Articles | Volume 16, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1765-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1765-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Divergence of apparent and intrinsic snow albedo over a season at a sub-alpine site with implications for remote sensing
Earth Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106,
USA
Jeff Dozier
Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of
California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
Charles Stern
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY 10964, USA
Adam LeWinter
Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
Karl Rittger
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado,
Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Earth Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106,
USA
Alexandria Savagian
Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME 04011, USA
Timbo Stillinger
Earth Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106,
USA
Robert E. Davis
Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
Related authors
Edward H. Bair, Dar A. Roberts, David R. Thompson, Philip G. Brodrick, Brenton A. Wilder, Niklas Bohn, Christopher J. Crawford, Nimrod Carmon, Carrie M. Vuyovich, and Jeff Dozier
The Cryosphere, 19, 2315–2320, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Key to the success of future satellite missions is understanding snowmelt in our warming climate, as this has implications for nearly 2 billion people. An obstacle is that an artifact, called the hook, is often mistaken for soot or dust. Instead, it is caused by three amplifying effects: (1) background reflectance that is too dark, (2) an assumption of level terrain, and (3) differences in optical constants of ice. Sensor calibration and directional effects may also contribute. Solutions are presented.
Niklas Bohn, Edward H. Bair, Philip G. Brodrick, Nimrod Carmon, Robert O. Green, Thomas H. Painter, and David R. Thompson
The Cryosphere, 19, 1279–1302, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1279-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1279-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A new type of Earth-observing satellite is measuring reflected sunlight in all its colors. These measurements can be used to characterize snow properties, which give us important information about climate change. In our work, we emphasize the difficulties of obtaining these properties from rough mountainous regions and present a solution to the problem. Our research was inspired by the growing number of new satellite technologies and the increasing challenges associated with climate change.
Edward H. Bair, Jeff Dozier, Karl Rittger, Timbo Stillinger, William Kleiber, and Robert E. Davis
The Cryosphere, 17, 2629–2643, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To test the title question, three snow cover products were used in a snow model. Contrary to previous work, higher-spatial-resolution snow cover products only improved the model accuracy marginally. Conclusions are as follows: (1) snow cover and albedo from moderate-resolution sensors continue to provide accurate forcings and (2) finer spatial and temporal resolutions are the future for Earth observations, but existing moderate-resolution sensors still offer value.
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Timbo Stillinger, Edward Bair, Yu Gu, and L. Ruby Leung
The Cryosphere, 17, 673–697, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We comprehensively evaluated the snow simulations in E3SM land model over the western United States in terms of spatial patterns, temporal correlations, interannual variabilities, elevation gradients, and change with forest cover of snow properties and snow phenology. Our study underscores the need for diagnosing model biases and improving the model representations of snow properties and snow phenology in mountainous areas for more credible simulation and future projection of mountain snowpack.
Timbo Stillinger, Karl Rittger, Mark S. Raleigh, Alex Michell, Robert E. Davis, and Edward H. Bair
The Cryosphere, 17, 567–590, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-567-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-567-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding global snow cover is critical for comprehending climate change and its impacts on the lives of billions of people. Satellites are the best way to monitor global snow cover, yet snow varies at a finer spatial resolution than most satellite images. We assessed subpixel snow mapping methods across a spectrum of conditions using airborne lidar. Spectral-unmixing methods outperformed older operational methods and are ready to to advance snow cover mapping at the global scale.
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Edward Bair, Cenlin He, Huilin Huang, Cheng Dang, Timbo Stillinger, Yu Gu, Hailong Wang, Yun Qian, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 75–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow with the highest albedo of land surface plays a vital role in Earth’s surface energy budget and water cycle. This study accounts for the impacts of snow grain shape and mixing state of light-absorbing particles with snow on snow albedo in the E3SM land model. The findings advance our understanding of the role of snow grain shape and mixing state of LAP–snow in land surface processes and offer guidance for improving snow simulations and radiative forcing estimates in Earth system models.
Edward H. Bair, Dar A. Roberts, David R. Thompson, Philip G. Brodrick, Brenton A. Wilder, Niklas Bohn, Christopher J. Crawford, Nimrod Carmon, Carrie M. Vuyovich, and Jeff Dozier
The Cryosphere, 19, 2315–2320, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Key to the success of future satellite missions is understanding snowmelt in our warming climate, as this has implications for nearly 2 billion people. An obstacle is that an artifact, called the hook, is often mistaken for soot or dust. Instead, it is caused by three amplifying effects: (1) background reflectance that is too dark, (2) an assumption of level terrain, and (3) differences in optical constants of ice. Sensor calibration and directional effects may also contribute. Solutions are presented.
Niklas Bohn, Edward H. Bair, Philip G. Brodrick, Nimrod Carmon, Robert O. Green, Thomas H. Painter, and David R. Thompson
The Cryosphere, 19, 1279–1302, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1279-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1279-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A new type of Earth-observing satellite is measuring reflected sunlight in all its colors. These measurements can be used to characterize snow properties, which give us important information about climate change. In our work, we emphasize the difficulties of obtaining these properties from rough mountainous regions and present a solution to the problem. Our research was inspired by the growing number of new satellite technologies and the increasing challenges associated with climate change.
Derek J. Pickell, Robert L. Hawley, and Adam LeWinter
The Cryosphere, 19, 1013–1029, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1013-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1013-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use a low-cost, low-power GNSS network to measure surface accumulation in Greenland's interior using the interferometric reflectometry technique. Additionally, we extend this method to also estimate centimeter- to meter-scale surface roughness. Our results closely align with a validation record and highlight a period of unusually high accumulation from late 2022 to 2023, along with seasonal variations in surface roughness.
Sarah E. Esenther, Laurence C. Smith, Adam LeWinter, Lincoln H. Pitcher, Brandon T. Overstreet, Aaron Kehl, Cuyler Onclin, Seth Goldstein, and Jonathan C. Ryan
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 215–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-215-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-215-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Meltwater runoff estimates from the Greenland ice sheet contain uncertainty. To better understand ice sheet hydrology, we installed a weather station and river stage sensors along three proglacial rivers in a cold-bedded area of NW Greenland without firn, crevasse, or moulin influence. The first 3 years (2019–2021) of observations have given us a first look at the seasonal and annual weather and hydrological patterns of this understudied region.
Edward H. Bair, Jeff Dozier, Karl Rittger, Timbo Stillinger, William Kleiber, and Robert E. Davis
The Cryosphere, 17, 2629–2643, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To test the title question, three snow cover products were used in a snow model. Contrary to previous work, higher-spatial-resolution snow cover products only improved the model accuracy marginally. Conclusions are as follows: (1) snow cover and albedo from moderate-resolution sensors continue to provide accurate forcings and (2) finer spatial and temporal resolutions are the future for Earth observations, but existing moderate-resolution sensors still offer value.
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Timbo Stillinger, Edward Bair, Yu Gu, and L. Ruby Leung
The Cryosphere, 17, 673–697, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We comprehensively evaluated the snow simulations in E3SM land model over the western United States in terms of spatial patterns, temporal correlations, interannual variabilities, elevation gradients, and change with forest cover of snow properties and snow phenology. Our study underscores the need for diagnosing model biases and improving the model representations of snow properties and snow phenology in mountainous areas for more credible simulation and future projection of mountain snowpack.
Timbo Stillinger, Karl Rittger, Mark S. Raleigh, Alex Michell, Robert E. Davis, and Edward H. Bair
The Cryosphere, 17, 567–590, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-567-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-567-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding global snow cover is critical for comprehending climate change and its impacts on the lives of billions of people. Satellites are the best way to monitor global snow cover, yet snow varies at a finer spatial resolution than most satellite images. We assessed subpixel snow mapping methods across a spectrum of conditions using airborne lidar. Spectral-unmixing methods outperformed older operational methods and are ready to to advance snow cover mapping at the global scale.
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Edward Bair, Cenlin He, Huilin Huang, Cheng Dang, Timbo Stillinger, Yu Gu, Hailong Wang, Yun Qian, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 75–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow with the highest albedo of land surface plays a vital role in Earth’s surface energy budget and water cycle. This study accounts for the impacts of snow grain shape and mixing state of light-absorbing particles with snow on snow albedo in the E3SM land model. The findings advance our understanding of the role of snow grain shape and mixing state of LAP–snow in land surface processes and offer guidance for improving snow simulations and radiative forcing estimates in Earth system models.
Takaya Uchida, Julien Le Sommer, Charles Stern, Ryan P. Abernathey, Chris Holdgraf, Aurélie Albert, Laurent Brodeau, Eric P. Chassignet, Xiaobiao Xu, Jonathan Gula, Guillaume Roullet, Nikolay Koldunov, Sergey Danilov, Qiang Wang, Dimitris Menemenlis, Clément Bricaud, Brian K. Arbic, Jay F. Shriver, Fangli Qiao, Bin Xiao, Arne Biastoch, René Schubert, Baylor Fox-Kemper, William K. Dewar, and Alan Wallcraft
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5829–5856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean and climate scientists have used numerical simulations as a tool to examine the ocean and climate system since the 1970s. Since then, owing to the continuous increase in computational power and advances in numerical methods, we have been able to simulate increasing complex phenomena. However, the fidelity of the simulations in representing the phenomena remains a core issue in the ocean science community. Here we propose a cloud-based framework to inter-compare and assess such simulations.
Yongkang Xue, Tandong Yao, Aaron A. Boone, Ismaila Diallo, Ye Liu, Xubin Zeng, William K. M. Lau, Shiori Sugimoto, Qi Tang, Xiaoduo Pan, Peter J. van Oevelen, Daniel Klocke, Myung-Seo Koo, Tomonori Sato, Zhaohui Lin, Yuhei Takaya, Constantin Ardilouze, Stefano Materia, Subodh K. Saha, Retish Senan, Tetsu Nakamura, Hailan Wang, Jing Yang, Hongliang Zhang, Mei Zhao, Xin-Zhong Liang, J. David Neelin, Frederic Vitart, Xin Li, Ping Zhao, Chunxiang Shi, Weidong Guo, Jianping Tang, Miao Yu, Yun Qian, Samuel S. P. Shen, Yang Zhang, Kun Yang, Ruby Leung, Yuan Qiu, Daniele Peano, Xin Qi, Yanling Zhan, Michael A. Brunke, Sin Chan Chou, Michael Ek, Tianyi Fan, Hong Guan, Hai Lin, Shunlin Liang, Helin Wei, Shaocheng Xie, Haoran Xu, Weiping Li, Xueli Shi, Paulo Nobre, Yan Pan, Yi Qin, Jeff Dozier, Craig R. Ferguson, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Qing Bao, Jinming Feng, Jinkyu Hong, Songyou Hong, Huilin Huang, Duoying Ji, Zhenming Ji, Shichang Kang, Yanluan Lin, Weiguang Liu, Ryan Muncaster, Patricia de Rosnay, Hiroshi G. Takahashi, Guiling Wang, Shuyu Wang, Weicai Wang, Xu Zhou, and Yuejian Zhu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4465–4494, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4465-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4465-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The subseasonal prediction of extreme hydroclimate events such as droughts/floods has remained stubbornly low for years. This paper presents a new international initiative which, for the first time, introduces spring land surface temperature anomalies over high mountains to improve precipitation prediction through remote effects of land–atmosphere interactions. More than 40 institutions worldwide are participating in this effort. The experimental protocol and preliminary results are presented.
Cited articles
Adams, J. B., Smith, M. O., and Johnson, P. E.: Spectral mixture modeling:
A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site, J.
Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 91, 8098–8112, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB08p08098, 1986.
Bair, E. H.: The CRREL UCSB Energy Site, CUES data [code], https://doi.org/10.21424/R4159Q,
2021.
Bair, E. H., Davis, R. E., Finnegan, D. C., LeWinter, A. L., Guttmann, E.,
and Dozier, J.: Can we estimate precipitation rate during snowfall using a
scanning terrestrial LiDAR?, Proc. 2012 Intl. Snow Sci. Workshop, Anchorage,
AK, http://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/1671 (last access: 24 August 2021), 2012.
Bair, E. H., Dozier, J., Davis, R. E., Colee, M. T., and Claffey, K. J.:
CUES – A study site for measuring snowpack energy balance in the Sierra
Nevada, Front. Earth Sci., 3, 58, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2015.00058, 2015.
Bair, E. H., Rittger, K., Davis, R. E., Painter, T. H., and Dozier, J.:
Validating reconstruction of snow water equivalent in California's Sierra
Nevada using measurements from the NASA Airborne Snow Observatory, Water
Resour. Res., 52, 8437–8460, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018704, 2016.
Bair, E. H., Davis, R. E., and Dozier, J.: Hourly mass and snow energy balance measurements from Mammoth Mountain, CA USA, 2011–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 549–563, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-549-2018, 2018.
Bair, E. H., Rittger, K., Skiles, S. M., and Dozier, J.: An examination of
snow albedo estimates from MODIS and their impact on snow water equivalent
reconstruction, Water Resour. Res., 55, 7826–7842, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr024810, 2019.
Bair, E. H., Stillinger, T., Rittger, K., and Skiles, M.: COVID-19 lockdowns
show reduced pollution on snow and ice in the Indus River Basin, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2101174118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101174118, 2021a.
Bair, E. H., Stillinger, T., and Dozier, J.: Snow Property Inversion from
Remote Sensing (SPIReS): A generalized multispectral unmixing approach with
examples from MODIS and Landsat 8 OLI, IEEE T. Geosci.
Remote, 59, 7270–7284, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3040328,
2021b.
Betterton, M. D.: Theory of structure formation in snowfields motivated by
penitentes, suncups, and dirt cones, Phys. Rev. E, 63, 056129,
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.056129, 2001.
Carroll, J. J.: The effect of surface striations on the absorption of
shortwave radiation, J.f Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 87, 9647–9652,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087iC12p09647, 1982.
Clarke, A. D. and Noone, K. J.: Soot in the Arctic snowpack: a cause for
perturbations in radiative transfer, Atmos. Environ., 19, 2045–2053,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(85)90113-1, 1985.
Copernicus and European Space Agency: Sentinel 2A/B data, https://scihub.copernicus.eu/,
last access: 24 August 2021.
Corbett, J. and Su, W.: Accounting for the effects of sastrugi in the CERES clear-sky Antarctic shortwave angular distribution models, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3163–3175, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3163-2015, 2015.
Darwin, C.: Journal of researches into the natural history and geology of
the countries visited during the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle round the world,
John Murray, London, 519 pp., http://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1878_Researches_F33.pdf (last access: 24 August 2021), 1845.
Dozier, J.: Revisiting the topographic horizon problem in the era of big
data and parallel computing, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 19,
8024605, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3125278, 2022.
Dozier, J. and Bair, E.: Snow albedo dataset for “Divergence of apparent and intrinsic snow albedo over a season at a sub-alpine site with implications for remote sensing”, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6458451, 2022.
Elder, K., Goodbody, A., Cline, D., Houser, P., Liston, G. E., Mahrt, L.,
and Rutter, N.: NASA Cold Land Processes Experiment (CLPX 2002/03):
Ground-based and near-surface meteorological observations, J.
Hydrometeorol., 10, 330–337, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jhm878.1, 2009.
Filhol, S. and Sturm, M.: Snow bedforms: A review, new data, and a
formation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 120,
1645–1669, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003529, 2015.
Flanner, M. G., Arnheim, J. B., Cook, J. M., Dang, C., He, C., Huang, X., Singh, D., Skiles, S. M., Whicker, C. A., and Zender, C. S.: SNICAR-ADv3: a community tool for modeling spectral snow albedo, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7673–7704, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7673-2021, 2021.
Gardner, A. S. and Sharp, M. J.: A review of snow and ice albedo and the
development of a new physically based broadband albedo parameterization,
J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 115, F01009, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001444, 2010.
Gascon, F., Bouzinac, C., Thépaut, O., Jung, M., Francesconi, B., Louis,
J., Lonjou, V., Lafrance, B., Massera, S., Gaudel-Vacaresse, A., Languille,
F., Alhammoud, B., Viallefont, F., Pflug, B., Bieniarz, J., Clerc, S.,
Pessiot, L., Trémas, T., Cadau, E., De Bonis, R., Isola, C., Martimort,
P., and Fernandez, V.: Copernicus Sentinel-2A calibration and products
validation status, Remote Sensing, 9, 584, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9060584, 2017.
Gottwald, M., Fritz, T., Breit, H., Schättler, B., and Harris, A.:
Remote sensing of terrestrial impact craters: The TanDEM-X digital elevation
model, Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 52, 1412–1427, https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.12794, 2017.
Gueymard, C. A.: The SMARTS spectral irradiance model after 25 years: New
developments and validation of reference spectra, Sol. Energ., 187,
233–253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.05.048, 2019.
Habte, A., Wilcox, S. M., and Myers, D. R.: Evaluation of radiometers
deployed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Solar Radiation
Research Laboratory National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report NREL/TP-5D00-60896,
Golden, CO USA,
188, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/60896.pdf (last access: 24 August 2021), 2015.
Haeffelin, M., Kato, S., Smith, A. M., Rutledge, C. K., Charlock, T. P., and
Mahan, J. R.: Determination of the thermal offset of the Eppley precision
spectral pyranometer, Appl. Optics, 40, 472–484, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.000472, 2001.
Hansen, J. and Nazarenko, L.: Soot climate forcing via snow and ice
albedos, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 423–428, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2237157100, 2004.
Jones, H. A.: Effect of dust on the melting of snow, Mon. Weather Rev.,
41, 599, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1913)41<599a:EODOTM>2.0.CO;2, 1913.
Kaempfer, T. U., Hopkins, M. A., and Perovich, D. K.: A three-dimensional
microstructure-based photon-tracking model of radiative transfer in snow,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D24113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008239, 2007.
Kuchiki, K., Aoki, T., Niwano, M., Motoyoshi, H., and Iwabuchi, H.: Effect
of sastrugi on snow bidirectional reflectance and its application to MODIS
data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D18110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016070, 2011.
Landry, C. C., Buck, K. A., Raleigh, M. S., and Clark, M. P.: Mountain
system monitoring at Senator Beck Basin, San Juan Mountains, Colorado: A new
integrative data source to develop and evaluate models of snow and
hydrologic processes, Water Resour. Res., 50, 1773–1788, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013711, 2014.
Larue, F., Picard, G., Arnaud, L., Ollivier, I., Delcourt, C., Lamare, M., Tuzet, F., Revuelto, J., and Dumont, M.: Snow albedo sensitivity to macroscopic surface roughness using a new ray-tracing model, The Cryosphere, 14, 1651–1672, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1651-2020, 2020.
Lejeune, Y., Dumont, M., Panel, J.-M., Lafaysse, M., Lapalus, P., Le Gac, E., Lesaffre, B., and Morin, S.: 57 years (1960–2017) of snow and meteorological observations from a mid-altitude mountain site (Col de Porte, France, 1325 m of altitude), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 71–88, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-71-2019, 2019.
Leroux, C. and Fily, M.: Modeling the effect of sastrugi on snow
reflectance, J. Geophys. Res.-Planet., 103, 25779–25788,
https://doi.org/10.1029/98JE00558, 1998.
Lhermitte, S., Abermann, J., and Kinnard, C.: Albedo over rough snow and ice surfaces, The Cryosphere, 8, 1069–1086, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1069-2014, 2014.
Li, Z., Erb, A., Sun, Q., Liu, Y., Shuai, Y., Wang, Z., Boucher, P., and
Schaaf, C.: Preliminary assessment of 20-m surface albedo retrievals from
sentinel-2A surface reflectance and MODIS/VIIRS surface anisotropy measures,
Remote Sens. Environ., 217, 352–365, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.025, 2018.
Libois, Q., Picard, G., France, J. L., Arnaud, L., Dumont, M., Carmagnola, C. M., and King, M. D.: Influence of grain shape on light penetration in snow, The Cryosphere, 7, 1803–1818, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1803-2013, 2013.
Lliboutry, L.: Traité de glaciologie, Masson et Cie, Paris, 427 pp., 1964.
Lyapustin, A., Gatebe, C. K., Kahn, R., Brandt, R., Redemann, J., Russell, P., King, M. D., Pedersen, C. A., Gerland, S., Poudyal, R., Marshak, A., Wang, Y., Schaaf, C., Hall, D., and Kokhanovsky, A.: Analysis of snow bidirectional reflectance from ARCTAS Spring-2008 Campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4359–4375, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4359-2010, 2010.
Manninen, T., Anttila, K., Jääskeläinen, E., Riihelä, A., Peltoniemi, J., Räisänen, P., Lahtinen, P., Siljamo, N., Thölix, L., Meinander, O., Kontu, A., Suokanerva, H., Pirazzini, R., Suomalainen, J., Hakala, T., Kaasalainen, S., Kaartinen, H., Kukko, A., Hautecoeur, O., and Roujean, J.-L.: Effect of small-scale snow surface roughness on snow albedo and reflectance, The Cryosphere, 15, 793–820, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-793-2021, 2021.
Matthes, F. E.: Ablation of snow-fields at high altitudes by radiant solar
heat, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 15, 380–385, https://doi.org/10.1029/TR015i002p00380, 1934.
Nolin, A. W.: Recent advances in remote sensing of seasonal snow, J.
Glaciol., 56, 1141–1150, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311796406077, 2010.
Nolin, A. W. and Payne, M. C.: Classification of glacier zones in western
Greenland using albedo and surface roughness from the Multi-angle Imaging
SpectroRadiometer (MISR), Remote Sens. Environ., 107, 264–275,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.004, 2007.
Nolin, A. W., Dozier, J., and Mertes, L. A. K.: Mapping alpine snow using a
spectral mixture modeling technique, Ann. Glaciol., 17, 121–124,
https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500012702, 1993.
Painter, T. H. and Dozier, J.: Measurements of the
hemispherical-directional reflectance of snow at fine spectral and angular
resolution, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D18115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004458, 2004.
Painter, T. H., Dozier, J., Roberts, D. A., Davis, R. E., and Green, R. O.:
Retrieval of subpixel snow-covered area and grain size from imaging
spectrometer data, Remote Sens. Environ., 85, 64–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00187-6, 2003.
Painter, T. H., Bryant, A. C., and Skiles, S. M.: Radiative forcing by light
absorbing impurities in snow from MODIS surface reflectance data,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L17502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052457, 2012a.
Painter, T. H., Skiles, S. M., Deems, J. S., Bryant, A. C., and Landry, C.
C.: Dust radiative forcing in snow of the Upper Colorado River Basin: 1. A 6
year record of energy balance, radiation, and dust concentrations, Water
Resour. Res., 48, W07521, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012wr011985, 2012b.
Picard, G., Dumont, M., Lamare, M., Tuzet, F., Larue, F., Pirazzini, R., and Arnaud, L.: Spectral albedo measurements over snow-covered slopes: theory and slope effect corrections, The Cryosphere, 14, 1497–1517, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1497-2020, 2020.
Pingel, T. J., Clarke, K. C., and McBride, W. A.: An improved simple
morphological filter for the terrain classification of airborne LIDAR data,
ISPRS J. Photogramm., 77, 21–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.12.002, 2013.
Rhodes, J. J., Armstrong, R. L., and Warren, S. G.: Mode of formation of
“ablation hollows” controlled by dirt content of snow, J.
Glaciol., 33, 135–139, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000008601, 1987.
Rodríguez, E., Morris, C. S., and Belz, J. E.: A global assessment of
the SRTM performance, Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 72,
249–260, https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.72.3.249, 2006.
Rosenthal, W. and Dozier, J.: Automated mapping of montane snow cover at
subpixel resolution from the Landsat Thematic Mapper, Water Resour.
Res., 32, 115–130, https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR02718, 1996.
Rusu, R. B., Marton, Z. C., Blodow, N., Dolha, M., and Beetz, M.: Towards 3D
Point cloud based object maps for household environments, Robot. Auton.
Syst., 56, 927–941, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2008.08.005, 2008.
Sailor, D. J., Resh, K., and Segura, D.: Field measurement of albedo for
limited extent test surfaces, Sol. Energ., 80, 589–599, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2005.03.012, 2006.
Schaepman-Strub, G., Schaepman, M. E., Painter, T. H., Dangel, S., and
Martonchik, J. V.: Reflectance quantities in optical remote
sensing – definitions and case studies, Remote Sens. Environ., 103,
27–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.002, 2006.
Seligman, G.: Snow structure and ski fields, MacMillan & Co., London, 555 pp.,
1936.
Shean, D. E., Alexandrov, O., Moratto, Z. M., Smith, B. E., Joughin, I. R.,
Porter, C., and Morin, P.: An automated, open-source pipeline for mass
production of digital elevation models (DEMs) from very-high-resolution
commercial stereo satellite imagery, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 116, 101–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.012, 2016.
Skiles, S. M. and Painter, T. H.: Toward understanding direct absorption
and grain size feedbacks by dust radiative forcing in snow with coupled snow
physical and radiative transfer modeling, Water Resour. Res., 55,
7362–7378, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024573, 2019.
Skiles, S. M., Painter, T., and Okin, G. S.: A method to retrieve the
spectral complex refractive index and single scattering optical properties
of dust deposited in mountain snow, J. Glaciol., 63, 133–147,
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.126, 2017.
Sterle, K. M., McConnell, J. R., Dozier, J., Edwards, R., and Flanner, M. G.: Retention and radiative forcing of black carbon in eastern Sierra Nevada snow, The Cryosphere, 7, 365–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-365-2013, 2013.
Warren, S. G.: Optical properties of snow, Rev. Geophys. Space
Phys., 20, 67–89, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i001p00067,
1982.
Warren, S. G.: Can black carbon in snow be detected by remote sensing?,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 779–786, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018476, 2013.
Warren, S. G.: Light-absorbing impurities in snow: A personal and historical
account, Front. Earth Sci., 6, 250, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00250, 2019.
Warren, S. G., Brandt, R. E., and O'Rawe Hinton, P.: Effect of surface
roughness on bidirectional reflectance of Antarctic snow, J.
Geophys. Res., 103, 25789–25807, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JE01898, 1998.
Weiser, U., Olefs, M., Schöner, W., Weyss, G., and Hynek, B.: Correction of broadband snow albedo measurements affected by unknown slope and sensor tilts, The Cryosphere, 10, 775–790, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-775-2016, 2016.
Wilcox, S. M. and Myers, D. R.: Evaluation of radiometers in full-time use
at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Solar Radiation Research
Laboratory National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical report: NREL/TP-550-44627,
Golden, CO USA, 45, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/44627.pdf (last access: 24 August 2021), 2008.
Wiscombe, W. J. and Warren, S. G.: A model for the spectral albedo of snow,
I, Pure snow, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2712–2733, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2712:AMFTSA>2.0.CO;2, 1980.
Wright, P., Bergin, M., Dibb, J., Lefer, B., Domine, F., Carman, T.,
Carmagnola, C., Dumont, M., Courville, Z., Schaaf, C., and Wang, Z.:
Comparing MODIS daily snow albedo to spectral albedo field measurements in
Central Greenland, Remote Sens. Environ., 140, 118–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.044, 2014.
Wu, S., Wen, J., You, D., Hao, D., Lin, X., Xiao, Q., Liu, Q., and
Gastellu-Etchegorry, J.-P.: Characterization of remote sensing albedo over
sloped surfaces based on DART simulations and in situ observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 8599–8622, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028283, 2018.
Zhou, X., Li, S., and Stamnes, K.: Effects of vertical inhomogeneity on snow
spectral albedo and its implication for optical remote sensing of snow,
J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4738, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003859, 2003.
Zhuravleva, T. B. and Kokhanovsky, A. A.: Influence of surface roughness on
the reflective properties of snow, J. Quant. Spectrosc.
Ra., 112, 1353–1368, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.01.004, 2011.
Short summary
Understanding how snow and ice reflect solar radiation (albedo) is important for global climate. Using high-resolution topography, darkening from surface roughness (apparent albedo) is separated from darkening by the composition of the snow (intrinsic albedo). Intrinsic albedo is usually greater than apparent albedo, especially during melt. Such high-resolution topography is often not available; thus the use of a shade component when modeling mixtures is advised.
Understanding how snow and ice reflect solar radiation (albedo) is important for global climate....