Articles | Volume 12, issue 7
The Cryosphere, 12, 2501–2513, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2501-2018
The Cryosphere, 12, 2501–2513, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2501-2018
Brief communication
27 Jul 2018
Brief communication | 27 Jul 2018

Brief communication: Understanding solar geoengineering's potential to limit sea level rise requires attention from cryosphere experts

Peter J. Irvine et al.

Related authors

Regional dynamical and statistical downscaling temperature, humidity and windspeed for the Beijing region under stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering
Jun Wang, John C. Moore, Liyun Zhao, Chao Yue, and Zhenhua Di
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2022-35,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2022-35, 2022
Preprint under review for ESD
Short summary
Northern high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to solar geoengineering
Yangxin Chen, Duoying Ji, Qian Zhang, John C. Moore, Olivier Boucher, Andy Jones, Thibaut Lurton, Michael J. Mills, Ulrike Niemeier, Roland Séférian, and Simone Tilmes
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2022-34,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2022-34, 2022
Preprint under review for ESD
Short summary
Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
Mengdie Xie, John C. Moore, Liyun Zhao, Michael Wolovick, and Helene Muri
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4581–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022, 2022
Short summary
An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO2 or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols
Debra K. Weisenstein, Daniele Visioni, Henning Franke, Ulrike Niemeier, Sandro Vattioni, Gabriel Chiodo, Thomas Peter, and David W. Keith
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2955–2973, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of six geothermal heat flux maps for the Antarctic Lambert-Amery glacial system
Haoran Kang, Liyun Zhao, Michael Wolovick, and John C. Moore
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-357,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-357, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for TC
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Ice sheets | Subject: Climate Interactions
A probabilistic framework for quantifying the role of anthropogenic climate change in marine-terminating glacier retreats
John Erich Christian, Alexander A. Robel, and Ginny Catania
The Cryosphere, 16, 2725–2743, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2725-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2725-2022, 2022
Short summary
Significant additional Antarctic warming in atmospheric bias-corrected ARPEGE projections with respect to control run
Julien Beaumet, Michel Déqué, Gerhard Krinner, Cécile Agosta, Antoinette Alias, and Vincent Favier
The Cryosphere, 15, 3615–3635, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3615-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3615-2021, 2021
Short summary
CMIP5 model selection for ISMIP6 ice sheet model forcing: Greenland and Antarctica
Alice Barthel, Cécile Agosta, Christopher M. Little, Tore Hattermann, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Heiko Goelzer, Sophie Nowicki, Helene Seroussi, Fiammetta Straneo, and Thomas J. Bracegirdle
The Cryosphere, 14, 855–879, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-855-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-855-2020, 2020
Short summary
The influence of atmospheric grid resolution in a climate model-forced ice sheet simulation
Marcus Lofverstrom and Johan Liakka
The Cryosphere, 12, 1499–1510, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1499-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1499-2018, 2018

Cited articles

Applegate, P. J. and Keller, K.: How effective is albedo modification (solar radiation management geoengineering) in preventing sea-level rise from the Greenland Ice Sheet?, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 084018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084018, 2015. 
Asay-Davis, X. S., Cornford, S. L., Durand, G., Galton-Fenzi, B. K., Gladstone, R. M., Gudmundsson, G. H., Hattermann, T., Holland, D. M., Holland, D., Holland, P. R., Martin, D. F., Mathiot, P., Pattyn, F., and Seroussi, H.: Experimental design for three interrelated marine ice sheet and ocean model intercomparison projects: MISMIP v.3 (MISMIP+), ISOMIP v.2 (ISOMIP +) and MISOMIP v.1 (MISOMIP1), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2471–2497, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2471-2016, 2016. 
Bala, G., Duffy, P. B., and Taylor, K. E.: Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 105, 7664–7669, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711648105, 2008. 
Bamber, J. L. and Aspinall, W. P.: An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 424–427, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1778, 2013. 
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013. 
Download
Short summary
Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, a form of solar geoengineering, is a proposal to add a reflective layer of aerosol to the upper atmosphere. This would reduce sea level rise by slowing the melting of ice on land and the thermal expansion of the oceans. However, there is considerable uncertainty about its potential efficacy. This article highlights key uncertainties in the sea level response to solar geoengineering and recommends approaches to address these in future work.