Articles | Volume 19, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2963-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2963-2025
Research article
 | 
12 Aug 2025
Research article |  | 12 Aug 2025

Bias in modeled Greenland Ice Sheet melt revealed by ASCAT

Anna Puggaard, Nicolaj Hansen, Ruth Mottram, Thomas Nagler, Stefan Scheiblauer, Sebastian B. Simonsen, Louise S. Sørensen, Jan Wuite, and Anne M. Solgaard

Related authors

Coupled simulation of landslide, tsunami, and ground deformation for the 2017 Nuugaatsiaq event in Greenland
Hideo Aochi, Masumi Yamada, Tung-Cheng Ho, Gonéri Le Cozannet, Arno Christian Hammann, and Ruth Mottram
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3803,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3803, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Modeled Greenland Ice Sheet evolution constrained by ice-core-derived Holocene elevation histories
Mikkel Langgaard Lauritzen, Anne Solgaard, Nicholas Mossor Rathmann, Bo Møllesøe Vinther, Aslak Grindsted, Brice Noël, Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir, and Christine Schøtt Hvidberg
The Cryosphere, 19, 3599–3622, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3599-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3599-2025, 2025
Short summary
Extending the range and reach of physically-based Greenland ice sheet sea-level projections
Heiko Goelzer, Constantijn J. Berends, Fredrik Boberg, Gael Durand, Tamsin Edwards, Xavier Fettweis, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, Quentin Glaude, Philippe Huybrechts, Sébastien Le clec'h, Ruth Mottram, Brice Noël, Martin Olesen, Charlotte Rahlves, Jeremy Rohmer, Michiel van den Broeke, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3098,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3098, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Antarctic Ice Sheet grounding line discharge from 1996–2024
Benjamin J. Davison, Anna E. Hogg, Thomas Slater, Richard Rigby, and Nicolaj Hansen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 3259–3281, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3259-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3259-2025, 2025
Short summary
Mélange or landfast ice: What controls seasonal calving at Greenland outlet glaciers?
Sofie Hedetoft, Olivia Bang Brinck, Ruth Mottram, Andrea M. U. Gierisch, Steffen Malskær Olsen, Martin Olesen, Nicolaj Hansen, Anders Anker Bjørk, Erik Loebel, Anne Solgaard, and Peter Thejll
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1907,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1907, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdalati, W. and Steffen, K.: Passive microwave derived snow melt regions on the Greenland Ice Sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 787–790, https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00433, 1995. a
Antwerpen, R. M., Tedesco, M., Fettweis, X., Alexander, P., and van de Berg, W. J.: Assessing bare-ice albedo simulated by MAR over the Greenland ice sheet (2000–2021) and implications for meltwater production estimates, The Cryosphere, 16, 4185–4199, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4185-2022, 2022. a
Ashcraft, I. S. and Long, D. G.: Comparison of methods for melt detection over Greenland using active and passive microwave measurements, Int. J. Remote Sens., 27, 2469–2488, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500534465, 2006. a, b, c
Box, J. E., Fettweis, X., Stroeve, J. C., Tedesco, M., Hall, D. K., and Steffen, K.: Greenland ice sheet albedo feedback: thermodynamics and atmospheric drivers, The Cryosphere, 6, 821–839, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-821-2012, 2012. a, b, c
Brangers, I., Lievens, H., Miège, C., Demuzere, M., Brucker, L., and De Lannoy, G. J. M.: Sentinel 1 detects firn aquifers in the Greenland Ice Sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085192, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085192, 2020. a
Download
Short summary
Regional climate models are currently the only source for assessing the melt volume of the Greenland Ice Sheet on a global scale. This study compares the modeled melt volume with observations from weather stations and melt extent observed from the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT) to assess the performance of the models. It highlights the importance of critically evaluating model outputs with high-quality satellite measurements to improve the understanding of variability among models.
Share