Articles | Volume 18, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5045-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5045-2024
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
15 Nov 2024
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 15 Nov 2024

Twenty-first century global glacier evolution under CMIP6 scenarios and the role of glacier-specific observations

Harry Zekollari, Matthias Huss, Lilian Schuster, Fabien Maussion, David R. Rounce, Rodrigo Aguayo, Nicolas Champollion, Loris Compagno, Romain Hugonnet, Ben Marzeion, Seyedhamidreza Mojtabavi, and Daniel Farinotti

Related authors

A minimal machine learning glacier mass balance model
Marijn van der Meer, Harry Zekollari, Matthias Huss, Jordi Bolibar, Kamilla Hauknes Sjursen, and Daniel Farinotti
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2378,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2378, 2024
Short summary
Adaptation of root zone storage capacity to climate change and its effects on future streamflow in Alpine catchments: towards non-stationary model parameters
Magali Ponds, Sarah Hanus, Harry Zekollari, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Gerrit Schoups, Roland Kaitna, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-260,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-260, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Greenland and Canadian Arctic ice temperature profiles database
Anja Løkkegaard, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Christian Zdanowicz, Gary D. Clow, Martin P. Lüthi, Samuel H. Doyle, Henrik H. Thomsen, David Fisher, Joel Harper, Andy Aschwanden, Bo M. Vinther, Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Harry Zekollari, Toby Meierbachtol, Ian McDowell, Neil Humphrey, Anne Solgaard, Nanna B. Karlsson, Shfaqat A. Khan, Benjamin Hills, Robert Law, Bryn Hubbard, Poul Christoffersen, Mylène Jacquemart, Julien Seguinot, Robert S. Fausto, and William T. Colgan
The Cryosphere, 17, 3829–3845, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3829-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3829-2023, 2023
Short summary
Global vs local glacier modelling: a comparison in the Tien Shan
Lander Van Tricht, Harry Zekollari, Matthias Huss, Daniel Farinotti, and Philippe Huybrechts
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-87,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-87, 2023
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Coupling a global glacier model to a global hydrological model prevents underestimation of glacier runoff
Pau Wiersma, Jerom Aerts, Harry Zekollari, Markus Hrachowitz, Niels Drost, Matthias Huss, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, and Rolf Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5971–5986, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5971-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5971-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Glaciers | Subject: Glaciers
Linking Glacier Retreat with Climate Change on the Tibetan Plateau through Satellite Remote Sensing
Fumeng Zhao, Wenping Gong, Silvia Bianchini, and Zhongkang Yang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1083,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1083, 2024
Short summary
A quasi-one-dimensional ice mélange flow model based on continuum descriptions of granular materials
Jason M. Amundson, Alexander A. Robel, Justin C. Burton, and Kavinda Nissanka
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-297,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-297, 2024
Short summary
Modelling the historical and future evolution of six ice masses in the Tien Shan, Central Asia, using a 3D ice-flow model
Lander Van Tricht and Philippe Huybrechts
The Cryosphere, 17, 4463–4485, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4463-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4463-2023, 2023
Short summary
Thinning and surface mass balance patterns of two neighbouring debris-covered glaciers in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau
Chuanxi Zhao, Wei Yang, Evan Miles, Matthew Westoby, Marin Kneib, Yongjie Wang, Zhen He, and Francesca Pellicciotti
The Cryosphere, 17, 3895–3913, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3895-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3895-2023, 2023
Short summary
Everest South Col Glacier did not thin during the period 1984–2017
Fanny Brun, Owen King, Marion Réveillet, Charles Amory, Anton Planchot, Etienne Berthier, Amaury Dehecq, Tobias Bolch, Kévin Fourteau, Julien Brondex, Marie Dumont, Christoph Mayer, Silvan Leinss, Romain Hugonnet, and Patrick Wagnon
The Cryosphere, 17, 3251–3268, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3251-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3251-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Abrahams, Z., Hoogendoorn, G., and Fitchett, J. M.: Glacier tourism and tourist reviews: an experiential engagement with the concept of “Last Chance Tourism”, Scand. J. Hosp. Tour., 22, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2021.1974545, 2022. 
Aguayo, R., Maussion, F., Schuster, L., Schaefer, M., Caro, A., Schmitt, P., Mackay, J., Ultee, L., Leon-Muñoz, J., and Aguayo, M.: Assessing the glacier projection uncertainties in the Patagonian Andes (40–56° S) from a catchment perspective, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2325, 2023. 
Aguayo, R., León-Muñoz, J., Aguayo, M., Baez-Villanueva, O. M., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M., Fernández, A., and Jacques-Coper, M.: PatagoniaMet: A multi-source hydrometeorological dataset for Western Patagonia, Sci. Data, 11, 6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02828-2, 2024. 
Bliss, A., Hock, R., and Radić, V.: Global response of glacier runoff to twenty-first century climate change, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 717–730, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002931, 2014. 
Bolibar, J., Rabatel, A., Gouttevin, I., Zekollari, H., and Galiez, C.: Nonlinear sensitivity of glacier mass balance to future climate change unveiled by deep learning, Nat. Commun., 13, 409, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28033-0, 2022. 
Download
Co-editor-in-chief
This study brings together an impressive amount of data to come up with an updated estimate of global glacier loss until the year 2100. This is an important result in a climate change context, and one of a global dimension.
Short summary
Glaciers are major contributors to sea-level rise and act as key water resources. Here, we model the global evolution of glaciers under the latest generation of climate scenarios. We show that the type of observations used for model calibration can strongly affect the projections at the local scale. Our newly projected 21st century global mass loss is higher than the current community estimate as reported in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.