Articles | Volume 13, issue 6
The Cryosphere, 13, 1743–1752, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1743-2019
The Cryosphere, 13, 1743–1752, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1743-2019

Research article 28 Jun 2019

Research article | 28 Jun 2019

Apparent discrepancy of Tibetan ice core δ18O records may be attributed to misinterpretation of chronology

Shugui Hou et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Shugui Hou on behalf of the Authors (19 Apr 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (26 Apr 2019) by Carlos Martin
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (03 May 2019)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (06 Jun 2019) by Carlos Martin
AR by Shugui Hou on behalf of the Authors (14 Jun 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (17 Jun 2019) by Carlos Martin
AR by Shugui Hou on behalf of the Authors (17 Jun 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
Short summary
The apparent discrepancy between the Holocene δ18O records of the Guliya and the Chongce ice cores may be attributed to a possible misinterpretation of the Guliya ice core chronology.