Articles | Volume 15, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4047-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4047-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An X-ray micro-tomographic study of the pore space, permeability and percolation threshold of young sea ice
Sönke Maus
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
Martin Schneebeli
WSL Swiss Federal Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research, Davos, Switzerland
Andreas Wiegmann
Math2Market GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Yubing Cheng, Bin Cheng, Roberta Pirazzini, Amy R. Macfarlane, Timo Vihma, Wolfgang Dorn, Ruzica Dadic, Martin Schneebeli, Stefanie Arndt, and Annette Rinke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1164, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1164, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We study snow density from the MOSAiC expedition. Several snow density schemes were tested and compared with observation. A thermodynamic ice model was employed to assess the impact of snow density and precipitation on the thermal regime of sea ice. The parameterized mean snow densities are consistent with observations. Increased snow density reduces snow and ice temperatures, promoting ice growth, while increased precipitation leads to warmer snow and ice temperatures and reduced ice thickness.
Cecile B. Menard, Sirpa Rasmus, Ioanna Merkouriadi, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Annett Bartsch, Chris Derksen, Florent Domine, Marie Dumont, Dorothee Ehrich, Richard Essery, Bruce C. Forbes, Gerhard Krinner, David Lawrence, Glen Liston, Heidrun Matthes, Nick Rutter, Melody Sandells, Martin Schneebeli, and Sari Stark
The Cryosphere, 18, 4671–4686, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4671-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4671-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Computer models, like those used in climate change studies, are written by modellers who have to decide how best to construct the models in order to satisfy the purpose they serve. Using snow modelling as an example, we examine the process behind the decisions to understand what motivates or limits modellers in their decision-making. We find that the context in which research is undertaken is often more crucial than scientific limitations. We argue for more transparency in our research practice.
Moein Mellat, Amy R. Macfarlane, Camilla F. Brunello, Martin Werner, Martin Schneebeli, Ruzica Dadic, Stefanie Arndt, Kaisa-Riikka Mustonen, Jeffrey M. Welker, and Hanno Meyer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-719, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-719, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Our research, utilizing data from the Arctic MOSAiC expedition, reveals how snow on Arctic sea ice changes due to weather conditions. By analyzing snow samples collected over a year, we found differences in snow layers that tell us about their origins and how they've been affected by the environment. We discovered variations in snow and vapour that reflect the influence of weather patterns and surface processes like wind and sublimation.
Amy R. Macfarlane, Henning Löwe, Lucille Gimenes, David N. Wagner, Ruzica Dadic, Rafael Ottersberg, Stefan Hämmerle, and Martin Schneebeli
The Cryosphere, 17, 5417–5434, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5417-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5417-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow acts as an insulating blanket on Arctic sea ice, keeping the underlying ice "warm", relative to the atmosphere. Knowing the snow's thermal conductivity is essential for understanding winter ice growth. During the MOSAiC expedition, we measured the thermal conductivity of snow. We found spatial and vertical variability to overpower any temporal variability or dependency on underlying ice type and the thermal resistance to be directly influenced by snow height.
Baptiste Vandecrux, Jason E. Box, Andreas P. Ahlstrøm, Signe B. Andersen, Nicolas Bayou, William T. Colgan, Nicolas J. Cullen, Robert S. Fausto, Dominik Haas-Artho, Achim Heilig, Derek A. Houtz, Penelope How, Ionut Iosifescu Enescu, Nanna B. Karlsson, Rebecca Kurup Buchholz, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Daniel McGrath, Noah P. Molotch, Bianca Perren, Maiken K. Revheim, Anja Rutishauser, Kevin Sampson, Martin Schneebeli, Sandy Starkweather, Simon Steffen, Jeff Weber, Patrick J. Wright, Henry Jay Zwally, and Konrad Steffen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5467–5489, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5467-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5467-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Greenland Climate Network (GC-Net) comprises stations that have been monitoring the weather on the Greenland Ice Sheet for over 30 years. These stations are being replaced by newer ones maintained by the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). The historical data were reprocessed to improve their quality, and key information about the weather stations has been compiled. This augmented dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.22008/FK2/VVXGUT (Steffen et al., 2022).
Julia Kaltenborn, Amy R. Macfarlane, Viviane Clay, and Martin Schneebeli
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4521–4550, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow layer segmentation and snow grain classification are essential diagnostic tasks for cryospheric applications. A SnowMicroPen (SMP) can be used to that end; however, the manual classification of its profiles becomes infeasible for large datasets. Here, we evaluate how well machine learning models automate this task. Of the 14 models trained on the MOSAiC SMP dataset, the long short-term memory model performed the best. The findings presented here facilitate and accelerate SMP data analysis.
Marie Dumont, Simon Gascoin, Marion Réveillet, Didier Voisin, François Tuzet, Laurent Arnaud, Mylène Bonnefoy, Montse Bacardit Peñarroya, Carlo Carmagnola, Alexandre Deguine, Aurélie Diacre, Lukas Dürr, Olivier Evrard, Firmin Fontaine, Amaury Frankl, Mathieu Fructus, Laure Gandois, Isabelle Gouttevin, Abdelfateh Gherab, Pascal Hagenmuller, Sophia Hansson, Hervé Herbin, Béatrice Josse, Bruno Jourdain, Irene Lefevre, Gaël Le Roux, Quentin Libois, Lucie Liger, Samuel Morin, Denis Petitprez, Alvaro Robledano, Martin Schneebeli, Pascal Salze, Delphine Six, Emmanuel Thibert, Jürg Trachsel, Matthieu Vernay, Léo Viallon-Galinier, and Céline Voiron
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3075–3094, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3075-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3075-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Saharan dust outbreaks have profound effects on ecosystems, climate, health, and the cryosphere, but the spatial deposition pattern of Saharan dust is poorly known. Following the extreme dust deposition event of February 2021 across Europe, a citizen science campaign was launched to sample dust on snow over the Pyrenees and the European Alps. This campaign triggered wide interest and over 100 samples. The samples revealed the high variability of the dust properties within a single event.
Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Robbie Mallett, Julienne Stroeve, Torsten Geldsetzer, Randall Scharien, Rasmus Tonboe, John Yackel, Jack Landy, David Clemens-Sewall, Arttu Jutila, David N. Wagner, Daniela Krampe, Marcus Huntemann, Mallik Mahmud, David Jensen, Thomas Newman, Stefan Hendricks, Gunnar Spreen, Amy Macfarlane, Martin Schneebeli, James Mead, Robert Ricker, Michael Gallagher, Claude Duguay, Ian Raphael, Chris Polashenski, Michel Tsamados, Ilkka Matero, and Mario Hoppmann
The Cryosphere, 17, 2211–2229, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We show that wind redistributes snow on Arctic sea ice, and Ka- and Ku-band radar measurements detect both newly deposited snow and buried snow layers that can affect the accuracy of snow depth estimates on sea ice. Radar, laser, meteorological, and snow data were collected during the MOSAiC expedition. With frequent occurrence of storms in the Arctic, our results show that
wind-redistributed snow needs to be accounted for to improve snow depth estimates on sea ice from satellite radars.
Julia Martin and Martin Schneebeli
The Cryosphere, 17, 1723–1734, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1723-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The grain size of snow determines how light is reflected and other physical properties. The IceCube measures snow grain size at the specific near-infrared wavelength of 1320 nm. In our study, the preparation of snow samples for the IceCube creates a thin layer of small particles. Comparisons of the grain size with computed tomography, particle counting and numerical simulation confirm the aforementioned observation. We conclude that measurements at this wavelength underestimate the grain size.
Julienne Stroeve, Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Ruzica Dadic, Philip Rostosky, Michael Gallagher, Robbie Mallett, Andrew Barrett, Stefan Hendricks, Rasmus Tonboe, Michelle McCrystall, Mark Serreze, Linda Thielke, Gunnar Spreen, Thomas Newman, John Yackel, Robert Ricker, Michel Tsamados, Amy Macfarlane, Henna-Reetta Hannula, and Martin Schneebeli
The Cryosphere, 16, 4223–4250, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4223-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4223-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Impacts of rain on snow (ROS) on satellite-retrieved sea ice variables remain to be fully understood. This study evaluates the impacts of ROS over sea ice on active and passive microwave data collected during the 2019–20 MOSAiC expedition. Rainfall and subsequent refreezing of the snowpack significantly altered emitted and backscattered radar energy, laying important groundwork for understanding their impacts on operational satellite retrievals of various sea ice geophysical variables.
Océane Hames, Mahdi Jafari, David Nicholas Wagner, Ian Raphael, David Clemens-Sewall, Chris Polashenski, Matthew D. Shupe, Martin Schneebeli, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6429–6449, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an Eulerian–Lagrangian snow transport model implemented in the fluid dynamics software OpenFOAM, which we call snowBedFoam 1.0. We apply this model to reproduce snow deposition on a piece of ridged Arctic sea ice, which was produced during the MOSAiC expedition through scan measurements. The model appears to successfully reproduce the enhanced snow accumulation and deposition patterns, although some quantitative uncertainties were shown.
David N. Wagner, Matthew D. Shupe, Christopher Cox, Ola G. Persson, Taneil Uttal, Markus M. Frey, Amélie Kirchgaessner, Martin Schneebeli, Matthias Jaggi, Amy R. Macfarlane, Polona Itkin, Stefanie Arndt, Stefan Hendricks, Daniela Krampe, Marcel Nicolaus, Robert Ricker, Julia Regnery, Nikolai Kolabutin, Egor Shimanshuck, Marc Oggier, Ian Raphael, Julienne Stroeve, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 16, 2373–2402, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2373-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Based on measurements of the snow cover over sea ice and atmospheric measurements, we estimate snowfall and snow accumulation for the MOSAiC ice floe, between November 2019 and May 2020. For this period, we estimate 98–114 mm of precipitation. We suggest that about 34 mm of snow water equivalent accumulated until the end of April 2020 and that at least about 50 % of the precipitated snow was eroded or sublimated. Further, we suggest explanations for potential snowfall overestimation.
Julienne Stroeve, Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Rasmus Tonboe, Stefan Hendricks, Robert Ricker, James Mead, Robbie Mallett, Marcus Huntemann, Polona Itkin, Martin Schneebeli, Daniela Krampe, Gunnar Spreen, Jeremy Wilkinson, Ilkka Matero, Mario Hoppmann, and Michel Tsamados
The Cryosphere, 14, 4405–4426, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4405-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4405-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides a first look at the data collected by a new dual-frequency Ka- and Ku-band in situ radar over winter sea ice in the Arctic Ocean. The instrument shows potential for using both bands to retrieve snow depth over sea ice, as well as sensitivity of the measurements to changing snow and atmospheric conditions.
Jacinta Edebeli, Jürg C. Trachsel, Sven E. Avak, Markus Ammann, Martin Schneebeli, Anja Eichler, and Thorsten Bartels-Rausch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13443–13454, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13443-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13443-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Earth’s snow cover is very dynamic and can change its physical properties within hours, as is well known by skiers. Snow is also a well-known host of chemical reactions – the products of which impact air composition and quality. Here, we present laboratory experiments that show how the dynamics of snow make snow essentially inert with respect to gas-phase ozone with time despite its content of reactive chemicals. Impacts on polar atmospheric chemistry are discussed.
Cited articles
Ambegaokar, V., Halperin, B., and Langer, J. S.: Hopping Conductivity in
Disordered Systems, Phys. Rev. B, 4, 2612–2620,
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.4.2612, 1971. a
Bartels-Rausch, T., Jacobi, H.-W., Kahan, T. F., Thomas, J. L., Thomson, E. S., Abbatt, J. P. D., Ammann, M., Blackford, J. R., Bluhm, H., Boxe, C., Domine, F., Frey, M. M., Gladich, I., Guzmán, M. I., Heger, D., Huthwelker, Th., Klán, P., Kuhs, W. F., Kuo, M. H., Maus, S., Moussa, S. G., McNeill, V. F., Newberg, J. T., Pettersson, J. B. C., Roeselová, M., and Sodeau, J. R.: A review of air–ice chemical and physical interactions (AICI): liquids, quasi-liquids, and solids in snow, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1587–1633, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1587-2014, 2014. a, b
Beckmann, F., Grupp, R., Haibel, A., Huppmann, M., Nöthe, M., Pyzalla, A.,
Reimers, W., Schreyer, A., and Zettler, R.: In-situ synchrotron x-ray
microtomography studies of microstructure and damage evolution in engineering
materials, Adv. Eng. Mater., 9, 939–950, https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200700254,
2007. a
Broadbent, S. R. and Hammersley, J. M.: Percolation processes, Math.
Proc. Cambridge, 53, 629–641,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100032680, 1957. a
Cheng, L., Rief, S., and Wiegmann, A.: Simple FFT for flow computations in low
porosity microCT images, urn:nbn:de:0011-n-3641306, poster presented at
Interpore 5th International Conference on Porous Media 2013, Prague, 2013. a
Cnudde, V. and Boone, M.: High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in
geosciences: a review of the current technology and applications,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 123, 1–17, 2013. a
Cox, G. F. N. and Weeks, W. F.: Brine drainage and initial salt entrapment in
sodium chloride ice, in: Brine drainage in sodium chloride ice, dr.-philos. thesis by: Cox, G. F. N.,
Dartsmouth College, Research Report 345, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and
Engineering Laboratory, 179 pp., 1975. a, b, c, d
Crabeck, O., Galley, R., Delille, B., Else, B., Geilfus, N.-X., Lemes, M., Des Roches, M., Francus, P., Tison, J.-L., and Rysgaard, S.: Imaging air volume fraction in sea ice using non-destructive X-ray tomography, The Cryosphere, 10, 1125–1145, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1125-2016, 2016. a
Eicken, H., Bock, C., Wittig, R., Miller, H., and Poertner, H.-O.: Magnetic
resonance imaging of sea-ice pore fluids: methods and thermal evolution of
pore microstructure, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 31, 207–225, 2000. a
Flin, F., Brzoska, J. B., Lesaffre, B., Coleou, C., and Pieritz, R. A.:
Three-dimensional geometric measurements of snow microstructural evolution
under isothermal conditions, Ann. Glaciol., 38, 39–44, 2004. a
Gelb, L., Graham, A. L., Mertz, A. M., and Koenig, P. H.: On the permeability of
colloidal gels, Phys. Fluids, 31, 021210,
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054596, 2019. a
Gervais, P. C., Dany, F., Bouilloux, L., and Ricciardi, L.: Simulations of
filter media performances from microtomography-based computational domain.
Experimental and analytical comparison, Comput. Fluid., 116, 118–128,
2015. a
Griewank, P. J. and Notz, D.: Insights into brine dynamics and sea ice
desalination from a 1-D model study of gravity drainage, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 3370–3386, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20247,
2013. a
Happel, J. and Brenner, J.: Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics, M. Nijhoff,
Dordrecht, Netherlands, 553 pp., 1986. a
Heggli, M., Köchle, B., Matzl, M., Pinzer, B., Riche, F., Steiner, S.,
Steinfeld, D., and Schneebeli, M.: Measuring snow in 3-D using X-ray
tomography: assessment of visualization techniques, Ann. Glaciol., 52,
231–236, 2011. a
Henkel, M., Hinrichsen, H., and Lübeck, S.: Non-equlibrium phase
transitions, Volume I: Absorbing phase transitions, Springer, 385 pp., 2008. a
Hinrichsen, H.: Observation of directed percolation – a class of nonequilibrium
phase transitions, Physics, 2, 96, https://doi.org/10.1103/Physics.2.96, 2009. a
Katz, A. J. and Thompson, A. H.: Quantitative prediction of permeability in
porous rock, Phys. Rev. B, 34, 8179–8181, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.8179,
1986. a, b
Kawamura, T.: Studies on preferred growth of sea ice grain, Contri. Inst. Low
Temp. Sci., 3120, 1–29, 1988. a
Kinney, J. H. and Nichols, M. C.: X-ray tomographic microscopy (xtm)
using synchrotron radiation, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 22, 121–152, 1992. a
Kovacs, A. and Morey, R. M.: Radar anisotropy of sea ice due to preferred
azimuthal orientation of the horizontal c axes of ice crystals, J. Geophys.
Res., 83, 6037–6046, 1978. a
Krembs, C., Mock, T., and Gradinger, R.: A mesocosm study of
physical-biological interactions in artifical sea ice: effects of brine
channel surface evolution and brine movement on agal mass, Polar Biol., 24,
356–364, 2001. a
Langhorne, P. J. and Robinson, W.: Alignment of crystals in sea ice due to
fluid motion, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 12, 197–214, 1986. a
Le Doussal, P.: Permeability versus conductivity for porous media with wide
distribution of pore sizes, Phys. Rev. B, 39, 4816–4819,
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.39.4816, 1989. a
Light, B., Maykut, G. A., and Grenfell, T. C.: Effects of temperature on
microstructure of first-year Arctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 108,
3051–3066, 2003. a
Linden, S., Cheng, L., and Wiegmann, A.: Tech. Rep. 2018-01, Math2Market,
https://doi.org/10.30423/report.m2m-2018-01, 2018. a
Maksym, T. and Jeffries, M. O.: A one-dimensional percolation model of flooding
and snow ice formation on Antarctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 105,
26313–26331, 2000. a
Maus, S.: Microstructure and solutal boundary layer at the sea ice – ocean interface, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-6039, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-6039, 2020 a
Maus, S., Haase, S., Büttner, J., Huthwelker, T., Schwikowski, M.,
Vähätalo, A., and Enzmann, F.: Ion fractionation in young sea ice
from Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, Ann. Glaciol., 52, 301–310,
2011. a
Maus, S., Schneebeli, M., and Wiegmann, A.: X-ray microtomographic imagery of
young sea ice from Adventfjorden, 3D grey scale microCT
images (170 Gigabytes), Svalbard,
https://doi.org/10.30423/scandata.scan-2021-01, 2021a. a
Maus, S., Schneebeli, M., and Wiegmann, A.: Vertical evolution of a horizontal
cross section of the sea ice brine pore space, video, Scandata at Math2Market GmbH,
https://doi.org/10.30423/video.scandata-2021-01,
2021b. a
Niedrauer, T. M. and Martin, S.: An experimental study of brine drainage and
convection in young sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 1176–1186, 1979. a
Nield, D. A. and Bejan, A.: Convection in Porous Media, Springer, 2nd Edn., 546
pp., 1999. a
Otsu, N.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms, IEEE
Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-9, 62–66, 1979. a
Perovich, D. K. and Gow, A. J.: A quantitative description of sea ice
inclusions, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 18327–18343, 1996. a
Polashenski, C., Golden, K., Perovich, D. K., Skyllingstad, E., Arnsten, A.,
C.Stwertka, and Wright, N.: Percolation blockage: A process that enables melt
pond formation on first year Arctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 413–440, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC011994, 2017. a, b
Rees Jones, D. and Grae Worster, M.: A physically based parametrization of
gravity dtainage for sea ice modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 5599–5621,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009296, 2014. a, b
Sahimi, M.: Flow phenomena in rocks, Rev. Mod. Phys., 65, 1393–1534, 1993. a
Schneebeli, M. and Sokratov, S. A.: Tomography of temperature gradient
metamorphism of snow and associated changes in heat conductivity, Hydrol.
Process., 18, 3655–3665, 2004. a
Turner, A. K., Hunke, E. C., and Bitz, C. M.: Two modes of sea-ice gravity
drainage: A parameterization for large-scale modeling, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 118, 2279–2294, 2013. a
Vancoppenolle, M., Bitz, C. M., and Fichefet, T.: Summer landfast sea ice
desalination at Point Barrow, Alaska: Modeling and observations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 112, 2156–2202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003493,
2007. a
Wakatsuchi, M.: Experiments on the growth of sea ice and the rejection of
brine, Contrib. Inst. Low Temp. Sci., A32, 195–205, 1974. a
Wells, A., Wettlaufer, J., and Orszag, S. A.: Nonlinear mushy-layer convection
with chimneys: stability and optimal solute fluxes, J. Fluid Mech., 716,
203–227, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2012.541, 2013. a
Wettlaufer, J. S.: Directional solidification of salt water: deep and shallow
cells, Europhys. Lett., 19, 337–342, 1992. a
Wettlaufer, J. S., Worster, M. G., and Huppert, H. E.: The phase evolution of
young sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 1251–1254, 1997. a
Wiegmann, A.: Computation of the permeability of porous materials from their
microstructure by FFF-Stokes, vol. ITWM-Berichte, 129, Kaiserslautern,
Fraunhofer ITWM, 1434-9973, 2007. a
Zermatten, E., Haussener, S., Schneebeli, M., and Steinfeldt, A.:
Tomography-based determination of permeability and Dupui Forchheimer
coefficient of characteristic snow samples, J. Glaciol., 47, 811–816, 2011. a
Short summary
As the hydraulic permeability of sea ice is difficult to measure, observations are sparse. The present work presents numerical simulations of the permeability of young sea ice based on a large set of 3D X-ray tomographic images. It extends the relationship between permeability and porosity available so far down to brine porosities near the percolation threshold of a few per cent. Evaluation of pore scales and 3D connectivity provides novel insight into the percolation behaviour of sea ice.
As the hydraulic permeability of sea ice is difficult to measure, observations are sparse. The...