Articles | Volume 13, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1743-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1743-2019
Research article
 | 
28 Jun 2019
Research article |  | 28 Jun 2019

Apparent discrepancy of Tibetan ice core δ18O records may be attributed to misinterpretation of chronology

Shugui Hou, Wangbin Zhang, Hongxi Pang, Shuang-Ye Wu, Theo M. Jenk, Margit Schwikowski, and Yetang Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 3,310 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,210 1,004 96 3,310 816 71 87
  • HTML: 2,210
  • PDF: 1,004
  • XML: 96
  • Total: 3,310
  • Supplement: 816
  • BibTeX: 71
  • EndNote: 87
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Feb 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,310 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,652 with geography defined and 658 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Short summary
The apparent discrepancy between the Holocene δ18O records of the Guliya and the Chongce ice cores may be attributed to a possible misinterpretation of the Guliya ice core chronology.