Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-821-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-821-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Refining the sea surface identification approach for determining freeboards in the ICESat-2 sea ice products
Applied Physics Laboratory, Polar Science Center, University of
Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland,
College Park, Maryland, USA
Marco Bagnardi
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
ADNET Systems, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA
Nathan T. Kurtz
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Glenn F. Cunningham
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, California, USA
Alvaro Ivanoff
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
ADNET Systems, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA
Sahra Kacimi
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, California, USA
Related authors
Sahra Kacimi and Ron Kwok
The Cryosphere, 14, 4453–4474, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4453-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4453-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Our current understanding of Antarctic ice cover is largely informed by ice extent measurements from passive microwave sensors. These records, while useful, provide a limited picture of how the ice is responding to climate change. In this paper, we combine measurements from ICESat-2 and CryoSat-2 missions to assess snow depth and ice thickness of the Antarctic ice cover over an 8-month period (April through November 2019). The potential impact of salinity in the snow layer is discussed.
Alex Cabaj, Paul J. Kushner, and Alek A. Petty
The Cryosphere, 19, 3033–3064, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3033-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3033-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The output of snow-on-sea-ice models is influenced by the choice of snowfall input used. We ran such a model with different snowfall inputs and calibrated it to observations, produced a new calibrated snow product, and regionally compared the model outputs to outputs from another snow-on-sea-ice model. The two models agree best on the seasonal cycle of snow in the central Arctic Ocean. Observational comparisons highlight ongoing challenges in estimating the depth and density of snow on Arctic sea ice.
Alek Aaron Petty, Christopher Cardinale, and Madison Smith
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-766, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-766, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We put global climate models to the test against NASA’s ICESat-2 satellite to see how well they simulate global sea ice cover. By adding fancy laser data from ICESat-2, we can better assess how well the models are performing compared to the standard assessments of sea ice area. Overall the models do a good job but there’s room for improvement, especially across the Southern Ocean. We should think a bit more about sea ice density if we want more reliable freeboard comparisons.
Siqi Liu, Shiming Xu, Wenkai Guo, Yanfei Fan, Lu Zhou, Jack Landy, Malin Johansson, Weixin Zhu, and Alek Petty
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1069, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1069, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we explore the potential of using synthetic aperture radars (SAR) to predict the sea ice height measurements by the airborne campaign of Operation IceBridge. In particular, we predict the meter-scale sea ice height with the statistical relationship between the two, overcoming the resolution limitation of SAR images from Sentinel-1 satellites. The prediction and ice drift correction algorithms can be applied to the extrapolation of ICESat-2 measurements in the Arctic region.
Youngmin Choi, Alek Petty, Denis Felikson, and Jonathan Poterjoy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-301, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-301, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we combined numerical models with satellite data using the ensemble Kalman filter to improve predictions of glacier states and their basal conditions. Simulations showed that adding more data enhances prediction accuracy. We also tested the effect of various data types and found that the high-resolution data improve model performance. This method could inform the design of better observation systems and refine future projections of ice sheet behavior.
Jack C. Landy, Claude de Rijke-Thomas, Carmen Nab, Isobel Lawrence, Isolde A. Glissenaar, Robbie D. C. Mallett, Renée M. Fredensborg Hansen, Alek Petty, Michel Tsamados, Amy R. Macfarlane, and Anne Braakmann-Folgmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2904, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2904, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we use three satellites to test the planned remote sensing approach of the upcoming mission CRISTAL over sea ice: that its dual radars will accurately measure the heights of the top and base of snow sitting atop floating sea ice floes. Our results suggest that CRISTAL's dual radars won’t necessarily measure the snow top and base under all conditions. We find that accurate height measurements depend much more on surface roughness than on snow properties, as is commonly assumed.
Lu Zhou, Julienne Stroeve, Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Shiming Xu, Weixin Zhu, Sahra Kacimi, Stefanie Arndt, and Zifan Yang
The Cryosphere, 18, 4399–4434, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4399-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4399-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow over Antarctic sea ice, influenced by highly variable meteorological conditions and heavy snowfall, has a complex stratigraphy and profound impact on the microwave signature. We employ advanced radiation transfer models to analyse the effects of complex snow properties on brightness temperatures over the sea ice in the Southern Ocean. Great potential lies in the understanding of snow processes and the application to satellite retrievals.
Michael Studinger, Benjamin E. Smith, Nathan Kurtz, Alek Petty, Tyler Sutterley, and Rachel Tilling
The Cryosphere, 18, 2625–2652, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2625-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2625-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use green lidar data and natural-color imagery over sea ice to quantify elevation biases potentially impacting estimates of change in ice thickness of the polar regions. We complement our analysis using a model of scattering of light in snow and ice that predicts the shape of lidar waveforms reflecting from snow and ice surfaces based on the shape of the transmitted pulse. We find that biased elevations exist in airborne and spaceborne data products from green lidars.
Alexander Mchedlishvili, Christof Lüpkes, Alek Petty, Michel Tsamados, and Gunnar Spreen
The Cryosphere, 17, 4103–4131, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4103-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4103-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we looked at sea ice–atmosphere drag coefficients, quantities that help with characterizing the friction between the atmosphere and sea ice, and vice versa. Using ICESat-2, a laser altimeter that measures elevation differences by timing how long it takes for photons it sends out to return to itself, we could map the roughness, i.e., how uneven the surface is. From roughness we then estimate drag force, the frictional force between sea ice and the atmosphere, across the Arctic.
Steven Fons, Nathan Kurtz, and Marco Bagnardi
The Cryosphere, 17, 2487–2508, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2487-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2487-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Antarctic sea ice thickness is an important quantity in the Earth system. Due to the thick and complex snow cover on Antarctic sea ice, estimating the thickness of the ice pack is difficult using traditional methods in radar altimetry. In this work, we use a waveform model to estimate the freeboard and snow depth of Antarctic sea ice from CryoSat-2 and use these values to calculate sea ice thickness and volume between 2010 and 2021 and showcase how the sea ice pack has changed over this time.
Robert Ricker, Steven Fons, Arttu Jutila, Nils Hutter, Kyle Duncan, Sinead L. Farrell, Nathan T. Kurtz, and Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
The Cryosphere, 17, 1411–1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1411-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1411-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Information on sea ice surface topography is important for studies of sea ice as well as for ship navigation through ice. The ICESat-2 satellite senses the sea ice surface with six laser beams. To examine the accuracy of these measurements, we carried out a temporally coincident helicopter flight along the same ground track as the satellite and measured the sea ice surface topography with a laser scanner. This showed that ICESat-2 can see even bumps of only few meters in the sea ice cover.
Alek A. Petty, Nicole Keeney, Alex Cabaj, Paul Kushner, and Marco Bagnardi
The Cryosphere, 17, 127–156, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-127-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-127-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present upgrades to winter Arctic sea ice thickness estimates from NASA's ICESat-2. Our new thickness results show better agreement with independent data from ESA's CryoSat-2 compared to our first data release, as well as new, very strong comparisons with data collected by moorings in the Beaufort Sea. We analyse three winters of thickness data across the Arctic, including 50 cm thinning of the multiyear ice over this 3-year period.
Isolde A. Glissenaar, Jack C. Landy, Alek A. Petty, Nathan T. Kurtz, and Julienne C. Stroeve
The Cryosphere, 15, 4909–4927, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4909-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4909-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Scientists can estimate sea ice thickness using satellites that measure surface height. To determine the sea ice thickness, we also need to know the snow depth and density. This paper shows that the chosen snow depth product has a considerable impact on the findings of sea ice thickness state and trends in Baffin Bay, showing mean thinning with some snow depth products and mean thickening with others. This shows that it is important to better understand and monitor snow depth on sea ice.
Lu Zhou, Julienne Stroeve, Shiming Xu, Alek Petty, Rachel Tilling, Mai Winstrup, Philip Rostosky, Isobel R. Lawrence, Glen E. Liston, Andy Ridout, Michel Tsamados, and Vishnu Nandan
The Cryosphere, 15, 345–367, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-345-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-345-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Snow on sea ice plays an important role in the Arctic climate system. Large spatial and temporal discrepancies among the eight snow depth products are analyzed together with their seasonal variability and long-term trends. These snow products are further compared against various ground-truth observations. More analyses on representation error of sea ice parameters are needed for systematic comparison and fusion of airborne, in situ and remote sensing observations.
Sahra Kacimi and Ron Kwok
The Cryosphere, 14, 4453–4474, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4453-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4453-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Our current understanding of Antarctic ice cover is largely informed by ice extent measurements from passive microwave sensors. These records, while useful, provide a limited picture of how the ice is responding to climate change. In this paper, we combine measurements from ICESat-2 and CryoSat-2 missions to assess snow depth and ice thickness of the Antarctic ice cover over an 8-month period (April through November 2019). The potential impact of salinity in the snow layer is discussed.
Michael Studinger, Brooke C. Medley, Kelly M. Brunt, Kimberly A. Casey, Nathan T. Kurtz, Serdar S. Manizade, Thomas A. Neumann, and Thomas B. Overly
The Cryosphere, 14, 3287–3308, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3287-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3287-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We use repeat airborne geophysical data consisting of laser altimetry, snow, and Ku-band radar and optical imagery to analyze the spatial and temporal variability in surface roughness, slope, wind deposition, and snow accumulation at 88° S. We find small–scale variability in snow accumulation based on the snow radar subsurface layering, indicating areas of strong wind redistribution are prevalent at 88° S. There is no slope–independent relationship between surface roughness and accumulation.
Cited articles
Farrell, S. L., Laxon, S. W., McAdoo, D. C., Yi, D., and Zwally, H. J.:
Five years of Arctic sea ice freeboard measurements from the Ice, Cloud and
land Elevation Satellite, J. Geophys. Res., 114, C04008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jc005074, 2009.
Kurtz, N. T., Farrell, S. L., Studinger, M., Galin, N., Harbeck, J. P., Lindsay, R., Onana, V. D., Panzer, B., and Sonntag, J. G.: Sea ice thickness, freeboard, and snow depth products from Operation IceBridge airborne data, The Cryosphere, 7, 1035–1056, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1035-2013, 2013.
Kwok, R., Cunningham, G. F., Zwally, H. J., and Yi, D.: Ice, Cloud, and land
Elevation Satellite (ICESat) over Arctic sea ice: Retrieval of freeboard, J.
Geophys. Res., 112, C12013, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jc003978, 2007.
Kwok, R., Cunningham, G. F., Manizade, S. S., and Krabill, W. B.: Arctic sea
ice freeboard from IceBridge acquisitions in 2009: Estimates and comparisons
with ICESat, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C02018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jc007654, 2012.
Kwok, R., Markus, T., Morison, J., Palm, S. P., Neumann, T. A., Brunt, K.
M., Cook, W. B., Hancock, D. W., and Cunningham, G. F.: Profiling Sea Ice
with a Multiple Altimeter Beam Experimental Lidar (MABEL), J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 1151–1168,
https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-13-00120.1, 2014.
Kwok, R., Cunningham, G. F., Hoffmann, J., and Markus, T.: Testing the
ice-water discrimination and freeboard retrieval algorithms for the ICESat-2
mission, Remote Sens. Environ., 183, 13–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.011, 2016.
Kwok, R., Cunningham, G. F., Hancock, D. W., Ivanoff, A., and Wimert, J. T.:
Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 Project: Algorithm Theoretical
Basis Document (ATBD) for Sea Ice Products, available at:
https://nsidc.org/sites/nsidc.org/files/technical-references/ICESat2_ATL07_ATL10_ATL20_ATBD_r003.pdf (last access: 1 November 2020),
2019a.
Kwok, R., Kacimi, S., Markus, T., Kurtz, N. T., Studinger, M., Sonntag, J.
G., Manizade, S. S., Boisvert, L. N., and Harbeck, J. P.: ICESat-2 Surface
Height and Sea Ice Freeboard Assessed With ATM Lidar Acquisitions From
Operation IceBridge, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 11228–11236, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl084976, 2019b.
Kwok, R., Cunningham, G., Markus, T., Hancock, D., Morison, J. H., Palm, S. P., Farrell, S. L., Ivanoff, A., Wimert, J., and the ICESat-2 Science Team: ATLAS/ICESat-2 L3A Sea Ice Freeboard, Version 3, January 2019–October 2019, Boulder, Colorado USA, NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5067/ATLAS/ATL10.003, 2020a.
Kwok, R., Kacimi, S., Webster, M. A., Kurtz, N. T., and Petty, A. A.: Arctic
Snow Depth and Sea Ice Thickness From ICESat-2 and CryoSat-2 Freeboards: A
First Examination, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JC016008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jc016008, 2020b.
Markus, T., Neumann, T., Martino, A., Abdalati, W., Brunt, K., Csatho, B.,
Farrell, S., Fricker, H., Gardner, A., Harding, D., Jasinski, M., Kwok, R.,
Magruder, L., Lubin, D., Luthcke, S., Morison, J., Nelson, R.,
Neuenschwander, A., Palm, S., Popescu, S., Shum, C. K., Schutz, B. E.,
Smith, B., Yang, Y. K., and Zwally, J.: The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation
Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): Science requirements, concept, and implementation,
Remote Sens. Environ., 190, 260–273, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.029, 2017.
Neumann, T. A., Martino, A. J., Markus, T., Bae, S., Bock, M. R., Brenner,
A. C., Brunt, K. M., Cavanaugh, J., Fernandes, S. T., Hancock, D. W.,
Harbeck, K., Lee, J., Kurtz, N. T., Luers, P. J., Luthcke, S. B., Magruder,
L., Pennington, T. A., Ramos-Izquierdo, L., Rebold, T., Skoog, J., and
Thomas, T. C.: The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite – 2 mission: A
global geolocated photon product derived from the Advanced Topographic Laser
Altimeter System, Remote Sens. Environ., 233, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111325,
2019.
Petty, A. A., Kurtz, N. T., Kwok, R., Markus, T., and Neumann, T. A.: Winter
Arctic Sea Ice Thickness From ICESat-2 Freeboards, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JC015764,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jc015764, 2020.
Studinger, M. and Harbeck, J.: IceBridge CAMBOT L1B Geolocated Images, Version 2, Boulder, Colorado USA, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, https://doi.org/10.5067/B0HL940D452L, 2019.
Yi, D. H., Zwally, H. J., and Robbins, J. W.: ICESat observations of
seasonal and interannual variations of sea-ice freeboard and estimated
thickness in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica (2003–2009), Ann. Glaciol., 52,
43–51, 2011.
Zwally, H. J., Schutz, B., Abdalati, W., Abshire, J., Bentley, C., Brenner,
A., Bufton, J., Dezio, J., Hancock, D., Harding, D., Herring, T., Minster,
B., Quinn, K., Palm, S., Spinhirne, J., and Thomas, R.: ICESat's laser
measurements of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean, and land, J. Geodyn., 34,
405–445, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00042-X, 2002.