Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
The Cryosphere, 14, 751–767, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-751-2020
The Cryosphere, 14, 751–767, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-751-2020
Research article
02 Mar 2020
Research article | 02 Mar 2020

Variability scaling and consistency in airborne and satellite altimetry measurements of Arctic sea ice

Shiming Xu et al.

Related authors

Ocean Modeling with Adaptive REsolution (OMARE, version 1.0) – Refactoring NEMO model (version 4.0.1) with the parallel computing framework of JASMIN. Part 1: adaptive grid refinement in an idealized double-gyre case
Yan Zhang, Xuantong Wang, Yuhao Sun, Chenhui Ning, Shiming Xu, Hengbin An, Dehong Tang, Hong Guo, Hao Yang, Ye Pu, Bo Jiang, and Bin Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-510,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-510, 2022
Short summary
Comparison of sea ice kinematics at different resolutions modeled with a grid hierarchy in the Community Earth System Model (version 1.2.1)
Shiming Xu, Jialiang Ma, Lu Zhou, Yan Zhang, Jiping Liu, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 603–628, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-603-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-603-2021, 2021
Short summary
Inter-comparison of snow depth over Arctic sea ice from reanalysis reconstructions and satellite retrieval
Lu Zhou, Julienne Stroeve, Shiming Xu, Alek Petty, Rachel Tilling, Mai Winstrup, Philip Rostosky, Isobel R. Lawrence, Glen E. Liston, Andy Ridout, Michel Tsamados, and Vishnu Nandan
The Cryosphere, 15, 345–367, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-345-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-345-2021, 2021
Short summary
Optimizing high-resolution Community Earth System Model on a heterogeneous many-core supercomputing platform
Shaoqing Zhang, Haohuan Fu, Lixin Wu, Yuxuan Li, Hong Wang, Yunhui Zeng, Xiaohui Duan, Wubing Wan, Li Wang, Yuan Zhuang, Hongsong Meng, Kai Xu, Ping Xu, Lin Gan, Zhao Liu, Sihai Wu, Yuhu Chen, Haining Yu, Shupeng Shi, Lanning Wang, Shiming Xu, Wei Xue, Weiguo Liu, Qiang Guo, Jie Zhang, Guanghui Zhu, Yang Tu, Jim Edwards, Allison Baker, Jianlin Yong, Man Yuan, Yangyang Yu, Qiuying Zhang, Zedong Liu, Mingkui Li, Dongning Jia, Guangwen Yang, Zhiqiang Wei, Jingshan Pan, Ping Chang, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Stephen Yeager, Nan Rosenbloom, and Ying Guo
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4809–4829, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4809-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4809-2020, 2020
Short summary
On the retrieval of sea ice thickness and snow depth using concurrent laser altimetry and L-band remote sensing data
Lu Zhou, Shiming Xu, Jiping Liu, and Bin Wang
The Cryosphere, 12, 993–1012, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-993-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-993-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Sea Ice
Recovering and monitoring the thickness, density, and elastic properties of sea ice from seismic noise recorded in Svalbard
Agathe Serripierri, Ludovic Moreau, Pierre Boue, Jérôme Weiss, and Philippe Roux
The Cryosphere, 16, 2527–2543, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2527-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2527-2022, 2022
Short summary
Influences of changing sea ice and snow thicknesses on simulated Arctic winter heat fluxes
Laura L. Landrum and Marika M. Holland
The Cryosphere, 16, 1483–1495, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1483-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1483-2022, 2022
Short summary
Reassessing seasonal sea ice predictability of the Pacific-Arctic sector using a Markov model
Yunhe Wang, Xiaojun Yuan, Haibo Bi, Mitchell Bushuk, Yu Liang, Cuihua Li, and Haijun Huang
The Cryosphere, 16, 1141–1156, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1141-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1141-2022, 2022
Short summary
Predictability of Arctic Sea Ice Drift in Coupled Climate Models
Simon F. Reifenberg and Helge F. Goessling
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-41,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-41, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for TC
Short summary
A new state-dependent parameterization for the free drift of sea ice
Charles Brunette, L. Bruno Tremblay, and Robert Newton
The Cryosphere, 16, 533–557, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-533-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-533-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abraham, C., Steiner, N., Monahan, A., and Michel, C.: Effects of subgrid-scale snow thickness variability on radiative transfer in sea ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 5597–5614, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010741, 2015. a
Alfred-Wegener-Institut: MOSAiC Expedition, available at: https://www.mosaic-expedition.org, last access: 6 February 2019. a
Armitage, T. W. K. and Ridout, A. L.: Arctic sea ice freeboard from AltiKa and comparison with CryoSat-2 and Operation IceBridge, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 6724–6731, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064823, 2015. a
Blockley, E. W. and Peterson, K. A.: Improving Met Office seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice using assimilation of CryoSat-2 thickness, The Cryosphere, 12, 3419–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3419-2018, 2018. a, b
Boisvert, L. N., Webster, M. A., Petty, A. A., Markus, T., Bromwich, D. H., and Cullather, R. I.: Intercomparison of Precipitation Estimates over the Arctic Ocean and Its Peripheral Seas from Reanalyses, J. Climate, 31, 8441–8462, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0125.1, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
Sea ice thickness parameters are key to polar climate change studies and forecasts. Airborne and satellite measurements provide complementary observational capabilities. The study analyzes the variability in freeboard and snow depth measurements and its changes with scale in Operation IceBridge, CryoVEx, CryoSat-2 and ICESat. Consistency between airborne and satellite data is checked. Analysis calls for process-oriented attribution of variability and covariability features of these parameters.