Articles | Volume 10, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2191-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2191-2016
Research article
 | 
22 Sep 2016
Research article |  | 22 Sep 2016

Mechanism of seasonal Arctic sea ice evolution and Arctic amplification

Kwang-Yul Kim, Benjamin D. Hamlington, Hanna Na, and Jinju Kim

Related authors

Understanding the Mechanism of Arctic Amplification and Sea Ice Loss
Kwang-Yul Kim, Jinju Kim, Saerim Yeo, Hanna Na, Benjamin D. Hamlington, and Robert R. Leben
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-39,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-39, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Sea Ice
Suitability of the CICE sea ice model for seasonal prediction and positive impact of CryoSat-2 ice thickness initialization
Shan Sun and Amy Solomon
The Cryosphere, 18, 3033–3048, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3033-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3033-2024, 2024
Short summary
A large-scale high-resolution numerical model for sea-ice fragmentation dynamics
Jan Åström, Fredrik Robertsen, Jari Haapala, Arttu Polojärvi, Rivo Uiboupin, and Ilja Maljutenko
The Cryosphere, 18, 2429–2442, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2429-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2429-2024, 2024
Short summary
Experimental modelling of the growth of tubular ice brinicles from brine flows under sea ice
Sergio Testón-Martínez, Laura M. Barge, Jan Eichler, C. Ignacio Sainz-Díaz, and Julyan H. E. Cartwright
The Cryosphere, 18, 2195–2205, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2195-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Why is summertime Arctic sea ice drift speed projected to decrease?
Jamie L. Ward and Neil F. Tandon
The Cryosphere, 18, 995–1012, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Seasonal Evolution of the Sea Ice Floe Size Distribution from Two Decades of MODIS Data
Ellen Margaret Buckley, Leela Cañuelas, Mary-Louise Timmermans, and Monica Martinez Wilhelmus
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-89,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-89, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Årthun, M. and Eldevik, T.: On Anomalous Ocean Heat Transport toward the Arctic and Associated Climate Predictability, J. Climate, 29, 689–704, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0448.1, 2016.
Årthun, M., Eldevik, T., Smedsrud, L. H., Skagseth, Ø., and Ingvaldsen, R. B.: Quantifying the Influence of Atlantic Heat on Barents Sea Ice Variability and Retreat, J. Climate, 25, 4736–4743, 2012.
Boé, J., Hall, A., and Qu, X.: September sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100, Nat. Geosci., 2, 341–343, 2009a.
Boé, J., Hall, A., and Qu, X.: Current GCMs' unrealistic negative feedback in the Arctic, J. Climate, 22, 4682–4695, 2009b.
Cavalieri, D. J. and Parkinson, C. L.: Arctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979–2010, The Cryosphere, 6, 881–889, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-881-2012, 2012.
Download
Short summary
Analysis reveals that “Arctic amplification”, lower tropospheric winter temperature rise in the Arctic, is due to sea ice melting and the resulting increase in the amount of turbulent heat flux from the ocean. As a result of increased turbulent heat flux, lower atmosphere warms up, resulting in increased downward longwave radiation. A detailed physical mechanism is presented together with an explanation why this positive feedback process is currently possible in the Barents–Kara seas.