual snow depth distribution: 2. Fractal analysis of snow depth development, Water Resources Research, 47, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009429, 2011. a
Schirmer, M., Wirz, V., Clifton, A., and Lehning, M.: Persistence in intra-annual snow depth distribution: 1. Measurements and topographic control, Water Resources Research, 47, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009426, 2011. a
Schutz, B. E., Zwally, H. J., Shuman, C. A., Hancock, D., and DiMarzio, J. P.: Overview of the ICESat Mission, Geophysical Research Letters, 32, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024009, 2005. a
Shean, D., Bhushan, S., Smith, B., Besso, H., Sutterley, T., Swinski, J.-P., Henderson, S., Neumann, T., and Williams, J. B.: Evaluating and improving seasonal snow depth retrievals with satellite laser altimetry, AGU Fall Meeting 2021, New Orleans, LA, 13–17 December 2021, C33B-04, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AGUFM.C33B..04S (last access: 7 November 2025), 2021. a, b, c, d
Shean, D., Swinski, J. p., Smith, B., Sutterley, T., Henderson, S., Ugarte, C., Lidwa, E., and Neumann, T.: SlideRule: Enabling rapid, scalable, open science for the NASA ICESat-2 mission and beyond, Journal of Open Source Software, 8, 4982, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04982, 2023. a, b, c
Simpson, J. E., Smith, T. E. L., and Wooster, M. J.: Assessment of Errors Caused by Forest Vegetation Structure in Airborne LiDAR-Derived DTMs, Remote Sensing, 9, 1101, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111101, 2017. a
Smith, B., Fricker, H. A., Holschuh, N., Gardner, A. S., Adusumilli, S., Brunt, K. M., Csatho, B., Harbeck, K., Huth, A., Neumann, T., Nilsson, J., and Siegfried, M. R.: Land ice height-retrieval algorithm for NASA's ICESat-2 photon-counting laser altimeter, Remote Sensing of Environment, 233, 111352, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111352, 2019. a, b, c
Smith, B. E., Gardner, A., Schneider, A., and Flanner, M.: Modeling biases in laser-altimetry measurements caused by scattering of green light in snow, Remote Sensing of Environment, 215, 398–410, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.012, 2018. a, b
Smyth, E. J., Raleigh, M. S., and Small, E. E.: Particle Filter Data Assimilation of Monthly Snow Depth Observations Improves Estimation of Snow Density and SWE, Water Resources Research, 55, 1296–1311, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023400, 2019. a
Smyth, E. J., Raleigh, M. S., and Small, E. E.: Improving SWE Estimation With Data Assimilation: The Influence of Snow Depth Observation Timing and Uncertainty, Water Resources Research, 56, e2019WR026853, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026853, 2020. a
Spaete, L. P., Glenn, N. F., Derryberry, D. R., Sankey, T. T., Mitchell, J. J., and Hardegree, S. P.: Vegetation and slope effects on accuracy of a LiDAR-derived DEM in the sagebrush steppe, Remote Sensing Letters, 2, 317–326, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.515267, 2011. a
Stoker, J. and Miller, B.: The Accuracy and Consistency of 3D Elevation Program Data: A Systematic Analysis, Remote Sensing, 14, 940, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040940, 2022. a, b
Sturm, M. and Wagner, A. M.: Using repeated patterns in snow distribution modeling: An Arctic example, Water Resources Research, 46, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009434, 2010. a
Sturm, M., Taras, B., Liston, G. E., Derksen, C., Jonas, T., and Lea, J.: Estimating Snow Water Equivalent Using Snow Depth Data and Climate Classes, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 11, 1380–1394, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1202.1, 2010. a, b
Sutterley, T. C. and Gibbons, A.: pyYAPC: Python interpretation of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center YAPC (“Yet Another Photon Classifier”) algorithm, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6717591, 2021. a
Tedesco, M. and Jeyaratnam, J.: AMSR-E/AMSR2 Unified L3 Global Daily 25 km EASE-Grid Snow Water Equivalent. (AU_DySno, Version 1), https://doi.org/10.5067/8AE2ILXB5SM6, 2019. a
Vas, D., Baxter, B., Maakestad, J., Bailey, J., Stuefer, S., Vuyovich, C. M., Elder, K., Mason, M., Marshall, H., and Durand, M.: SnowEx23 Time-Lapse Imagery, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/UB3A44RTR6JD, 2025. a
Vuyovich, C., Stuefer, S., Durand, M., Marshall, H. P., Osmanoglu, B., Elder, K., Vas, D., Gelvin, A., Larsen, C. F., Pedersen, S., Hodkinson, D., Deeb, E., Mason, M., and Youcha, E.: NASA SnowEx 2023 Experiment Plan, https://snow.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/users/user354/SNEX-Campaigns/2023/NASA_SnowEx_Experiment_Plan_2023_draft_20June2024.pdf (last access: 4 Novmeber 2025), 2024. a
Wang, C., Zhu, X., Nie, S., Xi, X., Li, D., Zheng, W., and Chen, S.: Ground elevation accuracy verification of ICESat-2 data: a case study in Alaska, USA, Opt. Express, OE, 27, 38168–38179, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.038168, 2019. a
Wayand, N. E., Massmann, A., Butler, C., Keenan, E., Stimberis, J., and Lundquist, J. D.: A meteorological and snow observational data set from Snoqualmie Pass (921 m), Washington Cascades, USA, Water Resources Research, 51, 10092–10103, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017773, 2015. a
Webb, R. W., Jennings, K. S., Fend, M., and Molotch, N. P.: Combining Ground-Penetrating Radar With Terrestrial LiDAR Scanning to Estimate the Spatial Distribution of Liquid Water Content in Seasonal Snowpacks, Water Resources Research, 54, 10339–10349, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022680, 2018. a
Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Omar, A., Hu, Y., Powell, K. A., Liu, Z., Hunt, W. H., and Young, S. A.: Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26, 2310–2323, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1, 2009. a
Wrzesien, M. L., Pavelsky, T. M., Durand, M. T., Dozier, J., and Lundquist, J. D.: Characterizing Biases in Mountain Snow Accumulation From Global Data Sets, Water Resources Research, 55, 9873–9891, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025350, 2019. a
Short summary
Lidar is commonly used to measure snow over global water reservoirs. However, ground-based and airborne lidar surveys are expensive, so satellite-based methods are needed. In this review, we outline the latest research using satellite-based lidar to monitor snow. Best practices for lidar-based snow monitoring are given, as is a discussion on challenges in this field of research.
Lidar is commonly used to measure snow over global water reservoirs. However, ground-based and...
