Articles | Volume 19, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2963-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2963-2025
Research article
 | 
12 Aug 2025
Research article |  | 12 Aug 2025

Bias in modeled Greenland Ice Sheet melt revealed by ASCAT

Anna Puggaard, Nicolaj Hansen, Ruth Mottram, Thomas Nagler, Stefan Scheiblauer, Sebastian B. Simonsen, Louise S. Sørensen, Jan Wuite, and Anne M. Solgaard

Related authors

Learning to melt: Emulating Greenland surface melt from a polar RCM with machine learning
Elke Schlager, Sebastian Scher, Ruth H. Mottram, and Peter L. Langen
The Cryosphere, 20, 3313–3343, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-3313-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-3313-2026, 2026
Short summary
A novel database of Antarctic meteorological extremes over key ice shelves during 1995–2023
Ian Simpson, Edward Hanna, Ryan S. Williams, Linh Luu, Andrew Orr, Julie Jones, Xavier Fettweis, Jose Abraham Torres Alavez, Ole Bøssing Christensen, Ella Gilbert, Sid Gumber, Christoph Kittel, Sihan Li, Damien Maure, Ruth Mottram, Tony Phillips, Willem Jan van de Berg, and Kristiina Verro
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2270,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2270, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
21st century change in precipitation on the Greenland Ice Sheet using high resolution regional climate models
Fredrik Boberg, Xavier Fettweis, Nicolaj Hansen, Ruth Mottram, and Michiel R. van den Broeke
The Cryosphere, 20, 2947–2960, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2947-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2947-2026, 2026
Short summary
PROMICE: Greenland ice velocity maps v2026
Anne Solgaard, Anders Kusk, John Peter Merryman Boncori, Jørgen Dall, Andreas P. Ahlstrøm, Signe B. Andersen, Michele Citterio, Penelope How, Nanna B. Karlsson, Kristian K. Kjeldsen, Signe H. Larsen, Mads C. Lund, Anja Løkkegaard, Martin P. Lüthi, Jessica Mejia, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Dirk van As, Shin Sugiyama, and Robert S. Fausto
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-221,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-221, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Dual frequency airborne SAR experiment on snow water equivalent retrieval in Alpine terrain
Helmut Rott, Thomas Nagler, Markus Hetzenecker, Ralf Horn, Jens Fischer, and Julia Kubanek
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2104,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2104, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdalati, W. and Steffen, K.: Passive microwave derived snow melt regions on the Greenland Ice Sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 787–790, https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00433, 1995. a
Antwerpen, R. M., Tedesco, M., Fettweis, X., Alexander, P., and van de Berg, W. J.: Assessing bare-ice albedo simulated by MAR over the Greenland ice sheet (2000–2021) and implications for meltwater production estimates, The Cryosphere, 16, 4185–4199, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4185-2022, 2022. a
Ashcraft, I. S. and Long, D. G.: Comparison of methods for melt detection over Greenland using active and passive microwave measurements, Int. J. Remote Sens., 27, 2469–2488, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500534465, 2006. a, b, c
Box, J. E., Fettweis, X., Stroeve, J. C., Tedesco, M., Hall, D. K., and Steffen, K.: Greenland ice sheet albedo feedback: thermodynamics and atmospheric drivers, The Cryosphere, 6, 821–839, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-821-2012, 2012. a, b, c
Brangers, I., Lievens, H., Miège, C., Demuzere, M., Brucker, L., and De Lannoy, G. J. M.: Sentinel 1 detects firn aquifers in the Greenland Ice Sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085192, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085192, 2020. a
Download
Short summary
Regional climate models are currently the only source for assessing the melt volume of the Greenland Ice Sheet on a global scale. This study compares the modeled melt volume with observations from weather stations and melt extent observed from the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT) to assess the performance of the models. It highlights the importance of critically evaluating model outputs with high-quality satellite measurements to improve the understanding of variability among models.
Share