Articles | Volume 20, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-3913-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-3913-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
17 Jul 2026
Research article |
| 17 Jul 2026
| 17 Jul 2026
Bayesian inversion of satellite altimetry for Arctic sea ice and snow thickness
Elie René-Bazin
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Département de Sciences de la Terre, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France
Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Michel Tsamados
Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Sabrina Sofea Binti Aliff Raziuddin
Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Joel Perez Ferrer
Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Tudor Suciu
Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Carmen Nab
Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Ocean Forecasting Research and Development, Met Office, Exeter, UK
Chamkaur Ghag
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, UK
Harry Heorton
Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Rosemary Willatt
Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Jack Landy
Department of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
Matthew Fox
Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Thomas Bodin
Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Related authors
No articles found.
Ghislain Picard, Justin Murfitt, Elena Zakharova, Pierre Zeiger, Laurent Arnaud, Jeremie Aublanc, Jack C. Landy, Michele Scagliola, and Claude Duguay
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 9103–9129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9103-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9103-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Radar altimeters measure ice-sheet elevation and sea-ice thickness. To improve their accuracy, we developed a model that simulates altimeter waveforms based on the physical properties of snow and sea ice. It computes the power, time, and Doppler shift of radar echoes as waves travel to the surface, interact with snow and ice, and return to the satellite. The model was verified internally, validated against other models and applied in Antarctica using in-situ snow measurements.
Alek Petty, Christopher Cardinale, Michel Tsamados, William Gregory, and Alex Cabaj
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-700, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-700, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We combine laser-altimeter measurements with daily passive-microwave estimates of thin ice using Gaussian-process regression. The resulting dataset provides complete daily Arctic sea ice thickness maps across seven winter growth seasons, substantially improving spatial and temporal coverage, particularly during autumn freeze-up. It also better represents thin ice and enables consistent estimates of Arctic sea ice volume.
Ayush Prasad, Ioanna Merkouriadi, Aleksi Nummelin, Jack Landy, Arttu Jutila, and Glen E. Liston
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4727, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4727, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
Snow on Arctic sea ice is blown by wind into uneven drifts around ridges, which affects how well we can measure the thickness of the ice from satellites. Numerical models can capture this but are far too slow to run across the whole Arctic. We trained a machine-learning model on detailed simulations of small patches of ice, then applied it across the Arctic using satellite measurements of how rough the ice surface is.
Wenxuan Liu, Ruibo Lei, Taoyong Jin, Heyang Sun, Michel Tsamados, Isolde A. Glissenaar, Jack Christopher Landy, and Yi Zhou
The Cryosphere, 20, 4839–4876, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4839-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4839-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic sea ice is thinning, but its height above the ocean is still hard to measure, especially in summer when melt ponds can look like open water from space. We developed a method that uses laser measurements from the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 and nearby satellite images to better separate ice from open water. It captures small ridges more clearly, improves lead detection, and provides year-round freeboard maps that can support better estimates of ice thickness.
Matthew Fox, Adam G. G. Smith, Pieter Vermeesch, Kerry Gallagher, and Andrew Carter
Geochronology, 8, 463–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-8-463-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-8-463-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The ability to reconstruct thermal histories from thermochronometric data is determined by kinetic parameters. The Great Unconformity represents an enormous amount of time lost from the sedimentary record and has been explored with zircon (U–Th)/He ages. Here we explore the uncertainty associated with the radiation damage model and show how this limits our ability to resolve the origin of the Great Unconformity.
Julienne Stroeve, Rosemary Willatt, Madeleine Downie, Monojit Saha, Carmen Nab, Alicia Fallows, Clement Soriot, Robbie Mallett, Anton Komarov, Vishnu Nandan, Thomas Newman, Jennifer Lukovich, and John Yackel
The Cryosphere, 20, 4367–4399, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4367-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4367-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate polarimetry for snow depth retrieval on Arctic winter transport routes. Over landfast ice and tundra, traditional dual-frequency (Ku/Ka) methods often fail. We demonstrate that cross-polarization (VH) provides a more reliable marker for snow/ice and snow/ground interfaces. For lakes, we successfully resolve air, snow, and ice interfaces to retrieve snow and ice thickness simultaneously. These results establish a baseline for future polarimetric satellite missions.
Patrick C. Taylor, Armin Sorooshian, Rei Ueyama, Sebastian Schmidt, Ihab Abboud, Quincy Allison, Kevin Barry, Sebastian Becker, Holly A. Bender, Joseph R. Bennett, James B. Blair, Niklas Bohn, Linette Boisvert, Matthew D. Brown, Roelof Bruintjes, Anthony Bucholtz, Megan Buzanowicz, Brian Cairns, Filippo Calì Quaglia, Eduard Chemyakin, Bo Chen, Gao Chen, Hong Chen, Yu-Wen Chen, Zezhen Cheng, Swarup China, Dan Chirica, Yonghoon Choi, Peter Colarco, Brian Collister, Ewan Crosbie, Maurice J. Cross, Janet Daniels, Paul DeMott, Joshua P. DiGangi, Alcide Giorgio di Sarra, Glenn S. Diskin, Erica K. Dolinar, Eva-Lou Edwards, Samuel Ephraim, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Romanos Foskinis, Francesca Gallo, Lan Gao, José Luis Gómez-Amo, Daisy Gonzalez, Christine Groot Zwaaftink, Pawan Gupta, Ivan Heckman, Michael Hendrickson, Miguel Ricardo A. Hilario, Ken Hirata, Michelle Hofton, Andrew L. Holen, Ulas Im, Alia L. Khan, Ralph Kahn, Alexei V. Korolev, Sonia Kreidenweis, Thomas Krumpen, Nathan Kurtz, Leslie Lait, Bradley Lamkin, Jack Landy, Nurun Nahar Lata, Paul Lawson, Samuel LeBlanc, Sean Leavor, Jing Li, Thorsten Markus, Hal Maring, Andreas H. Massling, Camille Mavis, Flynn McGinnity, Kerry Meyer, Gabriel Mojica, Richard H. Moore, Parker Morris, Giovanni Muscari, Vikas Nataraja, Amin R. Nehrir, Athanasios Nenes, Edward P. Nowottnick, Matteo Ottaviani, Chelsea Parker, Ryan Patnaude, Michael Perez, Russell J. Perkins, Colten Peterson, Alek Petty, Stevie Phothisane, Chris Polashenski, Kerri A. Pratt, Kayla M. Preisler, John Prytherch, David Rabine, Jens Redemann, Ju-Mee Ryoo, Joseph S. Schlosser, Vanessa Selimovic, Michael A. Shook, Morgan Silverman, Henrik Skov, Alexander Smirnov, Cassidy Soloff, Amy Solomon, Snorre Stamnes, Azusa Takeishi, David R. Thompson, K. Lee Thornhill, Rachel Tilling, Michael Tjernström, Monica Tosco, Pedro C. Valdelomar, David Van Gilst, Jian Wang, Zhien Wang, Andrzej Wasilewski, Manfred Wendisch, Brent Wilder, Edward L. Winstead, Albert Wu, Peng Xian, Lauren M. Zamora, Jiaoshi Zhang, Lei Zhang, Lu Zhang, Luke Ziemba, and Paquita Zuidema
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-241, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-241, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
This article summarizes the data sets collected during the Arctic Radiation Cloud aerosol Sea ice Interaction eXperiment (ARCSIX), NASA's most comprehensive Arctic field campaign to date. The overarching goal was to quantify the contributions of surface, clouds, aerosol particles, and precipitation to summer sea ice melt. This paper describes the ARCSIX implementation including the flight strategy, instruments, complementary data sets, access, and usage details.
Lanqing Huang, Julienne Stroeve, Thomas Newman, Robbie Mallett, Rosemary Willatt, Lu Zhou, Malin Johansson, Carmen Nab, and Alicia Fallows
The Cryosphere, 20, 2825–2849, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2825-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2825-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding snow depth on sea ice is key for measuring ice thickness, studying ecosystems, and modelling climate. Using snow and ice thickness measurements from Arctic and Antarctic campaigns, this study examines sub-kilometre-scale (<1 km²) snow depth variations and identifies the most suitable statistical models for different ice ages, thicknesses, and weather conditions. These results can improve sub-grid snow parameterisations in snow models and remote sensing algorithms.
Alistair Duffey, Walker Lee, Lauren Wheeler, Peter Irvine, Benjamin Wagman, Matthew Henry, Daniele Visioni, Michel Tsamados, and Douglas MacMartin
Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 353–385, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-353-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-353-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Adding a layer of reflective particles high in the atmosphere is one suggested way of cooling the planet and reducing the impacts of climate change. This technique might be less logistically difficult in the high latitudes, because the material could be released at lower altitude there. Here, we use new simulations in three earth system models to assess how this form of intervention, High-Latitude Low-Altitude Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (HiLLA-SAI), would impact the global climate.
Catherine Taelman, Jack Landy, Robbie Mallett, and Polona Itkin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1662, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1662, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic sea ice thickness is commonly estimated using radar measurements from satellites. This technique assumes that the snow on sea ice is 'invisible' to the radar signals. We studied if this assumption is valid and found that the radar measurements work well in cold conditions, when air temperatures are below –10 °C. However, the radar measurements can overestimate ice thickness during warmer periods, especially if there is new snowfall and if the snow contains salt.
Nicholas Williams, Nicholas Byrne, Daniel Feltham, Peter Jan Van Leeuwen, Ross Bannister, David Schroeder, Isobel Lawrence, Lars Nerger, Jack Landy, and Geoffrey Dawson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-742, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-742, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we present three satellite era Arctic sea ice reanalyses, each assimilating different combinations of sea ice concentration and thickness observations. Results show that using year-round thickness observations substantially improves reanalysis compared to winter-only data. The best-performing reanalysis reveals a seasonally compensating bias cycle, suggesting errors in ice growth, leads, refreezing, marginal ice zone dynamics, redistribution, and melt timing mask model errors.
Anne Braakmann-Folgmann, Jack C. Landy, Geoffrey Dawson, and Robert Ricker
The Cryosphere, 20, 905–929, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-905-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-905-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
To calculate sea ice thickness from altimetry, returns from ice and leads need to be differentiated. During summer, melt ponds complicate this task, as they resemble leads. In this study, we improve a previously suggested neural network classifier by expanding the training dataset fivefold, tuning the network architecture and introducing an additional class for thinned floes. We show that this increases the accuracy from 77 ± 5 % to 84 ± 2 % and that more leads are found.
Jack C. Landy, Claude de Rijke-Thomas, Carmen Nab, Isobel Lawrence, Isolde A. Glissenaar, Robbie D. C. Mallett, Renée M. Fredensborg Hansen, Alek Petty, Michel Tsamados, Amy R. Macfarlane, and Anne Braakmann-Folgmann
The Cryosphere, 20, 183–208, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-183-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-183-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we use three satellites to test the planned remote sensing approach of the upcoming mission Copernicus Polar Ice and Snow Topography Altimeter (CRISTAL) over sea ice and that its dual radars will accurately measure the heights of the top and base of snow sitting atop floating sea ice floes. Our results suggest that CRISTAL's dual radars will not necessarily measure the snow top and base under all conditions. We find that accurate height measurements depend more on surface roughness than on snow properties, as is commonly assumed.
Valentin Ludwig, Caroline Ribere, Sara Fleury, Christian Haas, Michel Tsamados, Mahmoud El Hajj, Jerome Bouffard, Michele Scagliola, Marion Bocquet, Eric de Boisseson, Vincent Boulenger, Guillaume Boutin, Laurence Connor, Léo Edel, Stefan Hendricks, Ferran Hernández Macià, Marcus Huntemann, Lars Kaleschke, Frank Kauker, Jack Landy, Tom Megain, Alek Petty, Till Soya Rasmussen, Mads Hvid Ribergaard, Robert Ricker, Axel Schweiger, Hoyeon Shi, Xiangshan Tian-Kunze, Donghui Yi, and Alessandro Di Bella
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6201, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6201, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper compares Arctic sea-ice thickness datasets from models, reanalyses, satellite-only, and multi-product sources. We validate them against Beaufort Sea reference data, compare large-scale products, and analyse time series. Cross-product biases range from 0.2–0.4 m, RMSDs from 0.4–0.9 m, and correlations from 0.5–0.8. We find no 2010–2023 trend, but 1995–2023 thinning of ~ 0.5 m in November and ~ 0.3 m in March.
Stephen E. L. Howell, Alex Cabaj, David G. Babb, Jack C. Landy, Jackie Dawson, Mallik Mahmud, and Mike Brady
The Cryosphere, 19, 6711–6725, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6711-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6711-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Northwest Passage provides a shorter transit route connecting the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean but ever-present sea ice has prevented its practical navigation. Sea ice area in the northern route of the Northwest Passage on September 30, 2024 fell to a minimum of 4×103 km2 or ~3% of its total area, the lowest ice area observed since 1960. This paper describes the unique processes that contributed to the record low sea ice area in the northern route of the Northwest Passage in 2024.
Siqi Liu, Shiming Xu, Wenkai Guo, Yanfei Fan, Lu Zhou, Jack Landy, Malin Johansson, Weixin Zhu, and Alek Petty
The Cryosphere, 19, 5175–5199, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5175-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5175-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we explore the potential of using synthetic aperture radars (SAR) to predict the sea ice height measurements by the airborne campaign of Operation IceBridge. In particular, we predict the meter-scale sea ice height with the statistical relationship between the two, overcoming the resolution limitation of SAR images from Sentinel-1 satellites. The prediction and ice drift correction algorithms can be applied to the extrapolation of ICESat-2 measurements in the Arctic region.
Evgenii Salganik, Odile Crabeck, Niels Fuchs, Nils Hutter, Philipp Anhaus, and Jack Christopher Landy
The Cryosphere, 19, 1259–1278, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1259-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1259-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To measure Arctic ice thickness, we often check how much ice sticks out of the water. This method depends on knowing the ice's density, which drops significantly in summer. Our study, validated with sonar and laser data, shows that these seasonal changes in density can complicate melt measurements. We stress the importance of considering these density changes for more accurate ice thickness readings.
Monojit Saha, Julienne Stroeve, Dustin Isleifson, John Yackel, Vishnu Nandan, Jack Christopher Landy, and Hoi Ming Lam
The Cryosphere, 19, 325–346, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-325-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-325-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Snow on sea ice is vital for near-shore sea ice geophysical and biological processes. Past studies have measured snow depths using the satellite altimeters Cryosat-2 and ICESat-2 (Cryo2Ice), but estimating sea surface height from leadless landfast sea ice remains challenging. Snow depths from Cryo2Ice are compared to in situ data after adjusting for tides. Realistic snow depths are retrieved, but differences in roughness, satellite footprints, and snow geophysical properties are identified.
Lu Zhou, Julienne Stroeve, Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Shiming Xu, Weixin Zhu, Sahra Kacimi, Stefanie Arndt, and Zifan Yang
The Cryosphere, 18, 4399–4434, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4399-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4399-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow over Antarctic sea ice, influenced by highly variable meteorological conditions and heavy snowfall, has a complex stratigraphy and profound impact on the microwave signature. We employ advanced radiation transfer models to analyse the effects of complex snow properties on brightness temperatures over the sea ice in the Southern Ocean. Great potential lies in the understanding of snow processes and the application to satellite retrievals.
Stephen E. L. Howell, David G. Babb, Jack C. Landy, Isolde A. Glissenaar, Kaitlin McNeil, Benoit Montpetit, and Mike Brady
The Cryosphere, 18, 2321–2333, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2321-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2321-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The CAA serves as both a source and a sink for sea ice from the Arctic Ocean, while also exporting sea ice into Baffin Bay. It is also an important region with respect to navigating the Northwest Passage. Here, we quantify sea ice transport and replenishment across and within the CAA from 2016 to 2022. We also provide the first estimates of the ice area and volume flux within the CAA from the Queen Elizabeth Islands to Parry Channel, which spans the central region of the Northwest Passage.
Alistair Duffey, Robbie Mallett, Peter J. Irvine, Michel Tsamados, and Julienne Stroeve
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1165–1169, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1165-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1165-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Arctic is warming several times faster than the rest of the planet. Here, we use climate model projections to quantify for the first time how this faster warming in the Arctic impacts the timing of crossing the 1.5 °C and 2 °C thresholds defined in the Paris Agreement. We show that under plausible emissions scenarios that fail to meet the Paris 1.5 °C target, a hypothetical world without faster warming in the Arctic would breach that 1.5 °C target around 5 years later.
Geoffrey J. Dawson and Jack C. Landy
The Cryosphere, 17, 4165–4178, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4165-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4165-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we compared measurements from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2 over Arctic summer sea ice to understand any possible biases between the two satellites. We found that there is a difference when we measure elevation over summer sea ice using CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2, and this is likely due to surface melt ponds. The differences we found were in good agreement with theoretical predictions, and this work will be valuable for summer sea ice thickness measurements from both altimeters.
Alexander Mchedlishvili, Christof Lüpkes, Alek Petty, Michel Tsamados, and Gunnar Spreen
The Cryosphere, 17, 4103–4131, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4103-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4103-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we looked at sea ice–atmosphere drag coefficients, quantities that help with characterizing the friction between the atmosphere and sea ice, and vice versa. Using ICESat-2, a laser altimeter that measures elevation differences by timing how long it takes for photons it sends out to return to itself, we could map the roughness, i.e., how uneven the surface is. From roughness we then estimate drag force, the frictional force between sea ice and the atmosphere, across the Arctic.
Isolde A. Glissenaar, Jack C. Landy, David G. Babb, Geoffrey J. Dawson, and Stephen E. L. Howell
The Cryosphere, 17, 3269–3289, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3269-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3269-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Observations of large-scale ice thickness have unfortunately only been available since 2003, a short record for researching trends and variability. We generated a proxy for sea ice thickness in the Canadian Arctic for 1996–2020. This is the longest available record for large-scale sea ice thickness available to date and the first record reliably covering the channels between the islands in northern Canada. The product shows that sea ice has thinned by 21 cm over the 25-year record in April.
Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Robbie Mallett, Julienne Stroeve, Torsten Geldsetzer, Randall Scharien, Rasmus Tonboe, John Yackel, Jack Landy, David Clemens-Sewall, Arttu Jutila, David N. Wagner, Daniela Krampe, Marcus Huntemann, Mallik Mahmud, David Jensen, Thomas Newman, Stefan Hendricks, Gunnar Spreen, Amy Macfarlane, Martin Schneebeli, James Mead, Robert Ricker, Michael Gallagher, Claude Duguay, Ian Raphael, Chris Polashenski, Michel Tsamados, Ilkka Matero, and Mario Hoppmann
The Cryosphere, 17, 2211–2229, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We show that wind redistributes snow on Arctic sea ice, and Ka- and Ku-band radar measurements detect both newly deposited snow and buried snow layers that can affect the accuracy of snow depth estimates on sea ice. Radar, laser, meteorological, and snow data were collected during the MOSAiC expedition. With frequent occurrence of storms in the Arctic, our results show that
wind-redistributed snow needs to be accounted for to improve snow depth estimates on sea ice from satellite radars.
Julienne Stroeve, Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Ruzica Dadic, Philip Rostosky, Michael Gallagher, Robbie Mallett, Andrew Barrett, Stefan Hendricks, Rasmus Tonboe, Michelle McCrystall, Mark Serreze, Linda Thielke, Gunnar Spreen, Thomas Newman, John Yackel, Robert Ricker, Michel Tsamados, Amy Macfarlane, Henna-Reetta Hannula, and Martin Schneebeli
The Cryosphere, 16, 4223–4250, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4223-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4223-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Impacts of rain on snow (ROS) on satellite-retrieved sea ice variables remain to be fully understood. This study evaluates the impacts of ROS over sea ice on active and passive microwave data collected during the 2019–20 MOSAiC expedition. Rainfall and subsequent refreezing of the snowpack significantly altered emitted and backscattered radar energy, laying important groundwork for understanding their impacts on operational satellite retrievals of various sea ice geophysical variables.
William Gregory, Julienne Stroeve, and Michel Tsamados
The Cryosphere, 16, 1653–1673, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1653-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1653-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This research was conducted to better understand how coupled climate models simulate one of the large-scale interactions between the atmosphere and Arctic sea ice that we see in observational data, the accurate representation of which is important for producing reliable forecasts of Arctic sea ice on seasonal to inter-annual timescales. With network theory, this work shows that models do not reflect this interaction well on average, which is likely due to regional biases in sea ice thickness.
Florent Garnier, Sara Fleury, Gilles Garric, Jérôme Bouffard, Michel Tsamados, Antoine Laforge, Marion Bocquet, Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen, and Frédérique Remy
The Cryosphere, 15, 5483–5512, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5483-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5483-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Snow depth data are essential to monitor the impacts of climate change on sea ice volume variations and their impacts on the climate system. For that purpose, we present and assess the altimetric snow depth product, computed in both hemispheres from CryoSat-2 and SARAL satellite data. The use of these data instead of the common climatology reduces the sea ice thickness by about 30 cm over the 2013–2019 period. These data are also crucial to argue for the launch of the CRISTAL satellite mission.
Isolde A. Glissenaar, Jack C. Landy, Alek A. Petty, Nathan T. Kurtz, and Julienne C. Stroeve
The Cryosphere, 15, 4909–4927, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4909-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4909-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Scientists can estimate sea ice thickness using satellites that measure surface height. To determine the sea ice thickness, we also need to know the snow depth and density. This paper shows that the chosen snow depth product has a considerable impact on the findings of sea ice thickness state and trends in Baffin Bay, showing mean thinning with some snow depth products and mean thickening with others. This shows that it is important to better understand and monitor snow depth on sea ice.
Cited articles
Aaboe, S., Down, E., Sørensen, A., Lavergne, T., and Eastwood, S.: Sea-ice type climate data record October 1978–August 2023, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/CDS.29C46D83, 2021. a, b
Alexandrov, V., Sandven, S., Wahlin, J., and Johannessen, O. M.: The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic, The Cryosphere, 4, 373–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-373-2010, 2010. a, b
Bodin, T. and Sambridge, M.: Seismic tomography with the reversible jump algorithm, Geophys. J. Int., 178, 1411–1436, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04226.x, 2009. a
Brodzik, M. J., Billingsley, B., Haran, T., Raup, B., and Savoie, M. H.: EASE-grid 2.0: Incremental but significant improvements for Earth-gridded data sets, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi1010032, 2012. a
Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G., and Meng, X.-L.: Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, https://books.google.fr/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=8VWNEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1929&dq=Brooks,+S.,+Gelman,+A.,+Jones,+G.,+and+Meng,+X.-L.:+Handbook+of+Markov+Chain+Monte+Carlo,+Chapman+and+Hall/CRC,+New+York,+TS14+2011&ots=6Wehu935lA&sig=S6206mosnIlXGFsAXnu75TLVir8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (last access: 14 July 2026), 2011. a
Dettmering, D., Schwatke, C., and Bosch, W.: Global Calibration of SARAL/AltiKa Using Multi-Mission Sea Surface Height Crossovers, Mar. Geod., 38, 206–218, https://doi.org/10.1080/01490419.2014.988832, 2015. a
Elierb: Elierb/Bayesian-trans-dimensional-inversion-from-satellite-altimeters-for-Arctic-ice-and-snow-retrievals: v2 (Version v2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17475067, 2025. a
Forsström, S., Gerland, S., and Pedersen, C. A.: Thickness and density of snow-covered sea ice and hydrostatic equilibrium assumption from in situ measurements in Fram Strait, the Barents Sea and the Svalbard coast, Ann. Glaciol., 52, 261–270, https://doi.org/10.3189/172756411795931598, 2011. a
Green, P. J.: Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination, Biometrika, 82, 711–732, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/82.4.711, 1995. a
Gregory, W., Lawrence, I. R., and Tsamados, M.: A Bayesian approach towards daily pan-Arctic sea ice freeboard estimates from combined CryoSat-2 and Sentinel-3 satellite observations, The Cryosphere, 15, 2857–2871, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2857-2021, 2021. a
Gregory, W., Bushuk, M., Zhang, Y., Adcroft, A., and Zanna, L.: Machine Learning for Online Sea Ice Bias Correction Within Global Ice-Ocean Simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106776, 2024a. a
Gregory, W., MacEachern, R., Takao, S., Lawrence, I. R., Nab, C., Deisenroth, M. P., and Tsamados, M.: Scalable interpolation of satellite altimetry data with probabilistic machine learning, Nat. Commun., 15, 7453, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51900-x, 2024b. a
Guerreiro, K., Fleury, S., Zakharova, E., Rémy, F., and Kouraev, A.: Potential for estimation of snow depth on Arctic sea ice from CryoSat-2 and SARAL/AltiKa missions, Remote Sens. Environ., 186, 339–349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.013, 2016. a
Hawkins, R., Bodin, T., Sambridge, M., Choblet, G., and Husson, L.: Trans-dimensional surface reconstruction with different classes of parameterization, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 20, 505–529, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008022, 2019a. a, b, c, d
Hawkins, R., Husson, L., Choblet, G., Bodin, T., and Pfeffer, J.: Virtual tide gauges for predicting relative sea level rise, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 13367–13391, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017943, 2019b. a
Itkin, P., Webster, M., Hendricks, S., Oggier, M., Jaggi, M., Ricker, R., Arndt, S., Divine, D. V., von Albedyll, L., Raphael, I., Rohde, J., and Liston, G. E.: Magnaprobe snow and melt pond depth measurements from the 2019–2020 MOSAiC expedition, PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.937781, 2021. a, b
Jutila, A., Hendricks, S., Ricker, R., von Albedyll, L., and Haas, C.: Airborne sea ice parameters during the IceBird Winter 2019 campaign in the Arctic Ocean, Version 1, PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.933912, 2021. a, b
Kacimi, S. and Kwok, R.: Arctic Snow Depth, Ice Thickness, and Volume From ICESat-2 and CryoSat-2: 2018–2021, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097448, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097448, 2022. a
Kurtz, N., Studinger, M., Harbeck, J., Onana, V., and Yi, D.: IceBridge Sea Ice Freeboard, Snow Depth, and Thickness Quick Look, Version 1, NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/GRIXZ91DE0L9, 2016. a, b
Kwok, R.: Simulated effects of a snow layer on retrieval of CryoSat-2 sea ice freeboard, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 5014–5020, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060993, 2014. a
Kwok, R.: Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage: losses and coupled variability (1958–2018), Environ. Res. Lett., 13, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae3ec, 2018. a
Kwok, R. and Markus, T.: Potential basin-scale estimates of Arctic snow depth with sea ice freeboards from CryoSat-2 and ICESat-2: An exploratory analysis, Adv. Space Res., 62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.09.007, 2017. a
Kwok, R. and Rothrock, D. A.: Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958–2008, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039035, 2009. a
Kwok, R., Kurtz, N. T., Brucker, L., Ivanoff, A., Newman, T., Farrell, S. L., King, J., Howell, S., Webster, M. A., Paden, J., Leuschen, C., MacGregor, J. A., Richter-Menge, J., Harbeck, J., and Tschudi, M.: Intercomparison of snow depth retrievals over Arctic sea ice from radar data acquired by Operation IceBridge, The Cryosphere, 11, 2571–2593, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2571-2017, 2017. a
Kwok, R., Kacimi, S., Webster, M., Kurtz, N., and Petty, A.: Arctic Snow Depth and Sea Ice Thickness From ICESat-2 and CryoSat-2 Freeboards: A First Examination, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC016008, 2020. a
Kwok, R., Petty, A., Cunningham, G., Markus, T., Ivanoff, D. H. A., Wimert, J., Bagnardi, M., and Kurtz, N.: ATLAS/ICESat-2 L3A Sea Ice Freeboard, Version 6, NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/ATLAS/ATL10.006, 2023a. a
Kwok, R., Cunningham, G., Markus, T., Hancock, D., Morison, J. H., Palm, S. P., Farrell, S. L., Ivanoff, A., and Wimert, J.: ATLAS/ICESat-2 L3A Sea Ice Freeboard, Version 3, NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5067/ATLAS/ATL10.006, 2023b. a
Landy, J. C., Petty, A. A., Tsamados, M., and Stroeve, J. C.: Sea ice roughness overlooked as a key source of uncertainty in CryoSat-2 ice freeboard retrievals, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015820, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015820, 2020. a, b
Landy, J. C., Dawson, G. J., Tsamados, M., Bushuk, M., Stroeve, J. C., Howell, S. E. L., Krumpen, T., Babb, D. G., Komarov, A. S., Heorton, H. D. B. S., Belter, H. J., and Aksenov, Y.: A year-round satellite sea-ice thickness record from CryoSat-2, Nature, 609, 517–522, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05058-5, 2022. a
Landy, J. C., de Rijke-Thomas, C., Nab, C., Lawrence, I., Glissenaar, I. A., Mallett, R. D., Fredensborg Hansen, R. M., Petty, A., Tsamados, M., Macfarlane, A. R., and Braakmann-Folgmann, A.: Anticipating CRISTAL: an exploration of multi-frequency satellite altimeter snow depth estimates over Arctic sea ice, 2018–2023, The Cryosphere, 20, 183–208, 2026. a, b, c, d
Lawrence, I. R., Tsamados, M. C., Stroeve, J. C., Armitage, T. W. K., and Ridout, A. L.: Estimating snow depth over Arctic sea ice from calibrated dual-frequency radar freeboards, The Cryosphere, 12, 3551–3564, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3551-2018, 2018. a
Laxon, S., Peacock, N., and Smith, D.: High interannual variability of sea ice thickness in the Arctic region, Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02050, 2003. a
Malinverno, A. and Briggs, V. A.: Expanded uncertainty quantification in inverse problems: Hierarchical Bayes and empirical Bayes, Geophysics, 69, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1778243, 2004. a
Mallett, R. D.: A methodologically robust densification function for snow on multiyear Arctic sea ice, J. Glaciol., 71, e24, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2025.5, 2025. a
Mallett, R. D. C., Lawrence, I. R., Stroeve, J. C., Landy, J. C., and Tsamados, M.: Brief communication: Conventional assumptions involving the speed of radar waves in snow introduce systematic underestimates to sea ice thickness and seasonal growth rate estimates, The Cryosphere, 14, 251–260, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-251-2020, 2020. a
Nab, C., Mallett, R., Gregory, W., Landy, J., Lawrence, I., Willatt, R., Stroeve, J., and Tsamados, M.: Synoptic variability in satellite altimeter-derived radar freeboard of Arctic sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2022GL100696, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100696, 2023. a
Nab, C., Mallett, R., Nelson, C., Stroeve, J., and Tsamados, M.: Optimising interannual sea ice thickness variability retrieved from CryoSat-2, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2024GL111071, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111071, 2024. a
Nab, C., Mignac, D., Landy, J., Martin, M., Stroeve, J., and Tsamados, M.: Sensitivity to sea ice thickness parameters in a coupled ice-ocean data assimilation system, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004276, 2025. a
Nandan, V., Geldsetzer, T., Yackel, J., Mahmud, M., Scharien, R., Howell, S., King, J., Ricker, R., and Else, B.: Effect of Snow Salinity on CryoSat-2 Arctic First-Year Sea Ice Freeboard Measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074506, 2017. a
Nicolaus, M., Perovich, D. K., Spreen, G., Granskog, M. A., von Albedyll, L., Angelopoulos, M., Anhaus, P., Arndt, S., Belter, H. J., Bessonov, V., Birnbaum, G., Brauchle, J., Calmer, R., Cardellach, E., Cheng, B., Clemens-Sewall, D., Dadic, R., Damm, E., de Boer, G., Demir, O., Dethloff, K., Divine, D. V., Fong, A. A., Fons, S., Frey, M. M., Fuchs, N., Gabarró, C., Gerland, S., Goessling, H. F., Gradinger, R., Haapala, J., Haas, C., Hamilton, J., Hannula, H.-R., Hendricks, S., Herber, A., Heuzé, C., Hoppmann, M., Høyland, K. V., Huntemann, M., Hutchings, J. K., Hwang, B., Itkin, P., Jacobi, H.-W., Jaggi, M., Jutila, A., Kaleschke, L., Katlein, C., Kolabutin, N., Krampe, D., Kristensen, S. S., Krumpen, T., Kurtz, N., Lampert, A., Lange, B. A., Lei, R., Light, B., Linhardt, F., Liston, G. E., Loose, B., Macfarlane, A. R., Mahmud, M., Matero, I. O., Maus, S., Morgenstern, A., Naderpour, R., Nandan, V., Niubom, A., Oggier, M., Oppelt, N., Pätzold, F., Perron, C., Petrovsky, T., Pirazzini, R., Polashenski, C., Rabe, B., Raphael, I. A., Regnery, J., Rex, M., Ricker, R., Riemann-Campe, K., Rinke, A., Rohde, J., Salganik, E., Scharien, R. K., Schiller, M., Schneebeli, M., Semmling, M., Shimanchuk, E., Shupe, M. D., Smith, M. M., Smolyanitsky, V., Sokolov, V., Stanton, T., Stroeve, J., Thielke, L., Timofeeva, A., Tonboe, R. T., Tavri, A., Tsamados, M., Wagner, D. N., Watkins, D., Webster, M., and Wendisch, M.: Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Snow and sea ice, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 10, 000046, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.000046, 2022. a
Oelsmann, J., Marcos, M., Passaro, M., Sanchez, L., Dettmering, D., Dangendorf, S., and Seitz, F.: Regional variations in relative sea-level changes influenced by nonlinear vertical land motion, Nat. Geosci., 17, 137–144, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01357-2, 2024. a
Petty, A. A., Keeney, N., Cabaj, A., Kushner, P., and Bagnardi, M.: Winter Arctic sea ice thickness from ICESat-2: upgrades to freeboard and snow loading estimates and an assessment of the first three winters of data collection, The Cryosphere, 17, 127–156, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-127-2023, 2023. a
Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D., Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., Nicolai, M., Okem, A., Petzold, J., Rama, B., and Weyer, N.: Summary for Policymakers, IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.001, 2019. a
Rostosky, P., Spreen, G., Farrell, S. L., Frost, T., Heygster, G., and Melsheimer, C.: Snow Depth Retrieval on Arctic Sea Ice From Passive Microwave Radiometers – Improvements and Extensions to Multiyear Ice Using Lower Frequencies, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014028, 2018. a, b, c
Rothrock, D. A., Zhang, J., and Yu, Y.: The arctic ice thickness anomaly of the 1990s: A consistent view from observations and models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001208, 2003. a
Sambridge, M., Braun, J., and McQueen, H.: Geophysical parametrization and interpolation of irregular data using natural neighbours, Geophys. J. Int., 122, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb06841.x, 1995. a
Shi, H., Sohn, B.-J., Dybkjær, G., Tonboe, R. T., and Lee, S.-M.: Simultaneous estimation of wintertime sea ice thickness and snow depth from space-borne freeboard measurements, The Cryosphere, 14, 3761–3783, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3761-2020, 2020. a
Stroeve, J. and Notz, D.: Changing state of Arctic sea ice across all seasons, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 103001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aade56, 2018. a
Tilling, R. L., Ridout, A., and Shepherd, A.: Estimating Arctic sea ice thickness and volume using CryoSat-2 radar altimeter data, Adv. Space Res., 62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.10.051, 2018. a
Wadhams, P., Tucker, W. B., Krabill, W. B., Swift, R. N., Comiso, J. C., and Davis, N. R.: Relationship Between Sea Ice Freeboard and Draft in the Arctic Basin, and Implications for Ice Thickness Monitoring, J. Geophys. Res., 97, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JC02014, 1992. a
Warren, S. G., Rigor, I. G., Untersteiner, N., Radionov, V. F., Bryazgin, N. N., Aleksandrov, Y. I., and Colony, R.: Snow Depth on Arctic Sea Ice, J. Climate, 12, 1814–1829, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1814:SDOASI>2.0.CO;2 , 1999. a, b
Webster, M. A., Rigor, I. G., Nghiem, S. V., Kurtz, N. T., Farrell, S. L., Perovich, D. K., and Sturm, M.: Interdecadal changes in snow depth on Arctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC009985, 2014. a
Willatt, R., Laxon, S., Giles, K., Cullen, R., Haas, C., and Helm, V.: Ku-band radar penetration into snow cover on Arctic sea ice using airborne data, Ann. Glaciol., https://doi.org/10.3189/172756411795931589, 2011. a
Willatt, R., Stroeve, J. C., Nandan, V., Newman, T., Mallett, R., Hendricks, S., Ricker, R., Mead, J., Itkin, P., Tonboe, R., Wagner, D. N., Spreen, G., Liston, G., Schneebeli, M., Krampe, D., Tsamados, M., Demir, O., Wilkinson, J., Jaggi, M., Zhou, L., Huntemann, M., Raphael, I. A., Jutila, A., and Oggier, M.: Retrieval of Snow Depth on Arctic Sea Ice From Surface-Based, Polarimetric, Dual-Frequency Radar Altimetry, Geophys. Res. Lett., https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104461, 2023. a
Wingham, D. J., Francis, C. R., Baker, S. Bouzinac, C., Brockley, D., Cullen, R., De Chateau-Thierry, P., Laxon, S. W., Mallow, U., Mavrocordatos, C., Phalippou, L., Ratier, G., Rey, L., Rostan, F., Viau, P., and Wallis, D. W.: CryoSat: A mission to determine the fluctuations in Earth's land and marine ice fields, Adv. Space Res., 37, 841–871, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.027, 2006. a
Zygmuntowska, M., Rampal, P., Ivanova, N., and Smedsrud, L. H.: Uncertainties in Arctic sea ice thickness and volume: new estimates and implications for trends, The Cryosphere, 8, 705–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-705-2014, 2014. a
Short summary
This paper introduces a new statistical approach to retrieve ice and snow depth over the Arctic Ocean, using satellite altimeters measurements. We demonstrate the ability of this method to compute efficiently the sea ice thickness and the snow depth over the Arctic, without major assumptions on the snow. In addition to the ice and snow depth, this approach is efficient to study the penetration of radar and laser pulses, paving the way for further research in satellite altimetry.
This paper introduces a new statistical approach to retrieve ice and snow depth over the Arctic...
