Articles | Volume 13, issue 11
Research article
08 Nov 2019
Research article |  | 08 Nov 2019

Estimating early-winter Antarctic sea ice thickness from deformed ice morphology

M. Jeffrey Mei, Ted Maksym, Blake Weissling, and Hanumant Singh

Related authors

Calving localization at Helheim Glacier using multiple local seismic stations
M. Jeffrey Mei, David M. Holland, Sridhar Anandakrishnan, and Tiantian Zheng
The Cryosphere, 11, 609–618,,, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Sea Ice
A collection of wet beam models for wave–ice interaction
Sasan Tavakoli and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 17, 939–958,,, 2023
Short summary
First results of Antarctic sea ice type retrieval from active and passive microwave remote sensing data
Christian Melsheimer, Gunnar Spreen, Yufang Ye, and Mohammed Shokr
The Cryosphere, 17, 105–126,,, 2023
Short summary
Analysis of micro-seismicity in sea ice with deep learning and Bayesian inference: application to high-resolution thickness monitoring
Ludovic Moreau, Léonard Seydoux, Jérôme Weiss, and Michel Campillo
The Cryosphere Discuss.,,, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for TC
Short summary
Linking scales of sea ice surface topography: evaluation of ICESat-2 measurements with coincident helicopter laser scanning during MOSAiC
Robert Ricker, Steven Fons, Arttu Jutila, Nils Hutter, Kyle Duncan, Sinead L. Farrell, Nathan T. Kurtz, and Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
EGUsphere,,, 2022
Short summary
Probabilistic spatiotemporal seasonal sea ice presence forecasting using sequence-to-sequence learning and ERA5 data in the Hudson Bay region
Nazanin Asadi, Philippe Lamontagne, Matthew King, Martin Richard, and K. Andrea Scott
The Cryosphere, 16, 3753–3773,,, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification, in: Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike, Springer, 215–222,, 1974. a, b
Baldi, P.: Autoencoders, unsupervised learning, and deep architectures, in: Proceedings of ICML workshop on unsupervised and transfer learning, 37–49, 2012. a
Behrendt, A., Dierking, W., Fahrbach, E., and Witte, H.: Sea ice draft in the Weddell Sea, measured by upward looking sonars, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 209–226,, 2013. a
Brock, J. C., Wright, C. W., Clayton, T. D., and Nayegandhi, A.: LIDAR optical rugosity of coral reefs in Biscayne National Park, Florida, Coral Reefs, 23, 48–59,, 2004. a
Dierking, W.: Laser profiling of the ice surface topography during the Winter Weddell Gyre Study 1992, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 100, 4807–4820,, 1995. a
Short summary
Sea ice thickness is hard to measure directly, and current datasets are very limited to sporadically conducted drill lines. However, surface elevation is much easier to measure. Converting surface elevation to ice thickness requires making assumptions about snow depth and density, which leads to large errors (and may not generalize to new datasets). A deep learning method is presented that uses the surface morphology as a direct predictor of sea ice thickness, with testing errors of < 20 %.