Articles | Volume 15, issue 8
The Cryosphere, 15, 4047–4072, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4047-2021
The Cryosphere, 15, 4047–4072, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4047-2021
Research article
24 Aug 2021
Research article | 24 Aug 2021

An X-ray micro-tomographic study of the pore space, permeability and percolation threshold of young sea ice

Sönke Maus et al.

Related authors

Impact of the sampling procedure on the specific surface area of snow measurements with the IceCube
Julia Martin and Martin Schneebeli
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-501,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-501, 2022
Short summary
Snowfall and snow accumulation during the MOSAiC winter and spring seasons
David N. Wagner, Matthew D. Shupe, Christopher Cox, Ola G. Persson, Taneil Uttal, Markus M. Frey, Amélie Kirchgaessner, Martin Schneebeli, Matthias Jaggi, Amy R. Macfarlane, Polona Itkin, Stefanie Arndt, Stefan Hendricks, Daniela Krampe, Marcel Nicolaus, Robert Ricker, Julia Regnery, Nikolai Kolabutin, Egor Shimanshuck, Marc Oggier, Ian Raphael, Julienne Stroeve, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 16, 2373–2402, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2373-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Rain-on-Snow (ROS) Understudied in Sea Ice Remote Sensing: A Multi-Sensor Analysis of ROS during MOSAiC
Julienne Stroeve, Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Ruzica Dadic, Philip Rotosky, Michael Gallagher, Robbie Mallett, Andrew Barrett, Stefan Hendricks, Rasmus Tonboe, Mark Serreze, Linda Thielke, Gunnar Spreen, Thomas Newman, John Yackel, Robert Ricker, Michel Tsamados, Amy Macfarlane, Henna-Reetta Hannula, and Martin Schneebeli
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-383,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-383, 2022
Revised manuscript under review for TC
Short summary
Modelling the small-scale deposition of snow onto structured Arctic sea ice during a MOSAiC storm using snowBedFoam 1.0.
Océane Hames, Mahdi Jafari, David N. Wagner, Ian Raphael, David Clemens-Sewall, Chris Polashenski, Matthew D. Shupe, Martin Schneebeli, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-254,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-254, 2021
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Surface-based Ku- and Ka-band polarimetric radar for sea ice studies
Julienne Stroeve, Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Rasmus Tonboe, Stefan Hendricks, Robert Ricker, James Mead, Robbie Mallett, Marcus Huntemann, Polona Itkin, Martin Schneebeli, Daniela Krampe, Gunnar Spreen, Jeremy Wilkinson, Ilkka Matero, Mario Hoppmann, and Michel Tsamados
The Cryosphere, 14, 4405–4426, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4405-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4405-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Sea Ice
Recovering and monitoring the thickness, density, and elastic properties of sea ice from seismic noise recorded in Svalbard
Agathe Serripierri, Ludovic Moreau, Pierre Boue, Jérôme Weiss, and Philippe Roux
The Cryosphere, 16, 2527–2543, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2527-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2527-2022, 2022
Short summary
Influences of changing sea ice and snow thicknesses on simulated Arctic winter heat fluxes
Laura L. Landrum and Marika M. Holland
The Cryosphere, 16, 1483–1495, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1483-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1483-2022, 2022
Short summary
Reassessing seasonal sea ice predictability of the Pacific-Arctic sector using a Markov model
Yunhe Wang, Xiaojun Yuan, Haibo Bi, Mitchell Bushuk, Yu Liang, Cuihua Li, and Haijun Huang
The Cryosphere, 16, 1141–1156, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1141-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1141-2022, 2022
Short summary
Predictability of Arctic Sea Ice Drift in Coupled Climate Models
Simon F. Reifenberg and Helge F. Goessling
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-41,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-41, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for TC
Short summary
A new state-dependent parameterization for the free drift of sea ice
Charles Brunette, L. Bruno Tremblay, and Robert Newton
The Cryosphere, 16, 533–557, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-533-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-533-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Ambegaokar, V., Halperin, B., and Langer, J. S.: Hopping Conductivity in Disordered Systems, Phys. Rev. B, 4, 2612–2620, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.4.2612, 1971. a
Anderson, D. L. and Weeks, W. F.: A theoretical study of sea ice strength, T. Am. Geophys. Un., 39, 632–640, 1958. a, b
Bartels-Rausch, T., Jacobi, H.-W., Kahan, T. F., Thomas, J. L., Thomson, E. S., Abbatt, J. P. D., Ammann, M., Blackford, J. R., Bluhm, H., Boxe, C., Domine, F., Frey, M. M., Gladich, I., Guzmán, M. I., Heger, D., Huthwelker, Th., Klán, P., Kuhs, W. F., Kuo, M. H., Maus, S., Moussa, S. G., McNeill, V. F., Newberg, J. T., Pettersson, J. B. C., Roeselová, M., and Sodeau, J. R.: A review of air–ice chemical and physical interactions (AICI): liquids, quasi-liquids, and solids in snow, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1587–1633, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1587-2014, 2014. a, b
Beckmann, F., Grupp, R., Haibel, A., Huppmann, M., Nöthe, M., Pyzalla, A., Reimers, W., Schreyer, A., and Zettler, R.: In-situ synchrotron x-ray microtomography studies of microstructure and damage evolution in engineering materials, Adv. Eng. Mater., 9, 939–950, https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200700254, 2007. a
Broadbent, S. R. and Hammersley, J. M.: Percolation processes, Math. Proc. Cambridge, 53, 629–641, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100032680, 1957. a
Download
Short summary
As the hydraulic permeability of sea ice is difficult to measure, observations are sparse. The present work presents numerical simulations of the permeability of young sea ice based on a large set of 3D X-ray tomographic images. It extends the relationship between permeability and porosity available so far down to brine porosities near the percolation threshold of a few per cent. Evaluation of pore scales and 3D connectivity provides novel insight into the percolation behaviour of sea ice.