Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1287-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1287-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
20 Mar 2024
Research article |
| 20 Mar 2024
| 20 Mar 2024
Understanding snow saltation parameterizations: lessons from theory, experiments and numerical simulations
Daniela Brito Melo
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
Armin Sigmund
School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Michael Lehning
School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
Related authors
No articles found.
Mahdi Jafari and Michael Lehning
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3035, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3035, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how air moves within snow in Arctic regions and how this affects the snow's structure. Using a new method that links two computer models, we found that cold weather can trigger air movement inside the snow, creating vertical channels and changing the snow's density and temperature. These changes are not captured by traditional models, so our work helps improve how snow and climate processes are simulated in cold environments.
Francesca Carletti, Carlo Marin, Chiara Ghielmini, Mathias Bavay, and Michael Lehning
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-974, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-974, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents the first high-resolution dataset of wet snow properties for satellite applications. With it, we validate links between Sentinel-1 backscattering and snowmelt stages, and investigate scattering mechanisms through a radiative transfer model. We disclose the influence of liquid water content and surface roughness at different melting stages and address future challenges, such as capturing large-scale scattering mechanisms and enhancing radiative transfer modules for wet snow.
Elizaveta Sharaborova, Michael Lehning, Nander Wever, Marcia Phillips, and Hendrik Huwald
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4174, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4174, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global warming provokes permafrost to thaw, damaging landscapes and infrastructure. This study explores methods to slow this thawing at an alpine site. We investigate different methods based on passive and active cooling system. The best approach mixes both methods and manages heat flow, potentially allowing excess energy to be used locally.
Hongxiang Yu, Michael Lehning, Guang Li, Benjamin Walter, Jianping Huang, and Ning Huang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2458, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2458, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Cornices are overhanging snow accumulations that form on mountain crests. Previous studies focused on how cornices collapse, little is known about why they form in the first place, specifically how snow particles adhere together to form the front end of the cornice. This study looked at the movement of snow particles around a developing cornice to understand how they gather, the speed and angle at which the snow particles hit the cornice surface, and how this affects the shape of the cornice.
Sonja Wahl, Benjamin Walter, Franziska Aemisegger, Luca Bianchi, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 18, 4493–4515, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4493-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind-driven airborne transport of snow is a frequent phenomenon in snow-covered regions and a process difficult to study in the field as it is unfolding over large distances. Thus, we use a ring wind tunnel with infinite fetch positioned in a cold laboratory to study the evolution of the shape and size of airborne snow. With the help of stable water isotope analyses, we identify the hitherto unobserved process of airborne snow metamorphism that leads to snow particle rounding and growth.
Dylan Reynolds, Louis Quéno, Michael Lehning, Mahdi Jafari, Justine Berg, Tobias Jonas, Michael Haugeneder, and Rebecca Mott
The Cryosphere, 18, 4315–4333, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4315-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4315-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Information about atmospheric variables is needed to produce simulations of mountain snowpacks. We present a model that can represent processes that shape mountain snowpack, focusing on the accumulation of snow. Simulations show that this model can simulate the complex path that a snowflake takes towards the ground and that this leads to differences in the distribution of snow by the end of winter. Overall, this model shows promise with regard to improving forecasts of snow in mountains.
Benjamin Bouchard, Daniel F. Nadeau, Florent Domine, Nander Wever, Adrien Michel, Michael Lehning, and Pierre-Erik Isabelle
The Cryosphere, 18, 2783–2807, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2783-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2783-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Observations over several winters at two boreal sites in eastern Canada show that rain-on-snow (ROS) events lead to the formation of melt–freeze layers and that preferential flow is an important water transport mechanism in the sub-canopy snowpack. Simulations with SNOWPACK generally show good agreement with observations, except for the reproduction of melt–freeze layers. This was improved by simulating intercepted snow microstructure evolution, which also modulates ROS-induced runoff.
Dylan Reynolds, Ethan Gutmann, Bert Kruyt, Michael Haugeneder, Tobias Jonas, Franziska Gerber, Michael Lehning, and Rebecca Mott
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5049–5068, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5049-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5049-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The challenge of running geophysical models is often compounded by the question of where to obtain appropriate data to give as input to a model. Here we present the HICAR model, a simplified atmospheric model capable of running at spatial resolutions of hectometers for long time series or over large domains. This makes physically consistent atmospheric data available at the spatial and temporal scales needed for some terrestrial modeling applications, for example seasonal snow forecasting.
Hongxiang Yu, Guang Li, Benjamin Walter, Michael Lehning, Jie Zhang, and Ning Huang
The Cryosphere, 17, 639–651, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-639-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-639-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow cornices lead to the potential risk of causing snow avalanche hazards, which are still unknown so far. We carried out a wind tunnel experiment in a cold lab to investigate the environmental conditions for snow cornice accretion recorded by a camera. The length growth rate of the cornices reaches a maximum for wind speeds approximately 40 % higher than the threshold wind speed. Experimental results improve our understanding of the cornice formation process.
Varun Sharma, Franziska Gerber, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 719–749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-719-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-719-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Most current generation climate and weather models have a relatively simplistic description of snow and snow–atmosphere interaction. One reason for this is the belief that including an advanced snow model would make the simulations too computationally demanding. In this study, we bring together two state-of-the-art models for atmosphere (WRF) and snow cover (SNOWPACK) and highlight both the feasibility and necessity of such coupled models to explore underexplored phenomena in the cryosphere.
Océane Hames, Mahdi Jafari, David Nicholas Wagner, Ian Raphael, David Clemens-Sewall, Chris Polashenski, Matthew D. Shupe, Martin Schneebeli, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6429–6449, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an Eulerian–Lagrangian snow transport model implemented in the fluid dynamics software OpenFOAM, which we call snowBedFoam 1.0. We apply this model to reproduce snow deposition on a piece of ridged Arctic sea ice, which was produced during the MOSAiC expedition through scan measurements. The model appears to successfully reproduce the enhanced snow accumulation and deposition patterns, although some quantitative uncertainties were shown.
Francesca Carletti, Adrien Michel, Francesca Casale, Alice Burri, Daniele Bocchiola, Mathias Bavay, and Michael Lehning
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3447–3475, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3447-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3447-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
High Alpine catchments are dominated by the melting of seasonal snow cover and glaciers, whose amount and seasonality are expected to be modified by climate change. This paper compares the performances of different types of models in reproducing discharge among two catchments under present conditions and climate change. Despite many advantages, the use of simpler models for climate change applications is controversial as they do not fully represent the physics of the involved processes.
David N. Wagner, Matthew D. Shupe, Christopher Cox, Ola G. Persson, Taneil Uttal, Markus M. Frey, Amélie Kirchgaessner, Martin Schneebeli, Matthias Jaggi, Amy R. Macfarlane, Polona Itkin, Stefanie Arndt, Stefan Hendricks, Daniela Krampe, Marcel Nicolaus, Robert Ricker, Julia Regnery, Nikolai Kolabutin, Egor Shimanshuck, Marc Oggier, Ian Raphael, Julienne Stroeve, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 16, 2373–2402, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2373-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Based on measurements of the snow cover over sea ice and atmospheric measurements, we estimate snowfall and snow accumulation for the MOSAiC ice floe, between November 2019 and May 2020. For this period, we estimate 98–114 mm of precipitation. We suggest that about 34 mm of snow water equivalent accumulated until the end of April 2020 and that at least about 50 % of the precipitated snow was eroded or sublimated. Further, we suggest explanations for potential snowfall overestimation.
Joel Fiddes, Kristoffer Aalstad, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1753–1768, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1753-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1753-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study describes and evaluates a new downscaling scheme that addresses the need for hillslope-scale atmospheric forcing time series for modelling the local impact of regional climate change on the land surface in mountain areas. The method has a global scope and is able to generate all model forcing variables required for hydrological and land surface modelling. This is important, as impact models require high-resolution forcings such as those generated here to produce meaningful results.
Adrien Michel, Bettina Schaefli, Nander Wever, Harry Zekollari, Michael Lehning, and Hendrik Huwald
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1063–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1063-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1063-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents an extensive study of climate change impacts on river temperature in Switzerland. Results show that, even for low-emission scenarios, water temperature increase will lead to adverse effects for both ecosystems and socio-economic sectors throughout the 21st century. For high-emission scenarios, the effect will worsen. This study also shows that water seasonal warming will be different between the Alpine regions and the lowlands. Finally, efficiency of models is assessed.
Pirmin Philipp Ebner, Franziska Koch, Valentina Premier, Carlo Marin, Florian Hanzer, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Hugues François, Daniel Günther, Fabiano Monti, Olivier Hargoaa, Ulrich Strasser, Samuel Morin, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 15, 3949–3973, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3949-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3949-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A service to enable real-time optimization of grooming and snow-making at ski resorts was developed and evaluated using both GNSS-measured snow depth and spaceborne snow maps derived from Copernicus Sentinel-2. The correlation to the ground observation data was high. Potential sources for the overestimation of the snow depth by the simulations are mainly the impact of snow redistribution by skiers, compensation of uneven terrain, or spontaneous local adaptions of the snow management.
Cited articles
Aksamit, N. O. and Pomeroy, J. W.: Scale Interactions in Turbulence for Mountain Blowing Snow, J. Hydrometeorol., 19, 305–320, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0179.1, 2018. a, b
Albertson, J. D. and Parlange, M. B.: Natural integration of scalar fluxes from complex terrain, Adv. Water Resour., 23, 239–252, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00011-1, 1999. a
Amory, C., Trouvilliez, A., Gallée, H., Favier, V., Naaim-Bouvet, F., Genthon, C., Agosta, C., Piard, L., and Bellot, H.: Comparison between observed and simulated aeolian snow mass fluxes in Adélie Land, East Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 9, 1373–1383, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1373-2015, 2015. a
Amory, C., Kittel, C., Le Toumelin, L., Agosta, C., Delhasse, A., Favier, V., and Fettweis, X.: Performance of MAR (v3.11) in simulating the drifting-snow climate and surface mass balance of Adélie Land, East Antarctica, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3487–3510, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3487-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Anderson, R. S. and Haff, P. K.: Wind modification and bed response during saltation of sand in air, in: Aeolian Grain Transport 1, edited by: Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. and Willetts, B. B., Springer Vienna–New York, pp. 21–51, ISBN 978-3-211-82269-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6706-9, 1991. a, b
Anderson, R. S., Sørensen, M., and Willetts, B. B.: A review of recent progress in our understanding of aeolian sediment transport, in: Aeolian Grain Transport 1, edited by: Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. and Willetts, B. B., Springer Vienna–New York, pp. 1–19, ISBN 978-3-211-82269-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6706-9, 1991. a
Araoka, K. and Maeno, N.: Dynamical behaviors of snow particles in the saltation layer, in: Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Polar Meteorology and Glaciology, 13–14 January 1981, National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo, vol. 19, pp. 253–263, 1981. a
Bagnold, R. A.: The nature of saltation and of '1bed-load' transport in water, P. R. Soc. Lond. A, 332, 473–504, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1973.0038, 1973. a, b, c, d
Bartelt, P. and Lehning, M.: A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning: Part I: numerical model, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 35, 123–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00074-5, 2002. a
Bauer, B. O. and Davidson-Arnott, R. G. D.: Aeolian particle flux profiles and transport unsteadiness, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 119, 1542–1563, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003128, 2014. a, b
Bernhardt, M., Zängl, G., Liston, G. E., Strasser, U., and Mauser, W.: Using wind fields from a high-resolution atmospheric model for simulating snow dynamics in mountainous terrain, Hydrol. Process., 23, 1064–1075, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7208, 2009. a
Bintanja, R.: The contribution of snowdrift sublimation to the surface mass balance of Antarctica, Ann. Glaciol., 27, 251–259, https://doi.org/10.3189/1998AoG27-1-251-259, 1998. a
Bou-Zeid, E., Meneveau, C., and Parlange, M.: A scale-dependent Lagrangian dynamic model for large eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids, 17, 025105, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1839152, 2005. a
Budd, W. F., Dingle, W. R. J., and Radok, U.: The Byrd Snow Drift Project: Outline and Basic Results, in: Studies in Antarctic Meteorology, vol. 9 of Antartic Research Series, edited by: Rubin, M. J., pp. 71–134, https://doi.org/10.1029/AR009p0071, 1966. a
Clifton, A., Rüedi, J.-D., and Lehning, M.: Snow saltation threshold measurements in a drifting-snow wind tunnel, J. Glaciol., 52, 585–596, https://doi.org/10.3189/172756506781828430, 2006. a
Comola, F.: Stochastic modeling of snow transport and hydrologic response in alpine terrain, PhD thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, https://doi.org/10.5075/epfl-thesis-7532, 2017. a
Comola, F. and Lehning, M.: Energy- and momentum-conserving model of splash entrainment in sand and snow saltation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 1601–1609, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071822, 2017. a, b, c, d
Comola, F., Kok, J. F., Gaume, J., Paterna, E., and Lehning, M.: Fragmentation of wind-blown snow crystals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 4195–4203, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073039, 2017. a
Comola, F., Gaume, J., Kok, J. F., and Lehning, M.: Cohesion-Induced Enhancement of Aeolian Saltation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 5566–5574, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082195, 2019a. a
Comola, F., Giometto, M. G., Salesky, S. T., Parlange, M. B., and Lehning, M.: Preferential Deposition of Snow and Dust Over Hills: Governing Processes and Relevant Scales, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 7951–7974, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029614, 2019b. a, b, c
Comola, F., Kok, J. F., Chamecki, M., and Martin, R. L.: The Intermittency of Wind-Driven Sand Transport, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 13430–13440, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085739, 2019c. a
Comola, F., Kok, J. F., Lora, J. M., Cohanim, K., Yu, X., He, C., McGuiggan, P., Hörst, S. M., and Turney, F.: Titan's Prevailing Circulation Might Drive Highly Intermittent, Yet Significant Sediment Transport, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL097913, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL097913, 2022. a, b
Creyssels, M., Dupont, P., Moctar, A. O. E., Valance, A., Cantat, I., Jenkins, J. T., Pasini, J. M., and Rasmussen, K. R.: Saltating particles in a turbulent boundary layer: experiment and theory, J. Fluid Mech., 625, 47–74, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112008005491, 2009. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l
Dai, X. and Huang, N.: Numerical simulation of drifting snow sublimation in the saltation layer, Sci. Rep.-UK, 4, 6611, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06611, 2014. a
Das, R. K., Datt, P., and Acharya, A.: An assessment of the FlowCapt acoustic sensor for measuring snowdrift in the Indian Himalayas, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 121, 1483–1491, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0234-2, 2012. a
Déry, S. J., Taylor, P., and Xiao, J.: The Thermodynamic Effects of Sublimating, Blowing Snow in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 89, 251–283, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001712111718, 1998. a, b
Dyunin, A. K.: Fundamentals of the Mechanics of Snow Storms, Physics of Snow and Ice: proceedings, 1, in: Physics of Snow and Ice: proceedings, 1, 1065–1073, edited by: Oura, H., International Conference on Low Temperature Science, Sapporo, 14–19 August 1966, Hokkaido University, Institute of Low Temperature Science, 1967. a
Dyunin, A. K. and Kotlyakov, V. M.: Redistribution of snow in the mountains under the effect of heavy snow-storms, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 3, 287–294, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(80)90035-X, 1980. a
Filhol, S. and Sturm, M.: Snow bedforms: A review, new data, and a formation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 120, 1645–1669, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003529, 2015. a
Gallée, H.: Simulation of blowing snow over the antarctic ice sheet, Ann. Glaciol., 26, 203–206, https://doi.org/10.3189/1998AoG26-1-203-206, 1998. a
Gallée, H., Guyomarc'h, G., and Brun, E.: Impact Of Snow Drift On The Antarctic Ice Sheet Surface Mass Balance: Possible Sensitivity To Snow-Surface Properties, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 99, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018776422809, 2001. a, b
Gauer, P.: Blowing and drifting snow in Alpine terrain: numerical simulation and related field measurements, Ann. Glaciol., 26, 174–178, https://doi.org/10.3189/1998AoG26-1-174-178, 1998. a
Gerber, F., Sharma, V., and Lehning, M.: CRYOWRF – Model Evaluation and the Effect of Blowing Snow on the Antarctic Surface Mass Balance, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037744, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037744, 2023. a, b
Giometto, M. G., Christen, A., Meneveau, C., Fang, J., Krafczyk, M., and Parlange, M. B.: Spatial Characteristics of Roughness Sublayer Mean Flow and Turbulence Over a Realistic Urban Surface, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 160, 425–452, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0157-6, 2016. a
Giometto, M. G., Christen, A., Egli, P. E., Schmid, M. F., Tooke, R. T., Coops, N. C., and Parlange, M. B.: Effects of trees on mean wind, turbulence and momentum exchange within and above a real urban environment, Adv. Water Resour., 106, 154–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.06.018, 2017. a
Gordon, M., Savelyev, S., and Taylor, P. A.: Measurements of blowing snow, part II: Mass and number density profiles and saltation height at Franklin Bay, NWT, Canada, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 55, 75–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2008.07.001, 2009. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o
Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Löwe, H., Mott, R., Bavay, M., and Lehning, M.: Drifting snow sublimation: A high-resolution 3-D model with temperature and moisture feedbacks, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D16107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015754, 2011. a, b
Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Diebold, M., Horender, S., Overney, J., Lieberherr, G., Parlange, M. B., and Lehning, M.: Modelling Small-Scale Drifting Snow with a Lagrangian Stochastic Model Based on Large-Eddy Simulations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 153, 117–139, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9934-2, 2014. a
Guyomarc'h, G. and Mérindol, L.: Validation of an application for forecasting blowing snow, Ann. Glaciol., 26, 138–143, https://doi.org/10.3189/1998AoG26-1-138-143, 1998. a
Hancock, H., Eckerstorfer, M., Prokop, A., and Hendrikx, J.: Quantifying seasonal cornice dynamics using a terrestrial laser scanner in Svalbard, Norway, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 603–623, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-603-2020, 2020. a
Jiménez, J.: Turbulent Flows over Rough Walls, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 36, 173–196, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122103, 2004. a
Kobayashi, D.: Studies of Snow Transport In Low-Level Drifting Snow, Contributions from the Institute of Low Temperature Science, Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, A24, 1–58, 1972. a
Lehning, M., Doorschot, J., and Bartelt, P.: A snowdrift index based on SNOWPACK model calculations, Ann. Glaciol., 31, 382–386, https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781819770, 2000. a, b
Lehning, M., Löwe, H., Ryser, M., and Raderschall, N.: Inhomogeneous precipitation distribution and snow transport in steep terrain, Water Resour. Res., 44, W07404, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006545, 2008. a, b
Lenaerts, J. T. M. and van den Broeke, M. R.: Modeling drifting snow in Antarctica with a regional climate model: 2. Results, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D05109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015419, 2012. a
Lenaerts, J. T. M., van den Broeke, M. R., Déry, S. J., van Meijgaard, E., van de Berg, W. J., Palm, S. P., and Sanz Rodrigo, J.: Modeling drifting snow in Antarctica with a regional climate model: 1. Methods and model evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D05108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016145, 2012. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Li, B. and McKenna Neuman, C.: Boundary-layer turbulence characteristics during aeolian saltation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L11402, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052234, 2012. a, b, c
Li, L. and Pomeroy, J. W.: Estimates of Threshold Wind Speeds for Snow Transport Using Meteorological Data, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 36, 205–213, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<0205:EOTWSF>2.0.CO;2, 1997. a
Liston, G. and Sturm, M.: The role of winter sublimation in the Arctic moisture budget, Hydrol. Res., 35, 325–334, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2004.0024, 2004. a
Liston, G. E. and Sturm, M.: Winter Precipitation Patterns in Arctic Alaska Determined from a Blowing-Snow Model and Snow-Depth Observations, J. Hydrometeorol., 3, 646–659, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0646:WPPIAA>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Martin, R. L., Kok, J. F., Hugenholtz, C. H., Barchyn, T. E., Chamecki, M., and Ellis, J. T.: High-frequency measurements of aeolian saltation flux: Field-based methodology and applications, Aeolian Res., 30, 97–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2017.12.003, 2018. a
Melo, D. B., Sigmund, A., and Lehning, M.: Understanding snow saltation parameterizations – Reproducibility, EnviDat [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.479, 2024. a
Monin, A. S.: The Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 2, 225–250, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.02.010170.001301, 1970. a
Monin, A. S. and Obukhov, A. M.: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere, Transactions of the Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 24, 163–187, 1954. a
Mott, R. and Lehning, M.: Meteorological Modeling of Very High-Resolution Wind Fields and Snow Deposition for Mountains, J. Hydrometeorol., 11, 934–949, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1216.1, 2010. a
Mott, R., Vionnet, V., and Grünewald, T.: The Seasonal Snow Cover Dynamics: Review on Wind-Driven Coupling Processes, Front. Earth Sci., 6, 197, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00197, 2018. a
Nalpanis, P., Hunt, J. C. R., and Barrett, C. F.: Saltating particles over flat beds, J. Fluid Mech., 251, 661–685, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112093003568, 1993. a, b, c
Nemoto, M. and Nishimura, K.: Numerical simulation of snow saltation and suspension in a turbulent boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D18206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004657, 2004. a, b, c, d
Niiya, H. and Nishimura, K.: Spatiotemporal Structure of Aeolian Particle Transport on Flat Surface, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 86, 054402, https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.86.054402, 2017. a, b
Nishimura, K., Yokoyama, C., Ito, Y., Nemoto, M., Naaim-Bouvet, F., Bellot, H., and Fujita, K.: Snow particle speeds in drifting snow: Snow particle speeds in drifting snow, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9901–9913, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021686, 2014. a, b, c, d
Palm, S. P., Kayetha, V., Yang, Y., and Pauly, R.: Blowing snow sublimation and transport over Antarctica from 11 years of CALIPSO observations, The Cryosphere, 11, 2555–2569, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2555-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d
Paterna, E., Crivelli, P., and Lehning, M.: Decoupling of mass flux and turbulent wind fluctuations in drifting snow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 4441–4447, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068171, 2016. a, b
Pomeroy, J. W. and Male, D. H.: Steady-state suspension of snow, J. Hydrol., 136, 275–301, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90015-N, 1992. a, b
Pomeroy, J. W., Gray, D. M., and Landine, P. G.: The Prairie Blowing Snow Model: characteristics, validation, operation, J. Hydrol., 144, 165–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90171-5, 1993. a
Pomeroy, J. W., Marsh, P., and Gray, D. M.: Application of a distributed blowing snow model to the Arctic, Hydrol. Process., 11, 1451–1464, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199709)11:11<1451::AID-HYP449>3.0.CO;2-Q, 1997. a
Prandtl, L.: The mechanics of viscous flows, in: Aerodynamic Theory III, edited by Durand, W. F., Springer Berlin, pp. 34–208, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91489-8, 1935. a
Raderschall, N., Lehning, M., and Schär, C.: Fine-scale modeling of the boundary layer wind field over steep topography, Water Resour. Res., 44, W09425, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006544, 2008. a
Rasmussen, K. R. and Sørensen, M.: Vertical variation of particle speed and flux density in aeolian saltation: Measurement and modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 113, F02S12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000774, 2008. a
Raupach, M. R.: Saltation layers, vegetation canopies and roughness lengths, in: Aeolian Grain Transport 1, edited by: Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. and Willetts, B. B., Springer Vienna–New York, pp. 83–96, ISBN 978-3-211-82269-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6706-9, 1991. a
Raupach, M. R., Gillette, D. A., and Leys, J. F.: The effect of roughness elements on wind erosion threshold, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 3023–3029, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01922, 1993. a
Sato, T., Kosugi, K., and Sato, A.: Saltation-layer structure of drifting snow observed in wind tunnel, Ann. Glaciol., 32, 203–208, https://doi.org/10.3189/172756401781819184, 2001. a, b, c, d
Schiller, L. and Nauman, A. Z.: Über die grundlegenden Berechnungen bei der SchwerSraftaufbereitung, Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing., 77, 318–320, 1933. a
Schmidt, R.: Estimates of threshold windspeed from particle sizes in blowing snow, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 4, 187–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(81)90003-3, 1981. a
Schmidt, R. A.: Vertical profiles of wind speed, snow concentration, and humidity in blowing snow, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 23, 223–246, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123299, 1982. a
Shao, Y. and Mikami, M.: Heterogeneous Saltation: Theory, Observation and Comparison, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 115, 359–379, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-7089-2, 2005. a
Sharma, V., Parlange, M. B., and Calaf, M.: Perturbations to the Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of the Diurnally-Varying Atmospheric Boundary Layer Due to an Extensive Wind Farm, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 162, 255–282, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0195-0, 2017. a
Sharma, V., Comola, F., and Lehning, M.: On the suitability of the Thorpe–Mason model for calculating sublimation of saltating snow, The Cryosphere, 12, 3499–3509, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3499-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d
Sigmund, A., Dujardin, J., Comola, F., Sharma, V., Huwald, H., Melo, D. B., Hirasawa, N., Nishimura, K., and Lehning, M.: Evidence of Strong Flux Underestimation by Bulk Parametrizations During Drifting and Blowing Snow, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 182, 119–146, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00653-x, 2022. a, b
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, B., Dudhia, J., Gill, O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Wang, W., Powers, G., Duda, G., Barker, D., and Huang, X.-y.: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Model Version 4.1, Tech. Rep. No. NCAR/TN-556+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, https://doi.org/10.5065/1dfh-6p97, 2019. a, b
Sommer, C. G., Wever, N., Fierz, C., and Lehning, M.: Investigation of a wind-packing event in Queen Maud Land, Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 12, 2923–2939, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2923-2018, 2018. a
Stull, R. B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, ISBN-13 978-90-277-2769-5, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8, 1988. a
Sugiura, K., Nishimura, K., Maeno, N., and Kimura, T.: Measurements of snow mass flux and transport rate at different particle diameters in drifting snow, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 27, 83–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(98)00002-0, 1998. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w
Takeuchi, M.: Vertical profile and Horizontal Increase of Drift-Snow Transport, J. Glaciol., 26, 481–492, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000010996, 1980. a
Thorpe, A. D. and Mason, B. J.: The evaporation of ice spheres and ice crystals, Brit. J. Appl. Phys., 17, 541–548, https://doi.org/10.1088/0508-3443/17/4/316, 1966. a
van den Broeke, M., König-Langlo, G., Picard, G., Kuipers Munneke, P., and Lenaerts, J.: Surface energy balance, melt and sublimation at Neumayer Station, East Antarctica, Antarct. Sci., 22, 87–96, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102009990538, 2010. a
van Wessem, J. M., van de Berg, W. J., Noël, B. P. Y., van Meijgaard, E., Amory, C., Birnbaum, G., Jakobs, C. L., Krüger, K., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lhermitte, S., Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Medley, B., Reijmer, C. H., van Tricht, K., Trusel, L. D., van Ulft, L. H., Wouters, B., Wuite, J., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Modelling the climate and surface mass balance of polar ice sheets using RACMO2 – Part 2: Antarctica (1979–2016), The Cryosphere, 12, 1479–1498, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1479-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Vionnet, V., Martin, E., Masson, V., Guyomarc'h, G., Naaim-Bouvet, F., Prokop, A., Durand, Y., and Lac, C.: Simulation of wind-induced snow transport and sublimation in alpine terrain using a fully coupled snowpack/atmosphere model, The Cryosphere, 8, 395–415, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-395-2014, 2014. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l
Walter, B., Horender, S., Voegeli, C., and Lehning, M.: Experimental assessment of Owen's second hypothesis on surface shear stress induced by a fluid during sediment saltation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 6298–6305, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061069, 2014. a, b
Werner, B. T.: A Steady-State Model of Wind-Blown Sand Transport, J. Geol., 98, 1–17, 1990. a
White, P. W.: Part IV: Physical processes, in: IFS Documentation CY23R4, vol. 4, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), https://doi.org/10.21957/02054f0fbf, 2003. a
Yu, H., Li, G., Walter, B., Lehning, M., Zhang, J., and Huang, N.: Wind conditions for snow cornice formation in a wind tunnel, The Cryosphere, 17, 639–651, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-639-2023, 2023. a
Short summary
Snow saltation – the transport of snow close to the surface – occurs when the wind blows over a snow-covered surface with sufficient strength. This phenomenon is represented in some climate models; however, with limited accuracy. By performing numerical simulations and a detailed analysis of previous works, we show that snow saltation is characterized by two regimes. This is not represented in climate models in a consistent way, which hinders the quantification of snow transport and sublimation.
Snow saltation – the transport of snow close to the surface – occurs when the wind blows over a...
