Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2409-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2409-2020
Research article
 | 
27 Jul 2020
Research article |  | 27 Jul 2020

Statistical predictability of the Arctic sea ice volume anomaly: identifying predictors and optimal sampling locations

Leandro Ponsoni, François Massonnet, David Docquier, Guillian Van Achter, and Thierry Fichefet

Related authors

Modulating surface heat flux through sea ice leads improves Arctic sea ice simulation in the coupled EC-Earth3
Tian Tian, Richard Davy, Leandro Ponsoni, and Shuting Yang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1865,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1865, 2024
Short summary
Brief Communication: On the mid-summer melt pond fraction–September Arctic sea ice extent relationship in the EC-Earth3 climate model
Mukesh Gupta, Leandro Ponsoni, Jean Sterlin, François Massonnet, and Thierry Fichefet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1560,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1560, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
An inter-comparison of the mass budget of the Arctic sea ice in CMIP6 models
Ann Keen, Ed Blockley, David A. Bailey, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Mitchell Bushuk, Steve Delhaye, David Docquier, Daniel Feltham, François Massonnet, Siobhan O'Farrell, Leandro Ponsoni, José M. Rodriguez, David Schroeder, Neil Swart, Takahiro Toyoda, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Martin Vancoppenolle, and Klaus Wyser
The Cryosphere, 15, 951–982, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-951-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-951-2021, 2021
Short summary
Brief communication: Arctic sea ice thickness internal variability and its changes under historical and anthropogenic forcing
Guillian Van Achter, Leandro Ponsoni, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, and Vincent Legat
The Cryosphere, 14, 3479–3486, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3479-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3479-2020, 2020
Short summary
On the timescales and length scales of the Arctic sea ice thickness anomalies: a study based on 14 reanalyses
Leandro Ponsoni, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Matthieu Chevallier, and David Docquier
The Cryosphere, 13, 521–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-521-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-521-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Sea Ice
Seasonal evolution of the sea ice floe size distribution in the Beaufort Sea from 2 decades of MODIS data
Ellen M. Buckley, Leela Cañuelas, Mary-Louise Timmermans, and Monica M. Wilhelmus
The Cryosphere, 18, 5031–5043, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5031-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5031-2024, 2024
Short summary
Suitability of the CICE sea ice model for seasonal prediction and positive impact of CryoSat-2 ice thickness initialization
Shan Sun and Amy Solomon
The Cryosphere, 18, 3033–3048, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3033-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3033-2024, 2024
Short summary
A large-scale high-resolution numerical model for sea-ice fragmentation dynamics
Jan Åström, Fredrik Robertsen, Jari Haapala, Arttu Polojärvi, Rivo Uiboupin, and Ilja Maljutenko
The Cryosphere, 18, 2429–2442, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2429-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2429-2024, 2024
Short summary
Experimental modelling of the growth of tubular ice brinicles from brine flows under sea ice
Sergio Testón-Martínez, Laura M. Barge, Jan Eichler, C. Ignacio Sainz-Díaz, and Julyan H. E. Cartwright
The Cryosphere, 18, 2195–2205, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2195-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Why is summertime Arctic sea ice drift speed projected to decrease?
Jamie L. Ward and Neil F. Tandon
The Cryosphere, 18, 995–1012, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-995-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Amélineau, F., Grémillet, D., Bonnet, D., Le Bot, T., and Fort, J.: Where to Forage in the Absence of Sea Ice? Bathymetry As a Key Factor for an Arctic Seabird, PLoS ONE, 11, e0157764, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157764, 2016. a
Barnett, D. G.: Empirical orthogonal functions and the statistical predictability of sea ice extent, in: Sea Ice Processes and Models, edited by: Pritchard, R. S., Univ. Wash. Press, Seattle, 1980. a
Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E. and Bitz, C.: Characteristics of Arctic Sea-Ice Thickness Variability in GCMs, J. Clim., 27, 8244–8258, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00345.1, 2014. a
Brown, T. A., Galicia, M. P., Thiemann, G. W., Belt, S. T., Yurkowski, D. J., and Dyck, M. G.: High contributions of sea ice derived carbon in polar bear (Ursus maritimus) tissue, PLoS ONE, 13, e0191631, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191631, 2016. a
Burgard, C. and Notz, D.: Drivers of Arctic Ocean warming in CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res. Let., 44, 4263–4271, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072342, 2017. a
Download
Short summary
The continuous melting of the Arctic sea ice observed in the last decades has a significant impact at global and regional scales. To understand the amplitude and consequences of this impact, the monitoring of the total sea ice volume is crucial. However, in situ monitoring in such a harsh environment is hard to perform and far too expensive. This study shows that four well-placed sampling locations are sufficient to explain about 70 % of the inter-annual changes in the pan-Arctic sea ice volume.